このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

The Effect of Digital Storytelling on Nursing Students' Compliance

2021年8月20日 更新者:Sule BIYIK BAYRAM、Karadeniz Technical University

The Effect of Digital Storytelling on Nursing Students' Compliance With Isolation Precautions and Their Knowledge Levels: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study investigated the effect of digital storytelling on nursing students' compliance with isolation precautions and their knowledge levels.This was a pretest-posttest open-label randomized controlled trial. The nursing department of the faculty of health sciences of a university in the eastern Black Sea region of Turkey. The sample consisted of 109 fourth-year nursing students divided into groups of experimental (n=66) and control (n=43). Data were collected using a demographic characteristics questionnaire, an Isolation Knowledge Test (IKT), a Questionnaire of Students' Opinions on Digital storytelling (QSODS), and the Scale of Compliance with Isolation Precautions (SKIP). The experimental group attended a digital storytelling activity (intervention), while the control group received an education based on the curriculum. The data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, the Wilcoxon test, the Analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the Spearman correlation test.

調査の概要

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

109

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

      • Trabzon、七面鳥
        • Şule BIYIK BAYRAM

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

21年~22年 (大人)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being voluntary
  • Having access to the Internet

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not attending the digital storytelling activity (intervention)
  • Not taking the posttest

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:他の
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Digital Story Group
Digital Story Group: One of the researchers gave the experimental group participants a 15-minute briefing on how to perform digital storytelling. She also told them not to talk to the control group participants about the content of the briefing. She created a Pixton account (https://edu.pixton.com/educators/) and a class named "Isolation." She sent the link (https://join.pixton.com/x5xb6) to the experimental group participants. She asked them to click on the link and make stories out of their knowledge of isolation in four weeks.
Digital story
介入なし:Control Group
Control group participants did not go through any training in isolation.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Distribution of students according to descriptive characteristics.
時間枠:1 month

The 11-item demographic characteristics questionnaire was based on a literature review conducted by the researchers (Özden and Özveren, 2016; Orabi, 2017; Sarier and Kurşun, 2020).

The experimental and control group participants had a mean age of 22.57±2.28 and 21.79±0.80, respectively. The experimental group consisted of 56 women and ten men. The control group consisted of 38 women and six men

1 month

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
The difference between the pre, post and follow-up knowledge scores of the control and experimental group students
時間枠:1 month

The Isolation Knowledge Test (IKT) was based on a literature review conducted by the researchers (Erden et al., 2015, Doğanay et al., 2013, Karabay et al., 2018). Three experts in nursing fundamentals were consulted to develop the test. The draft test consisted of 40 statements. A pilot study was conducted to check for the intelligibility and relevance of the statements and to calculate item difficulty and item discrimination indices.

was a significant difference between pretest and posttest IKT scores in the experimental group (p=0.01). There was also a significant difference between posttest and follow-up IKT scores in the experimental group (p=0.01). The experimental group had significantly higher follow-up IKT scores than pretest scores.

1 month
The difference between the control and experimental group scores according to the total and sub-dimensions of the scale
時間枠:2 months

The Scale of Compliance with Isolation Precautions (SCIP) was developed by Tayran and Ulupınar (2011). The scale consists of 18 items scored on a five-point Likert-type scale ("1 = Strongly disagree," "2 = Disagree," "3 = Neither agree nor disagree," "4 = Agree," "5 = Strongly agree"). The scale has a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.85 (Tayran & Ulupınar, 2011), which was 0.86 (pretest) and 0.78 (posttest) in the present study.

There was no significant difference in pretest SCIP scores between the experimental and control groups. However, there was a significant difference in posttest SCIP scores between them. The experimental group had significantly higher posttest SCIP scores than pretest scores (p=0.00). It had significantly higher follow-up SCIP scores than posttest and pretest scores. There was no significant difference between the control group's pretest, posttest, and follow-up SCIP scores

2 months
The following are quotations from the experimental group participants about digital storytelling.
時間枠:2 months

The Questionnaire of Students' Opinions on Digital Storytelling (QSODS) consisted of three open-ended questions on (1) the contribution of digital storytelling to learning, (2) the effect of digital storytelling on students' compliance with isolation precautions and knowledge levels, and (3) students' opinions about digital storytelling.

The following are quotations from the experimental group participants about digital storytelling.

"I realized that I had some gaps in my knowledge of isolation methods and protective measures. It [digital storytelling] helped me fill those gaps." [Student (S). 10].

I think that it's [digital storytelling] fun and instructive. I helped me go over what I already knew and learn new stuff (S.12).

We've had distance learning for a long time, so this storytelling thing helped me feel like I was in it" (S. 54).

2 months

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

捜査官

  • スタディチェア:Emel Gulnar, PhD、Kırıkkale University
  • スタディチェア:Nurcan Caliskan, PhD、Gazi University
  • スタディチェア:Cigdem Torun Kılıc, Msc、Karadeniz Teknik University

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2021年1月10日

一次修了 (実際)

2021年5月10日

研究の完了 (実際)

2021年5月30日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2021年8月17日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2021年8月20日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2021年8月26日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2021年8月26日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2021年8月20日

最終確認日

2021年8月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • KaradenizTU-1

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する