The Effect of Digital Storytelling on Nursing Students' Compliance
The Effect of Digital Storytelling on Nursing Students' Compliance With Isolation Precautions and Their Knowledge Levels: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Обзор исследования
Статус
Условия
Вмешательство/лечение
Тип исследования
Регистрация (Действительный)
Фаза
- Непригодный
Контакты и местонахождение
Места учебы
-
-
-
Trabzon, Турция
- Şule BIYIK BAYRAM
-
-
Критерии участия
Критерии приемлемости
Возраст, подходящий для обучения
Принимает здоровых добровольцев
Полы, имеющие право на обучение
Описание
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being voluntary
- Having access to the Internet
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not attending the digital storytelling activity (intervention)
- Not taking the posttest
Учебный план
Как устроено исследование?
Детали дизайна
- Основная цель: Другой
- Распределение: Рандомизированный
- Интервенционная модель: Параллельное назначение
- Маскировка: Нет (открытая этикетка)
Оружие и интервенции
Группа участников / Армия |
Вмешательство/лечение |
|---|---|
|
Экспериментальный: Digital Story Group
Digital Story Group: One of the researchers gave the experimental group participants a 15-minute briefing on how to perform digital storytelling.
She also told them not to talk to the control group participants about the content of the briefing.
She created a Pixton account (https://edu.pixton.com/educators/)
and a class named "Isolation."
She sent the link (https://join.pixton.com/x5xb6) to the experimental group participants.
She asked them to click on the link and make stories out of their knowledge of isolation in four weeks.
|
Digital story
|
|
Без вмешательства: Control Group
Control group participants did not go through any training in isolation.
|
Что измеряет исследование?
Первичные показатели результатов
Мера результата |
Мера Описание |
Временное ограничение |
|---|---|---|
|
Distribution of students according to descriptive characteristics.
Временное ограничение: 1 month
|
The 11-item demographic characteristics questionnaire was based on a literature review conducted by the researchers (Özden and Özveren, 2016; Orabi, 2017; Sarier and Kurşun, 2020). The experimental and control group participants had a mean age of 22.57±2.28 and 21.79±0.80, respectively. The experimental group consisted of 56 women and ten men. The control group consisted of 38 women and six men |
1 month
|
Вторичные показатели результатов
Мера результата |
Мера Описание |
Временное ограничение |
|---|---|---|
|
The difference between the pre, post and follow-up knowledge scores of the control and experimental group students
Временное ограничение: 1 month
|
The Isolation Knowledge Test (IKT) was based on a literature review conducted by the researchers (Erden et al., 2015, Doğanay et al., 2013, Karabay et al., 2018). Three experts in nursing fundamentals were consulted to develop the test. The draft test consisted of 40 statements. A pilot study was conducted to check for the intelligibility and relevance of the statements and to calculate item difficulty and item discrimination indices. was a significant difference between pretest and posttest IKT scores in the experimental group (p=0.01). There was also a significant difference between posttest and follow-up IKT scores in the experimental group (p=0.01). The experimental group had significantly higher follow-up IKT scores than pretest scores. |
1 month
|
|
The difference between the control and experimental group scores according to the total and sub-dimensions of the scale
Временное ограничение: 2 months
|
The Scale of Compliance with Isolation Precautions (SCIP) was developed by Tayran and Ulupınar (2011). The scale consists of 18 items scored on a five-point Likert-type scale ("1 = Strongly disagree," "2 = Disagree," "3 = Neither agree nor disagree," "4 = Agree," "5 = Strongly agree"). The scale has a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.85 (Tayran & Ulupınar, 2011), which was 0.86 (pretest) and 0.78 (posttest) in the present study. There was no significant difference in pretest SCIP scores between the experimental and control groups. However, there was a significant difference in posttest SCIP scores between them. The experimental group had significantly higher posttest SCIP scores than pretest scores (p=0.00). It had significantly higher follow-up SCIP scores than posttest and pretest scores. There was no significant difference between the control group's pretest, posttest, and follow-up SCIP scores |
2 months
|
|
The following are quotations from the experimental group participants about digital storytelling.
Временное ограничение: 2 months
|
The Questionnaire of Students' Opinions on Digital Storytelling (QSODS) consisted of three open-ended questions on (1) the contribution of digital storytelling to learning, (2) the effect of digital storytelling on students' compliance with isolation precautions and knowledge levels, and (3) students' opinions about digital storytelling. The following are quotations from the experimental group participants about digital storytelling. "I realized that I had some gaps in my knowledge of isolation methods and protective measures. It [digital storytelling] helped me fill those gaps." [Student (S). 10]. I think that it's [digital storytelling] fun and instructive. I helped me go over what I already knew and learn new stuff (S.12). We've had distance learning for a long time, so this storytelling thing helped me feel like I was in it" (S. 54). |
2 months
|
Соавторы и исследователи
Спонсор
Следователи
- Учебный стул: Emel Gulnar, PhD, Kırıkkale University
- Учебный стул: Nurcan Caliskan, PhD, Gazi University
- Учебный стул: Cigdem Torun Kılıc, Msc, Karadeniz Teknik University
Даты записи исследования
Изучение основных дат
Начало исследования (Действительный)
Первичное завершение (Действительный)
Завершение исследования (Действительный)
Даты регистрации исследования
Первый отправленный
Впервые представлено, что соответствует критериям контроля качества
Первый опубликованный (Действительный)
Обновления учебных записей
Последнее опубликованное обновление (Действительный)
Последнее отправленное обновление, отвечающее критериям контроля качества
Последняя проверка
Дополнительная информация
Термины, связанные с этим исследованием
Другие идентификационные номера исследования
- KaradenizTU-1
Информация о лекарствах и устройствах, исследовательские документы
Изучает лекарственный продукт, регулируемый FDA США.
Изучает продукт устройства, регулируемый Управлением по санитарному надзору за качеством пищевых продуктов и медикаментов США.
Эта информация была получена непосредственно с веб-сайта clinicaltrials.gov без каких-либо изменений. Если у вас есть запросы на изменение, удаление или обновление сведений об исследовании, обращайтесь по адресу register@clinicaltrials.gov. Как только изменение будет реализовано на clinicaltrials.gov, оно будет автоматически обновлено и на нашем веб-сайте. .