Construct Validity and Responsiveness of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in Patients With Inflammatory Joint Disease
2026年5月5日 更新者：Emelie Heintz、Karolinska Institutet
The aim of this study is to compare the construct validity (convergent validity and known-groups validity) and responsiveness of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in patients with inflammatory joint disease.
The study is based on prospectively collected data through the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register (SRQ).
調査の概要
詳細な説明
A detailed description of the study can be found in the uploaded document titled 'Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan.'
研究の種類
観察的
入学 (実際)
6967
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究場所
-
-
-
Stockholm、スウェーデン
- Karolinska Institutet
-
-
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
いいえ
サンプリング方法
非確率サンプル
調査対象母集団
Patients with inflammatory joint disease complete PROMs routinely in conjunction with their follow-up healthcare visits, through an online platform called Patients Own Registration (PER).
Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be asked whether they want to participate in the study when they access PER.
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Agreed to participate in the study
- ≥18 years at the time of the first measurement
- A diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), polyarthritis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or ankylosing spondylitis (AS)
- Complete registration of responses in the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L descriptive system at least at one time point (one visit)
- For patients with RA: At least one measurement with Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) reported in relation to the same visit as the EQ-5D was registered
- For patients with polyarthritis: At least one measurement with DAS28 reported in relation to the same visit as the EQ-5D was registered
- For patients with PsA: At least one measurement with DAS28 or Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) reported in relation to the same visit as the EQ-5D was registered
- For patients with AS: At least one measurement with the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) or the Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) reported in relation to the same visit as the EQ-5D was registered
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
EQ-5D-3L
時間枠：Established disease: Baseline at inclusion in the study and the next health care visit within the study period (nov 23 - mar 26). Newly diagnosed disease: At baseline and at every health care visit throughout study completion (nov 23 - mar 26).
|
Instrument used to measure and value health-related quality of life.
The instrument consists of five items/dimensions that can be answered from 1-3.
A higher score indicates more problems.
The responses to the items can be recalculated into an index value where 1 indicates full health and 0 a state considered equivalent to being dead.
|
Established disease: Baseline at inclusion in the study and the next health care visit within the study period (nov 23 - mar 26). Newly diagnosed disease: At baseline and at every health care visit throughout study completion (nov 23 - mar 26).
|
|
EQ-5D-5L
時間枠：Established disease: Baseline at inclusion in the study and the next health care visit within the study period (nov 23 - mar 26). Newly diagnosed disease: At baseline and at every health care visit throughout study completion (nov 23 - mar 26).
|
Instrument used to measure and value health-related quality of life.
The instrument consists of five items/dimensions that can be answered from 1-5.
A higher score indicates more problems.
The responses to the items can be recalculated into an index value where 1 indicates full health and 0 a state considered equivalent to being dead.
|
Established disease: Baseline at inclusion in the study and the next health care visit within the study period (nov 23 - mar 26). Newly diagnosed disease: At baseline and at every health care visit throughout study completion (nov 23 - mar 26).
|
|
Disease activity score 28 (DAS28)
時間枠：Established disease: Baseline at inclusion in the study and the next health care visit within the study period (nov 23 - mar 26). Newly diagnosed disease: At baseline and at every health care visit throughout study completion (nov 23 - mar 26).
|
Measure of disease activity.
0 indicates no disease activity and 10 indicates the highest disease activity.
|
Established disease: Baseline at inclusion in the study and the next health care visit within the study period (nov 23 - mar 26). Newly diagnosed disease: At baseline and at every health care visit throughout study completion (nov 23 - mar 26).
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
時間枠：Established disease: Baseline at inclusion in the study and the next health care visit within the study period (nov 23 - mar 26). Newly diagnosed disease: At baseline and at every health care visit throughout study completion (nov 23 - mar 26).
|
Measure of disease activity.
0 indicates no disease activity and 10 highest disease activity.
|
Established disease: Baseline at inclusion in the study and the next health care visit within the study period (nov 23 - mar 26). Newly diagnosed disease: At baseline and at every health care visit throughout study completion (nov 23 - mar 26).
|
|
Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)
時間枠：Established disease: Baseline at inclusion in the study and the next health care visit within the study period (nov 23 - mar 26). Newly diagnosed disease: At baseline and at every health care visit throughout study completion (nov 23 - mar 26).
|
Measure of disease activity.
0 indicates no disease activity.
There is no upper limit, but a higher score indicates higher disease activity.
|
Established disease: Baseline at inclusion in the study and the next health care visit within the study period (nov 23 - mar 26). Newly diagnosed disease: At baseline and at every health care visit throughout study completion (nov 23 - mar 26).
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
時間枠：Established disease: Baseline at inclusion in the study and the next health care visit within the study period (nov 23 - mar 26). Newly diagnosed disease: At baseline and at every health care visit throughout study completion (nov 23 - mar 26).
|
Measure of physical function.
Ranges between 0 and 3. A higher score indicates more problems with physical function.
|
Established disease: Baseline at inclusion in the study and the next health care visit within the study period (nov 23 - mar 26). Newly diagnosed disease: At baseline and at every health care visit throughout study completion (nov 23 - mar 26).
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)
時間枠：Established disease: Baseline at inclusion in the study and the next health care visit within the study period (nov 23 - mar 26). Newly diagnosed disease: At baseline and at every health care visit throughout study completion (nov 23 - mar 26).
|
Measure of physical function.
Ranges between 0 and 10.
A higher score indicates more problems with physical function.
|
Established disease: Baseline at inclusion in the study and the next health care visit within the study period (nov 23 - mar 26). Newly diagnosed disease: At baseline and at every health care visit throughout study completion (nov 23 - mar 26).
|
|
Pain measured with a visual analogue scale
時間枠：Established disease: Baseline at inclusion in the study and the next health care visit within the study period (nov 23 - mar 26). Newly diagnosed disease: At baseline and at every health care visit throughout study completion (nov 23 - mar 26).
|
Visual analogue scale measuring pain.
0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates the worst possible pain.
|
Established disease: Baseline at inclusion in the study and the next health care visit within the study period (nov 23 - mar 26). Newly diagnosed disease: At baseline and at every health care visit throughout study completion (nov 23 - mar 26).
|
|
Fatigue measured with a visual analogue scale
時間枠：Established disease: Baseline at inclusion in the study and the next health care visit within the study period (nov 23 - mar 26). Newly diagnosed disease: At baseline and at every health care visit throughout study completion (nov 23 - mar 26).
|
Visual analogue scale measuring fatigue.
0 indicates no problem with fatigue and 100 indicates the worst possible fatigue.
|
Established disease: Baseline at inclusion in the study and the next health care visit within the study period (nov 23 - mar 26). Newly diagnosed disease: At baseline and at every health care visit throughout study completion (nov 23 - mar 26).
|
|
General health measured with a visual analogue scale
時間枠：Established disease: Baseline at inclusion in the study and the next health care visit within the study period (nov 23 - mar 26). Newly diagnosed disease: At baseline and at every health care visit throughout study completion (nov 23 - mar 26).
|
Visual analogue scale measuring general health.
0 indicates no problems with general health and 100 indicates worst possible general health.
|
Established disease: Baseline at inclusion in the study and the next health care visit within the study period (nov 23 - mar 26). Newly diagnosed disease: At baseline and at every health care visit throughout study completion (nov 23 - mar 26).
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
出版物と役立つリンク
研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。
一般刊行物
- Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
- van Hout B, Janssen MF, Feng YS, Kohlmann T, Busschbach J, Golicki D, Lloyd A, Scalone L, Kind P, Pickard AS. Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. Value Health. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(5):708-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.008. Epub 2012 May 24.
- EuroQol Group. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9.
- Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997 Nov;35(11):1095-108. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002.
- Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012. Epub 2006 Aug 24.
- Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996 Jul;37(1):53-72. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6.
- Bruce B, Fries JF. The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire: dimensions and practical applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Jun 9;1:20. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-20.
- Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1980 Feb;23(2):137-45. doi: 10.1002/art.1780230202.
- Prevoo ML, van 't Hof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Jan;38(1):44-8. doi: 10.1002/art.1780380107.
- Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H, Kennedy LG, O'Hea J, Mallorie P, Jenkinson T. A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol. 1994 Dec;21(12):2281-5.
- Lukas C, Landewe R, Sieper J, Dougados M, Davis J, Braun J, van der Linden S, van der Heijde D; Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society. Development of an ASAS-endorsed disease activity score (ASDAS) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jan;68(1):18-24. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.094870. Epub 2008 Jul 14.
- Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, de Vet HCW, Terwee CB. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
- Fransen J, van Riel PL. The Disease Activity Score and the EULAR response criteria. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov;35(4):745-57, vii-viii. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2009.10.001.
- Aletaha D, Smolen JS. The Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) to monitor patients in standard clinical care. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Aug;21(4):663-75. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2007.02.004.
- Boonen A, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, van Tubergen A, Mielants H, Dougados M, van der Linden S. How do the EQ-5D, SF-6D and the well-being rating scale compare in patients with ankylosing spondylitis? Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Jun;66(6):771-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.060384. Epub 2007 Jan 9.
- Calin A, Nakache JP, Gueguen A, Zeidler H, Mielants H, Dougados M. Defining disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis: is a combination of variables (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index) an appropriate instrument? Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999 Sep;38(9):878-82. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/38.9.878.
- Nell-Duxneuner VP, Stamm TA, Machold KP, Pflugbeil S, Aletaha D, Smolen JS. Evaluation of the appropriateness of composite disease activity measures for assessment of psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Mar;69(3):546-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.117945. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
- Schoels M, Aletaha D, Funovits J, Kavanaugh A, Baker D, Smolen JS. Application of the DAREA/DAPSA score for assessment of disease activity in psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Aug;69(8):1441-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.122259. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
- Thyberg I, Dahlstrom O, Bjork M, Arvidsson P, Thyberg M. Potential of the HAQ score as clinical indicator suggesting comprehensive multidisciplinary assessments: the Swedish TIRA cohort 8 years after diagnosis of RA. Clin Rheumatol. 2012 May;31(5):775-83. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-1937-0. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
- Schoels MM, Aletaha D, Alasti F, Smolen JS. Disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (PsA): defining remission and treatment success using the DAPSA score. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 May;75(5):811-8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207507. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
- Buchholz I, Thielker K, Feng YS, Kupatz P, Kohlmann T. Measuring changes in health over time using the EQ-5D 3L and 5L: a head-to-head comparison of measurement properties and sensitivity to change in a German inpatient rehabilitation sample. Qual Life Res. 2015 Apr;24(4):829-35. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0838-x. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
- Devlin NJ, Parkin D, Browne J. Patient-reported outcome measures in the NHS: new methods for analysing and reporting EQ-5D data. Health Econ. 2010 Aug;19(8):886-905. doi: 10.1002/hec.1608.
- Bas Janssen MF, Birnie E, Bonsel GJ. Evaluating the discriminatory power of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in a US general population survey using Shannon's indices. Qual Life Res. 2007 Jun;16(5):895-904. doi: 10.1007/s11136-006-9160-6. Epub 2007 Feb 10.
- Gulfe A, Geborek P, Saxne T. Response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice: how useful are they? Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Aug;64(8):1186-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.027649. Epub 2005 Mar 10.
- Hernandez Alava M, Pudney S, Wailoo A. Estimating the Relationship Between EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L: Results from a UK Population Study. Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Feb;41(2):199-207. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01218-7. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
- Sun S, Chuang LH, Sahlen KG, Lindholm L, Norstrom F. Estimating a social value set for EQ-5D-5L in Sweden. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Dec 23;20(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-02083-w.
- Degerlund-Maldi K, Regardt M, Nystrand Lansman C, Larsson L, Parodis I, Heintz E. The value of EQ-5D-3L and EQ VAS as a patient-reported outcome measure for patients with ankylosing spondylitis in routine healthcare: an evaluation of construct validity and responsiveness based on the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2026 Feb 7;10(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s41687-026-01009-0.
- Fritz CO, Morris PE, Richler JJ. Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Feb;141(1):2-18. doi: 10.1037/a0024338. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
2023年11月30日
一次修了 (実際)
2026年3月5日
研究の完了 (実際)
2026年3月5日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2026年4月21日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2026年5月5日
最初の投稿 (実際)
2026年5月12日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2026年5月12日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2026年5月5日
最終確認日
2026年5月1日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
追加の関連 MeSH 用語
その他の研究ID番号
- Dnr 2022-04211-01
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
いいえ
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
いいえ
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
いいえ
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。