このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Case-Based Learning for Bedside Lung Ultrasound Teaching in ICU

2026年5月14日 更新者:Qiancheng Xu、First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College

CBL Mode in Clinical Teaching of Bedside Lung Ultrasound in Intensive Care Unit: A Randomized Controlled Study

This single-center randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Case-Based Learning (CBL) compared with traditional teaching in clinical training of bedside lung ultrasound (BLUE) for emergency medicine residents and medical students. The hypothesis is that CBL improves theoretical understanding, practical ultrasound skills, and clinical reasoning in emergency settings.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

This single-center randomized controlled educational trial will be conducted in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, China. The study aims to compare the effectiveness of Case-Based Learning (CBL) and traditional lecture-based teaching in bedside lung ultrasound (BLUE) education for residents and medical students participating in critical care rotations.

Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio by computer-generated sequence into either the CBL group or the traditional teaching group. Both groups will receive a total of 8 hours of instruction delivered in two 4-hour sessions during their ICU rotation period.

In the CBL group, teaching will be guided by authentic clinical cases that include varied respiratory pathologies (e.g., pneumonia, pneumothorax, pulmonary edema). Each case will involve small-group discussion of diagnostic reasoning, interpretation of ultrasound findings, and supervised scanning practice at the bedside. Instructors will facilitate feedback and reflective learning, integrating theoretical concepts with clinical application.

In the traditional teaching group, participants will attend classroom lectures on ultrasound principles and watch instructor-led demonstrations of standardized BLUE examination techniques. Short hands-on practice sessions will follow under supervision but without case-based discussion or peer-feedback components.

All teaching sessions will be delivered by faculty certified in critical ultrasonography, using standardized instruction materials and the same ultrasound equipment and scanning protocols across groups. Data collection will occur within one week after completion of the teaching intervention. Primary outcomes include Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) score reflecting image acquisition, interpretation, and clinical reasoning. Secondary outcomes comprise written knowledge test scores and learner-reported measures of learning motivation and satisfaction.

All analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle. Group differences will be tested using appropriate statistical methods (e.g., independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables). The results will provide empirical evidence to guide optimization of bedside lung ultrasound education and the implementation of interactive, case-based teaching strategies in the context of intensive and emergency care training programs.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

106

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

研究場所

    • Anhui
      • Wuhu、Anhui、中国、241001
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College)
        • コンタクト:

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 子
  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

はい

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Standardized residency trainees currently rotating in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), specializing in Internal Medicine, Surgery, Emergency Medicine, Anesthesiology, or General Practice.
  • Have completed institutional basic ultrasound theory training or possess preliminary ultrasound knowledge.
  • Voluntarily participate and provide written informed consent.
  • Able to complete the entire teaching and evaluation schedule (including written test and OSCE).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior formal training or certification in lung/critical care ultrasound.
  • Unable to complete the study period due to rotation scheduling or absence.
  • Decline or withdraw informed consent.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:ヘルスサービス研究
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:独身

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Case-Based Learning (CBL) Group
Participants study authentic emergency cases, analyze lung ultrasound images, perform bedside scanning under instructor facilitation, and discuss diagnostic reasoning in small groups.
Participants study authentic emergency cases, analyze lung ultrasound images, perform bedside scanning under instructor facilitation, and discuss diagnostic reasoning in small groups.
アクティブコンパレータ:Traditional Teaching Group
Participants receive conventional didactic lectures and instructor demonstration of BLUE examination followed by limited practice.
Participants receive conventional didactic lectures and instructor demonstration of BLUE examination followed by limited practice.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Total Score
時間枠:Within one week after completion of the teaching sessions

he Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) total score (0-100 points) evaluates overall bedside lung ultrasound proficiency. It includes five weighted stations: (1) image acquisition and scanning technique (20 points), (2) image interpretation (20 points), (3) clinical decision-making (20 points), (4) structured case reporting and teamwork (20 points), and (5) emergency communication with patients or families (20 points). Each station is rated by three blinded assessors using standardized checklists and global rating scales. Higher scores indicate better ultrasound performance and clinical reasoning ability.

Scale Range: 0 (poor performance) to 100 (excellent performance); higher = better

Within one week after completion of the teaching sessions

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Written Theoretical Knowledge Test Score
時間枠:Within one week after the intervention

Description: Written examination assessing understanding of lung ultrasound principles, BLUE protocol workflow, and case analysis. The test includes multiple-choice, multiple-response, short-answer, and case-analysis items. Total score ranges from 0 to 100 points. Higher scores indicate greater theoretical knowledge mastery.

Scale Range: 0 (lowest) to 100 (highest); higher = better

Within one week after the intervention
Clinical Decision Substation Score
時間枠:Within one week after intervention

Description: Subscore from the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Station 3, evaluating diagnostic reasoning and initial management decisions based on bedside lung ultrasound findings. Scored on a 0-20 point checklist by blinded assessors. Higher values reflect stronger clinical decision-making ability.

Scale Range: 0 (lowest) to 20 (highest); higher = better

Within one week after intervention
Self-Assessment Questionnaire Scores
時間枠:Within one week after the intervention

Description: Study-specific questionnaire evaluating self-perceived improvement in learning motivation, clinical reasoning, teamwork, and communication. Each dimension consists of 5 dichotomous items (Yes = 1; No = 0). Scores are summarized as the proportion (%) of participants responding "Yes" in each domain. The possible range is 0%-100%; higher proportions indicate more participants reporting improvement.

Scale Range: 0%-100%; higher = better perceived improvement

Within one week after the intervention
Overall Learning Satisfaction Rating
時間枠:Within one week after the intervention

Description: Overall satisfaction measured by a single 5-point Likert-type item (1 = Very dissatisfied, 2 = Dissatisfied, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Satisfied, 5 = Very satisfied). Reported as the proportion (%) of participants rating ≥4. Higher proportions reflect greater satisfaction with the assigned teaching method.

Scale Range: 1-5 for individual ratings; 0%-100% for proportion ≥4; higher = better satisfaction

Within one week after the intervention

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

2026年7月1日

一次修了 (推定)

2027年6月30日

研究の完了 (推定)

2027年6月30日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年5月10日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年5月14日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年5月18日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年5月18日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年5月14日

最終確認日

2026年5月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

未定

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する