이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Case-Based Learning for Bedside Lung Ultrasound Teaching in ICU

2026년 5월 14일 업데이트: Qiancheng Xu, First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College

CBL Mode in Clinical Teaching of Bedside Lung Ultrasound in Intensive Care Unit: A Randomized Controlled Study

This single-center randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Case-Based Learning (CBL) compared with traditional teaching in clinical training of bedside lung ultrasound (BLUE) for emergency medicine residents and medical students. The hypothesis is that CBL improves theoretical understanding, practical ultrasound skills, and clinical reasoning in emergency settings.

연구 개요

상세 설명

This single-center randomized controlled educational trial will be conducted in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, China. The study aims to compare the effectiveness of Case-Based Learning (CBL) and traditional lecture-based teaching in bedside lung ultrasound (BLUE) education for residents and medical students participating in critical care rotations.

Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio by computer-generated sequence into either the CBL group or the traditional teaching group. Both groups will receive a total of 8 hours of instruction delivered in two 4-hour sessions during their ICU rotation period.

In the CBL group, teaching will be guided by authentic clinical cases that include varied respiratory pathologies (e.g., pneumonia, pneumothorax, pulmonary edema). Each case will involve small-group discussion of diagnostic reasoning, interpretation of ultrasound findings, and supervised scanning practice at the bedside. Instructors will facilitate feedback and reflective learning, integrating theoretical concepts with clinical application.

In the traditional teaching group, participants will attend classroom lectures on ultrasound principles and watch instructor-led demonstrations of standardized BLUE examination techniques. Short hands-on practice sessions will follow under supervision but without case-based discussion or peer-feedback components.

All teaching sessions will be delivered by faculty certified in critical ultrasonography, using standardized instruction materials and the same ultrasound equipment and scanning protocols across groups. Data collection will occur within one week after completion of the teaching intervention. Primary outcomes include Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) score reflecting image acquisition, interpretation, and clinical reasoning. Secondary outcomes comprise written knowledge test scores and learner-reported measures of learning motivation and satisfaction.

All analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle. Group differences will be tested using appropriate statistical methods (e.g., independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables). The results will provide empirical evidence to guide optimization of bedside lung ultrasound education and the implementation of interactive, case-based teaching strategies in the context of intensive and emergency care training programs.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (추정된)

106

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

연구 장소

    • Anhui
      • Wuhu, Anhui, 중국, 241001
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College)
        • 연락하다:

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 어린이
  • 성인
  • 고령자

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

예

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Standardized residency trainees currently rotating in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), specializing in Internal Medicine, Surgery, Emergency Medicine, Anesthesiology, or General Practice.
  • Have completed institutional basic ultrasound theory training or possess preliminary ultrasound knowledge.
  • Voluntarily participate and provide written informed consent.
  • Able to complete the entire teaching and evaluation schedule (including written test and OSCE).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior formal training or certification in lung/critical care ultrasound.
  • Unable to complete the study period due to rotation scheduling or absence.
  • Decline or withdraw informed consent.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 건강 서비스 연구
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 하나의

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Case-Based Learning (CBL) Group
Participants study authentic emergency cases, analyze lung ultrasound images, perform bedside scanning under instructor facilitation, and discuss diagnostic reasoning in small groups.
Participants study authentic emergency cases, analyze lung ultrasound images, perform bedside scanning under instructor facilitation, and discuss diagnostic reasoning in small groups.
활성 비교기: Traditional Teaching Group
Participants receive conventional didactic lectures and instructor demonstration of BLUE examination followed by limited practice.
Participants receive conventional didactic lectures and instructor demonstration of BLUE examination followed by limited practice.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Total Score
기간: Within one week after completion of the teaching sessions

he Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) total score (0-100 points) evaluates overall bedside lung ultrasound proficiency. It includes five weighted stations: (1) image acquisition and scanning technique (20 points), (2) image interpretation (20 points), (3) clinical decision-making (20 points), (4) structured case reporting and teamwork (20 points), and (5) emergency communication with patients or families (20 points). Each station is rated by three blinded assessors using standardized checklists and global rating scales. Higher scores indicate better ultrasound performance and clinical reasoning ability.

Scale Range: 0 (poor performance) to 100 (excellent performance); higher = better

Within one week after completion of the teaching sessions

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Written Theoretical Knowledge Test Score
기간: Within one week after the intervention

Description: Written examination assessing understanding of lung ultrasound principles, BLUE protocol workflow, and case analysis. The test includes multiple-choice, multiple-response, short-answer, and case-analysis items. Total score ranges from 0 to 100 points. Higher scores indicate greater theoretical knowledge mastery.

Scale Range: 0 (lowest) to 100 (highest); higher = better

Within one week after the intervention
Clinical Decision Substation Score
기간: Within one week after intervention

Description: Subscore from the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Station 3, evaluating diagnostic reasoning and initial management decisions based on bedside lung ultrasound findings. Scored on a 0-20 point checklist by blinded assessors. Higher values reflect stronger clinical decision-making ability.

Scale Range: 0 (lowest) to 20 (highest); higher = better

Within one week after intervention
Self-Assessment Questionnaire Scores
기간: Within one week after the intervention

Description: Study-specific questionnaire evaluating self-perceived improvement in learning motivation, clinical reasoning, teamwork, and communication. Each dimension consists of 5 dichotomous items (Yes = 1; No = 0). Scores are summarized as the proportion (%) of participants responding "Yes" in each domain. The possible range is 0%-100%; higher proportions indicate more participants reporting improvement.

Scale Range: 0%-100%; higher = better perceived improvement

Within one week after the intervention
Overall Learning Satisfaction Rating
기간: Within one week after the intervention

Description: Overall satisfaction measured by a single 5-point Likert-type item (1 = Very dissatisfied, 2 = Dissatisfied, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Satisfied, 5 = Very satisfied). Reported as the proportion (%) of participants rating ≥4. Higher proportions reflect greater satisfaction with the assigned teaching method.

Scale Range: 1-5 for individual ratings; 0%-100% for proportion ≥4; higher = better satisfaction

Within one week after the intervention

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (추정된)

2026년 7월 1일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2027년 6월 30일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2027년 6월 30일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 5월 10일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 5월 14일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 5월 18일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 5월 18일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 5월 14일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 5월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

미정

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다