このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Improving Management and Secondary Prevention Through Azithromycin Comparative Trial in Rheumatic Heart Disease in Nigeria)- IMPACT-RHD Nigeria (IMPACT-RHD)

2026年6月1日 更新者:Prof Adeseye Abiodun Akintunde、Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria

Oral Azithromycin Versus Intramuscular Penicillin for Secondary Prevention of Rheumatic Heart Disease in Nigerian Secondary School Students: A Comparative Study to Improve Outcomes in Rheumatic Heart Disease Management

Background: Nigeria, among other Low and Middle-income countries, bears one of the highest burdens of RHD in Africa, affecting young to middle-aged adults within their productive years. This leads to loss of productivity, high out-of-pocket costs, and increased mortality risk. Challenges such as such as poverty, overcrowding, limited antibiotic access, and inconsistent prophylaxis contribute to the persistence of the disease. Secondary prophylaxis using intramuscular Benzathine Penicillin G (BPG) serves as the current standard for prevention, but has demonstrated poor adherence due to injection pain, fear, physical, and socioeconomic constraints. Oral Azithromycin offers a potential alternative by overcoming these barriers, providing an effective, acceptable, affordable and sustainable preventive strategy in Nigeria.

Methods and design: A randomised, non-inferiority, open-label, controlled clinical trial conducted across cardiology clinics of four tertiary hospitals in major Nigerian cities, for a duration of 24 months. This study will recruit participants aged 15 to 45 years with mild to moderate RHD cases (stage A or B as defined by World Heart Federation criteria) confirmed by a blinded adjudication panel, comprising 5 expert cardiologists, who will determine the echocardiographic stage of RHD on enrollment and at completion of the study period. Randomisation of participants will be done in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the standard regimen of intramuscular BPG (1.2 million units) every 28 days or a 3-day course of oral Azithromycin (500mg daily) repeated monthly. A total sample size of 474 participants will provide 90% power to demonstrate non-inferiority, using a margin of 4% with allowance for 15% on follow-up losses.

Objectives: The proportion of participants in the oral Azithromycin arm versus the IM BPG arm who demonstrate echocardiographic progression to worsen RHD stages or experience a recurrence of Acute Rheumatic Fever (ARF) within the period of two years will be compared. Additionally, accessing the adherence rates, causes of RHD-related hospitalisations, safety profiles, cost-effectiveness, and patient-reported outcomes, including treatment satisfaction and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL).

Significance: This trial is designed to highlight the most effective and readily adoptable secondary prevention strategy for Nigeria's young-to-middle-aged population by evaluating patients' adherence, ease of administration, safety profile, drug availability, cost effectiveness, and other practical considerations in resource-limited settings. Establishing a prevention strategy that addresses the socioeconomic, physical barriers of injection-based prophylaxis and improving long-term adherence and clinical outcomes in Nigeria.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Study Description Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) remains a major cause of preventable cardiovascular morbidity in low- and middle-income countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. The disease results from repeated or inadequately treated episodes of acute rheumatic fever (ARF), leading to progressive valvular damage, most commonly involving the mitral valve and, in some cases, combined mitral and aortic valve disease. Secondary antibiotic prophylaxis is the cornerstone of RHD control because it reduces recurrent Group A streptococcal infection and helps prevent further ARF episodes and progression of cardiac injury.

Intramuscular benzathine benzyl penicillin G (BPG) administered at regular intervals is the current standard for secondary prophylaxis. Although BPG is effective, sustained adherence is often limited by injection pain, fear of needles, travel and clinic-access barriers, inconsistent drug supply, and health-system constraints. These challenges are particularly important in settings where long-term monthly follow-up is difficult to maintain. Oral prophylactic regimens may offer a more acceptable and scalable alternative if they can provide comparable protection against recurrent ARF and progression of valvular disease.

Azithromycin is active against Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci and offers a shorter dosing schedule that may improve adherence relative to longer oral penicillin regimens. In addition, oral prophylaxis may be particularly relevant for patients in whom repeated intramuscular injections are poorly tolerated or difficult to deliver consistently. The study focuses on adolescents aged 10-18 years because this population is clinically relevant to recurrent ARF prevention, relatively homogeneous, and well suited to school- and clinic-based follow-up systems commonly used in African settings. Compared with broader age ranges, this narrower age group is expected to reduce heterogeneity and allow a more focused evaluation of the effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of secondary antibiotic prophylaxis in Nigeria.

The primary objective of the IMPACT-RHD study is to determine whether oral azithromycin is non-inferior to intramuscular benzathine penicillin G for secondary prophylaxis among adolescents aged 10-18 years with mild to moderate RHD, based on prevention of clinically confirmed recurrent ARF during follow-up and echocardiographic progression to more severe valvular disease over 24 months.

This study is a randomized, controlled, open-label clinical trial to be conducted across selected secondary schools and cardiology clinics affiliated with five tertiary hospitals in Nigeria: Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Teaching Hospital, Ogbomoso; Bowen University Teaching Hospital, Ogbomoso; University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Uyo; Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos; and Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital, Sagamu.

Eligible participants with confirmed RHD will be enrolled and followed for 24 months. Diagnosis and clinical assessment will be based on protocol-defined criteria for rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either standard intramuscular BPG or oral azithromycin as secondary prophylaxis.

Participants will attend scheduled follow-up visits every 3 months, with additional unscheduled visits for suspected ARF when needed. Follow-up procedures will include clinical assessment for recurrent ARF, adherence evaluation, safety monitoring, protocol-specified prophylaxis administration or dispensing, throat swab collection at selected intervals, and echocardiography at baseline and 24 months. The planned sample size is 474 participants, with 237 participants in each treatment arm.

The study will be conducted in accordance with applicable national ethical standards. Approval will be obtained from the National Health Research Ethics Committee of Nigeria and the institutional review boards of the participating centers before study initiation.

Randomization will be computer-generated using permuted blocks to maintain balanced allocation in a 1:1 ratio between the intramuscular BPG group and the oral azithromycin group. The trial includes two secondary prophylaxis regimens. Participants assigned to the control arm will receive intramuscular benzathine penicillin G as the standard of care. Participants assigned to the intervention arm will receive oral azithromycin according to the protocol-defined dosing schedule.

Study outcomes include recurrence of acute rheumatic fever, progression of rheumatic heart disease on echocardiography, safety, adherence, patient-reported outcomes, and health economic evaluation. Detailed outcome definitions, assessment schedules, and analysis plans are provided in the corresponding protocol sections.

At scheduled follow-up visits, participants will undergo interval clinical review, adverse-event monitoring, adherence assessment, and protocol-specified treatment administration or dispensing. Echocardiography and patient-reported outcome assessments will be repeated at key time points according to the study schedule. Patient-reported outcomes will assess treatment acceptance, treatment satisfaction, and health-related quality of life using protocol-specified validated instruments. These assessments will be administered at predefined study time points to compare participant experience across treatment groups.

The study is powered for a non-inferiority comparison using a prespecified margin and planned enrollment of 474 participants, including allowance for loss to follow-up. Primary analyses will be conducted on intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations using appropriate regression methods for binary outcomes.

Secondary analyses will evaluate disease progression and changes in patient-reported outcomes over time using methods appropriate for repeated measurements.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

474

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

研究連絡先のバックアップ

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 子
  • 大人

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • They must be between 10 and 18 years old and have a confirmed diagnosis of mild or moderate RHD.
  • They must be under follow-up care at one of the four trial sites and be capable of attending monthly visits or be picked during routine secondary school screening to be performed as part of the study.
  • At enrollment, patients must demonstrate cognitive capacity to consent (or assent, if a minor) and a willingness to adhere to the study schedule.
  • Females of childbearing potential must agree to avoid pregnancy during the trial.
  • Individuals must not have initiated any alternative RHD prophylaxis regimen before enrollment; the trial will provide all prophylaxis during the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known allergy to penicillin or any history of anaphylaxis to antibiotics.
  • Girls who are pregnant or breastfeeding will be excluded, as well as any patient with severe comorbidities likely to complicate prophylaxis or follow-up. For example, patients with advanced heart failure (NYHA class III-IV), significant chronic kidney or liver disease, uncontrolled diabetes, or other serious chronic illnesses (e.g. active tuberculosis, immunodeficiency).
  • Patients with psychiatric conditions or cognitive impairment that preclude informed consent or reliable adherence will also be excluded.
  • Any patient currently enrolled in another interventional trial, or who is unwilling or unlikely to comply with monthly visits, will be excluded.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:防止
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:独身

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
アクティブコンパレータ:Intramuscular Benzathine Penicillin Arm
2.4 Million Unit Benzathine Penicillin to be given monthly for 24 months
Benzathine Penicillin 2.4 Million Units to be given intramuscularly every month for 24 months
実験的:Oral Azithromycin Group
Oral Azithromycin to be given daily for 3 days every month
Oral Azithromycin 500 mg once daily for three days to be repeated every month will be given

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Recurrence of acute rheumatic fever and progression of valvular cardiomyopathy
時間枠:24 months
Recurrence of acute rheumatic fever and echocardiographic progression of valvular cardiomyopathy that occurs after 24 months of enrolment
24 months
Progression to more advanced RHD in the oral antibiotics arm compared to those in the BPG arm.
時間枠:24 months
The primary outcome of the study will be the proportion of participants in the oral antibiotics arm who progress to more advanced RHD compared to those in the BPG arm.
24 months

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Treatment acceptance and satisfaction.
時間枠:24 months
Treatment acceptance and satisfaction using the Assessment criteria for Compliance, evaluation, and Performance Testing(ACCEPT) Questionnaire. The questionnaire scale uses a 0-100 scale where 0 represents the lowest level of treatment acceptance and 100 represents the highest level of treatment acceptance. In addition to the general acceptance score, the instrument summarizes data into five distinct dimensions, each also scored 0-100, which include acceptance/medications inconvenience, acceptance/long term treatment, acceptance/regimen constraints, acceptance/side effects, and General level of acceptance. The score provides an individualised assessment of teh risk /benefit ratio from the patient's perspective. eg. a lower score in a specific dimension, such as the regimen constraints, can highlight exactly which barriers are impacting a patient's adherence or persistence.
24 months
Health-related Quality of Life
時間枠:24 months
Health-related quality of life using World Health Organization Health-Related Quality of Life-Brief Version (WHOQoL-BREF) Questionnaire.WHOQOL-BREF scores are summarized across four domains-physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment-with higher scores indicating better perceived quality of life. In addition, the instrument includes two general items assessing overall quality of life and general health. Each domain score is usually transformed to a 0-100 scale. The tool does not produce a single total overall score; results are interpreted by domain.
24 months

その他の成果指標

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Cost and cost-effectiveness comparison of Azithromycin and Benzathine Penicillin
時間枠:24 months
Economic outcomes will include the comparative assessment of direct and, where applicable, indirect costs associated with oral antibiotics versus intramuscular benzathine penicillin, as well as evaluation of incremental cost-effectiveness in relation to predefined clinical outcomes among adolescents in Nigeria. This will include direct treatment costs, delivery-related resource use, and the relative value of each regimen in achieving desired clinical outcomes.
24 months

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Adeseye A Akintunde、Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

2027年1月5日

一次修了 (推定)

2030年12月30日

研究の完了 (推定)

2031年12月30日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年5月21日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年6月1日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年6月4日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年6月4日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年6月1日

最終確認日

2026年6月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

はい

IPD プランの説明

The Research data will be available on reasonable request to the principal Investigator

IPD 共有時間枠

January 2030 for 4 years

IPD 共有アクセス基準

On reasonable request to the principal Investigator

IPD 共有サポート情報タイプ

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する