Ta strona została przetłumaczona automatycznie i dokładność tłumaczenia nie jest gwarantowana. Proszę odnieść się do angielska wersja za tekst źródłowy.

Improving Management and Secondary Prevention Through Azithromycin Comparative Trial in Rheumatic Heart Disease in Nigeria)- IMPACT-RHD Nigeria (IMPACT-RHD)

1 czerwca 2026 zaktualizowane przez: Prof Adeseye Abiodun Akintunde, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria

Oral Azithromycin Versus Intramuscular Penicillin for Secondary Prevention of Rheumatic Heart Disease in Nigerian Secondary School Students: A Comparative Study to Improve Outcomes in Rheumatic Heart Disease Management

Background: Nigeria, among other Low and Middle-income countries, bears one of the highest burdens of RHD in Africa, affecting young to middle-aged adults within their productive years. This leads to loss of productivity, high out-of-pocket costs, and increased mortality risk. Challenges such as such as poverty, overcrowding, limited antibiotic access, and inconsistent prophylaxis contribute to the persistence of the disease. Secondary prophylaxis using intramuscular Benzathine Penicillin G (BPG) serves as the current standard for prevention, but has demonstrated poor adherence due to injection pain, fear, physical, and socioeconomic constraints. Oral Azithromycin offers a potential alternative by overcoming these barriers, providing an effective, acceptable, affordable and sustainable preventive strategy in Nigeria.

Methods and design: A randomised, non-inferiority, open-label, controlled clinical trial conducted across cardiology clinics of four tertiary hospitals in major Nigerian cities, for a duration of 24 months. This study will recruit participants aged 15 to 45 years with mild to moderate RHD cases (stage A or B as defined by World Heart Federation criteria) confirmed by a blinded adjudication panel, comprising 5 expert cardiologists, who will determine the echocardiographic stage of RHD on enrollment and at completion of the study period. Randomisation of participants will be done in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the standard regimen of intramuscular BPG (1.2 million units) every 28 days or a 3-day course of oral Azithromycin (500mg daily) repeated monthly. A total sample size of 474 participants will provide 90% power to demonstrate non-inferiority, using a margin of 4% with allowance for 15% on follow-up losses.

Objectives: The proportion of participants in the oral Azithromycin arm versus the IM BPG arm who demonstrate echocardiographic progression to worsen RHD stages or experience a recurrence of Acute Rheumatic Fever (ARF) within the period of two years will be compared. Additionally, accessing the adherence rates, causes of RHD-related hospitalisations, safety profiles, cost-effectiveness, and patient-reported outcomes, including treatment satisfaction and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL).

Significance: This trial is designed to highlight the most effective and readily adoptable secondary prevention strategy for Nigeria's young-to-middle-aged population by evaluating patients' adherence, ease of administration, safety profile, drug availability, cost effectiveness, and other practical considerations in resource-limited settings. Establishing a prevention strategy that addresses the socioeconomic, physical barriers of injection-based prophylaxis and improving long-term adherence and clinical outcomes in Nigeria.

Przegląd badań

Szczegółowy opis

Study Description Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) remains a major cause of preventable cardiovascular morbidity in low- and middle-income countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. The disease results from repeated or inadequately treated episodes of acute rheumatic fever (ARF), leading to progressive valvular damage, most commonly involving the mitral valve and, in some cases, combined mitral and aortic valve disease. Secondary antibiotic prophylaxis is the cornerstone of RHD control because it reduces recurrent Group A streptococcal infection and helps prevent further ARF episodes and progression of cardiac injury.

Intramuscular benzathine benzyl penicillin G (BPG) administered at regular intervals is the current standard for secondary prophylaxis. Although BPG is effective, sustained adherence is often limited by injection pain, fear of needles, travel and clinic-access barriers, inconsistent drug supply, and health-system constraints. These challenges are particularly important in settings where long-term monthly follow-up is difficult to maintain. Oral prophylactic regimens may offer a more acceptable and scalable alternative if they can provide comparable protection against recurrent ARF and progression of valvular disease.

Azithromycin is active against Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci and offers a shorter dosing schedule that may improve adherence relative to longer oral penicillin regimens. In addition, oral prophylaxis may be particularly relevant for patients in whom repeated intramuscular injections are poorly tolerated or difficult to deliver consistently. The study focuses on adolescents aged 10-18 years because this population is clinically relevant to recurrent ARF prevention, relatively homogeneous, and well suited to school- and clinic-based follow-up systems commonly used in African settings. Compared with broader age ranges, this narrower age group is expected to reduce heterogeneity and allow a more focused evaluation of the effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of secondary antibiotic prophylaxis in Nigeria.

The primary objective of the IMPACT-RHD study is to determine whether oral azithromycin is non-inferior to intramuscular benzathine penicillin G for secondary prophylaxis among adolescents aged 10-18 years with mild to moderate RHD, based on prevention of clinically confirmed recurrent ARF during follow-up and echocardiographic progression to more severe valvular disease over 24 months.

This study is a randomized, controlled, open-label clinical trial to be conducted across selected secondary schools and cardiology clinics affiliated with five tertiary hospitals in Nigeria: Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Teaching Hospital, Ogbomoso; Bowen University Teaching Hospital, Ogbomoso; University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Uyo; Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos; and Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital, Sagamu.

Eligible participants with confirmed RHD will be enrolled and followed for 24 months. Diagnosis and clinical assessment will be based on protocol-defined criteria for rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either standard intramuscular BPG or oral azithromycin as secondary prophylaxis.

Participants will attend scheduled follow-up visits every 3 months, with additional unscheduled visits for suspected ARF when needed. Follow-up procedures will include clinical assessment for recurrent ARF, adherence evaluation, safety monitoring, protocol-specified prophylaxis administration or dispensing, throat swab collection at selected intervals, and echocardiography at baseline and 24 months. The planned sample size is 474 participants, with 237 participants in each treatment arm.

The study will be conducted in accordance with applicable national ethical standards. Approval will be obtained from the National Health Research Ethics Committee of Nigeria and the institutional review boards of the participating centers before study initiation.

Randomization will be computer-generated using permuted blocks to maintain balanced allocation in a 1:1 ratio between the intramuscular BPG group and the oral azithromycin group. The trial includes two secondary prophylaxis regimens. Participants assigned to the control arm will receive intramuscular benzathine penicillin G as the standard of care. Participants assigned to the intervention arm will receive oral azithromycin according to the protocol-defined dosing schedule.

Study outcomes include recurrence of acute rheumatic fever, progression of rheumatic heart disease on echocardiography, safety, adherence, patient-reported outcomes, and health economic evaluation. Detailed outcome definitions, assessment schedules, and analysis plans are provided in the corresponding protocol sections.

At scheduled follow-up visits, participants will undergo interval clinical review, adverse-event monitoring, adherence assessment, and protocol-specified treatment administration or dispensing. Echocardiography and patient-reported outcome assessments will be repeated at key time points according to the study schedule. Patient-reported outcomes will assess treatment acceptance, treatment satisfaction, and health-related quality of life using protocol-specified validated instruments. These assessments will be administered at predefined study time points to compare participant experience across treatment groups.

The study is powered for a non-inferiority comparison using a prespecified margin and planned enrollment of 474 participants, including allowance for loss to follow-up. Primary analyses will be conducted on intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations using appropriate regression methods for binary outcomes.

Secondary analyses will evaluate disease progression and changes in patient-reported outcomes over time using methods appropriate for repeated measurements.

Typ studiów

Interwencyjne

Zapisy (Szacowany)

474

Faza

  • Nie dotyczy

Kontakty i lokalizacje

Ta sekcja zawiera dane kontaktowe osób prowadzących badanie oraz informacje o tym, gdzie badanie jest przeprowadzane.

Kontakt w sprawie studiów

Kopia zapasowa kontaktu do badania

Kryteria uczestnictwa

Badacze szukają osób, które pasują do określonego opisu, zwanego kryteriami kwalifikacyjnymi. Niektóre przykłady tych kryteriów to ogólny stan zdrowia danej osoby lub wcześniejsze leczenie.

Kryteria kwalifikacji

Wiek uprawniający do nauki

  • Dziecko
  • Dorosły

Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników

Nie

Opis

Inclusion Criteria:

  • They must be between 10 and 18 years old and have a confirmed diagnosis of mild or moderate RHD.
  • They must be under follow-up care at one of the four trial sites and be capable of attending monthly visits or be picked during routine secondary school screening to be performed as part of the study.
  • At enrollment, patients must demonstrate cognitive capacity to consent (or assent, if a minor) and a willingness to adhere to the study schedule.
  • Females of childbearing potential must agree to avoid pregnancy during the trial.
  • Individuals must not have initiated any alternative RHD prophylaxis regimen before enrollment; the trial will provide all prophylaxis during the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known allergy to penicillin or any history of anaphylaxis to antibiotics.
  • Girls who are pregnant or breastfeeding will be excluded, as well as any patient with severe comorbidities likely to complicate prophylaxis or follow-up. For example, patients with advanced heart failure (NYHA class III-IV), significant chronic kidney or liver disease, uncontrolled diabetes, or other serious chronic illnesses (e.g. active tuberculosis, immunodeficiency).
  • Patients with psychiatric conditions or cognitive impairment that preclude informed consent or reliable adherence will also be excluded.
  • Any patient currently enrolled in another interventional trial, or who is unwilling or unlikely to comply with monthly visits, will be excluded.

Plan studiów

Ta sekcja zawiera szczegółowe informacje na temat planu badania, w tym sposób zaprojektowania badania i jego pomiary.

Jak projektuje się badanie?

Szczegóły projektu

  • Główny cel: Zapobieganie
  • Przydział: Randomizowane
  • Model interwencyjny: Przydział równoległy
  • Maskowanie: Pojedynczy

Broń i interwencje

Grupa uczestników / Arm
Interwencja / Leczenie
Aktywny komparator: Intramuscular Benzathine Penicillin Arm
2.4 Million Unit Benzathine Penicillin to be given monthly for 24 months
Benzathine Penicillin 2.4 Million Units to be given intramuscularly every month for 24 months
Eksperymentalny: Oral Azithromycin Group
Oral Azithromycin to be given daily for 3 days every month
Oral Azithromycin 500 mg once daily for three days to be repeated every month will be given

Co mierzy badanie?

Podstawowe miary wyniku

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Recurrence of acute rheumatic fever and progression of valvular cardiomyopathy
Ramy czasowe: 24 months
Recurrence of acute rheumatic fever and echocardiographic progression of valvular cardiomyopathy that occurs after 24 months of enrolment
24 months
Progression to more advanced RHD in the oral antibiotics arm compared to those in the BPG arm.
Ramy czasowe: 24 months
The primary outcome of the study will be the proportion of participants in the oral antibiotics arm who progress to more advanced RHD compared to those in the BPG arm.
24 months

Miary wyników drugorzędnych

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Treatment acceptance and satisfaction.
Ramy czasowe: 24 months
Treatment acceptance and satisfaction using the Assessment criteria for Compliance, evaluation, and Performance Testing(ACCEPT) Questionnaire. The questionnaire scale uses a 0-100 scale where 0 represents the lowest level of treatment acceptance and 100 represents the highest level of treatment acceptance. In addition to the general acceptance score, the instrument summarizes data into five distinct dimensions, each also scored 0-100, which include acceptance/medications inconvenience, acceptance/long term treatment, acceptance/regimen constraints, acceptance/side effects, and General level of acceptance. The score provides an individualised assessment of teh risk /benefit ratio from the patient's perspective. eg. a lower score in a specific dimension, such as the regimen constraints, can highlight exactly which barriers are impacting a patient's adherence or persistence.
24 months
Health-related Quality of Life
Ramy czasowe: 24 months
Health-related quality of life using World Health Organization Health-Related Quality of Life-Brief Version (WHOQoL-BREF) Questionnaire.WHOQOL-BREF scores are summarized across four domains-physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment-with higher scores indicating better perceived quality of life. In addition, the instrument includes two general items assessing overall quality of life and general health. Each domain score is usually transformed to a 0-100 scale. The tool does not produce a single total overall score; results are interpreted by domain.
24 months

Inne miary wyników

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Cost and cost-effectiveness comparison of Azithromycin and Benzathine Penicillin
Ramy czasowe: 24 months
Economic outcomes will include the comparative assessment of direct and, where applicable, indirect costs associated with oral antibiotics versus intramuscular benzathine penicillin, as well as evaluation of incremental cost-effectiveness in relation to predefined clinical outcomes among adolescents in Nigeria. This will include direct treatment costs, delivery-related resource use, and the relative value of each regimen in achieving desired clinical outcomes.
24 months

Współpracownicy i badacze

Tutaj znajdziesz osoby i organizacje zaangażowane w to badanie.

Śledczy

  • Główny śledczy: Adeseye A Akintunde, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria

Daty zapisu na studia

Daty te śledzą postęp w przesyłaniu rekordów badań i podsumowań wyników do ClinicalTrials.gov. Zapisy badań i zgłoszone wyniki są przeglądane przez National Library of Medicine (NLM), aby upewnić się, że spełniają określone standardy kontroli jakości, zanim zostaną opublikowane na publicznej stronie internetowej.

Główne daty studiów

Rozpoczęcie studiów (Szacowany)

5 stycznia 2027

Zakończenie podstawowe (Szacowany)

30 grudnia 2030

Ukończenie studiów (Szacowany)

30 grudnia 2031

Daty rejestracji na studia

Pierwszy przesłany

21 maja 2026

Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości

1 czerwca 2026

Pierwszy wysłany (Rzeczywisty)

4 czerwca 2026

Aktualizacje rekordów badań

Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)

4 czerwca 2026

Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości

1 czerwca 2026

Ostatnia weryfikacja

1 czerwca 2026

Więcej informacji

Terminy związane z tym badaniem

Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)

Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?

TAK

Opis planu IPD

The Research data will be available on reasonable request to the principal Investigator

Ramy czasowe udostępniania IPD

January 2030 for 4 years

Kryteria dostępu do udostępniania IPD

On reasonable request to the principal Investigator

Typ informacji pomocniczych dotyczących udostępniania IPD

  • PROTOKÓŁ BADANIA
  • ICF
  • ANALITYCZNY_KOD
  • CSR

Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze

Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .

Subskrybuj