Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Improving Management and Secondary Prevention Through Azithromycin Comparative Trial in Rheumatic Heart Disease in Nigeria)- IMPACT-RHD Nigeria (IMPACT-RHD)

1. Juni 2026 aktualisiert von: Prof Adeseye Abiodun Akintunde, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria

Oral Azithromycin Versus Intramuscular Penicillin for Secondary Prevention of Rheumatic Heart Disease in Nigerian Secondary School Students: A Comparative Study to Improve Outcomes in Rheumatic Heart Disease Management

Background: Nigeria, among other Low and Middle-income countries, bears one of the highest burdens of RHD in Africa, affecting young to middle-aged adults within their productive years. This leads to loss of productivity, high out-of-pocket costs, and increased mortality risk. Challenges such as such as poverty, overcrowding, limited antibiotic access, and inconsistent prophylaxis contribute to the persistence of the disease. Secondary prophylaxis using intramuscular Benzathine Penicillin G (BPG) serves as the current standard for prevention, but has demonstrated poor adherence due to injection pain, fear, physical, and socioeconomic constraints. Oral Azithromycin offers a potential alternative by overcoming these barriers, providing an effective, acceptable, affordable and sustainable preventive strategy in Nigeria.

Methods and design: A randomised, non-inferiority, open-label, controlled clinical trial conducted across cardiology clinics of four tertiary hospitals in major Nigerian cities, for a duration of 24 months. This study will recruit participants aged 15 to 45 years with mild to moderate RHD cases (stage A or B as defined by World Heart Federation criteria) confirmed by a blinded adjudication panel, comprising 5 expert cardiologists, who will determine the echocardiographic stage of RHD on enrollment and at completion of the study period. Randomisation of participants will be done in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the standard regimen of intramuscular BPG (1.2 million units) every 28 days or a 3-day course of oral Azithromycin (500mg daily) repeated monthly. A total sample size of 474 participants will provide 90% power to demonstrate non-inferiority, using a margin of 4% with allowance for 15% on follow-up losses.

Objectives: The proportion of participants in the oral Azithromycin arm versus the IM BPG arm who demonstrate echocardiographic progression to worsen RHD stages or experience a recurrence of Acute Rheumatic Fever (ARF) within the period of two years will be compared. Additionally, accessing the adherence rates, causes of RHD-related hospitalisations, safety profiles, cost-effectiveness, and patient-reported outcomes, including treatment satisfaction and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL).

Significance: This trial is designed to highlight the most effective and readily adoptable secondary prevention strategy for Nigeria's young-to-middle-aged population by evaluating patients' adherence, ease of administration, safety profile, drug availability, cost effectiveness, and other practical considerations in resource-limited settings. Establishing a prevention strategy that addresses the socioeconomic, physical barriers of injection-based prophylaxis and improving long-term adherence and clinical outcomes in Nigeria.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Study Description Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) remains a major cause of preventable cardiovascular morbidity in low- and middle-income countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. The disease results from repeated or inadequately treated episodes of acute rheumatic fever (ARF), leading to progressive valvular damage, most commonly involving the mitral valve and, in some cases, combined mitral and aortic valve disease. Secondary antibiotic prophylaxis is the cornerstone of RHD control because it reduces recurrent Group A streptococcal infection and helps prevent further ARF episodes and progression of cardiac injury.

Intramuscular benzathine benzyl penicillin G (BPG) administered at regular intervals is the current standard for secondary prophylaxis. Although BPG is effective, sustained adherence is often limited by injection pain, fear of needles, travel and clinic-access barriers, inconsistent drug supply, and health-system constraints. These challenges are particularly important in settings where long-term monthly follow-up is difficult to maintain. Oral prophylactic regimens may offer a more acceptable and scalable alternative if they can provide comparable protection against recurrent ARF and progression of valvular disease.

Azithromycin is active against Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci and offers a shorter dosing schedule that may improve adherence relative to longer oral penicillin regimens. In addition, oral prophylaxis may be particularly relevant for patients in whom repeated intramuscular injections are poorly tolerated or difficult to deliver consistently. The study focuses on adolescents aged 10-18 years because this population is clinically relevant to recurrent ARF prevention, relatively homogeneous, and well suited to school- and clinic-based follow-up systems commonly used in African settings. Compared with broader age ranges, this narrower age group is expected to reduce heterogeneity and allow a more focused evaluation of the effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of secondary antibiotic prophylaxis in Nigeria.

The primary objective of the IMPACT-RHD study is to determine whether oral azithromycin is non-inferior to intramuscular benzathine penicillin G for secondary prophylaxis among adolescents aged 10-18 years with mild to moderate RHD, based on prevention of clinically confirmed recurrent ARF during follow-up and echocardiographic progression to more severe valvular disease over 24 months.

This study is a randomized, controlled, open-label clinical trial to be conducted across selected secondary schools and cardiology clinics affiliated with five tertiary hospitals in Nigeria: Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Teaching Hospital, Ogbomoso; Bowen University Teaching Hospital, Ogbomoso; University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Uyo; Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos; and Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital, Sagamu.

Eligible participants with confirmed RHD will be enrolled and followed for 24 months. Diagnosis and clinical assessment will be based on protocol-defined criteria for rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either standard intramuscular BPG or oral azithromycin as secondary prophylaxis.

Participants will attend scheduled follow-up visits every 3 months, with additional unscheduled visits for suspected ARF when needed. Follow-up procedures will include clinical assessment for recurrent ARF, adherence evaluation, safety monitoring, protocol-specified prophylaxis administration or dispensing, throat swab collection at selected intervals, and echocardiography at baseline and 24 months. The planned sample size is 474 participants, with 237 participants in each treatment arm.

The study will be conducted in accordance with applicable national ethical standards. Approval will be obtained from the National Health Research Ethics Committee of Nigeria and the institutional review boards of the participating centers before study initiation.

Randomization will be computer-generated using permuted blocks to maintain balanced allocation in a 1:1 ratio between the intramuscular BPG group and the oral azithromycin group. The trial includes two secondary prophylaxis regimens. Participants assigned to the control arm will receive intramuscular benzathine penicillin G as the standard of care. Participants assigned to the intervention arm will receive oral azithromycin according to the protocol-defined dosing schedule.

Study outcomes include recurrence of acute rheumatic fever, progression of rheumatic heart disease on echocardiography, safety, adherence, patient-reported outcomes, and health economic evaluation. Detailed outcome definitions, assessment schedules, and analysis plans are provided in the corresponding protocol sections.

At scheduled follow-up visits, participants will undergo interval clinical review, adverse-event monitoring, adherence assessment, and protocol-specified treatment administration or dispensing. Echocardiography and patient-reported outcome assessments will be repeated at key time points according to the study schedule. Patient-reported outcomes will assess treatment acceptance, treatment satisfaction, and health-related quality of life using protocol-specified validated instruments. These assessments will be administered at predefined study time points to compare participant experience across treatment groups.

The study is powered for a non-inferiority comparison using a prespecified margin and planned enrollment of 474 participants, including allowance for loss to follow-up. Primary analyses will be conducted on intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations using appropriate regression methods for binary outcomes.

Secondary analyses will evaluate disease progression and changes in patient-reported outcomes over time using methods appropriate for repeated measurements.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

474

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Kind
  • Erwachsene

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • They must be between 10 and 18 years old and have a confirmed diagnosis of mild or moderate RHD.
  • They must be under follow-up care at one of the four trial sites and be capable of attending monthly visits or be picked during routine secondary school screening to be performed as part of the study.
  • At enrollment, patients must demonstrate cognitive capacity to consent (or assent, if a minor) and a willingness to adhere to the study schedule.
  • Females of childbearing potential must agree to avoid pregnancy during the trial.
  • Individuals must not have initiated any alternative RHD prophylaxis regimen before enrollment; the trial will provide all prophylaxis during the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known allergy to penicillin or any history of anaphylaxis to antibiotics.
  • Girls who are pregnant or breastfeeding will be excluded, as well as any patient with severe comorbidities likely to complicate prophylaxis or follow-up. For example, patients with advanced heart failure (NYHA class III-IV), significant chronic kidney or liver disease, uncontrolled diabetes, or other serious chronic illnesses (e.g. active tuberculosis, immunodeficiency).
  • Patients with psychiatric conditions or cognitive impairment that preclude informed consent or reliable adherence will also be excluded.
  • Any patient currently enrolled in another interventional trial, or who is unwilling or unlikely to comply with monthly visits, will be excluded.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Verhütung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Aktiver Komparator: Intramuscular Benzathine Penicillin Arm
2.4 Million Unit Benzathine Penicillin to be given monthly for 24 months
Benzathine Penicillin 2.4 Million Units to be given intramuscularly every month for 24 months
Experimental: Oral Azithromycin Group
Oral Azithromycin to be given daily for 3 days every month
Oral Azithromycin 500 mg once daily for three days to be repeated every month will be given

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Recurrence of acute rheumatic fever and progression of valvular cardiomyopathy
Zeitfenster: 24 months
Recurrence of acute rheumatic fever and echocardiographic progression of valvular cardiomyopathy that occurs after 24 months of enrolment
24 months
Progression to more advanced RHD in the oral antibiotics arm compared to those in the BPG arm.
Zeitfenster: 24 months
The primary outcome of the study will be the proportion of participants in the oral antibiotics arm who progress to more advanced RHD compared to those in the BPG arm.
24 months

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Treatment acceptance and satisfaction.
Zeitfenster: 24 months
Treatment acceptance and satisfaction using the Assessment criteria for Compliance, evaluation, and Performance Testing(ACCEPT) Questionnaire. The questionnaire scale uses a 0-100 scale where 0 represents the lowest level of treatment acceptance and 100 represents the highest level of treatment acceptance. In addition to the general acceptance score, the instrument summarizes data into five distinct dimensions, each also scored 0-100, which include acceptance/medications inconvenience, acceptance/long term treatment, acceptance/regimen constraints, acceptance/side effects, and General level of acceptance. The score provides an individualised assessment of teh risk /benefit ratio from the patient's perspective. eg. a lower score in a specific dimension, such as the regimen constraints, can highlight exactly which barriers are impacting a patient's adherence or persistence.
24 months
Health-related Quality of Life
Zeitfenster: 24 months
Health-related quality of life using World Health Organization Health-Related Quality of Life-Brief Version (WHOQoL-BREF) Questionnaire.WHOQOL-BREF scores are summarized across four domains-physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment-with higher scores indicating better perceived quality of life. In addition, the instrument includes two general items assessing overall quality of life and general health. Each domain score is usually transformed to a 0-100 scale. The tool does not produce a single total overall score; results are interpreted by domain.
24 months

Andere Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Cost and cost-effectiveness comparison of Azithromycin and Benzathine Penicillin
Zeitfenster: 24 months
Economic outcomes will include the comparative assessment of direct and, where applicable, indirect costs associated with oral antibiotics versus intramuscular benzathine penicillin, as well as evaluation of incremental cost-effectiveness in relation to predefined clinical outcomes among adolescents in Nigeria. This will include direct treatment costs, delivery-related resource use, and the relative value of each regimen in achieving desired clinical outcomes.
24 months

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Adeseye A Akintunde, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

5. Januar 2027

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

30. Dezember 2030

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

30. Dezember 2031

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

21. Mai 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

1. Juni 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

4. Juni 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

4. Juni 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

1. Juni 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juni 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

JA

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

The Research data will be available on reasonable request to the principal Investigator

IPD-Sharing-Zeitrahmen

January 2030 for 4 years

IPD-Sharing-Zugriffskriterien

On reasonable request to the principal Investigator

Art der unterstützenden IPD-Freigabeinformationen

  • STUDIENPROTOKOLL
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren