このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

eAMS-Eco: Implementation of a Tool for Climate Conscious Inhaler Prescribing

2026年8月4日 更新者:Samir Gupta、University of Toronto

eAMS-Eco: Implementation of a Climate Conscious Prescribing Aid at the Point-of-Care

The goal of this study is to determine whether an 'eco' version of the Electronic Asthma Management System (eAMS) can reduce inhaler carbon emissions in primary care, in patients with asthma. The existing eAMS uses patient-specific criteria (asthma control, asthma flare-up risk, and current medications) to provide guideline-based computerized clinical decision support to clinicians, to improve the delivery of asthma care. The eAMS-Eco includes embedded cues and messaging on the environmental impact of inhaler medications and links to a patient-friendly conversation aid that facilitates shared decision-making and climate-conscious prescribing.

The study will evaluate the implementation of the eAMS-Eco in two primary care clinics that have been using the existing eAMS, using an interrupted time-series analysis (one year pre- and post-launch of the eAMS-Eco). The investigators will assess system uptake and user feedback on the eAMS-Eco, as well as changes in inhaler prescriptions (including resulting changes in carbon emissions and costs) and changes in asthma control, in the implementation period (eAMS-Eco) compared to the baseline period (eAMS).

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Climate change poses a significant threat to human health and yet healthcare itself contributes substantially to climate change. Reducing the carbon emissions from healthcare is one actionable step to combat the climate crisis. In regards to asthma care, reductions in carbon emissions could be achieved by addressing the unnecessary of metered-dose inhalers (MDIs), the propellants in which contain potent greenhouse gases. This could be achieved by preferentially prescribing inhaler devices such as dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and soft mist inhalers (SMIs), which do not use propellants and have much lower carbon footprints than MDIs. These devices are almost always available in the same medication classes as MDIs (sometimes with the same active ingredient) and demonstrate comparable clinical efficacy and patient acceptability. Yet MDIs still account for the majority of prescribed inhalers.

The investigators will leverage the existing Electronic Asthma Management System (eAMS), a computerized decision support system (CDSS) that recommends guideline-based medication changes based on assessment of the patients' asthma control and exacerbation risk, to promote climate-conscious prescribing at the point-of-care. When tested in real-world settings, the eAMS improved the quality of asthma care, with a significant increase in the provision of asthma action plans, assessment of asthma control, use of guideline-based inhaler medications, including escalation of controller therapy when indicated. Subsequently, the tool has been used widely in primary care sites in Ontario. To address the issue of inhaler GHG emissions, our team has now created an enhanced version of the existing eAMS, called the 'eAMS-Eco'.

The eAMS-Eco has embedded cues and messaging that indicate the relative carbon footprint of each medication recommended by the eAMS, to provide clinicians with the knowledge needed to enact climate-conscious prescribing. A an orange or red leaf appears next to the recommended medication with hover text indicating that the device has a moderate or high carbon footprint, respectively. The medication name and hover text are clickable links which take the clinician to an inhaler conversation aid, which serves to promote shared decision-making by presenting the carbon footprint (as the equivalent to kilometers driven in a gas powered car) and cost of each inhaler in the corresponding medication class, along with usage details (dosing, number of inhalations per dose, number of doses per device). The conversation aids also include information on inhaler contents (active ingredients) and include a safety warning that emphasizes the importance of considering patient-level factors, such as adequate technique, age, disease severity, and the impact on adherence, when selecting an inhaler device.

Ultimately, the eco-features added to the eAMS are designed to promote climate-conscious prescribing of inhalers while considering the preference and ability of each individual patient. Our study will evaluate the implementation of the eAMS-Eco in two primary care clinics which are already using the eAMS, with an overall goal of reducing inhaler emissions in the primary care of patients with asthma.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

95

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

    • Ontario
      • Toronto、Ontario、カナダ、M5G 1N8
        • Taddle Creek Family Health Team (Bay Street)
      • Toronto、Ontario、カナダ、M6G 4A1
        • Taddle Creek Family Health Team (Bloor Street)

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 子
  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

説明

Clinician eligibility criteria:

Inclusion criteria:

-Active clinician at one of the two study sites during the study period

Patient eligibility criteria:

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patient at one of the two study sites with a visit during the study period
  • Diagnosis of asthma (using validated algorithm for primary care of

    1. asthma billing code (493) in the past 3 years OR asthma in the cumulative patient profile (CPP) and
    2. prescription for an inhaler in the past year

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:ヘルスサービス研究
  • 割り当て:非ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:順次割り当て
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
介入なし:Electronic Asthma Management System (eAMS)
A retrospective chart review and system audit will assess outcomes during the one-year baseline period where the base version of the Electronic Asthma Management System (eAMS) was in use
アクティブコンパレータ:eAMS-Eco
The eAMS-Eco will be launched at study sites and available to clinicians to use for eligible patients with data collected prospectively for 12 months
An 'eco' version of a computerized clinical decision support system that provides information on the carbon footprint of inhalers when making guideline-based treatment recommendations for patients with asthma
他の名前:
  • eAMS-Eco

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Prescribed inhaler carbon emissions
時間枠:24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
Among patients entering on at least one metered dose inhaler, system analytics, chart review and existing data on inhaler carbon emissions will be used to assess the average and total difference in the change (exit versus entry medications) in estimated annual carbon emissions from inhalers per patient between the baseline and implementation periods
24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
Proportion of low carbon footprint inhalers to moderate/high carbon footprint inhalers prescribed
時間枠:24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
For all new inhaler prescriptions, system analytics and chart review data will be used to compare the difference in the average proportion of low to moderate/high carbon footprint inhalers across all patients, between the baseline and implementation periods
24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Cost of prescribed inhalers
時間枠:24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
Among patients entering on at least one metered dose inhaler, system analytics, chart review and data from Ontario's provincial drug formulary will be used to assess the difference in the change (exit versus entry medications) in the estimated annual cost of prescribed inhalers, per patient, between the baseline and implementation periods
24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
System usage: conversation aid access
時間枠:12 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
Using system analytics from the implementation period, investigators will determine the proportion of visits in which the conversation aid was accessed when it was available and assess trends in access over time
12 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
System usage: decision-support access
時間枠:24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
Using system analytics, investigators will assess compare use of the decision support (access, medication changes, and asthma action plans created) between the baseline and implementation period
24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
Quantitative patient Likert-Scale questionnaire
時間枠:12 months
Exclusively throughout the implementation period, the investigators will identify clinic visits where the conversation aid was available and invite patients to complete an online feedback questionnaire to assess perceptions on the conversation aid's utility, content, and impact (using a 5-point likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree), overall impressions (rating from 1: worst to 10: best) and impact of switching (or not switching) to a lower carbon device on inhaler adherence, feelings of guilt, and contribution to climate action.
12 months
Patient feedback: 4-item Shared Decision-Making Process Scale
時間枠:12 months
Exclusively throughout the implementation period, the investigators will identify clinic visits where the conversation aid was available and invite patients to complete the 4-item Shared Decision-Making (SDM) Process Scale (Version 2.0) which measures the amount of SDM that occurs around inhaler selection to assess the quality of shared decision-making during their recent clinic visit. Higher scores (range 0 to 4) reflect higher quality of SDM.
12 months
Qualitative patient free-text feedback questionnaire
時間枠:12 months
Exclusively throughout the implementation period, the investigators will identify clinic visits in which the conversation aid was available and invite patients to provide feedback on their experience during their recent clinic visit
12 months
Quantitative provider Likert-Scale questionnaire
時間枠:12 months
At the end of the implementation period, all providers who accessed the eAMS-Eco and had at least one visit with the Eco features triggered, will be invited to complete an online questionnaire to assess their perceptions of the eAMS-Eco and the conversation aid's utility, content and impact (using a 5-point likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree).
12 months
Provider feedback: 10-item System Usability Scale
時間枠:12 months
At the end of the implementation period, all providers who accessed the eAMS-Eco and had at least one visit with the Eco features triggered, will be invited to complete the 10-item System Usability Scale (SUS) to assess feedback on system usability (using a 5-point likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree). Higher scores (range 0 to 100) reflect higher overall usability.
12 months
Qualitative provider free-text feedback questionnaire
時間枠:12 months
At the end of the implementation period, all providers who accessed the eAMS-Eco and had at least one visit with the Eco features triggered, will be invited to provide feedback on their experience using the eAMS-Eco
12 months
Asthma Control
時間枠:24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
Among all patients who had at least one visit during the baseline and/or implementation period, the investigators will assess change in asthma control, exclusively using data from the pre-visit eAMS questionnaire (among patients with multiple visits during the baseline and/or implementation period) or by inviting patients to complete the pre-visit questionnaire at the end of the baseline and/or implementation period (among patients with a single visit during either period). Asthma control is scored as acceptable or suboptimal according to Canadian guidelines based on frequency of daytime symptoms, rescue medication use; nighttime awakenings; impact on school/work attendance; impact on exercise; and exacerbations.
24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2026年4月28日

一次修了 (推定)

2027年4月28日

研究の完了 (推定)

2027年7月7日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年5月27日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年6月9日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年6月10日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年8月7日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年8月4日

最終確認日

2026年6月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する