이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

eAMS-Eco: Implementation of a Tool for Climate Conscious Inhaler Prescribing

2026년 8월 4일 업데이트: Samir Gupta, University of Toronto

eAMS-Eco: Implementation of a Climate Conscious Prescribing Aid at the Point-of-Care

The goal of this study is to determine whether an 'eco' version of the Electronic Asthma Management System (eAMS) can reduce inhaler carbon emissions in primary care, in patients with asthma. The existing eAMS uses patient-specific criteria (asthma control, asthma flare-up risk, and current medications) to provide guideline-based computerized clinical decision support to clinicians, to improve the delivery of asthma care. The eAMS-Eco includes embedded cues and messaging on the environmental impact of inhaler medications and links to a patient-friendly conversation aid that facilitates shared decision-making and climate-conscious prescribing.

The study will evaluate the implementation of the eAMS-Eco in two primary care clinics that have been using the existing eAMS, using an interrupted time-series analysis (one year pre- and post-launch of the eAMS-Eco). The investigators will assess system uptake and user feedback on the eAMS-Eco, as well as changes in inhaler prescriptions (including resulting changes in carbon emissions and costs) and changes in asthma control, in the implementation period (eAMS-Eco) compared to the baseline period (eAMS).

연구 개요

상세 설명

Climate change poses a significant threat to human health and yet healthcare itself contributes substantially to climate change. Reducing the carbon emissions from healthcare is one actionable step to combat the climate crisis. In regards to asthma care, reductions in carbon emissions could be achieved by addressing the unnecessary of metered-dose inhalers (MDIs), the propellants in which contain potent greenhouse gases. This could be achieved by preferentially prescribing inhaler devices such as dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and soft mist inhalers (SMIs), which do not use propellants and have much lower carbon footprints than MDIs. These devices are almost always available in the same medication classes as MDIs (sometimes with the same active ingredient) and demonstrate comparable clinical efficacy and patient acceptability. Yet MDIs still account for the majority of prescribed inhalers.

The investigators will leverage the existing Electronic Asthma Management System (eAMS), a computerized decision support system (CDSS) that recommends guideline-based medication changes based on assessment of the patients' asthma control and exacerbation risk, to promote climate-conscious prescribing at the point-of-care. When tested in real-world settings, the eAMS improved the quality of asthma care, with a significant increase in the provision of asthma action plans, assessment of asthma control, use of guideline-based inhaler medications, including escalation of controller therapy when indicated. Subsequently, the tool has been used widely in primary care sites in Ontario. To address the issue of inhaler GHG emissions, our team has now created an enhanced version of the existing eAMS, called the 'eAMS-Eco'.

The eAMS-Eco has embedded cues and messaging that indicate the relative carbon footprint of each medication recommended by the eAMS, to provide clinicians with the knowledge needed to enact climate-conscious prescribing. A an orange or red leaf appears next to the recommended medication with hover text indicating that the device has a moderate or high carbon footprint, respectively. The medication name and hover text are clickable links which take the clinician to an inhaler conversation aid, which serves to promote shared decision-making by presenting the carbon footprint (as the equivalent to kilometers driven in a gas powered car) and cost of each inhaler in the corresponding medication class, along with usage details (dosing, number of inhalations per dose, number of doses per device). The conversation aids also include information on inhaler contents (active ingredients) and include a safety warning that emphasizes the importance of considering patient-level factors, such as adequate technique, age, disease severity, and the impact on adherence, when selecting an inhaler device.

Ultimately, the eco-features added to the eAMS are designed to promote climate-conscious prescribing of inhalers while considering the preference and ability of each individual patient. Our study will evaluate the implementation of the eAMS-Eco in two primary care clinics which are already using the eAMS, with an overall goal of reducing inhaler emissions in the primary care of patients with asthma.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (추정된)

95

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, 캐나다, M5G 1N8
        • Taddle Creek Family Health Team (Bay Street)
      • Toronto, Ontario, 캐나다, M6G 4A1
        • Taddle Creek Family Health Team (Bloor Street)

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 어린이
  • 성인
  • 고령자

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

설명

Clinician eligibility criteria:

Inclusion criteria:

-Active clinician at one of the two study sites during the study period

Patient eligibility criteria:

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patient at one of the two study sites with a visit during the study period
  • Diagnosis of asthma (using validated algorithm for primary care of

    1. asthma billing code (493) in the past 3 years OR asthma in the cumulative patient profile (CPP) and
    2. prescription for an inhaler in the past year

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 건강 서비스 연구
  • 할당: 무작위화되지 않음
  • 중재 모델: 순차적 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
간섭 없음: Electronic Asthma Management System (eAMS)
A retrospective chart review and system audit will assess outcomes during the one-year baseline period where the base version of the Electronic Asthma Management System (eAMS) was in use
활성 비교기: eAMS-Eco
The eAMS-Eco will be launched at study sites and available to clinicians to use for eligible patients with data collected prospectively for 12 months
An 'eco' version of a computerized clinical decision support system that provides information on the carbon footprint of inhalers when making guideline-based treatment recommendations for patients with asthma
다른 이름들:
  • eAMS-Eco

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Prescribed inhaler carbon emissions
기간: 24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
Among patients entering on at least one metered dose inhaler, system analytics, chart review and existing data on inhaler carbon emissions will be used to assess the average and total difference in the change (exit versus entry medications) in estimated annual carbon emissions from inhalers per patient between the baseline and implementation periods
24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
Proportion of low carbon footprint inhalers to moderate/high carbon footprint inhalers prescribed
기간: 24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
For all new inhaler prescriptions, system analytics and chart review data will be used to compare the difference in the average proportion of low to moderate/high carbon footprint inhalers across all patients, between the baseline and implementation periods
24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Cost of prescribed inhalers
기간: 24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
Among patients entering on at least one metered dose inhaler, system analytics, chart review and data from Ontario's provincial drug formulary will be used to assess the difference in the change (exit versus entry medications) in the estimated annual cost of prescribed inhalers, per patient, between the baseline and implementation periods
24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
System usage: conversation aid access
기간: 12 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
Using system analytics from the implementation period, investigators will determine the proportion of visits in which the conversation aid was accessed when it was available and assess trends in access over time
12 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
System usage: decision-support access
기간: 24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
Using system analytics, investigators will assess compare use of the decision support (access, medication changes, and asthma action plans created) between the baseline and implementation period
24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
Quantitative patient Likert-Scale questionnaire
기간: 12 months
Exclusively throughout the implementation period, the investigators will identify clinic visits where the conversation aid was available and invite patients to complete an online feedback questionnaire to assess perceptions on the conversation aid's utility, content, and impact (using a 5-point likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree), overall impressions (rating from 1: worst to 10: best) and impact of switching (or not switching) to a lower carbon device on inhaler adherence, feelings of guilt, and contribution to climate action.
12 months
Patient feedback: 4-item Shared Decision-Making Process Scale
기간: 12 months
Exclusively throughout the implementation period, the investigators will identify clinic visits where the conversation aid was available and invite patients to complete the 4-item Shared Decision-Making (SDM) Process Scale (Version 2.0) which measures the amount of SDM that occurs around inhaler selection to assess the quality of shared decision-making during their recent clinic visit. Higher scores (range 0 to 4) reflect higher quality of SDM.
12 months
Qualitative patient free-text feedback questionnaire
기간: 12 months
Exclusively throughout the implementation period, the investigators will identify clinic visits in which the conversation aid was available and invite patients to provide feedback on their experience during their recent clinic visit
12 months
Quantitative provider Likert-Scale questionnaire
기간: 12 months
At the end of the implementation period, all providers who accessed the eAMS-Eco and had at least one visit with the Eco features triggered, will be invited to complete an online questionnaire to assess their perceptions of the eAMS-Eco and the conversation aid's utility, content and impact (using a 5-point likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree).
12 months
Provider feedback: 10-item System Usability Scale
기간: 12 months
At the end of the implementation period, all providers who accessed the eAMS-Eco and had at least one visit with the Eco features triggered, will be invited to complete the 10-item System Usability Scale (SUS) to assess feedback on system usability (using a 5-point likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree). Higher scores (range 0 to 100) reflect higher overall usability.
12 months
Qualitative provider free-text feedback questionnaire
기간: 12 months
At the end of the implementation period, all providers who accessed the eAMS-Eco and had at least one visit with the Eco features triggered, will be invited to provide feedback on their experience using the eAMS-Eco
12 months
Asthma Control
기간: 24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
Among all patients who had at least one visit during the baseline and/or implementation period, the investigators will assess change in asthma control, exclusively using data from the pre-visit eAMS questionnaire (among patients with multiple visits during the baseline and/or implementation period) or by inviting patients to complete the pre-visit questionnaire at the end of the baseline and/or implementation period (among patients with a single visit during either period). Asthma control is scored as acceptable or suboptimal according to Canadian guidelines based on frequency of daytime symptoms, rescue medication use; nighttime awakenings; impact on school/work attendance; impact on exercise; and exacerbations.
24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2026년 4월 28일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2027년 4월 28일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2027년 7월 7일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 5월 27일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 6월 9일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 6월 10일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 8월 7일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 8월 4일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 6월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다