此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

eAMS-Eco: Implementation of a Tool for Climate Conscious Inhaler Prescribing

2026年8月4日 更新者:Samir Gupta、University of Toronto

eAMS-Eco: Implementation of a Climate Conscious Prescribing Aid at the Point-of-Care

The goal of this study is to determine whether an 'eco' version of the Electronic Asthma Management System (eAMS) can reduce inhaler carbon emissions in primary care, in patients with asthma. The existing eAMS uses patient-specific criteria (asthma control, asthma flare-up risk, and current medications) to provide guideline-based computerized clinical decision support to clinicians, to improve the delivery of asthma care. The eAMS-Eco includes embedded cues and messaging on the environmental impact of inhaler medications and links to a patient-friendly conversation aid that facilitates shared decision-making and climate-conscious prescribing.

The study will evaluate the implementation of the eAMS-Eco in two primary care clinics that have been using the existing eAMS, using an interrupted time-series analysis (one year pre- and post-launch of the eAMS-Eco). The investigators will assess system uptake and user feedback on the eAMS-Eco, as well as changes in inhaler prescriptions (including resulting changes in carbon emissions and costs) and changes in asthma control, in the implementation period (eAMS-Eco) compared to the baseline period (eAMS).

研究概览

详细说明

Climate change poses a significant threat to human health and yet healthcare itself contributes substantially to climate change. Reducing the carbon emissions from healthcare is one actionable step to combat the climate crisis. In regards to asthma care, reductions in carbon emissions could be achieved by addressing the unnecessary of metered-dose inhalers (MDIs), the propellants in which contain potent greenhouse gases. This could be achieved by preferentially prescribing inhaler devices such as dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and soft mist inhalers (SMIs), which do not use propellants and have much lower carbon footprints than MDIs. These devices are almost always available in the same medication classes as MDIs (sometimes with the same active ingredient) and demonstrate comparable clinical efficacy and patient acceptability. Yet MDIs still account for the majority of prescribed inhalers.

The investigators will leverage the existing Electronic Asthma Management System (eAMS), a computerized decision support system (CDSS) that recommends guideline-based medication changes based on assessment of the patients' asthma control and exacerbation risk, to promote climate-conscious prescribing at the point-of-care. When tested in real-world settings, the eAMS improved the quality of asthma care, with a significant increase in the provision of asthma action plans, assessment of asthma control, use of guideline-based inhaler medications, including escalation of controller therapy when indicated. Subsequently, the tool has been used widely in primary care sites in Ontario. To address the issue of inhaler GHG emissions, our team has now created an enhanced version of the existing eAMS, called the 'eAMS-Eco'.

The eAMS-Eco has embedded cues and messaging that indicate the relative carbon footprint of each medication recommended by the eAMS, to provide clinicians with the knowledge needed to enact climate-conscious prescribing. A an orange or red leaf appears next to the recommended medication with hover text indicating that the device has a moderate or high carbon footprint, respectively. The medication name and hover text are clickable links which take the clinician to an inhaler conversation aid, which serves to promote shared decision-making by presenting the carbon footprint (as the equivalent to kilometers driven in a gas powered car) and cost of each inhaler in the corresponding medication class, along with usage details (dosing, number of inhalations per dose, number of doses per device). The conversation aids also include information on inhaler contents (active ingredients) and include a safety warning that emphasizes the importance of considering patient-level factors, such as adequate technique, age, disease severity, and the impact on adherence, when selecting an inhaler device.

Ultimately, the eco-features added to the eAMS are designed to promote climate-conscious prescribing of inhalers while considering the preference and ability of each individual patient. Our study will evaluate the implementation of the eAMS-Eco in two primary care clinics which are already using the eAMS, with an overall goal of reducing inhaler emissions in the primary care of patients with asthma.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

95

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Ontario
      • Toronto、Ontario、加拿大、M5G 1N8
        • Taddle Creek Family Health Team (Bay Street)
      • Toronto、Ontario、加拿大、M6G 4A1
        • Taddle Creek Family Health Team (Bloor Street)

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 孩子
  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Clinician eligibility criteria:

Inclusion criteria:

-Active clinician at one of the two study sites during the study period

Patient eligibility criteria:

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patient at one of the two study sites with a visit during the study period
  • Diagnosis of asthma (using validated algorithm for primary care of

    1. asthma billing code (493) in the past 3 years OR asthma in the cumulative patient profile (CPP) and
    2. prescription for an inhaler in the past year

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:卫生服务研究
  • 分配:非随机化
  • 介入模型:顺序分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
无干预:Electronic Asthma Management System (eAMS)
A retrospective chart review and system audit will assess outcomes during the one-year baseline period where the base version of the Electronic Asthma Management System (eAMS) was in use
有源比较器:eAMS-Eco
The eAMS-Eco will be launched at study sites and available to clinicians to use for eligible patients with data collected prospectively for 12 months
An 'eco' version of a computerized clinical decision support system that provides information on the carbon footprint of inhalers when making guideline-based treatment recommendations for patients with asthma
其他名称:
  • eAMS-Eco

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Prescribed inhaler carbon emissions
大体时间:24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
Among patients entering on at least one metered dose inhaler, system analytics, chart review and existing data on inhaler carbon emissions will be used to assess the average and total difference in the change (exit versus entry medications) in estimated annual carbon emissions from inhalers per patient between the baseline and implementation periods
24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
Proportion of low carbon footprint inhalers to moderate/high carbon footprint inhalers prescribed
大体时间:24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
For all new inhaler prescriptions, system analytics and chart review data will be used to compare the difference in the average proportion of low to moderate/high carbon footprint inhalers across all patients, between the baseline and implementation periods
24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Cost of prescribed inhalers
大体时间:24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
Among patients entering on at least one metered dose inhaler, system analytics, chart review and data from Ontario's provincial drug formulary will be used to assess the difference in the change (exit versus entry medications) in the estimated annual cost of prescribed inhalers, per patient, between the baseline and implementation periods
24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
System usage: conversation aid access
大体时间:12 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
Using system analytics from the implementation period, investigators will determine the proportion of visits in which the conversation aid was accessed when it was available and assess trends in access over time
12 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
System usage: decision-support access
大体时间:24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
Using system analytics, investigators will assess compare use of the decision support (access, medication changes, and asthma action plans created) between the baseline and implementation period
24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
Quantitative patient Likert-Scale questionnaire
大体时间:12 months
Exclusively throughout the implementation period, the investigators will identify clinic visits where the conversation aid was available and invite patients to complete an online feedback questionnaire to assess perceptions on the conversation aid's utility, content, and impact (using a 5-point likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree), overall impressions (rating from 1: worst to 10: best) and impact of switching (or not switching) to a lower carbon device on inhaler adherence, feelings of guilt, and contribution to climate action.
12 months
Patient feedback: 4-item Shared Decision-Making Process Scale
大体时间:12 months
Exclusively throughout the implementation period, the investigators will identify clinic visits where the conversation aid was available and invite patients to complete the 4-item Shared Decision-Making (SDM) Process Scale (Version 2.0) which measures the amount of SDM that occurs around inhaler selection to assess the quality of shared decision-making during their recent clinic visit. Higher scores (range 0 to 4) reflect higher quality of SDM.
12 months
Qualitative patient free-text feedback questionnaire
大体时间:12 months
Exclusively throughout the implementation period, the investigators will identify clinic visits in which the conversation aid was available and invite patients to provide feedback on their experience during their recent clinic visit
12 months
Quantitative provider Likert-Scale questionnaire
大体时间:12 months
At the end of the implementation period, all providers who accessed the eAMS-Eco and had at least one visit with the Eco features triggered, will be invited to complete an online questionnaire to assess their perceptions of the eAMS-Eco and the conversation aid's utility, content and impact (using a 5-point likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree).
12 months
Provider feedback: 10-item System Usability Scale
大体时间:12 months
At the end of the implementation period, all providers who accessed the eAMS-Eco and had at least one visit with the Eco features triggered, will be invited to complete the 10-item System Usability Scale (SUS) to assess feedback on system usability (using a 5-point likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree). Higher scores (range 0 to 100) reflect higher overall usability.
12 months
Qualitative provider free-text feedback questionnaire
大体时间:12 months
At the end of the implementation period, all providers who accessed the eAMS-Eco and had at least one visit with the Eco features triggered, will be invited to provide feedback on their experience using the eAMS-Eco
12 months
Asthma Control
大体时间:24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods
Among all patients who had at least one visit during the baseline and/or implementation period, the investigators will assess change in asthma control, exclusively using data from the pre-visit eAMS questionnaire (among patients with multiple visits during the baseline and/or implementation period) or by inviting patients to complete the pre-visit questionnaire at the end of the baseline and/or implementation period (among patients with a single visit during either period). Asthma control is scored as acceptable or suboptimal according to Canadian guidelines based on frequency of daytime symptoms, rescue medication use; nighttime awakenings; impact on school/work attendance; impact on exercise; and exacerbations.
24 months, cumulative and broken into individual time periods

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2026年4月28日

初级完成 (估计的)

2027年4月28日

研究完成 (估计的)

2027年7月7日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年5月27日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年6月9日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年6月10日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年8月7日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年8月4日

最后验证

2026年6月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅