このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Robot-Assisted Hematoma Evacuation With Intrahematoma Tenecteplase for Post-Reperfusion PH2 Hemorrhagic Transformation (REPORT)

2026年6月6日 更新者:Kaijiang Kang、Beijing Tiantan Hospital

A Phase I, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of Robot-Assisted Stereotactic Minimally Invasive Hematoma Aspiration Followed by Intrahematoma Tenecteplase in Patients With Symptomatic Supratentorial PH2 Hemorrhagic Transformation After Reperfusion Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

The purpose of this phase I trial is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted stereotactic minimally invasive hematoma aspiration, followed when eligible by intrahematoma tenecteplase administration, in patients who develop symptomatic supratentorial PH2 hemorrhagic transformation after reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke. The main study questions are whether this strategy is associated with an acceptable early rebleeding risk and whether it can achieve clinically meaningful hematoma reduction with accurate catheter placement and relief of hematoma-related mass effect.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after reperfusion therapy is one of the most devastating complications of acute ischemic stroke and is associated with high mortality, especially in patients with PH2 hemorrhagic transformation and substantial mass effect. Current management is largely supportive and includes discontinuation of antithrombotic agents, correction of coagulation abnormalities, blood pressure control, and intracranial pressure management. However, medical treatment does not remove the hematoma or reverse the local toxic and space-occupying effects of blood products.

Open craniotomy may be lifesaving in selected patients, but it may also cause additional injury to already ischemic and vulnerable brain tissue. Robot-assisted stereotactic minimally invasive puncture and aspiration may provide a less disruptive method to evacuate hematoma, reduce mass effect, and preserve surrounding tissue. A prior phase I neuronavigation-assisted minimally invasive puncture study in spontaneous deep intracerebral hemorrhage identified 0.009 mg/mL of hematoma-volume-adjusted tenecteplase as the highest tested dose with acceptable safety and the greatest mean hematoma clearance. Because the present trial targets a different and higher-risk population, namely post-reperfusion therapy PH2 hemorrhagic transformation, the study remains phase I in intent but uses a fixed dose rather than a dose-escalation design.

This is a prospective, open-label, single-arm phase I trial enrolling 20 participants with symptomatic supratentorial PH2 hemorrhagic transformation after reperfusion therapy (intravenous thrombolysis, with or without bridging mechanical thrombectomy). Eligible hematomas may be deep or lobar and must be associated with clinically relevant neurological worsening and hematoma-related mass effect. Before puncture, all participants must undergo protocol-based correction of coagulation abnormalities and at least one stability CT scan confirming no ongoing rapid expansion. Robot-assisted stereotactic aspiration and catheter placement will then be performed. A repeat CT approximately 2 hours later must confirm no procedure-related rebleeding before intrahematoma tenecteplase is started.

Tenecteplase will be administered once daily through the indwelling catheter at a fixed dose of 0.009 mg/mL of residual hematoma volume, for up to 3 doses. Each dose will be diluted to 1 mL with sterile water for injection, followed by a 3 ml normal saline flush. The catheter will remain clamped for 2 hours and then reopened for drainage. Treatment will stop when any termination criterion is met, including symptomatic rebleeding, radiographic hematoma enlargement, residual hematoma of 10 mL or less, or completion of 3 doses.

The primary objective is safety, particularly symptomatic rebleeding within 72 hours after the procedure or first tenecteplase dose, defined as clinically relevant hematoma expansion at the original cavity or catheter tract accompanied by neurological deterioration. The main efficacy and feasibility objectives are to determine whether the procedure achieves protocol-defined hematoma reduction-residual hematoma volume<15 mL or <33% of baseline volume by end-of-treatment CT-and accurate catheter placement within 3 mm of the planned target on immediate postoperative imaging. Secondary outcomes include residual hematoma volume at Day 7 or end of treatment, the proportion of participants achieving residual hematoma ≤10 mL, any radiographic rebleeding through Day 7, and procedure-related serious adverse events(SAE) through Day 7.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

20

段階

  • フェーズ 1

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

研究場所

    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing、Beijing Municipality、中国、100070
        • Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University
        • コンタクト:

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

•. Age 18 years or older and younger than 80 years.

  • Prestroke modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2.
  • Acute ischemic stroke treated with reperfusion therapy (standard-dose intravenous thrombolysis using alteplase or tenecteplase, or mechanical thrombectomy or any other endovascular reperfusion procedure for the index stroke).
  • CT-confirmed symptomatic PH2 hemorrhagic transformation according to ECASS criteria in a supratentorial deep or lobar location, with hematoma-related mass effect and/or midline shift.
  • Hematoma volume 20 to 80 mL measured by ABC/2 method.
  • Neurological deterioration attributed to hemorrhagic transformation, defined as an NIHSS increase of 4 points or more from the best post-thrombolysis status or a GCS decrease of 2 points or more.
  • At least one repeat stability CT scan obtained 6 hours or more after the diagnostic CT showing no ongoing rapid expansion, defined as hematoma growth less than 6 mL.
  • Planned robot-assisted stereotactic minimally invasive puncture/aspiration within 24 hours after the diagnostic CT.
  • Completion of intravenous thrombolytic infusion at least 4 hours before final preprocedure assessment, with protocol-based reversal/correction of coagulopathy as needed.
  • Preprocedure coagulation thresholds achieved after reversal/correction: INR < 1.4 or less, and fibrinogen > 1.6 g/L.
  • Systolic blood pressure 180 mmHg or less maintained for at least 6 hours before the procedure.
  • Written informed consent provided by the participant or legally authorized representative.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • HI1, HI2, or PH1 hemorrhagic transformation without clinically relevant mass effect.
  • Infratentorial hemorrhage, including brainstem or cerebellar hemorrhage.
  • Large malignant hemispheric infarction in which the dominant cause of mass effect is ischemic edema rather than hematoma, or clear need for decompressive craniectomy as first-line treatment.
  • Hemorrhage primarily attributable to aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, dural arteriovenous fistula, moyamoya disease, tumor, trauma, or another structural lesion; or hemorrhage caused predominantly by a procedural vascular injury unrelated to thrombolysis-associated hemorrhagic transformation.
  • Intraventricular hemorrhage requiring separate emergency surgical treatment as the dominant lesion.
  • Irreversible brainstem failure, bilateral fixed and dilated pupils, or GCS score of 4 or less.
  • Ongoing hematoma expansion on stability CT, defined as growth of 6 mL or more.
  • Imaging evidence of active bleeding or markedly high rebleeding risk, such as spot sign, if judged unsafe for catheter aspiration.
  • Need for long-term anticoagulation that cannot be safely interrupted during the first 30 days after treatment.
  • No safe robot-planned stereotactic trajectory to the hematoma cavity.
  • Severe hepatic, renal, cardiac, respiratory, or hematologic illness likely to confound assessment or markedly increase procedural risk.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to alteplase or tenecteplase.
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial.
  • Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes the participant unsuitable for this study.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:なし
  • 介入モデル:単一グループの割り当て
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Robot-assisted stereotactic hematoma aspiration plus intrahematoma tenecteplase

Participants will undergo robot-assisted stereotactic minimally invasive puncture/aspiration with indwelling catheter drainage. After a postoperative stability CT confirms no rebleeding, intrahematoma tenecteplase will be administered through the catheter.

Procedure: Robot-assisted stereotactic minimally invasive hematoma aspiration and drainage. Using fused CT and/or MRI images, a robot-guided trajectory will be planned to avoid major vessels, eloquent cortex, and vulnerable peri-infarct tissue when feasible. Initial evacuation will be performed with passive drainage or very low-pressure aspiration, avoiding rapid decompression. Catheter position will be confirmed on postoperative CT.

Procedure: Robot-assisted stereotactic minimally invasive hematoma aspiration and drainage. Using fused CT and/or MRI images, a robot-guided trajectory will be planned to avoid major vessels, eloquent cortex, and vulnerable peri-infarct tissue when feasible. Initial evacuation will be performed with passive drainage or very low-pressure aspiration, avoiding rapid decompression. Catheter position will be confirmed on postoperative CT.

Drug: Tenecteplase (TNK) for intrahematoma administration. After a 2-hour postoperative stability CT confirms no rebleeding, the dose will be calculated as residual hematoma volume × 0.009 mg/mL, diluted to 1 mL with sterile water for injection, instilled through the indwelling catheter, and followed by a 3mL normal saline flush. The catheter will be clamped for 2 hours and then reopened for gravity drainage. TNK will be given once every 24 hours for up to 3 doses.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Symptomatic rebleeding rate
時間枠:Through 72 hours after procedure or first TNK dose
Symptomatic rebleeding is defined as an increase in hematoma volume of more than 6 mL or more than 33% compared with the immediate postoperative CT or the previous study CT, occurring at the original hematoma cavity or catheter tract, together with neurological worsening defined as an NIHSS increase of 4 points or more or a GCS decrease of 2 points or more.
Through 72 hours after procedure or first TNK dose
Target hematoma reduction rate
時間枠:End of treatment, defined as within 7 days after procedure or before catheter removal
Proportion of participants with residual hematoma volume less than 15 mL or less than 33% of baseline hematoma volume on the end-of-treatment CT scan.
End of treatment, defined as within 7 days after procedure or before catheter removal
Technical success of catheter placement
時間枠:Immediate postoperative CT, within 24 hours after procedure
Successful placement of the catheter tip within 3 mm of the planned target on postoperative imaging.
Immediate postoperative CT, within 24 hours after procedure

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Residual hematoma volume
時間枠:Day 7, or at end of treatment
Residual hematoma volume measured by CT using ABC/2 or a prespecified volumetric method.
Day 7, or at end of treatment
Proportion achieving residual hematoma ≤10 mL
時間枠:Day 7, or at end of treatment
Participants meeting the treatment-completion target for catheter removal or treatment termination.
Day 7, or at end of treatment
Any radiographic rebleeding
時間枠:Through Day 7
Any increase in hematoma volume meeting protocol imaging criteria regardless of clinical symptoms.
Through Day 7
Procedure-related SAES
時間枠:Through Day 7
Procedure-related SAES
Through Day 7

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Kaijiang Kang, MD、Beijing Tiantan Hospital

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

一般刊行物

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

2026年6月10日

一次修了 (推定)

2026年12月10日

研究の完了 (推定)

2026年12月30日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年6月6日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年6月6日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年6月11日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年6月11日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年6月6日

最終確認日

2026年6月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

はい

IPD プランの説明

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after de-identification.

IPD 共有時間枠

Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication.

IPD 共有アクセス基準

Researchers with a peer-reviewed biological research proposal. Please contact the PI via email (kangkaijiang678@126.com)to request data access.

IPD 共有サポート情報タイプ

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する