Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Robot-Assisted Hematoma Evacuation With Intrahematoma Tenecteplase for Post-Reperfusion PH2 Hemorrhagic Transformation (REPORT)

6 de junio de 2026 actualizado por: Kaijiang Kang, Beijing Tiantan Hospital

A Phase I, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of Robot-Assisted Stereotactic Minimally Invasive Hematoma Aspiration Followed by Intrahematoma Tenecteplase in Patients With Symptomatic Supratentorial PH2 Hemorrhagic Transformation After Reperfusion Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

The purpose of this phase I trial is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted stereotactic minimally invasive hematoma aspiration, followed when eligible by intrahematoma tenecteplase administration, in patients who develop symptomatic supratentorial PH2 hemorrhagic transformation after reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke. The main study questions are whether this strategy is associated with an acceptable early rebleeding risk and whether it can achieve clinically meaningful hematoma reduction with accurate catheter placement and relief of hematoma-related mass effect.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after reperfusion therapy is one of the most devastating complications of acute ischemic stroke and is associated with high mortality, especially in patients with PH2 hemorrhagic transformation and substantial mass effect. Current management is largely supportive and includes discontinuation of antithrombotic agents, correction of coagulation abnormalities, blood pressure control, and intracranial pressure management. However, medical treatment does not remove the hematoma or reverse the local toxic and space-occupying effects of blood products.

Open craniotomy may be lifesaving in selected patients, but it may also cause additional injury to already ischemic and vulnerable brain tissue. Robot-assisted stereotactic minimally invasive puncture and aspiration may provide a less disruptive method to evacuate hematoma, reduce mass effect, and preserve surrounding tissue. A prior phase I neuronavigation-assisted minimally invasive puncture study in spontaneous deep intracerebral hemorrhage identified 0.009 mg/mL of hematoma-volume-adjusted tenecteplase as the highest tested dose with acceptable safety and the greatest mean hematoma clearance. Because the present trial targets a different and higher-risk population, namely post-reperfusion therapy PH2 hemorrhagic transformation, the study remains phase I in intent but uses a fixed dose rather than a dose-escalation design.

This is a prospective, open-label, single-arm phase I trial enrolling 20 participants with symptomatic supratentorial PH2 hemorrhagic transformation after reperfusion therapy (intravenous thrombolysis, with or without bridging mechanical thrombectomy). Eligible hematomas may be deep or lobar and must be associated with clinically relevant neurological worsening and hematoma-related mass effect. Before puncture, all participants must undergo protocol-based correction of coagulation abnormalities and at least one stability CT scan confirming no ongoing rapid expansion. Robot-assisted stereotactic aspiration and catheter placement will then be performed. A repeat CT approximately 2 hours later must confirm no procedure-related rebleeding before intrahematoma tenecteplase is started.

Tenecteplase will be administered once daily through the indwelling catheter at a fixed dose of 0.009 mg/mL of residual hematoma volume, for up to 3 doses. Each dose will be diluted to 1 mL with sterile water for injection, followed by a 3 ml normal saline flush. The catheter will remain clamped for 2 hours and then reopened for drainage. Treatment will stop when any termination criterion is met, including symptomatic rebleeding, radiographic hematoma enlargement, residual hematoma of 10 mL or less, or completion of 3 doses.

The primary objective is safety, particularly symptomatic rebleeding within 72 hours after the procedure or first tenecteplase dose, defined as clinically relevant hematoma expansion at the original cavity or catheter tract accompanied by neurological deterioration. The main efficacy and feasibility objectives are to determine whether the procedure achieves protocol-defined hematoma reduction-residual hematoma volume<15 mL or <33% of baseline volume by end-of-treatment CT-and accurate catheter placement within 3 mm of the planned target on immediate postoperative imaging. Secondary outcomes include residual hematoma volume at Day 7 or end of treatment, the proportion of participants achieving residual hematoma ≤10 mL, any radiographic rebleeding through Day 7, and procedure-related serious adverse events(SAE) through Day 7.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

20

Fase

  • Fase 1

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, Porcelana, 100070
        • Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University
        • Contacto:

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

•. Age 18 years or older and younger than 80 years.

  • Prestroke modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2.
  • Acute ischemic stroke treated with reperfusion therapy (standard-dose intravenous thrombolysis using alteplase or tenecteplase, or mechanical thrombectomy or any other endovascular reperfusion procedure for the index stroke).
  • CT-confirmed symptomatic PH2 hemorrhagic transformation according to ECASS criteria in a supratentorial deep or lobar location, with hematoma-related mass effect and/or midline shift.
  • Hematoma volume 20 to 80 mL measured by ABC/2 method.
  • Neurological deterioration attributed to hemorrhagic transformation, defined as an NIHSS increase of 4 points or more from the best post-thrombolysis status or a GCS decrease of 2 points or more.
  • At least one repeat stability CT scan obtained 6 hours or more after the diagnostic CT showing no ongoing rapid expansion, defined as hematoma growth less than 6 mL.
  • Planned robot-assisted stereotactic minimally invasive puncture/aspiration within 24 hours after the diagnostic CT.
  • Completion of intravenous thrombolytic infusion at least 4 hours before final preprocedure assessment, with protocol-based reversal/correction of coagulopathy as needed.
  • Preprocedure coagulation thresholds achieved after reversal/correction: INR < 1.4 or less, and fibrinogen > 1.6 g/L.
  • Systolic blood pressure 180 mmHg or less maintained for at least 6 hours before the procedure.
  • Written informed consent provided by the participant or legally authorized representative.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • HI1, HI2, or PH1 hemorrhagic transformation without clinically relevant mass effect.
  • Infratentorial hemorrhage, including brainstem or cerebellar hemorrhage.
  • Large malignant hemispheric infarction in which the dominant cause of mass effect is ischemic edema rather than hematoma, or clear need for decompressive craniectomy as first-line treatment.
  • Hemorrhage primarily attributable to aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, dural arteriovenous fistula, moyamoya disease, tumor, trauma, or another structural lesion; or hemorrhage caused predominantly by a procedural vascular injury unrelated to thrombolysis-associated hemorrhagic transformation.
  • Intraventricular hemorrhage requiring separate emergency surgical treatment as the dominant lesion.
  • Irreversible brainstem failure, bilateral fixed and dilated pupils, or GCS score of 4 or less.
  • Ongoing hematoma expansion on stability CT, defined as growth of 6 mL or more.
  • Imaging evidence of active bleeding or markedly high rebleeding risk, such as spot sign, if judged unsafe for catheter aspiration.
  • Need for long-term anticoagulation that cannot be safely interrupted during the first 30 days after treatment.
  • No safe robot-planned stereotactic trajectory to the hematoma cavity.
  • Severe hepatic, renal, cardiac, respiratory, or hematologic illness likely to confound assessment or markedly increase procedural risk.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to alteplase or tenecteplase.
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial.
  • Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes the participant unsuitable for this study.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: N / A
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Robot-assisted stereotactic hematoma aspiration plus intrahematoma tenecteplase

Participants will undergo robot-assisted stereotactic minimally invasive puncture/aspiration with indwelling catheter drainage. After a postoperative stability CT confirms no rebleeding, intrahematoma tenecteplase will be administered through the catheter.

Procedure: Robot-assisted stereotactic minimally invasive hematoma aspiration and drainage. Using fused CT and/or MRI images, a robot-guided trajectory will be planned to avoid major vessels, eloquent cortex, and vulnerable peri-infarct tissue when feasible. Initial evacuation will be performed with passive drainage or very low-pressure aspiration, avoiding rapid decompression. Catheter position will be confirmed on postoperative CT.

Procedure: Robot-assisted stereotactic minimally invasive hematoma aspiration and drainage. Using fused CT and/or MRI images, a robot-guided trajectory will be planned to avoid major vessels, eloquent cortex, and vulnerable peri-infarct tissue when feasible. Initial evacuation will be performed with passive drainage or very low-pressure aspiration, avoiding rapid decompression. Catheter position will be confirmed on postoperative CT.

Drug: Tenecteplase (TNK) for intrahematoma administration. After a 2-hour postoperative stability CT confirms no rebleeding, the dose will be calculated as residual hematoma volume × 0.009 mg/mL, diluted to 1 mL with sterile water for injection, instilled through the indwelling catheter, and followed by a 3mL normal saline flush. The catheter will be clamped for 2 hours and then reopened for gravity drainage. TNK will be given once every 24 hours for up to 3 doses.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Symptomatic rebleeding rate
Periodo de tiempo: Through 72 hours after procedure or first TNK dose
Symptomatic rebleeding is defined as an increase in hematoma volume of more than 6 mL or more than 33% compared with the immediate postoperative CT or the previous study CT, occurring at the original hematoma cavity or catheter tract, together with neurological worsening defined as an NIHSS increase of 4 points or more or a GCS decrease of 2 points or more.
Through 72 hours after procedure or first TNK dose
Target hematoma reduction rate
Periodo de tiempo: End of treatment, defined as within 7 days after procedure or before catheter removal
Proportion of participants with residual hematoma volume less than 15 mL or less than 33% of baseline hematoma volume on the end-of-treatment CT scan.
End of treatment, defined as within 7 days after procedure or before catheter removal
Technical success of catheter placement
Periodo de tiempo: Immediate postoperative CT, within 24 hours after procedure
Successful placement of the catheter tip within 3 mm of the planned target on postoperative imaging.
Immediate postoperative CT, within 24 hours after procedure

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Residual hematoma volume
Periodo de tiempo: Day 7, or at end of treatment
Residual hematoma volume measured by CT using ABC/2 or a prespecified volumetric method.
Day 7, or at end of treatment
Proportion achieving residual hematoma ≤10 mL
Periodo de tiempo: Day 7, or at end of treatment
Participants meeting the treatment-completion target for catheter removal or treatment termination.
Day 7, or at end of treatment
Any radiographic rebleeding
Periodo de tiempo: Through Day 7
Any increase in hematoma volume meeting protocol imaging criteria regardless of clinical symptoms.
Through Day 7
Procedure-related SAES
Periodo de tiempo: Through Day 7
Procedure-related SAES
Through Day 7

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Kaijiang Kang, MD, Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

10 de junio de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

10 de diciembre de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

30 de diciembre de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

6 de junio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

6 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

11 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

11 de junio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

6 de junio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de junio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • KY2024-386-02

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

Descripción del plan IPD

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after de-identification.

Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD

Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication.

Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD

Researchers with a peer-reviewed biological research proposal. Please contact the PI via email (kangkaijiang678@126.com)to request data access.

Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
  • SAVIA

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir