Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Robot-Assisted Hematoma Evacuation With Intrahematoma Tenecteplase for Post-Reperfusion PH2 Hemorrhagic Transformation (REPORT)

6 juin 2026 mis à jour par: Kaijiang Kang, Beijing Tiantan Hospital

A Phase I, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of Robot-Assisted Stereotactic Minimally Invasive Hematoma Aspiration Followed by Intrahematoma Tenecteplase in Patients With Symptomatic Supratentorial PH2 Hemorrhagic Transformation After Reperfusion Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

The purpose of this phase I trial is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted stereotactic minimally invasive hematoma aspiration, followed when eligible by intrahematoma tenecteplase administration, in patients who develop symptomatic supratentorial PH2 hemorrhagic transformation after reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke. The main study questions are whether this strategy is associated with an acceptable early rebleeding risk and whether it can achieve clinically meaningful hematoma reduction with accurate catheter placement and relief of hematoma-related mass effect.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after reperfusion therapy is one of the most devastating complications of acute ischemic stroke and is associated with high mortality, especially in patients with PH2 hemorrhagic transformation and substantial mass effect. Current management is largely supportive and includes discontinuation of antithrombotic agents, correction of coagulation abnormalities, blood pressure control, and intracranial pressure management. However, medical treatment does not remove the hematoma or reverse the local toxic and space-occupying effects of blood products.

Open craniotomy may be lifesaving in selected patients, but it may also cause additional injury to already ischemic and vulnerable brain tissue. Robot-assisted stereotactic minimally invasive puncture and aspiration may provide a less disruptive method to evacuate hematoma, reduce mass effect, and preserve surrounding tissue. A prior phase I neuronavigation-assisted minimally invasive puncture study in spontaneous deep intracerebral hemorrhage identified 0.009 mg/mL of hematoma-volume-adjusted tenecteplase as the highest tested dose with acceptable safety and the greatest mean hematoma clearance. Because the present trial targets a different and higher-risk population, namely post-reperfusion therapy PH2 hemorrhagic transformation, the study remains phase I in intent but uses a fixed dose rather than a dose-escalation design.

This is a prospective, open-label, single-arm phase I trial enrolling 20 participants with symptomatic supratentorial PH2 hemorrhagic transformation after reperfusion therapy (intravenous thrombolysis, with or without bridging mechanical thrombectomy). Eligible hematomas may be deep or lobar and must be associated with clinically relevant neurological worsening and hematoma-related mass effect. Before puncture, all participants must undergo protocol-based correction of coagulation abnormalities and at least one stability CT scan confirming no ongoing rapid expansion. Robot-assisted stereotactic aspiration and catheter placement will then be performed. A repeat CT approximately 2 hours later must confirm no procedure-related rebleeding before intrahematoma tenecteplase is started.

Tenecteplase will be administered once daily through the indwelling catheter at a fixed dose of 0.009 mg/mL of residual hematoma volume, for up to 3 doses. Each dose will be diluted to 1 mL with sterile water for injection, followed by a 3 ml normal saline flush. The catheter will remain clamped for 2 hours and then reopened for drainage. Treatment will stop when any termination criterion is met, including symptomatic rebleeding, radiographic hematoma enlargement, residual hematoma of 10 mL or less, or completion of 3 doses.

The primary objective is safety, particularly symptomatic rebleeding within 72 hours after the procedure or first tenecteplase dose, defined as clinically relevant hematoma expansion at the original cavity or catheter tract accompanied by neurological deterioration. The main efficacy and feasibility objectives are to determine whether the procedure achieves protocol-defined hematoma reduction-residual hematoma volume<15 mL or <33% of baseline volume by end-of-treatment CT-and accurate catheter placement within 3 mm of the planned target on immediate postoperative imaging. Secondary outcomes include residual hematoma volume at Day 7 or end of treatment, the proportion of participants achieving residual hematoma ≤10 mL, any radiographic rebleeding through Day 7, and procedure-related serious adverse events(SAE) through Day 7.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

20

Phase

  • La phase 1

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, Chine, 100070
        • Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University
        • Contact:

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

•. Age 18 years or older and younger than 80 years.

  • Prestroke modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2.
  • Acute ischemic stroke treated with reperfusion therapy (standard-dose intravenous thrombolysis using alteplase or tenecteplase, or mechanical thrombectomy or any other endovascular reperfusion procedure for the index stroke).
  • CT-confirmed symptomatic PH2 hemorrhagic transformation according to ECASS criteria in a supratentorial deep or lobar location, with hematoma-related mass effect and/or midline shift.
  • Hematoma volume 20 to 80 mL measured by ABC/2 method.
  • Neurological deterioration attributed to hemorrhagic transformation, defined as an NIHSS increase of 4 points or more from the best post-thrombolysis status or a GCS decrease of 2 points or more.
  • At least one repeat stability CT scan obtained 6 hours or more after the diagnostic CT showing no ongoing rapid expansion, defined as hematoma growth less than 6 mL.
  • Planned robot-assisted stereotactic minimally invasive puncture/aspiration within 24 hours after the diagnostic CT.
  • Completion of intravenous thrombolytic infusion at least 4 hours before final preprocedure assessment, with protocol-based reversal/correction of coagulopathy as needed.
  • Preprocedure coagulation thresholds achieved after reversal/correction: INR < 1.4 or less, and fibrinogen > 1.6 g/L.
  • Systolic blood pressure 180 mmHg or less maintained for at least 6 hours before the procedure.
  • Written informed consent provided by the participant or legally authorized representative.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • HI1, HI2, or PH1 hemorrhagic transformation without clinically relevant mass effect.
  • Infratentorial hemorrhage, including brainstem or cerebellar hemorrhage.
  • Large malignant hemispheric infarction in which the dominant cause of mass effect is ischemic edema rather than hematoma, or clear need for decompressive craniectomy as first-line treatment.
  • Hemorrhage primarily attributable to aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, dural arteriovenous fistula, moyamoya disease, tumor, trauma, or another structural lesion; or hemorrhage caused predominantly by a procedural vascular injury unrelated to thrombolysis-associated hemorrhagic transformation.
  • Intraventricular hemorrhage requiring separate emergency surgical treatment as the dominant lesion.
  • Irreversible brainstem failure, bilateral fixed and dilated pupils, or GCS score of 4 or less.
  • Ongoing hematoma expansion on stability CT, defined as growth of 6 mL or more.
  • Imaging evidence of active bleeding or markedly high rebleeding risk, such as spot sign, if judged unsafe for catheter aspiration.
  • Need for long-term anticoagulation that cannot be safely interrupted during the first 30 days after treatment.
  • No safe robot-planned stereotactic trajectory to the hematoma cavity.
  • Severe hepatic, renal, cardiac, respiratory, or hematologic illness likely to confound assessment or markedly increase procedural risk.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to alteplase or tenecteplase.
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial.
  • Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes the participant unsuitable for this study.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: N / A
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Robot-assisted stereotactic hematoma aspiration plus intrahematoma tenecteplase

Participants will undergo robot-assisted stereotactic minimally invasive puncture/aspiration with indwelling catheter drainage. After a postoperative stability CT confirms no rebleeding, intrahematoma tenecteplase will be administered through the catheter.

Procedure: Robot-assisted stereotactic minimally invasive hematoma aspiration and drainage. Using fused CT and/or MRI images, a robot-guided trajectory will be planned to avoid major vessels, eloquent cortex, and vulnerable peri-infarct tissue when feasible. Initial evacuation will be performed with passive drainage or very low-pressure aspiration, avoiding rapid decompression. Catheter position will be confirmed on postoperative CT.

Procedure: Robot-assisted stereotactic minimally invasive hematoma aspiration and drainage. Using fused CT and/or MRI images, a robot-guided trajectory will be planned to avoid major vessels, eloquent cortex, and vulnerable peri-infarct tissue when feasible. Initial evacuation will be performed with passive drainage or very low-pressure aspiration, avoiding rapid decompression. Catheter position will be confirmed on postoperative CT.

Drug: Tenecteplase (TNK) for intrahematoma administration. After a 2-hour postoperative stability CT confirms no rebleeding, the dose will be calculated as residual hematoma volume × 0.009 mg/mL, diluted to 1 mL with sterile water for injection, instilled through the indwelling catheter, and followed by a 3mL normal saline flush. The catheter will be clamped for 2 hours and then reopened for gravity drainage. TNK will be given once every 24 hours for up to 3 doses.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Symptomatic rebleeding rate
Délai: Through 72 hours after procedure or first TNK dose
Symptomatic rebleeding is defined as an increase in hematoma volume of more than 6 mL or more than 33% compared with the immediate postoperative CT or the previous study CT, occurring at the original hematoma cavity or catheter tract, together with neurological worsening defined as an NIHSS increase of 4 points or more or a GCS decrease of 2 points or more.
Through 72 hours after procedure or first TNK dose
Target hematoma reduction rate
Délai: End of treatment, defined as within 7 days after procedure or before catheter removal
Proportion of participants with residual hematoma volume less than 15 mL or less than 33% of baseline hematoma volume on the end-of-treatment CT scan.
End of treatment, defined as within 7 days after procedure or before catheter removal
Technical success of catheter placement
Délai: Immediate postoperative CT, within 24 hours after procedure
Successful placement of the catheter tip within 3 mm of the planned target on postoperative imaging.
Immediate postoperative CT, within 24 hours after procedure

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Residual hematoma volume
Délai: Day 7, or at end of treatment
Residual hematoma volume measured by CT using ABC/2 or a prespecified volumetric method.
Day 7, or at end of treatment
Proportion achieving residual hematoma ≤10 mL
Délai: Day 7, or at end of treatment
Participants meeting the treatment-completion target for catheter removal or treatment termination.
Day 7, or at end of treatment
Any radiographic rebleeding
Délai: Through Day 7
Any increase in hematoma volume meeting protocol imaging criteria regardless of clinical symptoms.
Through Day 7
Procedure-related SAES
Délai: Through Day 7
Procedure-related SAES
Through Day 7

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Kaijiang Kang, MD, Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

10 juin 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

10 décembre 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

30 décembre 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

6 juin 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

6 juin 2026

Première publication (Réel)

11 juin 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

11 juin 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

6 juin 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juin 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

OUI

Description du régime IPD

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after de-identification.

Délai de partage IPD

Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication.

Critères d'accès au partage IPD

Researchers with a peer-reviewed biological research proposal. Please contact the PI via email (kangkaijiang678@126.com)to request data access.

Type d'informations de prise en charge du partage d'IPD

  • PROTOCOLE D'ÉTUDE
  • SÈVE

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner