Patient Education and AI-Assisted Complaint Summaries in Endodontic Patients
2026年7月7日 更新者：Kübra Gürler、Cukurova University
The Effect of Different Patient Education Methods in Patients Presenting to an Endodontic Clinic With Toothache and the Feasibility of an AI-Assisted Complaint Summary
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the same-day effects of three standardized patient education methods in adults presenting to an endodontic clinic with toothache.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does standardized verbal education improve patients' knowledge, reduce antibiotic-related misconceptions, and reduce anxiety?
- Does leaflet-based education produce comparable changes in knowledge, antibiotic-related misconceptions, and anxiety?
- Does video-based education produce comparable changes in knowledge, antibiotic-related misconceptions, and anxiety?
- Does teach-back performance differ according to the method used to deliver patient education?
- Can an AI-assisted three-sentence complaint summary be generated reliably and used as a feasible clinician-facing communication support tool?
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three patient education groups.
In the verbal education group, participants will receive a standardized 90-second verbal explanation covering warning signs, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and appropriate antibiotic use.
In the leaflet-based education group, participants will review a written leaflet containing the same core educational messages for 90 seconds.
In the video-based education group, participants will watch a short video presenting the same core educational messages for 90 seconds.
Knowledge level, antibiotic-related misconceptions, and anxiety will be assessed immediately before and immediately after the educational intervention. After education, participants will also be asked to restate the main messages in their own words using a teach-back procedure.
In addition, symptom information collected using standardized prompts will be entered into an artificial intelligence tool to generate a concise three-sentence complaint summary. The feasibility, completeness, and clinician-rated usefulness of these summaries will be evaluated as process outcomes. AI-generated summaries will not be used for diagnosis, triage, or treatment decisions.
調査の概要
状態
完了
研究の種類
介入
入学 (実際)
120
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究場所
-
-
Sarıçam
-
Adana、Sarıçam、トルコ（Türkiye）、01250
- Cukurova University
-
-
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
いいえ
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Reported pain of at least 1 point on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS ≥ 1) at presentation,
- Were aged 18-65 years,
- Had sufficient cognitive capacity to complete the questionnaires, and
- Provided written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Reported no pain at presentation (NRS = 0) or presented electively/asymptomatically,
- Required immediate emergency clinical evaluation due to signs suggestive of urgent intervention (e.g., marked diffuse swelling, dysphagia, dyspnea),
- Had substantial communication or cognitive difficulties preventing completion of the measures, or
- Were repeat participants (i.e., the same patient re-entering the study).
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：ヘルスサービス研究
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：なし（オープンラベル）
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
アクティブコンパレータ：Standardized Verbal Education
Participants received a standardized 90-second verbal education session immediately after baseline assessment.
The education covered warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain.
The content and sequence were delivered using a standardized script.
|
Participants received a standardized 90-second verbal education session immediately after baseline assessment.
The education included warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and guidance on the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain.
A standardized script was used to ensure consistency of content and sequence.
|
|
実験的：Leaflet-Based Education
Participants reviewed a written educational leaflet for 90 seconds immediately after baseline assessment.
The leaflet contained the same core messages as the verbal education, including warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain.
|
Participants reviewed a written educational leaflet for 90 seconds immediately after baseline assessment.
The leaflet included warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and guidance on the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain.
The educational content was equivalent to that provided in the verbal and video groups.
|
|
実験的：Video-Based Education
Participants watched a 90-second educational video immediately after baseline assessment.
The video presented the same core messages as the verbal and leaflet-based education, including warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain.
|
Participants watched a 90-second educational video immediately after baseline assessment.
The video included warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and guidance on the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain.
The educational content was equivalent to that provided in the verbal and leaflet-based education groups.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Patient Knowledge Score
時間枠：Immediately before the educational intervention and immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
|
Patient knowledge will be assessed using an 8-item questionnaire developed according to the standardized educational content.
Each item will be scored as 1 for a correct response and 0 for an incorrect or unsure response, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 8. Higher scores indicate greater knowledge.
The change score will be calculated as the post-education score minus the baseline score (T1 - T0) and compared among the verbal, leaflet-based, and video-based education groups.
|
Immediately before the educational intervention and immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
|
|
Change in Antibiotic Misconception Score
時間枠：Immediately before the educational intervention and immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
|
Antibiotic-related misconceptions will be assessed using a 5-item Likert-type scale.
Each item will be rated from 1 to 5, yielding a total score ranging from 5 to 25.
Higher scores indicate stronger endorsement of antibiotic-related misconceptions.
The change score will be calculated as the post-education score minus the baseline score (T1 - T0) and compared among the three education groups.
|
Immediately before the educational intervention and immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
|
|
Change in Anxiety Level
時間枠：Immediately before the educational intervention and immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
|
Anxiety related to the presenting dental pain will be assessed using a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no anxiety and 10 indicates the worst imaginable anxiety.
The change score will be calculated as the post-education score minus the baseline score (T1 - T0) and compared among the verbal, leaflet-based, and video-based education groups.
|
Immediately before the educational intervention and immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Teach-Back Critical Elements Score
時間枠：Immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
|
Immediately after the educational intervention, participants will be asked to restate the main educational messages in their own words within approximately 20-30 seconds.
Teach-back performance will be evaluated using five predefined critical elements.
Each element will be scored as present or absent, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 5. Higher scores indicate more complete recall of the educational content.
|
Immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
|
|
Teach-Back Global Adequacy Rating
時間枠：Immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
|
The overall adequacy of the participant's teach-back response will be rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 to 2. A score of 0 indicates an incorrect, unsafe, or markedly incomplete response; a score of 1 indicates a partially correct response with missing critical elements; and a score of 2 indicates a correct and adequate response.
|
Immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
|
|
Generability of the AI-Assisted Complaint Summary
時間枠：During the same clinical visit, after collection of standardized symptom information
|
The ability to generate a concise three-sentence AI-assisted complaint summary from standardized, de-identified symptom information will be recorded as generated or not generated.
The proportion of successfully generated summaries will be calculated for all participants.
|
During the same clinical visit, after collection of standardized symptom information
|
|
Completeness of the AI-Assisted Complaint Summary
時間枠：Immediately after generation of the AI-assisted complaint summary during the same clinical visit
|
The completeness of each AI-assisted complaint summary will be assessed according to the presence of five predefined symptom-related components.
The completeness score will range from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating more complete coverage of the required information.
|
Immediately after generation of the AI-assisted complaint summary during the same clinical visit
|
|
Clinician-Rated Usefulness of the AI-Assisted Complaint Summary
時間枠：Immediately after review of the AI-assisted complaint summary during the same clinical visit
|
The usefulness of the AI-assisted complaint summary for structuring the clinical encounter will be rated by a single endodontist on a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates not useful at all and 10 indicates extremely useful.
|
Immediately after review of the AI-assisted complaint summary during the same clinical visit
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
スポンサー
出版物と役立つリンク
研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
2025年12月15日
一次修了 (実際)
2026年3月12日
研究の完了 (実際)
2026年4月24日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2026年7月7日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2026年7月7日
最初の投稿 (実際)
2026年7月13日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2026年7月13日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2026年7月7日
最終確認日
2026年7月1日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。