Tato stránka byla automaticky přeložena a přesnost překladu není zaručena. Podívejte se prosím na anglická verze pro zdrojový text.

Patient Education and AI-Assisted Complaint Summaries in Endodontic Patients

7. července 2026 aktualizováno: Kübra Gürler, Cukurova University

The Effect of Different Patient Education Methods in Patients Presenting to an Endodontic Clinic With Toothache and the Feasibility of an AI-Assisted Complaint Summary

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the same-day effects of three standardized patient education methods in adults presenting to an endodontic clinic with toothache.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does standardized verbal education improve patients' knowledge, reduce antibiotic-related misconceptions, and reduce anxiety?
  • Does leaflet-based education produce comparable changes in knowledge, antibiotic-related misconceptions, and anxiety?
  • Does video-based education produce comparable changes in knowledge, antibiotic-related misconceptions, and anxiety?
  • Does teach-back performance differ according to the method used to deliver patient education?
  • Can an AI-assisted three-sentence complaint summary be generated reliably and used as a feasible clinician-facing communication support tool?

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three patient education groups.

In the verbal education group, participants will receive a standardized 90-second verbal explanation covering warning signs, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and appropriate antibiotic use.

In the leaflet-based education group, participants will review a written leaflet containing the same core educational messages for 90 seconds.

In the video-based education group, participants will watch a short video presenting the same core educational messages for 90 seconds.

Knowledge level, antibiotic-related misconceptions, and anxiety will be assessed immediately before and immediately after the educational intervention. After education, participants will also be asked to restate the main messages in their own words using a teach-back procedure.

In addition, symptom information collected using standardized prompts will be entered into an artificial intelligence tool to generate a concise three-sentence complaint summary. The feasibility, completeness, and clinician-rated usefulness of these summaries will be evaluated as process outcomes. AI-generated summaries will not be used for diagnosis, triage, or treatment decisions.

Přehled studie

Postavení

Dokončeno

Podmínky

Intervence / Léčba

Typ studie

Intervenční

Zápis (Aktuální)

120

Fáze

  • Nelze použít

Kontakty a umístění

Tato část poskytuje kontaktní údaje pro ty, kteří studii provádějí, a informace o tom, kde se tato studie provádí.

Studijní místa

  • Turecko (Türkiye)
    • Sarıçam
      • Adana, Sarıçam, Turecko (Türkiye), 01250
        • Cukurova University

Kritéria účasti

Výzkumníci hledají lidi, kteří odpovídají určitému popisu, kterému se říká kritéria způsobilosti. Některé příklady těchto kritérií jsou celkový zdravotní stav osoby nebo předchozí léčba.

Kritéria způsobilosti

Věk způsobilý ke studiu

  • Dospělý
  • Starší dospělý

Přijímá zdravé dobrovolníky

Ne

Popis

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Reported pain of at least 1 point on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS ≥ 1) at presentation,
  • Were aged 18-65 years,
  • Had sufficient cognitive capacity to complete the questionnaires, and
  • Provided written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Reported no pain at presentation (NRS = 0) or presented electively/asymptomatically,
  • Required immediate emergency clinical evaluation due to signs suggestive of urgent intervention (e.g., marked diffuse swelling, dysphagia, dyspnea),
  • Had substantial communication or cognitive difficulties preventing completion of the measures, or
  • Were repeat participants (i.e., the same patient re-entering the study).

Studijní plán

Tato část poskytuje podrobnosti o studijním plánu, včetně toho, jak je studie navržena a co studie měří.

Jak je studie koncipována?

Detaily designu

  • Primární účel: Výzkum zdravotnických služeb
  • Přidělení: Randomizované
  • Intervenční model: Paralelní přiřazení
  • Maskování: Žádné (otevřený štítek)

Zbraně a zásahy

Skupina účastníků / Arm
Intervence / Léčba
Aktivní komparátor: Standardized Verbal Education
Participants received a standardized 90-second verbal education session immediately after baseline assessment. The education covered warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain. The content and sequence were delivered using a standardized script.
Behaviorální: Standardized Verbal Education
Participants received a standardized 90-second verbal education session immediately after baseline assessment. The education included warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and guidance on the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain. A standardized script was used to ensure consistency of content and sequence.
Experimentální: Leaflet-Based Education
Participants reviewed a written educational leaflet for 90 seconds immediately after baseline assessment. The leaflet contained the same core messages as the verbal education, including warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain.
Behaviorální: Leaflet-Based Education
Participants reviewed a written educational leaflet for 90 seconds immediately after baseline assessment. The leaflet included warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and guidance on the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain. The educational content was equivalent to that provided in the verbal and video groups.
Experimentální: Video-Based Education
Participants watched a 90-second educational video immediately after baseline assessment. The video presented the same core messages as the verbal and leaflet-based education, including warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain.
Behaviorální: Video-Based Education
Participants watched a 90-second educational video immediately after baseline assessment. The video included warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and guidance on the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain. The educational content was equivalent to that provided in the verbal and leaflet-based education groups.

Co je měření studie?

Primární výstupní opatření

Měření výsledku
Popis opatření
Časové okno
Change in Patient Knowledge Score
Časové okno: Immediately before the educational intervention and immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
Patient knowledge will be assessed using an 8-item questionnaire developed according to the standardized educational content. Each item will be scored as 1 for a correct response and 0 for an incorrect or unsure response, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 8. Higher scores indicate greater knowledge. The change score will be calculated as the post-education score minus the baseline score (T1 - T0) and compared among the verbal, leaflet-based, and video-based education groups.
Immediately before the educational intervention and immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
Change in Antibiotic Misconception Score
Časové okno: Immediately before the educational intervention and immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
Antibiotic-related misconceptions will be assessed using a 5-item Likert-type scale. Each item will be rated from 1 to 5, yielding a total score ranging from 5 to 25. Higher scores indicate stronger endorsement of antibiotic-related misconceptions. The change score will be calculated as the post-education score minus the baseline score (T1 - T0) and compared among the three education groups.
Immediately before the educational intervention and immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
Change in Anxiety Level
Časové okno: Immediately before the educational intervention and immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
Anxiety related to the presenting dental pain will be assessed using a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no anxiety and 10 indicates the worst imaginable anxiety. The change score will be calculated as the post-education score minus the baseline score (T1 - T0) and compared among the verbal, leaflet-based, and video-based education groups.
Immediately before the educational intervention and immediately after the educational intervention on the same day

Sekundární výstupní opatření

Měření výsledku
Popis opatření
Časové okno
Teach-Back Critical Elements Score
Časové okno: Immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
Immediately after the educational intervention, participants will be asked to restate the main educational messages in their own words within approximately 20-30 seconds. Teach-back performance will be evaluated using five predefined critical elements. Each element will be scored as present or absent, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 5. Higher scores indicate more complete recall of the educational content.
Immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
Teach-Back Global Adequacy Rating
Časové okno: Immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
The overall adequacy of the participant's teach-back response will be rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 to 2. A score of 0 indicates an incorrect, unsafe, or markedly incomplete response; a score of 1 indicates a partially correct response with missing critical elements; and a score of 2 indicates a correct and adequate response.
Immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
Generability of the AI-Assisted Complaint Summary
Časové okno: During the same clinical visit, after collection of standardized symptom information
The ability to generate a concise three-sentence AI-assisted complaint summary from standardized, de-identified symptom information will be recorded as generated or not generated. The proportion of successfully generated summaries will be calculated for all participants.
During the same clinical visit, after collection of standardized symptom information
Completeness of the AI-Assisted Complaint Summary
Časové okno: Immediately after generation of the AI-assisted complaint summary during the same clinical visit
The completeness of each AI-assisted complaint summary will be assessed according to the presence of five predefined symptom-related components. The completeness score will range from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating more complete coverage of the required information.
Immediately after generation of the AI-assisted complaint summary during the same clinical visit
Clinician-Rated Usefulness of the AI-Assisted Complaint Summary
Časové okno: Immediately after review of the AI-assisted complaint summary during the same clinical visit
The usefulness of the AI-assisted complaint summary for structuring the clinical encounter will be rated by a single endodontist on a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates not useful at all and 10 indicates extremely useful.
Immediately after review of the AI-assisted complaint summary during the same clinical visit

Spolupracovníci a vyšetřovatelé

Zde najdete lidi a organizace zapojené do této studie.

Sponzor

Cukurova University

Publikace a užitečné odkazy

Osoba odpovědná za zadávání informací o studiu tyto publikace poskytuje dobrovolně. Mohou se týkat čehokoli, co souvisí se studiem.

Obecné publikace

Termíny studijních záznamů

Tato data sledují průběh záznamů studie a předkládání souhrnných výsledků na ClinicalTrials.gov. Záznamy ze studií a hlášené výsledky jsou před zveřejněním na veřejné webové stránce přezkoumány Národní lékařskou knihovnou (NLM), aby se ujistily, že splňují specifické standardy kontroly kvality.

Hlavní termíny studia

Začátek studia (Aktuální)

15. prosince 2025

Primární dokončení (Aktuální)

12. března 2026

Dokončení studie (Aktuální)

24. dubna 2026

Termíny zápisu do studia

První předloženo

7. července 2026

První předloženo, které splnilo kritéria kontroly kvality

7. července 2026

První zveřejněno (Aktuální)

13. července 2026

Aktualizace studijních záznamů

Poslední zveřejněná aktualizace (Aktuální)

13. července 2026

Odeslaná poslední aktualizace, která splnila kritéria kontroly kvality

7. července 2026

Naposledy ověřeno

1. července 2026

Více informací

Termíny související s touto studií

Další relevantní podmínky MeSH

Další identifikační čísla studie

  • 13.03.2026/104

Plán pro data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)

Plánujete sdílet data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)?

NE

Informace o lécích a zařízeních, studijní dokumenty

Studuje lékový produkt regulovaný americkým FDA

Ne

Studuje produkt zařízení regulovaný americkým úřadem FDA

Ne

Tyto informace byly beze změn načteny přímo z webu clinicaltrials.gov. Máte-li jakékoli požadavky na změnu, odstranění nebo aktualizaci podrobností studie, kontaktujte prosím register@clinicaltrials.gov. Jakmile bude změna implementována na clinicaltrials.gov, bude automaticky aktualizována i na našem webu .

Klinické studie na Standardized Verbal Education

Prohledejte podobné pokusy

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

CROs by country

CROs in Kyrgyzstan

Podmínky

Vzácné nemoci

Drogové intervence

Doplňky stravy

Sponzor / Spolupracovníci

Místa

3
Předplatit