Patient Education and AI-Assisted Complaint Summaries in Endodontic Patients
2026년 7월 7일 업데이트: Kübra Gürler, Cukurova University
The Effect of Different Patient Education Methods in Patients Presenting to an Endodontic Clinic With Toothache and the Feasibility of an AI-Assisted Complaint Summary
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the same-day effects of three standardized patient education methods in adults presenting to an endodontic clinic with toothache.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does standardized verbal education improve patients' knowledge, reduce antibiotic-related misconceptions, and reduce anxiety?
- Does leaflet-based education produce comparable changes in knowledge, antibiotic-related misconceptions, and anxiety?
- Does video-based education produce comparable changes in knowledge, antibiotic-related misconceptions, and anxiety?
- Does teach-back performance differ according to the method used to deliver patient education?
- Can an AI-assisted three-sentence complaint summary be generated reliably and used as a feasible clinician-facing communication support tool?
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three patient education groups.
In the verbal education group, participants will receive a standardized 90-second verbal explanation covering warning signs, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and appropriate antibiotic use.
In the leaflet-based education group, participants will review a written leaflet containing the same core educational messages for 90 seconds.
In the video-based education group, participants will watch a short video presenting the same core educational messages for 90 seconds.
Knowledge level, antibiotic-related misconceptions, and anxiety will be assessed immediately before and immediately after the educational intervention. After education, participants will also be asked to restate the main messages in their own words using a teach-back procedure.
In addition, symptom information collected using standardized prompts will be entered into an artificial intelligence tool to generate a concise three-sentence complaint summary. The feasibility, completeness, and clinician-rated usefulness of these summaries will be evaluated as process outcomes. AI-generated summaries will not be used for diagnosis, triage, or treatment decisions.
연구 개요
상태
완전한
연구 유형
중재적
등록 (실제)
120
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.
연구 장소
-
-
Sarıçam
-
Adana, Sarıçam, 터키 (Türkiye), 01250
- Cukurova University
-
-
참여기준
연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
- 성인
- 고령자
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
아니
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Reported pain of at least 1 point on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS ≥ 1) at presentation,
- Were aged 18-65 years,
- Had sufficient cognitive capacity to complete the questionnaires, and
- Provided written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Reported no pain at presentation (NRS = 0) or presented electively/asymptomatically,
- Required immediate emergency clinical evaluation due to signs suggestive of urgent intervention (e.g., marked diffuse swelling, dysphagia, dyspnea),
- Had substantial communication or cognitive difficulties preventing completion of the measures, or
- Were repeat participants (i.e., the same patient re-entering the study).
공부 계획
이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 건강 서비스 연구
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
활성 비교기: Standardized Verbal Education
Participants received a standardized 90-second verbal education session immediately after baseline assessment.
The education covered warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain.
The content and sequence were delivered using a standardized script.
|
Participants received a standardized 90-second verbal education session immediately after baseline assessment.
The education included warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and guidance on the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain.
A standardized script was used to ensure consistency of content and sequence.
|
|
실험적: Leaflet-Based Education
Participants reviewed a written educational leaflet for 90 seconds immediately after baseline assessment.
The leaflet contained the same core messages as the verbal education, including warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain.
|
Participants reviewed a written educational leaflet for 90 seconds immediately after baseline assessment.
The leaflet included warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and guidance on the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain.
The educational content was equivalent to that provided in the verbal and video groups.
|
|
실험적: Video-Based Education
Participants watched a 90-second educational video immediately after baseline assessment.
The video presented the same core messages as the verbal and leaflet-based education, including warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain.
|
Participants watched a 90-second educational video immediately after baseline assessment.
The video included warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and guidance on the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain.
The educational content was equivalent to that provided in the verbal and leaflet-based education groups.
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Patient Knowledge Score
기간: Immediately before the educational intervention and immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
|
Patient knowledge will be assessed using an 8-item questionnaire developed according to the standardized educational content.
Each item will be scored as 1 for a correct response and 0 for an incorrect or unsure response, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 8. Higher scores indicate greater knowledge.
The change score will be calculated as the post-education score minus the baseline score (T1 - T0) and compared among the verbal, leaflet-based, and video-based education groups.
|
Immediately before the educational intervention and immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
|
|
Change in Antibiotic Misconception Score
기간: Immediately before the educational intervention and immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
|
Antibiotic-related misconceptions will be assessed using a 5-item Likert-type scale.
Each item will be rated from 1 to 5, yielding a total score ranging from 5 to 25.
Higher scores indicate stronger endorsement of antibiotic-related misconceptions.
The change score will be calculated as the post-education score minus the baseline score (T1 - T0) and compared among the three education groups.
|
Immediately before the educational intervention and immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
|
|
Change in Anxiety Level
기간: Immediately before the educational intervention and immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
|
Anxiety related to the presenting dental pain will be assessed using a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no anxiety and 10 indicates the worst imaginable anxiety.
The change score will be calculated as the post-education score minus the baseline score (T1 - T0) and compared among the verbal, leaflet-based, and video-based education groups.
|
Immediately before the educational intervention and immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Teach-Back Critical Elements Score
기간: Immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
|
Immediately after the educational intervention, participants will be asked to restate the main educational messages in their own words within approximately 20-30 seconds.
Teach-back performance will be evaluated using five predefined critical elements.
Each element will be scored as present or absent, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 5. Higher scores indicate more complete recall of the educational content.
|
Immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
|
|
Teach-Back Global Adequacy Rating
기간: Immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
|
The overall adequacy of the participant's teach-back response will be rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 to 2. A score of 0 indicates an incorrect, unsafe, or markedly incomplete response; a score of 1 indicates a partially correct response with missing critical elements; and a score of 2 indicates a correct and adequate response.
|
Immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
|
|
Generability of the AI-Assisted Complaint Summary
기간: During the same clinical visit, after collection of standardized symptom information
|
The ability to generate a concise three-sentence AI-assisted complaint summary from standardized, de-identified symptom information will be recorded as generated or not generated.
The proportion of successfully generated summaries will be calculated for all participants.
|
During the same clinical visit, after collection of standardized symptom information
|
|
Completeness of the AI-Assisted Complaint Summary
기간: Immediately after generation of the AI-assisted complaint summary during the same clinical visit
|
The completeness of each AI-assisted complaint summary will be assessed according to the presence of five predefined symptom-related components.
The completeness score will range from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating more complete coverage of the required information.
|
Immediately after generation of the AI-assisted complaint summary during the same clinical visit
|
|
Clinician-Rated Usefulness of the AI-Assisted Complaint Summary
기간: Immediately after review of the AI-assisted complaint summary during the same clinical visit
|
The usefulness of the AI-assisted complaint summary for structuring the clinical encounter will be rated by a single endodontist on a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates not useful at all and 10 indicates extremely useful.
|
Immediately after review of the AI-assisted complaint summary during the same clinical visit
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.
간행물 및 유용한 링크
연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.
연구 기록 날짜
이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
2025년 12월 15일
기본 완료 (실제)
2026년 3월 12일
연구 완료 (실제)
2026년 4월 24일
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
2026년 7월 7일
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
2026년 7월 7일
처음 게시됨 (실제)
2026년 7월 13일
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
2026년 7월 13일
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
2026년 7월 7일
마지막으로 확인됨
2026년 7월 1일
추가 정보
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .