このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Skills Training and Relief for Orofacial Pain (STAR)

2026年10月1日 更新者:Ian Boggero, PhD、University of Kentucky

Skills Training and Relief for Orofacial Pain: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Single Session Pain Management Course in a Tertiary Orofacial Pain Clinic

Chronic orofacial pain conditions (COFP) are associated with substantial physical and psychological burden and are best treated with multidisciplinary approaches combining psychological interventions and comprehensive orofacial pain care. Yet, important barriers prevent access to psychological interventions for COFP (e.g., lack of providers, financial resources). This study will assess the feasibility and acceptability of adapting a single two-hour telehealth-delivered group course, Empowered Relief (ER), which was created for heterogenous chronic pain condition, into a multidisciplinary COFP clinic. ER addresses many existing barriers to assessing psychological interventions for COFP as it is deliverable via telehealth, in a group format, within a single session. This study hypothesizes that ER will demonstrate adequate feasibility and acceptability among patients with COFP. Participants will be recruited over a 6-month period from patients evaluated for an initial appointment at the University of Kentucky Orofacial Pain Clinic (UKOPC). A randomized waitlist control design will be used to inform a future efficacy trial. Specifically, new patients seeking an initial appointment at the UKOPC will be introduced to the study, and if they consent, they will be randomly assigned to participate in the next available ER course (i.e., immediate group) or the ER course offered the subsequent month (i.e., waitlist control group). All participants will provide feasibility and acceptability data after receiving the intervention. Those assigned to immediate group will provide biopsychosocial functioning and outcome data at one, two, and four weeks following the pain course. Those assigned to the immediate control group will provide data one, two, and four weeks before the intervention for a comparison group. Data from this study will inform design decisions for a future efficacy trial.

調査の概要

状態

まだ募集していません

詳細な説明

Chronic orofacial pain (COFP) is comprised of various disorders in the temporomandibular region causing pain that lasts more than three months and are associated with substantial physical and psychological burden. These disorders often co-occur with other conditions such as headache, general chronic pain, and psychiatric disorders. The etiology of COFP is complex, with environmental, psychosocial, emotional, and genetic factors contributing to the development, chronicity, and maintenance of these disorders. Regardless of etiology, COFPs are impactful, commonly resulting in interference with daily activities, reduced quality of life (QoL), and mental health difficulties. COFP disorders are therefore best treated with multidisciplinary approaches combining psychological interventions and comprehensive orofacial pain care.

Numerous psychological interventions for chronic pain are available, drawing from numerous theoretical orientations. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a goal focused intervention designed to teach patients skills in restructuring cognitive distortions and thought patterns while promoting self-efficacy, which have shown to reduce pain intensity and psychological distress. Many relaxation techniques use a self-management approach by encouraging patients' role in managing their condition by learning skills to implement within their daily routine. Carlson (2008) categorizes multiple methods of relaxation techniques ranging from brief, easily taught skills to structured therapist-led interventions. He categorizes multiple methods of relaxation techniques ranging from brief, easily taught skills (brief relaxation techniques) to structured therapist-led interventions such as Physical Self-Regulation, where a therapist trains the patient through breathing exercises, clenching awareness, postural relaxation, and postural reeducation (progressive relaxation training).

Despite the multitude of empirically-supported psychological interventions available, they all share common obstacles; namely, that uptake of these interventions in COFP clinic is low due to lack of sufficient specialized orofacial pain treatment providers, financial resources, and mental health stigma, and patients not expecting to have clinical psychologists involved in their COFP management, which has historically been treated (with minimal success) by dental providers alone, among other obstacles. Additionally, while literature suggests the effectiveness of these interventions for COFP populations, patients are often met with access related issues. These treatments introduce barriers through financial costs associated with healthcare and travel, lack of geographic access, especially for patients in rural communities, and few professionally certified clinicians to provide services. Consequently, there is also a lack of multimodal tertiary clinics available that offer treatments combining dental, psychological, and behavioral healthcare, leading patients to travel far distances for interdisciplinary treatments that can last hours across multiple sessions. Geographic access also poses a significant issue because interdisciplinary COFP clinics are scarce, with many states not having any access to specialty care, despite their being empirical evidence for greater longitudinal outcomes in COFP patients.

Recent literature has identified Empowered Relief (ER), a virtual single-session, two-hour group-based intervention developed at Stanford University that overcomes many of the existing obstacles. ER introduces evidenced-based skills through a single session, two-hour course where patients develop tools that allow them to become self-sufficient in managing their chronic pain. The session can be held through a virtual format, providing accessible care and reducing patient travel or long stays. The training also provides space for multiple patients to receive care at one time as ER is hosted in a group format, allowing more patients to receive treatment over time.

The effectiveness of ER was first demonstrated through a pilot study that included participants with various chronic pain conditions which indicated significant reduction in distress and improved participants' ability to use self-regulation strategies for pain management 4 weeks post intervention. Additionally, a randomized control study found that one session of ER was just as effective as eight weeks of traditional CBT for reducing pain catastrophizing and pain intensity in individuals with chronic lower back pain. Currently, no literature to date has investigated the feasibility and acceptability of ER in patients with COFP, indicating a gap in literature. The present study aims to fill this gap to work towards the identification of a low-cost and low-burden intervention for this underserved population.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

200

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

  • 名前:Kathleen E Wakeman, M.S.
  • 電話番号:508-759-8037
  • メール:kewa246@uky.edu

研究場所

    • Kentucky
      • Lexington、Kentucky、アメリカ、40509
        • University of Kentucky
        • コンタクト:
        • コンタクト:
          • Kathleen E Wakeman, M.S.
          • 電話番号:5027598037
          • メール:kewa246@uky.edu

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

18年歳以上 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be in the state of Kentucky
  • Must be 18 years or older
  • Ability to read, write, and speak English
  • Experienced pain longer than 3 months
  • Treatment-seeking patient at University of Kentucky Orofacial Pain Clinic
  • Must have the appropriate technology to access telehealth (e.g., laptop, stable connection)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suicidal ideation with intent in the last two weeks
  • Homicidal ideation with intent in the last 2 weeks
  • Mania symptoms in the past 6 months
  • Hypomania symptoms in the past 6 months
  • Psychosis symptoms in the past 6 months

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Immediate Intervention

Participants in this arm will be scheduled to partake in the next available Empowered Relief course

Empowered Relief (ER) is a single-session, 2-hour pain management course designed with the purpose of assisting individuals with chronic pain to gain skills for self-pain management. ER is taught through a PowerPoint presentation which includes pain education, self-regulatory skills (i.e., relaxation, cognitive reframing, and self-soothing), and mindfulness skills, all grounded in pain-CBT theory (Darnall et al., 2021). The intervention will be delivered by a certified Empowered Relief instructor.

介入なし:Waitlist Control

Participants in this arm will be scheduled to partake in the Empowered Relief course approximately 1 month after they consent for the study

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Recruitment Rate
時間枠:Baseline (week 0)

The number of patients who are consented into the study from the UK Orofacial Pain Clinic per month

Baseline (week 0)
Retention Rate
時間枠:Follow up outcome survey at one month (approximately)

The number of patients who were consented into the study and completed the one month follow-up outcome survey

Follow up outcome survey at one month (approximately)
Client Satisfaction
時間枠:Immediate Intervention - approximately one week after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance. Waitlist Control - approximately one month after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance.

Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) 8 items on a 4 point likert scale. Higher scores on items 1, 3, 6, 7, likert scale equate to greater satisfaction. Higher scores on items 2, 4, 5, and 8 likert scale equate to lower satisfaction.

Immediate Intervention - approximately one week after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance. Waitlist Control - approximately one month after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance.
Empowered Relief Post Course Survey
時間枠:Immediate Intervention - approximately one week after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance. Waitlist Control - approximately one month after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance.

Empowered Relief Post-Course Survey 5 items on a 6 point Likert scale. Higher scores equate to greater satisfaction with Empowered Relief course, content, and practice.

Immediate Intervention - approximately one week after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance. Waitlist Control - approximately one month after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance.
Satisfaction with Class
時間枠:Immediate Intervention - approximately one week after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance. Waitlist Control - approximately one month after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance.

Satisfaction with Class (Empowered Relief) is a 11 item survey. Items 1 - 5 are on a 0 to 10 numeric scale with higher scores equating to greater satisfaction. Items 6 - 10 are on a 7 point Likert scale with higher scores equating to greater satisfaction. Item 11 is a closed-ended single select question which includes three answer options.

Immediate Intervention - approximately one week after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance. Waitlist Control - approximately one month after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance.

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
PTSD Symptoms
時間枠:Baseline (Week 0)

The PTSD Symptom Checklist (Past Month) (PCL-5) will assess if the participant has experienced a traumatic event as defined by the DSM-5-TR and if they have experienced PTSD symptoms in the past month related to the event. The PCL-5 is a 20 item questionnaire with each item rated on a 5-point likert scale ranging from 0 - 4. Higher scores equate to greater intensity and interference of PTSD symptoms.

Baseline (Week 0)
Headache Impact
時間枠:Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow up (Week 4)

The Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) 6 item questionnaire evaluates pain intensity, life interference, and psychological distress due to headaches. Items are rated on a 5 point likert scale. Higher scores equate greater headache impact.

Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow up (Week 4)
PTSD Symptoms (Past Two Weeks)
時間枠:Two Week Follow up (Week 2), One Month Follow up (Week 4)

The PTSD Short Form (PCL-5-SF) are administered to participants who indicate having experienced a trauma. The PCL-5-SF is a 4 item questionnaire on a 5 point likert scale. Higher scores equate to greater PTSD symptoms.

Two Week Follow up (Week 2), One Month Follow up (Week 4)
Pain Self Efficacy
時間枠:Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow Up (Week 4)

The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-2) includes two items with a 6 point likert scale. Lower scores equate to less pain self-efficacy.

Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow Up (Week 4)
Pain Catastrophizing
時間枠:Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow Up (Week 4)

The University of Washington Concerns About Pain Scale (UW-CAP-6) evaluates participants pain catastrophizing and negative thoughts in regard to their chronic pain. UW-CAP-6 short form includes 6 items rated on a 5 point likert scale with higher scores equating to greater levels of pain catastrophizing.

Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow Up (Week 4)
Acceptance of Chronic Pain
時間枠:Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow Up (Week 4)

The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8) is an 8 item questionnaire that evaluates participants acceptance of their chronic pain condition. Items are rated on a 7 point likert scale with higher scores equating to greater pain acceptance.

Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow Up (Week 4)
Pain Interference
時間枠:Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)

The PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form (PROMIS 4a) evaluates how much pain interferes with their daily life. The PROMIS 4a includes 4 items rated on a 5 point likert scale with higher scores equating to pain having greater interference on their life.

Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)
Anxiety and Depression
時間枠:Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)

The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) is a brief questionnaire evaluating the participants anxiety and depression with 4 items rated on a 4 point likert scale with higher scores equating to greater levels of distress.

Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)
Fatigue
時間枠:Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)

The PROMIS-FAT-4 is a brief questionnaire that evaluates participants level and impact of fatigue with 4 items on a 5 point likert scale with higher scores equating to greater severity of fatigue.

Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)
Satisfaction with Life
時間枠:Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)

The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) evaluates participants judgement of satisfaction with the conditions of their life with 5 items rated on a 7 point likert scale with higher scores equating to greater satisfaction with their life's conditions.

Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)
Jaw Function
時間枠:Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)

The Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS) short form evaluates participants jaw function limitations with 8 items on an 11 point numeric scale with higher scores equating to greater jaw function limitation.

Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)
Insomnia Severity
時間枠:Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)

The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI-brief) evaluates the participants experience with sleep and the the severity and impact of insomnia if present. The brief ISI measure includes 7 items on a 5 point likert scale with higher scores equating to greater impact and severity of insomnia symptoms.

Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Kathleen E Wakeman, M.S.、University of Kentucky
  • スタディチェア:Ian Boggero, PhD、University of Kentucky

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

一般刊行物

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

2026年10月1日

一次修了 (推定)

2027年10月1日

研究の完了 (推定)

2028年10月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年8月30日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年8月30日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年9月3日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年10月5日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年10月1日

最終確認日

2026年10月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

IPD プランの説明

Participant health data will be protected.

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する