- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT07802067
Skills Training and Relief for Orofacial Pain (STAR)
Skills Training and Relief for Orofacial Pain: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Single Session Pain Management Course in a Tertiary Orofacial Pain Clinic
Chronic orofacial pain conditions (COFP) are associated with substantial physical and psychological burden and are best treated with multidisciplinary approaches combining psychological interventions and comprehensive orofacial pain care. Yet, important barriers prevent access to psychological interventions for COFP (e.g., lack of providers, financial resources). This study will assess the feasibility and acceptability of adapting a single two-hour telehealth-delivered group course, Empowered Relief (ER), which was created for heterogenous chronic pain condition, into a multidisciplinary COFP clinic. ER addresses many existing barriers to assessing psychological interventions for COFP as it is deliverable via telehealth, in a group format, within a single session. This study hypothesizes that ER will demonstrate adequate feasibility and acceptability among patients with COFP. Participants will be recruited over a 6-month period from patients evaluated for an initial appointment at the University of Kentucky Orofacial Pain Clinic (UKOPC). A randomized waitlist control design will be used to inform a future efficacy trial. Specifically, new patients seeking an initial appointment at the UKOPC will be introduced to the study, and if they consent, they will be randomly assigned to participate in the next available ER course (i.e., immediate group) or the ER course offered the subsequent month (i.e., waitlist control group). All participants will provide feasibility and acceptability data after receiving the intervention. Those assigned to immediate group will provide biopsychosocial functioning and outcome data at one, two, and four weeks following the pain course. Those assigned to the immediate control group will provide data one, two, and four weeks before the intervention for a comparison group. Data from this study will inform design decisions for a future efficacy trial.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Chronic orofacial pain (COFP) is comprised of various disorders in the temporomandibular region causing pain that lasts more than three months and are associated with substantial physical and psychological burden. These disorders often co-occur with other conditions such as headache, general chronic pain, and psychiatric disorders. The etiology of COFP is complex, with environmental, psychosocial, emotional, and genetic factors contributing to the development, chronicity, and maintenance of these disorders. Regardless of etiology, COFPs are impactful, commonly resulting in interference with daily activities, reduced quality of life (QoL), and mental health difficulties. COFP disorders are therefore best treated with multidisciplinary approaches combining psychological interventions and comprehensive orofacial pain care.
Numerous psychological interventions for chronic pain are available, drawing from numerous theoretical orientations. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a goal focused intervention designed to teach patients skills in restructuring cognitive distortions and thought patterns while promoting self-efficacy, which have shown to reduce pain intensity and psychological distress. Many relaxation techniques use a self-management approach by encouraging patients' role in managing their condition by learning skills to implement within their daily routine. Carlson (2008) categorizes multiple methods of relaxation techniques ranging from brief, easily taught skills to structured therapist-led interventions. He categorizes multiple methods of relaxation techniques ranging from brief, easily taught skills (brief relaxation techniques) to structured therapist-led interventions such as Physical Self-Regulation, where a therapist trains the patient through breathing exercises, clenching awareness, postural relaxation, and postural reeducation (progressive relaxation training).
Despite the multitude of empirically-supported psychological interventions available, they all share common obstacles; namely, that uptake of these interventions in COFP clinic is low due to lack of sufficient specialized orofacial pain treatment providers, financial resources, and mental health stigma, and patients not expecting to have clinical psychologists involved in their COFP management, which has historically been treated (with minimal success) by dental providers alone, among other obstacles. Additionally, while literature suggests the effectiveness of these interventions for COFP populations, patients are often met with access related issues. These treatments introduce barriers through financial costs associated with healthcare and travel, lack of geographic access, especially for patients in rural communities, and few professionally certified clinicians to provide services. Consequently, there is also a lack of multimodal tertiary clinics available that offer treatments combining dental, psychological, and behavioral healthcare, leading patients to travel far distances for interdisciplinary treatments that can last hours across multiple sessions. Geographic access also poses a significant issue because interdisciplinary COFP clinics are scarce, with many states not having any access to specialty care, despite their being empirical evidence for greater longitudinal outcomes in COFP patients.
Recent literature has identified Empowered Relief (ER), a virtual single-session, two-hour group-based intervention developed at Stanford University that overcomes many of the existing obstacles. ER introduces evidenced-based skills through a single session, two-hour course where patients develop tools that allow them to become self-sufficient in managing their chronic pain. The session can be held through a virtual format, providing accessible care and reducing patient travel or long stays. The training also provides space for multiple patients to receive care at one time as ER is hosted in a group format, allowing more patients to receive treatment over time.
The effectiveness of ER was first demonstrated through a pilot study that included participants with various chronic pain conditions which indicated significant reduction in distress and improved participants' ability to use self-regulation strategies for pain management 4 weeks post intervention. Additionally, a randomized control study found that one session of ER was just as effective as eight weeks of traditional CBT for reducing pain catastrophizing and pain intensity in individuals with chronic lower back pain. Currently, no literature to date has investigated the feasibility and acceptability of ER in patients with COFP, indicating a gap in literature. The present study aims to fill this gap to work towards the identification of a low-cost and low-burden intervention for this underserved population.
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Estimado)
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Estudio Contacto
- Nombre: Kathleen E Wakeman, M.S.
- Número de teléfono: 508-759-8037
- Correo electrónico: kewa246@uky.edu
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Kentucky
-
Lexington, Kentucky, Estados Unidos, 40509
- University of Kentucky
-
Contacto:
- Ian Boggero, PhD
- Número de teléfono: 859-562-3291
- Correo electrónico: ian.boggero@uky.edu
-
Contacto:
- Kathleen E Wakeman, M.S.
- Número de teléfono: 5027598037
- Correo electrónico: kewa246@uky.edu
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Must be in the state of Kentucky
- Must be 18 years or older
- Ability to read, write, and speak English
- Experienced pain longer than 3 months
- Treatment-seeking patient at University of Kentucky Orofacial Pain Clinic
- Must have the appropriate technology to access telehealth (e.g., laptop, stable connection)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Suicidal ideation with intent in the last two weeks
- Homicidal ideation with intent in the last 2 weeks
- Mania symptoms in the past 6 months
- Hypomania symptoms in the past 6 months
- Psychosis symptoms in the past 6 months
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Tratamiento
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Immediate Intervention
Participants in this arm will be scheduled to partake in the next available Empowered Relief course |
Empowered Relief (ER) is a single-session, 2-hour pain management course designed with the purpose of assisting individuals with chronic pain to gain skills for self-pain management. ER is taught through a PowerPoint presentation which includes pain education, self-regulatory skills (i.e., relaxation, cognitive reframing, and self-soothing), and mindfulness skills, all grounded in pain-CBT theory (Darnall et al., 2021). The intervention will be delivered by a certified Empowered Relief instructor. |
|
Sin intervención: Waitlist Control
Participants in this arm will be scheduled to partake in the Empowered Relief course approximately 1 month after they consent for the study |
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Recruitment Rate
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (week 0)
|
The number of patients who are consented into the study from the UK Orofacial Pain Clinic per month |
Baseline (week 0)
|
|
Retention Rate
Periodo de tiempo: Follow up outcome survey at one month (approximately)
|
The number of patients who were consented into the study and completed the one month follow-up outcome survey |
Follow up outcome survey at one month (approximately)
|
|
Client Satisfaction
Periodo de tiempo: Immediate Intervention - approximately one week after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance. Waitlist Control - approximately one month after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance.
|
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) 8 items on a 4 point likert scale. Higher scores on items 1, 3, 6, 7, likert scale equate to greater satisfaction. Higher scores on items 2, 4, 5, and 8 likert scale equate to lower satisfaction. |
Immediate Intervention - approximately one week after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance. Waitlist Control - approximately one month after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance.
|
|
Empowered Relief Post Course Survey
Periodo de tiempo: Immediate Intervention - approximately one week after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance. Waitlist Control - approximately one month after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance.
|
Empowered Relief Post-Course Survey 5 items on a 6 point Likert scale. Higher scores equate to greater satisfaction with Empowered Relief course, content, and practice. |
Immediate Intervention - approximately one week after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance. Waitlist Control - approximately one month after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance.
|
|
Satisfaction with Class
Periodo de tiempo: Immediate Intervention - approximately one week after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance. Waitlist Control - approximately one month after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance.
|
Satisfaction with Class (Empowered Relief) is a 11 item survey. Items 1 - 5 are on a 0 to 10 numeric scale with higher scores equating to greater satisfaction. Items 6 - 10 are on a 7 point Likert scale with higher scores equating to greater satisfaction. Item 11 is a closed-ended single select question which includes three answer options. |
Immediate Intervention - approximately one week after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance. Waitlist Control - approximately one month after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance.
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
PTSD Symptoms
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (Week 0)
|
The PTSD Symptom Checklist (Past Month) (PCL-5) will assess if the participant has experienced a traumatic event as defined by the DSM-5-TR and if they have experienced PTSD symptoms in the past month related to the event. The PCL-5 is a 20 item questionnaire with each item rated on a 5-point likert scale ranging from 0 - 4. Higher scores equate to greater intensity and interference of PTSD symptoms. |
Baseline (Week 0)
|
|
Headache Impact
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow up (Week 4)
|
The Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) 6 item questionnaire evaluates pain intensity, life interference, and psychological distress due to headaches. Items are rated on a 5 point likert scale. Higher scores equate greater headache impact. |
Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow up (Week 4)
|
|
PTSD Symptoms (Past Two Weeks)
Periodo de tiempo: Two Week Follow up (Week 2), One Month Follow up (Week 4)
|
The PTSD Short Form (PCL-5-SF) are administered to participants who indicate having experienced a trauma. The PCL-5-SF is a 4 item questionnaire on a 5 point likert scale. Higher scores equate to greater PTSD symptoms. |
Two Week Follow up (Week 2), One Month Follow up (Week 4)
|
|
Pain Self Efficacy
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow Up (Week 4)
|
The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-2) includes two items with a 6 point likert scale. Lower scores equate to less pain self-efficacy. |
Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow Up (Week 4)
|
|
Pain Catastrophizing
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow Up (Week 4)
|
The University of Washington Concerns About Pain Scale (UW-CAP-6) evaluates participants pain catastrophizing and negative thoughts in regard to their chronic pain. UW-CAP-6 short form includes 6 items rated on a 5 point likert scale with higher scores equating to greater levels of pain catastrophizing. |
Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow Up (Week 4)
|
|
Acceptance of Chronic Pain
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow Up (Week 4)
|
The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8) is an 8 item questionnaire that evaluates participants acceptance of their chronic pain condition. Items are rated on a 7 point likert scale with higher scores equating to greater pain acceptance. |
Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow Up (Week 4)
|
|
Pain Interference
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)
|
The PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form (PROMIS 4a) evaluates how much pain interferes with their daily life. The PROMIS 4a includes 4 items rated on a 5 point likert scale with higher scores equating to pain having greater interference on their life. |
Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)
|
|
Anxiety and Depression
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)
|
The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) is a brief questionnaire evaluating the participants anxiety and depression with 4 items rated on a 4 point likert scale with higher scores equating to greater levels of distress. |
Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)
|
|
Fatigue
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)
|
The PROMIS-FAT-4 is a brief questionnaire that evaluates participants level and impact of fatigue with 4 items on a 5 point likert scale with higher scores equating to greater severity of fatigue. |
Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)
|
|
Satisfaction with Life
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)
|
The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) evaluates participants judgement of satisfaction with the conditions of their life with 5 items rated on a 7 point likert scale with higher scores equating to greater satisfaction with their life's conditions. |
Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)
|
|
Jaw Function
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)
|
The Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS) short form evaluates participants jaw function limitations with 8 items on an 11 point numeric scale with higher scores equating to greater jaw function limitation. |
Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)
|
|
Insomnia Severity
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)
|
The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI-brief) evaluates the participants experience with sleep and the the severity and impact of insomnia if present. The brief ISI measure includes 7 items on a 5 point likert scale with higher scores equating to greater impact and severity of insomnia symptoms. |
Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Kathleen E Wakeman, M.S., University of Kentucky
- Silla de estudio: Ian Boggero, PhD, University of Kentucky
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
Publicaciones Generales
- Larsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, Nguyen TD. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale. Eval Program Plann. 1979;2(3):197-207. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(79)90094-6. No abstract available.
- Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.
- Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, Look J, Anderson G, Goulet JP, List T, Svensson P, Gonzalez Y, Lobbezoo F, Michelotti A, Brooks SL, Ceusters W, Drangsholt M, Ettlin D, Gaul C, Goldberg LJ, Haythornthwaite JA, Hollender L, Jensen R, John MT, De Laat A, de Leeuw R, Maixner W, van der Meulen M, Murray GM, Nixdorf DR, Palla S, Petersson A, Pionchon P, Smith B, Visscher CM, Zakrzewska J, Dworkin SF; International RDC/TMD Consortium Network, International association for Dental Research; Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group, International Association for the Study of Pain. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Groupdagger. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014 Winter;28(1):6-27. doi: 10.11607/jop.1151.
- Attkisson CC, Zwick R. The client satisfaction questionnaire. Psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Eval Program Plann. 1982;5(3):233-7. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(82)90074-x.
- Morin CM, Belleville G, Belanger L, Ivers H. The Insomnia Severity Index: psychometric indicators to detect insomnia cases and evaluate treatment response. Sleep. 2011 May 1;34(5):601-8. doi: 10.1093/sleep/34.5.601.
- Ohrbach R, Larsson P, List T. The jaw functional limitation scale: development, reliability, and validity of 8-item and 20-item versions. J Orofac Pain. 2008 Summer;22(3):219-30.
- Weathers, F.W., Litz, B.T., Keane, T.M., Palmieri, P.A., Marx, B.P., & Schnurr, P.P. (2013). The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Scale available from the National Center for PTSD at www.ptsd.va.gov.
- Litt MD, Tennen H. What are the most effective coping strategies for managing chronic pain? Pain Manag. 2015;5(6):403-6. doi: 10.2217/pmt.15.45. Epub 2015 Sep 24. No abstract available.
- Yang M, Rendas-Baum R, Varon SF, Kosinski M. Validation of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) across episodic and chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2011 Feb;31(3):357-67. doi: 10.1177/0333102410379890. Epub 2010 Sep 6.
- Fjorback LO, Arendt M, Ornbol E, Fink P, Walach H. Mindfulness-based stress reduction and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2011 Aug;124(2):102-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01704.x. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
- Darnall BD, Sturgeon JA, Kao MC, Hah JM, Mackey SC. From Catastrophizing to Recovery: a pilot study of a single-session treatment for pain catastrophizing. J Pain Res. 2014 Apr 25;7:219-26. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S62329. eCollection 2014.
- Fish RA, McGuire B, Hogan M, Morrison TG, Stewart I. Validation of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ) in an Internet sample and development and preliminary validation of the CPAQ-8. Pain. 2010 Jun;149(3):435-443. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.12.016. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
- Houts CR, McGinley JS, Wirth RJ, Cady R, Lipton RB. Reliability and validity of the 6-item Headache Impact Test in chronic migraine from the PROMISE-2 study. Qual Life Res. 2021 Mar;30(3):931-943. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02668-2. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
- Ziadni MS, Anderson SR, Gonzalez-Castro L, Darnall BD. Comparative efficacy of a single-session "Empowered Relief" videoconference-delivered group intervention for chronic pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021 May 22;22(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05303-8.
- Carlson CR. Psychological considerations for chronic orofacial pain. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2008 May;20(2):185-95, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2007.12.002.
- Aggarwal VR, Fu Y, Main CJ, Wu J. The effectiveness of self-management interventions in adults with chronic orofacial pain: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Eur J Pain. 2019 May;23(5):849-865. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1358. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
- Nicholas MK, McGuire BE, Asghari A. A 2-item short form of the Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire: development and psychometric evaluation of PSEQ-2. J Pain. 2015 Feb;16(2):153-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
- Bertoni M, Telias I, Urner M, Long M, Del Sorbo L, Fan E, Sinderby C, Beck J, Liu L, Qiu H, Wong J, Slutsky AS, Ferguson ND, Brochard LJ, Goligher EC. A novel non-invasive method to detect excessively high respiratory effort and dynamic transpulmonary driving pressure during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care. 2019 Nov 6;23(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2617-0.
- Bingham Iii CO, Gutierrez AK, Butanis A, Bykerk VP, Curtis JR, Leong A, Lyddiatt A, Nowell WB, Orbai AM, Bartlett SJ. PROMIS Fatigue short forms are reliable and valid in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Feb 21;3(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0105-6.
- Horowitz LM, Snyder DJ, Boudreaux ED, He JP, Harrington CJ, Cai J, Claassen CA, Salhany JE, Dao T, Chaves JF, Jobes DA, Merikangas KR, Bridge JA, Pao M. Validation of the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions for Adult Medical Inpatients: A Brief Tool for All Ages. Psychosomatics. 2020 Nov-Dec;61(6):713-722. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2020.04.008. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
- Schrepf A, Maixner W, Fillingim R, Veasley C, Ohrbach R, Smith S, Williams DA. The Chronic Overlapping Pain Condition Screener. J Pain. 2024 Jan;25(1):265-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.08.009. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
- Zuromski KL, Ustun B, Hwang I, Keane TM, Marx BP, Stein MB, Ursano RJ, Kessler RC. Developing an optimal short-form of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Depress Anxiety. 2019 Sep;36(9):790-800. doi: 10.1002/da.22942. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
- In J. Introduction of a pilot study. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2017 Dec;70(6):601-605. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.6.601. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
- Darnall BD, Roy A, Chen AL, Ziadni MS, Keane RT, You DS, Slater K, Poupore-King H, Mackey I, Kao MC, Cook KF, Lorig K, Zhang D, Hong J, Tian L, Mackey SC. Comparison of a Single-Session Pain Management Skills Intervention With a Single-Session Health Education Intervention and 8 Sessions of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2113401. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13401.
- Caro-Fuentes S, Sanabria-Mazo JP. A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 in Clinical and Nonclinical Populations. J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2024 Mar-Apr;65(2):178-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jaclp.2023.11.685. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
- Stephan A, Stadelmann VA, Leunig M, Impellizzeri FM. Measurement properties of PROMIS short forms for pain and function in total hip arthroplasty patients. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 May 30;5(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00313-1.
- Amtmann D, Bamer AM, Liljenquist KS, Cowan P, Salem R, Turk DC, Jensen MP. The Concerns About Pain (CAP) Scale: A Patient-Reported Outcome Measure of Pain Catastrophizing. J Pain. 2020 Nov-Dec;21(11-12):1198-1211. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
- Forkus SR, Raudales AM, Rafiuddin HS, Weiss NH, Messman BA, Contractor AA. The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-5: A Systematic Review of Existing Psychometric Evidence. Clin Psychol (New York). 2023 Mar;30(1):110-121. doi: 10.1037/cps0000111. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
- Cerimele JM, Russo J, Bauer AM, Hawrilenko M, Pyne JM, Dalack GW, Kroenke K, Unutzer J, Fortney JC. The Patient Mania Questionnaire (PMQ-9): a Brief Scale for Assessing and Monitoring Manic Symptoms. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 May;37(7):1680-1687. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06947-7. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
- Calkins ME, Ered A, Moore TM, White LK, Taylor J, Moxam AB, Ruparel K, Wolf DH, Satterthwaite TD, Kohler CG, Gur RC, Gur RE. Development and Validation of a Brief Age-Normed Screening Tool for Subthreshold Psychosis Symptoms in Youth. Schizophr Bull. 2025 Sep 8;51(5):1242-1253. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae224.
- Priyank H, Shankar Prasad R, Shivakumar S, Sayed Abdul N, Pathak A, Cervino G, Cicciu M, Minervini G. Management protocols of chronic Orofacial Pain: A Systematic Review. Saudi Dent J. 2023 Jul;35(5):395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.04.003. Epub 2023 May 13.
- Lagisetty P, Slat S, Thomas J, Macleod C, Golmirzaie G, Bohnert AS. Access to Multimodal Pain Management for Patients with Chronic Pain: an Audit Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(3):818-820. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05866-3. Epub 2020 May 6. No abstract available.
- Davin SA, Abshire L, Thompson N, Savage J, Amps J, Pelle D, Steinmetz M. Acceptability of a brief behavioral pain treatment to enhance recovery after surgery. N Am Spine Soc J. 2026 Mar 27;26:100880. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2026.100880. eCollection 2026 Jun.
- Avinash B, Shivamallu AB, Ashwini TS, Sowmya HK, Ali I, Kudagi VS. Interprofessional Management of Orofacial Pain: Wearing Many Hats! J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022 Jul;14(Suppl 1):S65-S67. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_556_21. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
- Tan, Gabriel & Glaros, Alan & Sherman, Richard & Wong, Chin. (2017). Integrative Approaches to Orofacial Pain: Role of Biofeedback and Hypnosis. 10.1007/978-3-319-51508-3_27.
- Stone S, Wainwright E, Guest A, Ghiglieri C, Zeyen A, Gooberman-Hill R. Social influences in the experience of transition to or from long-term (chronic) pain: A systematic review of qualitative research studies. PLoS One. 2025 Jul 10;20(7):e0327984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327984. eCollection 2025.
- Sangalli L, Fernandez-Vial D, Moreno-Hay I, Boggero I. Telehealth Increases Access to Brief Behavioral Interventions in an Orofacial Pain Clinic During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Study. Pain Med. 2022 Apr 8;23(4):799-806. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab295.
- Perez L, Palenski P, Monson EA, Contreras L, Dorsonne B, Hailu AY, Gedeon K, Boyd H, Ziadni M, Herrick A, Friedman A, Xu J, Hong J, Tian L, Darnall BD. Online 1-session Empowered Relief in Marfan syndrome and related diseases: a single-arm feasibility and pilot efficacy study. Sci Rep. 2026 Jan 6;16(1):499. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-29943-x.
- Adair Monson E, Mardian A, Saxena K, Dorsonne B, Hailu AY, Heggan E, Riazi G, Slater K, Poupore-King H, Clifton J, Perez L, Tian L, Porter J, Denton S, Hanson ER, Miefert J, Thorn BE, Mackey SC, Cheung M, Darnall BD. Randomized comparative effectiveness study of 1-session vs 8-session online behavioral treatment for chronic pain: protocol for the national PROGRESS study. Pain Med. 2026 Jul 1;27(7):839-850. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnag027.
- Miller ME, Bowling WR, Borders TF, Kim N, Boggero IA. Patient-reported feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction of psychological telehealth orofacial pain interventions: a mixed-methods study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2026 Mar;141(3):334-342. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2025.10.009. Epub 2025 Oct 24.
- McIntyre RS, Patel MD, Masand PS, Harrington A, Gillard P, McElroy SL, Sullivan K, Montano CB, Brown TM, Nelson L, Jain R. The Rapid Mood Screener (RMS): a novel and pragmatic screener for bipolar I disorder. Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Jan;37(1):135-144. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1860358. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
- Lovette BC, Bannon SM, Spyropoulos DC, Vranceanu AM, Greenberg J. "I Still Suffer Every Second of Every Day": A Qualitative Analysis of the Challenges of Living with Chronic Orofacial Pain. J Pain Res. 2022 Jul 29;15:2139-2148. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S372469. eCollection 2022.
- Labanca M, Giano M, Franco C, Rezzani R. Orofacial Pain and Dentistry Management: Guidelines for a More Comprehensive Evidence-Based Approach. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Sep 4;13(17):2854. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13172854.
- Goldthorpe J, Lovell K, Peters S, McGowan L, Nemeth I, Roberts C, Aggarwal VR. A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Guided Self-Help Intervention to Manage Chronic Orofacial Pain. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2017 Winter;31(1):61-71. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1665.
- Esposito R, Sangalli L, Boggero IA, Kapos FP. Geographic and rural health care resource gaps in orofacial pain provider distribution across the United States. J Am Dent Assoc. 2026 Mar;157(3):294-304. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2025.12.021. Epub 2026 Feb 6.
- de Oliveira Melchior M, Magri LV, Diaz-Serrano KV, Junior EBC, Fregni F, Pacheco-Barrios K, Lacchini R, Leite-Panissi CRA, Gherardi-Donato ECS. Impact of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention on Pain and Psychological Factors in Women With Chronic Painful Temporomandibular Disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 2025 Dec;52(12):2269-2281. doi: 10.1111/joor.70028. Epub 2025 Aug 6.
- Darnall BD, Ziadni MS, Krishnamurthy P, Flood P, Heathcote LC, Mackey IG, Taub CJ, Wheeler A. "My Surgical Success": Effect of a Digital Behavioral Pain Medicine Intervention on Time to Opioid Cessation After Breast Cancer Surgery-A Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Pain Med. 2019 Nov 1;20(11):2228-2237. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz094.
- Carriere JS, Coutu MF, Darnall BD, Leonard G, Royer MP, Li MY, Bordeleau M, Durand MJ. Changes in Pain Catastrophizing and Related Outcomes Following a Single-Session Empowered Relief Intervention Delivered by Physical Therapists in Workers with Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study. J Pain Res. 2025 Sep 17;18:4845-4857. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S527830. eCollection 2025.
- Abrahamsen R, Zachariae R, Svensson P. Effect of hypnosis on oral function and psychological factors in temporomandibular disorders patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2009 Aug;36(8):556-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01974.x.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Estimado)
Finalización primaria (Estimado)
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 119306
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Descripción del plan IPD
Participant health data will be protected.
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .