Ta strona została przetłumaczona automatycznie i dokładność tłumaczenia nie jest gwarantowana. Proszę odnieść się do angielska wersja za tekst źródłowy.

Skills Training and Relief for Orofacial Pain (STAR)

1 października 2026 zaktualizowane przez: Ian Boggero, PhD, University of Kentucky

Skills Training and Relief for Orofacial Pain: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Single Session Pain Management Course in a Tertiary Orofacial Pain Clinic

Chronic orofacial pain conditions (COFP) are associated with substantial physical and psychological burden and are best treated with multidisciplinary approaches combining psychological interventions and comprehensive orofacial pain care. Yet, important barriers prevent access to psychological interventions for COFP (e.g., lack of providers, financial resources). This study will assess the feasibility and acceptability of adapting a single two-hour telehealth-delivered group course, Empowered Relief (ER), which was created for heterogenous chronic pain condition, into a multidisciplinary COFP clinic. ER addresses many existing barriers to assessing psychological interventions for COFP as it is deliverable via telehealth, in a group format, within a single session. This study hypothesizes that ER will demonstrate adequate feasibility and acceptability among patients with COFP. Participants will be recruited over a 6-month period from patients evaluated for an initial appointment at the University of Kentucky Orofacial Pain Clinic (UKOPC). A randomized waitlist control design will be used to inform a future efficacy trial. Specifically, new patients seeking an initial appointment at the UKOPC will be introduced to the study, and if they consent, they will be randomly assigned to participate in the next available ER course (i.e., immediate group) or the ER course offered the subsequent month (i.e., waitlist control group). All participants will provide feasibility and acceptability data after receiving the intervention. Those assigned to immediate group will provide biopsychosocial functioning and outcome data at one, two, and four weeks following the pain course. Those assigned to the immediate control group will provide data one, two, and four weeks before the intervention for a comparison group. Data from this study will inform design decisions for a future efficacy trial.

Przegląd badań

Status

Jeszcze nie rekrutacja

Interwencja / Leczenie

Szczegółowy opis

Chronic orofacial pain (COFP) is comprised of various disorders in the temporomandibular region causing pain that lasts more than three months and are associated with substantial physical and psychological burden. These disorders often co-occur with other conditions such as headache, general chronic pain, and psychiatric disorders. The etiology of COFP is complex, with environmental, psychosocial, emotional, and genetic factors contributing to the development, chronicity, and maintenance of these disorders. Regardless of etiology, COFPs are impactful, commonly resulting in interference with daily activities, reduced quality of life (QoL), and mental health difficulties. COFP disorders are therefore best treated with multidisciplinary approaches combining psychological interventions and comprehensive orofacial pain care.

Numerous psychological interventions for chronic pain are available, drawing from numerous theoretical orientations. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a goal focused intervention designed to teach patients skills in restructuring cognitive distortions and thought patterns while promoting self-efficacy, which have shown to reduce pain intensity and psychological distress. Many relaxation techniques use a self-management approach by encouraging patients' role in managing their condition by learning skills to implement within their daily routine. Carlson (2008) categorizes multiple methods of relaxation techniques ranging from brief, easily taught skills to structured therapist-led interventions. He categorizes multiple methods of relaxation techniques ranging from brief, easily taught skills (brief relaxation techniques) to structured therapist-led interventions such as Physical Self-Regulation, where a therapist trains the patient through breathing exercises, clenching awareness, postural relaxation, and postural reeducation (progressive relaxation training).

Despite the multitude of empirically-supported psychological interventions available, they all share common obstacles; namely, that uptake of these interventions in COFP clinic is low due to lack of sufficient specialized orofacial pain treatment providers, financial resources, and mental health stigma, and patients not expecting to have clinical psychologists involved in their COFP management, which has historically been treated (with minimal success) by dental providers alone, among other obstacles. Additionally, while literature suggests the effectiveness of these interventions for COFP populations, patients are often met with access related issues. These treatments introduce barriers through financial costs associated with healthcare and travel, lack of geographic access, especially for patients in rural communities, and few professionally certified clinicians to provide services. Consequently, there is also a lack of multimodal tertiary clinics available that offer treatments combining dental, psychological, and behavioral healthcare, leading patients to travel far distances for interdisciplinary treatments that can last hours across multiple sessions. Geographic access also poses a significant issue because interdisciplinary COFP clinics are scarce, with many states not having any access to specialty care, despite their being empirical evidence for greater longitudinal outcomes in COFP patients.

Recent literature has identified Empowered Relief (ER), a virtual single-session, two-hour group-based intervention developed at Stanford University that overcomes many of the existing obstacles. ER introduces evidenced-based skills through a single session, two-hour course where patients develop tools that allow them to become self-sufficient in managing their chronic pain. The session can be held through a virtual format, providing accessible care and reducing patient travel or long stays. The training also provides space for multiple patients to receive care at one time as ER is hosted in a group format, allowing more patients to receive treatment over time.

The effectiveness of ER was first demonstrated through a pilot study that included participants with various chronic pain conditions which indicated significant reduction in distress and improved participants' ability to use self-regulation strategies for pain management 4 weeks post intervention. Additionally, a randomized control study found that one session of ER was just as effective as eight weeks of traditional CBT for reducing pain catastrophizing and pain intensity in individuals with chronic lower back pain. Currently, no literature to date has investigated the feasibility and acceptability of ER in patients with COFP, indicating a gap in literature. The present study aims to fill this gap to work towards the identification of a low-cost and low-burden intervention for this underserved population.

Typ studiów

Interwencyjne

Zapisy (Szacowany)

200

Faza

  • Nie dotyczy

Kontakty i lokalizacje

Ta sekcja zawiera dane kontaktowe osób prowadzących badanie oraz informacje o tym, gdzie badanie jest przeprowadzane.

Kontakt w sprawie studiów

  • Nazwa: Kathleen E Wakeman, M.S.
  • Numer telefonu: 508-759-8037
  • E-mail: kewa246@uky.edu

Lokalizacje studiów

    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, Stany Zjednoczone, 40509
        • University of Kentucky
        • Kontakt:
        • Kontakt:
          • Kathleen E Wakeman, M.S.
          • Numer telefonu: 5027598037
          • E-mail: kewa246@uky.edu

Kryteria uczestnictwa

Badacze szukają osób, które pasują do określonego opisu, zwanego kryteriami kwalifikacyjnymi. Niektóre przykłady tych kryteriów to ogólny stan zdrowia danej osoby lub wcześniejsze leczenie.

Kryteria kwalifikacji

Wiek uprawniający do nauki

18 lat i starsze (Dorosły, Starszy dorosły)

Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników

Nie

Płeć kwalifikująca się do nauki

Wszystko

Opis

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be in the state of Kentucky
  • Must be 18 years or older
  • Ability to read, write, and speak English
  • Experienced pain longer than 3 months
  • Treatment-seeking patient at University of Kentucky Orofacial Pain Clinic
  • Must have the appropriate technology to access telehealth (e.g., laptop, stable connection)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suicidal ideation with intent in the last two weeks
  • Homicidal ideation with intent in the last 2 weeks
  • Mania symptoms in the past 6 months
  • Hypomania symptoms in the past 6 months
  • Psychosis symptoms in the past 6 months

Plan studiów

Ta sekcja zawiera szczegółowe informacje na temat planu badania, w tym sposób zaprojektowania badania i jego pomiary.

Jak projektuje się badanie?

Szczegóły projektu

  • Główny cel: Leczenie
  • Przydział: Randomizowane
  • Model interwencyjny: Przydział równoległy
  • Maskowanie: Brak (otwarta etykieta)

Broń i interwencje

Grupa uczestników / Arm
Interwencja / Leczenie
Eksperymentalny: Immediate Intervention

Participants in this arm will be scheduled to partake in the next available Empowered Relief course

Empowered Relief (ER) is a single-session, 2-hour pain management course designed with the purpose of assisting individuals with chronic pain to gain skills for self-pain management. ER is taught through a PowerPoint presentation which includes pain education, self-regulatory skills (i.e., relaxation, cognitive reframing, and self-soothing), and mindfulness skills, all grounded in pain-CBT theory (Darnall et al., 2021). The intervention will be delivered by a certified Empowered Relief instructor.

Brak interwencji: Waitlist Control

Participants in this arm will be scheduled to partake in the Empowered Relief course approximately 1 month after they consent for the study

Co mierzy badanie?

Podstawowe miary wyniku

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Recruitment Rate
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (week 0)

The number of patients who are consented into the study from the UK Orofacial Pain Clinic per month

Baseline (week 0)
Retention Rate
Ramy czasowe: Follow up outcome survey at one month (approximately)

The number of patients who were consented into the study and completed the one month follow-up outcome survey

Follow up outcome survey at one month (approximately)
Client Satisfaction
Ramy czasowe: Immediate Intervention - approximately one week after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance. Waitlist Control - approximately one month after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance.

Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) 8 items on a 4 point likert scale. Higher scores on items 1, 3, 6, 7, likert scale equate to greater satisfaction. Higher scores on items 2, 4, 5, and 8 likert scale equate to lower satisfaction.

Immediate Intervention - approximately one week after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance. Waitlist Control - approximately one month after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance.
Empowered Relief Post Course Survey
Ramy czasowe: Immediate Intervention - approximately one week after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance. Waitlist Control - approximately one month after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance.

Empowered Relief Post-Course Survey 5 items on a 6 point Likert scale. Higher scores equate to greater satisfaction with Empowered Relief course, content, and practice.

Immediate Intervention - approximately one week after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance. Waitlist Control - approximately one month after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance.
Satisfaction with Class
Ramy czasowe: Immediate Intervention - approximately one week after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance. Waitlist Control - approximately one month after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance.

Satisfaction with Class (Empowered Relief) is a 11 item survey. Items 1 - 5 are on a 0 to 10 numeric scale with higher scores equating to greater satisfaction. Items 6 - 10 are on a 7 point Likert scale with higher scores equating to greater satisfaction. Item 11 is a closed-ended single select question which includes three answer options.

Immediate Intervention - approximately one week after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance. Waitlist Control - approximately one month after consent and directly after pain management intervention attendance.

Miary wyników drugorzędnych

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
PTSD Symptoms
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (Week 0)

The PTSD Symptom Checklist (Past Month) (PCL-5) will assess if the participant has experienced a traumatic event as defined by the DSM-5-TR and if they have experienced PTSD symptoms in the past month related to the event. The PCL-5 is a 20 item questionnaire with each item rated on a 5-point likert scale ranging from 0 - 4. Higher scores equate to greater intensity and interference of PTSD symptoms.

Baseline (Week 0)
Headache Impact
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow up (Week 4)

The Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) 6 item questionnaire evaluates pain intensity, life interference, and psychological distress due to headaches. Items are rated on a 5 point likert scale. Higher scores equate greater headache impact.

Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow up (Week 4)
PTSD Symptoms (Past Two Weeks)
Ramy czasowe: Two Week Follow up (Week 2), One Month Follow up (Week 4)

The PTSD Short Form (PCL-5-SF) are administered to participants who indicate having experienced a trauma. The PCL-5-SF is a 4 item questionnaire on a 5 point likert scale. Higher scores equate to greater PTSD symptoms.

Two Week Follow up (Week 2), One Month Follow up (Week 4)
Pain Self Efficacy
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow Up (Week 4)

The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-2) includes two items with a 6 point likert scale. Lower scores equate to less pain self-efficacy.

Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow Up (Week 4)
Pain Catastrophizing
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow Up (Week 4)

The University of Washington Concerns About Pain Scale (UW-CAP-6) evaluates participants pain catastrophizing and negative thoughts in regard to their chronic pain. UW-CAP-6 short form includes 6 items rated on a 5 point likert scale with higher scores equating to greater levels of pain catastrophizing.

Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow Up (Week 4)
Acceptance of Chronic Pain
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow Up (Week 4)

The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8) is an 8 item questionnaire that evaluates participants acceptance of their chronic pain condition. Items are rated on a 7 point likert scale with higher scores equating to greater pain acceptance.

Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow Up (Week 4)
Pain Interference
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)

The PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form (PROMIS 4a) evaluates how much pain interferes with their daily life. The PROMIS 4a includes 4 items rated on a 5 point likert scale with higher scores equating to pain having greater interference on their life.

Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)
Anxiety and Depression
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)

The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) is a brief questionnaire evaluating the participants anxiety and depression with 4 items rated on a 4 point likert scale with higher scores equating to greater levels of distress.

Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)
Fatigue
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)

The PROMIS-FAT-4 is a brief questionnaire that evaluates participants level and impact of fatigue with 4 items on a 5 point likert scale with higher scores equating to greater severity of fatigue.

Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)
Satisfaction with Life
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)

The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) evaluates participants judgement of satisfaction with the conditions of their life with 5 items rated on a 7 point likert scale with higher scores equating to greater satisfaction with their life's conditions.

Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)
Jaw Function
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)

The Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS) short form evaluates participants jaw function limitations with 8 items on an 11 point numeric scale with higher scores equating to greater jaw function limitation.

Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)
Insomnia Severity
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)

The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI-brief) evaluates the participants experience with sleep and the the severity and impact of insomnia if present. The brief ISI measure includes 7 items on a 5 point likert scale with higher scores equating to greater impact and severity of insomnia symptoms.

Baseline (Week 0), Two Week Follow Up (Week 2), One Month Follow-Up (Week 4)

Współpracownicy i badacze

Tutaj znajdziesz osoby i organizacje zaangażowane w to badanie.

Śledczy

  • Główny śledczy: Kathleen E Wakeman, M.S., University of Kentucky
  • Krzesło do nauki: Ian Boggero, PhD, University of Kentucky

Publikacje i pomocne linki

Osoba odpowiedzialna za wprowadzenie informacji o badaniu dobrowolnie udostępnia te publikacje. Mogą one dotyczyć wszystkiego, co jest związane z badaniem.

Publikacje ogólne

Daty zapisu na studia

Daty te śledzą postęp w przesyłaniu rekordów badań i podsumowań wyników do ClinicalTrials.gov. Zapisy badań i zgłoszone wyniki są przeglądane przez National Library of Medicine (NLM), aby upewnić się, że spełniają określone standardy kontroli jakości, zanim zostaną opublikowane na publicznej stronie internetowej.

Główne daty studiów

Rozpoczęcie studiów (Szacowany)

1 października 2026

Zakończenie podstawowe (Szacowany)

1 października 2027

Ukończenie studiów (Szacowany)

1 października 2028

Daty rejestracji na studia

Pierwszy przesłany

30 sierpnia 2026

Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości

30 sierpnia 2026

Pierwszy wysłany (Rzeczywisty)

3 września 2026

Aktualizacje rekordów badań

Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)

5 października 2026

Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości

1 października 2026

Ostatnia weryfikacja

1 października 2026

Więcej informacji

Terminy związane z tym badaniem

Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania

  • 119306

Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)

Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?

NIE

Opis planu IPD

Participant health data will be protected.

Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze

Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .

Subskrybuj