Turkish Version of a Scale Measuring How People View Chronic Pain
Turkish Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale
This study will translate and culturally adapt the Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale (PEB) into Turkish and evaluate how well and consistently it measures the views of adults with chronic pain. The study will take place at the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic of Bilecik Training and Research Hospital. At least 200 adults will be included in the main sample. Participants will complete questionnaires that are expected to take 10 to 15 minutes. An additional 20 people who will not be included in the main sample will take part in a pilot assessment. Fifty participants from the main sample will complete the PEB Scale again after two weeks. No treatment or intervention will be assigned.
調査の概要
状態
条件
詳細な説明
This is a methodological, cross-sectional study with a prospective test-retest component. The Turkish cross-cultural adaptation will include independent forward translations, reconciliation of the translations, independent back-translations, comparison with the original scale, and review of discrepancies. Seven experts in relevant fields will assess the clarity, cultural suitability, and content relevance of the items. The revised form will be pilot-tested with 20 adults with chronic pain who will not be included in the main sample.
The main psychometric evaluation will include at least 200 adults with chronic pain. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses will be used to evaluate the scale structure. Criterion-related validity will be assessed through correlations with pain beliefs, pain-related self-efficacy, pain intensity, interference with daily activities, and pain-related distress. Internal consistency and item characteristics will also be examined. Measurement invariance across selected participant groups will be evaluated using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis.
For test-retest reliability, 50 participants from the main sample whose clinical condition is not expected to change substantially will complete the PEB Scale again after two weeks. Agreement between the two measurements will be assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and its 95% confidence interval.
研究の種類
入学 (推定)
連絡先と場所
研究連絡先
- 名前：Burcu Bayrak Kahraman, PhD
- 電話番号：+905057542411
- メール：burcu.bayrak@bilecik.edu.tr
研究場所
-
-
-
Bilecik、トルコ（Türkiye）、11000
- Bilecik Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
-
コンタクト：
- Burcu Bayrak Kahraman, Assoc. Prof.
- 電話番号：+905057542411
- メール：burcu.bayrak@bilecik.edu.tr
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
サンプリング方法
調査対象母集団
Adults aged 18 years or older with physician-diagnosed chronic pain lasting or recurring for more than 3 months who receive follow-up or treatment at the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic of Bilecik Training and Research Hospital, Türkiye.
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 18 years or older.
- Voluntarily agrees to participate in the study.
- Has physician-diagnosed chronic pain lasting or recurring for more than 3 months.
- Able to read and write Turkish.
- Has sufficient cognitive ability to understand and complete the data collection forms.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presents with acute pain or does not meet the chronic pain criteria.
- Has a cognitive or communication impairment that prevents completion of the data collection forms.
- Submits incomplete data collection forms.
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 観測モデル：OTHER
- 時間の展望：PROSPECTIVE
コホートと介入
グループ/コホート |
|---|
|
Adults With Chronic Pain
Adults aged 18 years or older with physician-diagnosed chronic pain lasting or recurring for more than 3 months. At least 200 participants will be included in the main sample, and an additional 20 participants will take part in the pilot assessment. Fifty participants from the main sample will complete the PEB Scale again after two weeks. No intervention will be assigned. |
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Construct validity and internal consistency of the Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale
時間枠：At the initial assessment (single administration)
|
The Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale (PEB Scale) consists of 11 items rated on a 4-point scale (1-4), yielding a total score of 11-44. Higher scores indicate stronger endorsement of the biopsychosocial model of chronic pain and represent a more favorable outcome. Construct validity will be evaluated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Internal consistency will be assessed using Cronbach's alpha and corrected item-total correlations. |
At the initial assessment (single administration)
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Test-retest reliability of the Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale
時間枠：At the initial assessment and 2 weeks later
|
The Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale (PEB Scale) consists of 11 items rated on a 4-point scale (1-4), yielding a total score of 11-44. Higher scores indicate stronger endorsement of the biopsychosocial model of chronic pain and represent a more favorable outcome. A subsample of 50 participants will complete the scale again after 2 weeks. Test-retest reliability will be evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and its 95% confidence interval. |
At the initial assessment and 2 weeks later
|
|
Criterion-related validity of the Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale
時間枠：At the initial assessment
|
Criterion-related validity will be assessed by examining correlations between scores on the Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale (PEB Scale), the Pain Beliefs Questionnaire, the University of Washington Pain-Related Self-Efficacy Scale Short Form, and three 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) items. The PEB Scale has 11 items rated 1-4, with a total score of 11-44; higher scores indicate stronger endorsement of the biopsychosocial model and represent a more favorable outcome. The Pain Beliefs Questionnaire has Organic Beliefs and Psychological Beliefs subscale mean scores ranging from 1-6; higher scores indicate stronger beliefs in the corresponding domain, with no uniformly better or worse direction. The University of Washington Pain-Related Self-Efficacy Scale Short Form has 6 items rated 1-5, with a total score of 6-30; higher scores indicate greater pain-related self-efficacy and represent a more favorable outcome. The three NRS items assess pain int |
At the initial assessment
|
協力者と研究者
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (推定)
一次修了 (推定)
研究の完了 (推定)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
追加の関連 MeSH 用語
その他の研究ID番号
- PEB-TR-2026
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
IPD プランの説明
No individual participant data will be shared with other researchers. The study involves sensitive health information, and participant confidentiality will be protected. Study findings will be reported in aggregate.
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。