Turkish Version of a Scale Measuring How People View Chronic Pain
Turkish Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale
This study will translate and culturally adapt the Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale (PEB) into Turkish and evaluate how well and consistently it measures the views of adults with chronic pain. The study will take place at the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic of Bilecik Training and Research Hospital. At least 200 adults will be included in the main sample. Participants will complete questionnaires that are expected to take 10 to 15 minutes. An additional 20 people who will not be included in the main sample will take part in a pilot assessment. Fifty participants from the main sample will complete the PEB Scale again after two weeks. No treatment or intervention will be assigned.
研究概览
地位
条件
详细说明
This is a methodological, cross-sectional study with a prospective test-retest component. The Turkish cross-cultural adaptation will include independent forward translations, reconciliation of the translations, independent back-translations, comparison with the original scale, and review of discrepancies. Seven experts in relevant fields will assess the clarity, cultural suitability, and content relevance of the items. The revised form will be pilot-tested with 20 adults with chronic pain who will not be included in the main sample.
The main psychometric evaluation will include at least 200 adults with chronic pain. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses will be used to evaluate the scale structure. Criterion-related validity will be assessed through correlations with pain beliefs, pain-related self-efficacy, pain intensity, interference with daily activities, and pain-related distress. Internal consistency and item characteristics will also be examined. Measurement invariance across selected participant groups will be evaluated using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis.
For test-retest reliability, 50 participants from the main sample whose clinical condition is not expected to change substantially will complete the PEB Scale again after two weeks. Agreement between the two measurements will be assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and its 95% confidence interval.
研究类型
注册 (估计的)
联系人和位置
学习联系方式
- 姓名：Burcu Bayrak Kahraman, PhD
- 电话号码：+905057542411
- 邮箱：burcu.bayrak@bilecik.edu.tr
学习地点
-
-
-
Bilecik、土耳其（türkiye）、11000
- Bilecik Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
-
接触：
- Burcu Bayrak Kahraman, Assoc. Prof.
- 电话号码：+905057542411
- 邮箱：burcu.bayrak@bilecik.edu.tr
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
取样方法
研究人群
Adults aged 18 years or older with physician-diagnosed chronic pain lasting or recurring for more than 3 months who receive follow-up or treatment at the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic of Bilecik Training and Research Hospital, Türkiye.
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 18 years or older.
- Voluntarily agrees to participate in the study.
- Has physician-diagnosed chronic pain lasting or recurring for more than 3 months.
- Able to read and write Turkish.
- Has sufficient cognitive ability to understand and complete the data collection forms.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presents with acute pain or does not meet the chronic pain criteria.
- Has a cognitive or communication impairment that prevents completion of the data collection forms.
- Submits incomplete data collection forms.
学习计划
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 观测模型：OTHER
- 时间观点：PROSPECTIVE
队列和干预
团体/队列 |
|---|
|
Adults With Chronic Pain
Adults aged 18 years or older with physician-diagnosed chronic pain lasting or recurring for more than 3 months. At least 200 participants will be included in the main sample, and an additional 20 participants will take part in the pilot assessment. Fifty participants from the main sample will complete the PEB Scale again after two weeks. No intervention will be assigned. |
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Construct validity and internal consistency of the Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale
大体时间：At the initial assessment (single administration)
|
The Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale (PEB Scale) consists of 11 items rated on a 4-point scale (1-4), yielding a total score of 11-44. Higher scores indicate stronger endorsement of the biopsychosocial model of chronic pain and represent a more favorable outcome. Construct validity will be evaluated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Internal consistency will be assessed using Cronbach's alpha and corrected item-total correlations. |
At the initial assessment (single administration)
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Test-retest reliability of the Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale
大体时间：At the initial assessment and 2 weeks later
|
The Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale (PEB Scale) consists of 11 items rated on a 4-point scale (1-4), yielding a total score of 11-44. Higher scores indicate stronger endorsement of the biopsychosocial model of chronic pain and represent a more favorable outcome. A subsample of 50 participants will complete the scale again after 2 weeks. Test-retest reliability will be evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and its 95% confidence interval. |
At the initial assessment and 2 weeks later
|
|
Criterion-related validity of the Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale
大体时间：At the initial assessment
|
Criterion-related validity will be assessed by examining correlations between scores on the Patients' Endorsement of a Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain Scale (PEB Scale), the Pain Beliefs Questionnaire, the University of Washington Pain-Related Self-Efficacy Scale Short Form, and three 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) items. The PEB Scale has 11 items rated 1-4, with a total score of 11-44; higher scores indicate stronger endorsement of the biopsychosocial model and represent a more favorable outcome. The Pain Beliefs Questionnaire has Organic Beliefs and Psychological Beliefs subscale mean scores ranging from 1-6; higher scores indicate stronger beliefs in the corresponding domain, with no uniformly better or worse direction. The University of Washington Pain-Related Self-Efficacy Scale Short Form has 6 items rated 1-5, with a total score of 6-30; higher scores indicate greater pain-related self-efficacy and represent a more favorable outcome. The three NRS items assess pain int |
At the initial assessment
|
合作者和调查者
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (估计的)
初级完成 (估计的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他相关的 MeSH 术语
其他研究编号
- PEB-TR-2026
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？
IPD 计划说明
No individual participant data will be shared with other researchers. The study involves sensitive health information, and participant confidentiality will be protected. Study findings will be reported in aggregate.
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.