- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT01144182
Veterans Affairs Lowering Readmission in Heart Failure (VALOR in HF)
VALOR (Veterans Affairs Lowering Readmissions) in Heart Failure Study
연구 개요
상세 설명
Heart failure (HF) greatly increases mortality and lowers quality of life (QOL). HF is the most common indication for readmission in older adults and the most frequent reason for 30-day readmission. Medications and restriction of dietary sodium constitute crucial therapy to lower HF recurrence. However, adherence to medications and dietary recommendations is low in HF patients. Nonadherence is often due to an interaction among the environment, the patient and providers. In the VALOR in Heart Failure Study, we will assess a novel quality improvement program (QIP) to improve HF care using a pretest-posttest design. This interdisciplinary theory-based prospective experimental study will target improving HF treatment using patient-based behavioral and checklist intervention, as well as provider and system-targeted checklists and treatment defaults (posttest or intervention phase); this will be compared to current best practice (CBP) evaluated in the pretest (pretest or pre-intervention) phase. It is hypothesized that the QIP, which intervenes on patient, provider and system levels, will improve QOL and lower HF recurrence compared to CBP.
The primary specific aims are 1) To test the effect of QIP on HF-specific quality of life compared to the CBP group, and 2) To evaluate the impact of QIP group on general quality of life compared to the CBP group.
Secondary specific aims are to:
1) assess the effect of QIP on medication adherence at 3 months, 2) examine the effect of QIP on diet adherence at 3 months, and 3) evaluate the effect of QIP on satisfaction, and 4) assess the effect of QIP on intervention acceptability. We will also examine the impact of QIP at 3 months on keeping routine outpatient visits, health-care utilization, exercise capacity, weight, perceived stress, depression, cardiovascular events and deaths.
Exploratory aim is to examine the effect of the QIP on 30 day post-discharge HF readmission rates compared to CBP.
We have enrolled 136 veterans being discharged from the hospital with a diagnosis of HF. Patients enrolled in the pretest phase will receive the HF management based on current best practice (CBP). Patients enrolled in the posttest phase receive the comprehensive quality improvement program (QIP) that intervenes on patient, provider and system levels. The QIP will consist of 3 monthly phone calls to promote diet and medication adherence using the transtheoretical model as a behavioral framework and checklists to facilitate patients' self-monitoring of their diet, physical activity, weight and medication taking. Further, providers during the posttest phase will use checklists for inpatient and outpatient care of HF patients. Data, including quality of life (QOL), medication adherence, and dietary adherence, will be collected from patients at baseline (prior to hospital discharge) and 3 months. Hospital readmissions, emergency room visits, and healthcare utilization will be tracked for 6 months. If, as expected, there are no differences in demographic or other confounders (EF, comorbidities, etc), the pretest and posttest groups will be compared by the Fisher's Exact test for discrete outcomes (30-day readmissions or ER visits). We will use the Student's ttest (two-tailed) for normally distributed outcomes and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for categorical variables and continuous variables not normally distributed.
This study will inform and enhance quality improvement efforts in heart failure care in VA New York Harbor and elsewhere. It will also provide data for a rigorous effectiveness trial to test this promising intervention that could reduce HF recurrence and improve QOL in HF. If this promising theory-driven approach can work in a clinical setting where improvements in HF care are so urgent, it will be an important scientific contribution.
연구 유형
등록 (실제)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, 미국, 10010
- VA New York Harbor Health Care System
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients admitted with either systolic or diastolic HF will be identified through ongoing daily prospective manual search of admission records in VA NYHHS
- Men and women ( 21 years) being discharged after a HF admission will be eligible
- They must have an available phone
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with poor short-term survival (< 3 months)
- recent major surgery (< 1 month)
- planned discharge to a long-term-care facility
- severe dementia or other serious psychiatric illness
- temporarily in the area
- those unable to provide consent, refusal to participate
- logistic or discretionary reasons (including participation in another study) will be excluded
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 치료
- 할당: 무작위화되지 않음
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
간섭 없음: Current Best Practice (CBP)
CBP received no intervention and only current best practices for inpatient HF care.
|
|
|
활성 비교기: Quality improvement program (QIP)
Comprehensive quality improvement program (QIP) intervenes on patient, provider and system levels.
The QIP will consist of 3 monthly phone calls to promote diet and medication adherence using the transtheoretical model as a behavioral framework and checklists to facilitate patients' self-monitoring of their diet, physical activity, weight and medication taking.
Further, providers during the posttest phase will use checklists for inpatient and outpatient care of HF patients.
|
Comprehensive quality improvement program (QIP) that intervenes on patient, provider and system levels.
The QIP will consist of 3 monthly phone calls to promote diet and medication adherence using the transtheoretical model as a behavioral framework and checklists to facilitate patients' self-monitoring of their diet, physical activity, weight and medication taking.
Further, providers during the posttest phase will use checklists for inpatient and outpatient care of HF patients.
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Quality of Life From the Standardized Physical Component Score
기간: 3 months after discharge
|
Assesses General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
|
3 months after discharge
|
|
Heart Failure Specific Quality of Life
기간: 3 months after discharge
|
Measured by Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire.
Scores range from 0-105, with higher scores indicating poorer QOL.
|
3 months after discharge
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Standardized Mental Component Score
기간: 3 months after discharge
|
Assesses General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
|
3 months after discharge
|
|
Physical Functioning
기간: 3 months after discharge
|
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
|
3 months after discharge
|
|
Role Physical
기간: 3 months after discharge
|
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
|
3 months after discharge
|
|
Pain Index
기간: 3 months after discharge
|
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
|
3 months after discharge
|
|
General Health
기간: 3 months after discharge
|
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
|
3 months after discharge
|
|
Vitality
기간: 3 months after discharge
|
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
|
3 months after discharge
|
|
Social Functioning
기간: 3 months after discharge
|
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
|
3 months after discharge
|
|
Role Emotional
기간: 3 months after discharge
|
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
|
3 months after discharge
|
|
Mental Health
기간: 3 months after discharge
|
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
|
3 months after discharge
|
|
Physical Subscale of Heart Failure Specific Quality of Life
기간: 3 months after discharge
|
Subscale of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (HF-specific quality of life measure).
Scores range from 0-40, with higher scores indicating poorer QOL.
|
3 months after discharge
|
|
Emotional Subscale of Heart Failure Specific Quality of Life
기간: 3 months after discharge
|
Subscale of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (HF-specific quality of life measure).
Scores range from 0-25, with higher scores indicating poorer QOL.
|
3 months after discharge
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Sundar Natarajan, MD MSc, VA New York Harbor Health Care System
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작
기본 완료 (실제)
연구 완료 (실제)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (추정)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (추정)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .