このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Veterans Affairs Lowering Readmission in Heart Failure (VALOR in HF)

2015年10月15日 更新者:VA Office of Research and Development

VALOR (Veterans Affairs Lowering Readmissions) in Heart Failure Study

Heart failure (HF) greatly increases mortality and lowers quality of life (QOL). HF is the most common indication for readmission in older adults and the most frequent reason for 30-day readmission. Medications and restriction of dietary sodium constitute crucial therapy to lower HF recurrence. However, adherence to medications and dietary recommendations is low in HF patients. Nonadherence is often due to an interaction among the environment, the patient and providers. In the VALOR in Heart Failure Study, we will assess a novel quality improvement program (QIP) to improve HF care using a pretest-posttest design. This interdisciplinary theory-based prospective experimental study will target improving HF treatment using patient-based behavioral and checklist intervention, as well as provider and system-targeted checklists and treatment defaults (posttest or intervention phase); this will be compared to current best practice (CBP) evaluated in the pretest (pretest or pre-intervention) phase. It is hypothesized that the QIP, which intervenes on patient, provider and system levels, will improve QOL and lower HF recurrence compared to CBP.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Heart failure (HF) greatly increases mortality and lowers quality of life (QOL). HF is the most common indication for readmission in older adults and the most frequent reason for 30-day readmission. Medications and restriction of dietary sodium constitute crucial therapy to lower HF recurrence. However, adherence to medications and dietary recommendations is low in HF patients. Nonadherence is often due to an interaction among the environment, the patient and providers. In the VALOR in Heart Failure Study, we will assess a novel quality improvement program (QIP) to improve HF care using a pretest-posttest design. This interdisciplinary theory-based prospective experimental study will target improving HF treatment using patient-based behavioral and checklist intervention, as well as provider and system-targeted checklists and treatment defaults (posttest or intervention phase); this will be compared to current best practice (CBP) evaluated in the pretest (pretest or pre-intervention) phase. It is hypothesized that the QIP, which intervenes on patient, provider and system levels, will improve QOL and lower HF recurrence compared to CBP.

The primary specific aims are 1) To test the effect of QIP on HF-specific quality of life compared to the CBP group, and 2) To evaluate the impact of QIP group on general quality of life compared to the CBP group.

Secondary specific aims are to:

1) assess the effect of QIP on medication adherence at 3 months, 2) examine the effect of QIP on diet adherence at 3 months, and 3) evaluate the effect of QIP on satisfaction, and 4) assess the effect of QIP on intervention acceptability. We will also examine the impact of QIP at 3 months on keeping routine outpatient visits, health-care utilization, exercise capacity, weight, perceived stress, depression, cardiovascular events and deaths.

Exploratory aim is to examine the effect of the QIP on 30 day post-discharge HF readmission rates compared to CBP.

We have enrolled 136 veterans being discharged from the hospital with a diagnosis of HF. Patients enrolled in the pretest phase will receive the HF management based on current best practice (CBP). Patients enrolled in the posttest phase receive the comprehensive quality improvement program (QIP) that intervenes on patient, provider and system levels. The QIP will consist of 3 monthly phone calls to promote diet and medication adherence using the transtheoretical model as a behavioral framework and checklists to facilitate patients' self-monitoring of their diet, physical activity, weight and medication taking. Further, providers during the posttest phase will use checklists for inpatient and outpatient care of HF patients. Data, including quality of life (QOL), medication adherence, and dietary adherence, will be collected from patients at baseline (prior to hospital discharge) and 3 months. Hospital readmissions, emergency room visits, and healthcare utilization will be tracked for 6 months. If, as expected, there are no differences in demographic or other confounders (EF, comorbidities, etc), the pretest and posttest groups will be compared by the Fisher's Exact test for discrete outcomes (30-day readmissions or ER visits). We will use the Student's ttest (two-tailed) for normally distributed outcomes and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for categorical variables and continuous variables not normally distributed.

This study will inform and enhance quality improvement efforts in heart failure care in VA New York Harbor and elsewhere. It will also provide data for a rigorous effectiveness trial to test this promising intervention that could reduce HF recurrence and improve QOL in HF. If this promising theory-driven approach can work in a clinical setting where improvements in HF care are so urgent, it will be an important scientific contribution.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

136

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

    • New York
      • New York、New York、アメリカ、10010
        • VA New York Harbor Health Care System

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

21年歳以上 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients admitted with either systolic or diastolic HF will be identified through ongoing daily prospective manual search of admission records in VA NYHHS
  • Men and women ( 21 years) being discharged after a HF admission will be eligible
  • They must have an available phone

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with poor short-term survival (< 3 months)
  • recent major surgery (< 1 month)
  • planned discharge to a long-term-care facility
  • severe dementia or other serious psychiatric illness
  • temporarily in the area
  • those unable to provide consent, refusal to participate
  • logistic or discretionary reasons (including participation in another study) will be excluded

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:非ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
介入なし:Current Best Practice (CBP)
CBP received no intervention and only current best practices for inpatient HF care.
アクティブコンパレータ:Quality improvement program (QIP)
Comprehensive quality improvement program (QIP) intervenes on patient, provider and system levels. The QIP will consist of 3 monthly phone calls to promote diet and medication adherence using the transtheoretical model as a behavioral framework and checklists to facilitate patients' self-monitoring of their diet, physical activity, weight and medication taking. Further, providers during the posttest phase will use checklists for inpatient and outpatient care of HF patients.
Comprehensive quality improvement program (QIP) that intervenes on patient, provider and system levels. The QIP will consist of 3 monthly phone calls to promote diet and medication adherence using the transtheoretical model as a behavioral framework and checklists to facilitate patients' self-monitoring of their diet, physical activity, weight and medication taking. Further, providers during the posttest phase will use checklists for inpatient and outpatient care of HF patients.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
General Quality of Life From the Standardized Physical Component Score
時間枠:3 months after discharge
Assesses General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
3 months after discharge
Heart Failure Specific Quality of Life
時間枠:3 months after discharge
Measured by Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Scores range from 0-105, with higher scores indicating poorer QOL.
3 months after discharge

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Standardized Mental Component Score
時間枠:3 months after discharge
Assesses General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
3 months after discharge
Physical Functioning
時間枠:3 months after discharge
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
3 months after discharge
Role Physical
時間枠:3 months after discharge
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
3 months after discharge
Pain Index
時間枠:3 months after discharge
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
3 months after discharge
General Health
時間枠:3 months after discharge
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
3 months after discharge
Vitality
時間枠:3 months after discharge
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
3 months after discharge
Social Functioning
時間枠:3 months after discharge
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
3 months after discharge
Role Emotional
時間枠:3 months after discharge
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
3 months after discharge
Mental Health
時間枠:3 months after discharge
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
3 months after discharge
Physical Subscale of Heart Failure Specific Quality of Life
時間枠:3 months after discharge
Subscale of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (HF-specific quality of life measure). Scores range from 0-40, with higher scores indicating poorer QOL.
3 months after discharge
Emotional Subscale of Heart Failure Specific Quality of Life
時間枠:3 months after discharge
Subscale of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (HF-specific quality of life measure). Scores range from 0-25, with higher scores indicating poorer QOL.
3 months after discharge

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Sundar Natarajan, MD MSc、VA New York Harbor Health Care System

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始

2010年10月1日

一次修了 (実際)

2013年7月1日

研究の完了 (実際)

2013年9月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2010年6月10日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2010年6月10日

最初の投稿 (見積もり)

2010年6月15日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (見積もり)

2015年10月16日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2015年10月15日

最終確認日

2015年8月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

キーワード

追加の関連 MeSH 用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • RRP 09-412

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

心不全の臨床試験

3
購読する