Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Veterans Affairs Lowering Readmission in Heart Failure (VALOR in HF)

15 octobre 2015 mis à jour par: VA Office of Research and Development

VALOR (Veterans Affairs Lowering Readmissions) in Heart Failure Study

Heart failure (HF) greatly increases mortality and lowers quality of life (QOL). HF is the most common indication for readmission in older adults and the most frequent reason for 30-day readmission. Medications and restriction of dietary sodium constitute crucial therapy to lower HF recurrence. However, adherence to medications and dietary recommendations is low in HF patients. Nonadherence is often due to an interaction among the environment, the patient and providers. In the VALOR in Heart Failure Study, we will assess a novel quality improvement program (QIP) to improve HF care using a pretest-posttest design. This interdisciplinary theory-based prospective experimental study will target improving HF treatment using patient-based behavioral and checklist intervention, as well as provider and system-targeted checklists and treatment defaults (posttest or intervention phase); this will be compared to current best practice (CBP) evaluated in the pretest (pretest or pre-intervention) phase. It is hypothesized that the QIP, which intervenes on patient, provider and system levels, will improve QOL and lower HF recurrence compared to CBP.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Les conditions

Description détaillée

Heart failure (HF) greatly increases mortality and lowers quality of life (QOL). HF is the most common indication for readmission in older adults and the most frequent reason for 30-day readmission. Medications and restriction of dietary sodium constitute crucial therapy to lower HF recurrence. However, adherence to medications and dietary recommendations is low in HF patients. Nonadherence is often due to an interaction among the environment, the patient and providers. In the VALOR in Heart Failure Study, we will assess a novel quality improvement program (QIP) to improve HF care using a pretest-posttest design. This interdisciplinary theory-based prospective experimental study will target improving HF treatment using patient-based behavioral and checklist intervention, as well as provider and system-targeted checklists and treatment defaults (posttest or intervention phase); this will be compared to current best practice (CBP) evaluated in the pretest (pretest or pre-intervention) phase. It is hypothesized that the QIP, which intervenes on patient, provider and system levels, will improve QOL and lower HF recurrence compared to CBP.

The primary specific aims are 1) To test the effect of QIP on HF-specific quality of life compared to the CBP group, and 2) To evaluate the impact of QIP group on general quality of life compared to the CBP group.

Secondary specific aims are to:

1) assess the effect of QIP on medication adherence at 3 months, 2) examine the effect of QIP on diet adherence at 3 months, and 3) evaluate the effect of QIP on satisfaction, and 4) assess the effect of QIP on intervention acceptability. We will also examine the impact of QIP at 3 months on keeping routine outpatient visits, health-care utilization, exercise capacity, weight, perceived stress, depression, cardiovascular events and deaths.

Exploratory aim is to examine the effect of the QIP on 30 day post-discharge HF readmission rates compared to CBP.

We have enrolled 136 veterans being discharged from the hospital with a diagnosis of HF. Patients enrolled in the pretest phase will receive the HF management based on current best practice (CBP). Patients enrolled in the posttest phase receive the comprehensive quality improvement program (QIP) that intervenes on patient, provider and system levels. The QIP will consist of 3 monthly phone calls to promote diet and medication adherence using the transtheoretical model as a behavioral framework and checklists to facilitate patients' self-monitoring of their diet, physical activity, weight and medication taking. Further, providers during the posttest phase will use checklists for inpatient and outpatient care of HF patients. Data, including quality of life (QOL), medication adherence, and dietary adherence, will be collected from patients at baseline (prior to hospital discharge) and 3 months. Hospital readmissions, emergency room visits, and healthcare utilization will be tracked for 6 months. If, as expected, there are no differences in demographic or other confounders (EF, comorbidities, etc), the pretest and posttest groups will be compared by the Fisher's Exact test for discrete outcomes (30-day readmissions or ER visits). We will use the Student's ttest (two-tailed) for normally distributed outcomes and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for categorical variables and continuous variables not normally distributed.

This study will inform and enhance quality improvement efforts in heart failure care in VA New York Harbor and elsewhere. It will also provide data for a rigorous effectiveness trial to test this promising intervention that could reduce HF recurrence and improve QOL in HF. If this promising theory-driven approach can work in a clinical setting where improvements in HF care are so urgent, it will be an important scientific contribution.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

136

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • New York
      • New York, New York, États-Unis, 10010
        • VA New York Harbor Health Care System

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

21 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients admitted with either systolic or diastolic HF will be identified through ongoing daily prospective manual search of admission records in VA NYHHS
  • Men and women ( 21 years) being discharged after a HF admission will be eligible
  • They must have an available phone

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with poor short-term survival (< 3 months)
  • recent major surgery (< 1 month)
  • planned discharge to a long-term-care facility
  • severe dementia or other serious psychiatric illness
  • temporarily in the area
  • those unable to provide consent, refusal to participate
  • logistic or discretionary reasons (including participation in another study) will be excluded

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Non randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Aucune intervention: Current Best Practice (CBP)
CBP received no intervention and only current best practices for inpatient HF care.
Comparateur actif: Quality improvement program (QIP)
Comprehensive quality improvement program (QIP) intervenes on patient, provider and system levels. The QIP will consist of 3 monthly phone calls to promote diet and medication adherence using the transtheoretical model as a behavioral framework and checklists to facilitate patients' self-monitoring of their diet, physical activity, weight and medication taking. Further, providers during the posttest phase will use checklists for inpatient and outpatient care of HF patients.
Comprehensive quality improvement program (QIP) that intervenes on patient, provider and system levels. The QIP will consist of 3 monthly phone calls to promote diet and medication adherence using the transtheoretical model as a behavioral framework and checklists to facilitate patients' self-monitoring of their diet, physical activity, weight and medication taking. Further, providers during the posttest phase will use checklists for inpatient and outpatient care of HF patients.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
General Quality of Life From the Standardized Physical Component Score
Délai: 3 months after discharge
Assesses General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
3 months after discharge
Heart Failure Specific Quality of Life
Délai: 3 months after discharge
Measured by Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Scores range from 0-105, with higher scores indicating poorer QOL.
3 months after discharge

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Standardized Mental Component Score
Délai: 3 months after discharge
Assesses General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
3 months after discharge
Physical Functioning
Délai: 3 months after discharge
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
3 months after discharge
Role Physical
Délai: 3 months after discharge
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
3 months after discharge
Pain Index
Délai: 3 months after discharge
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
3 months after discharge
General Health
Délai: 3 months after discharge
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
3 months after discharge
Vitality
Délai: 3 months after discharge
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
3 months after discharge
Social Functioning
Délai: 3 months after discharge
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
3 months after discharge
Role Emotional
Délai: 3 months after discharge
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
3 months after discharge
Mental Health
Délai: 3 months after discharge
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
3 months after discharge
Physical Subscale of Heart Failure Specific Quality of Life
Délai: 3 months after discharge
Subscale of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (HF-specific quality of life measure). Scores range from 0-40, with higher scores indicating poorer QOL.
3 months after discharge
Emotional Subscale of Heart Failure Specific Quality of Life
Délai: 3 months after discharge
Subscale of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (HF-specific quality of life measure). Scores range from 0-25, with higher scores indicating poorer QOL.
3 months after discharge

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Sundar Natarajan, MD MSc, VA New York Harbor Health Care System

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 octobre 2010

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 juillet 2013

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 septembre 2013

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

10 juin 2010

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

10 juin 2010

Première publication (Estimation)

15 juin 2010

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)

16 octobre 2015

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

15 octobre 2015

Dernière vérification

1 août 2015

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • RRP 09-412

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Essais cliniques sur Insuffisance cardiaque

3
S'abonner