- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT01144182
Veterans Affairs Lowering Readmission in Heart Failure (VALOR in HF)
VALOR (Veterans Affairs Lowering Readmissions) in Heart Failure Study
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Heart failure (HF) greatly increases mortality and lowers quality of life (QOL). HF is the most common indication for readmission in older adults and the most frequent reason for 30-day readmission. Medications and restriction of dietary sodium constitute crucial therapy to lower HF recurrence. However, adherence to medications and dietary recommendations is low in HF patients. Nonadherence is often due to an interaction among the environment, the patient and providers. In the VALOR in Heart Failure Study, we will assess a novel quality improvement program (QIP) to improve HF care using a pretest-posttest design. This interdisciplinary theory-based prospective experimental study will target improving HF treatment using patient-based behavioral and checklist intervention, as well as provider and system-targeted checklists and treatment defaults (posttest or intervention phase); this will be compared to current best practice (CBP) evaluated in the pretest (pretest or pre-intervention) phase. It is hypothesized that the QIP, which intervenes on patient, provider and system levels, will improve QOL and lower HF recurrence compared to CBP.
The primary specific aims are 1) To test the effect of QIP on HF-specific quality of life compared to the CBP group, and 2) To evaluate the impact of QIP group on general quality of life compared to the CBP group.
Secondary specific aims are to:
1) assess the effect of QIP on medication adherence at 3 months, 2) examine the effect of QIP on diet adherence at 3 months, and 3) evaluate the effect of QIP on satisfaction, and 4) assess the effect of QIP on intervention acceptability. We will also examine the impact of QIP at 3 months on keeping routine outpatient visits, health-care utilization, exercise capacity, weight, perceived stress, depression, cardiovascular events and deaths.
Exploratory aim is to examine the effect of the QIP on 30 day post-discharge HF readmission rates compared to CBP.
We have enrolled 136 veterans being discharged from the hospital with a diagnosis of HF. Patients enrolled in the pretest phase will receive the HF management based on current best practice (CBP). Patients enrolled in the posttest phase receive the comprehensive quality improvement program (QIP) that intervenes on patient, provider and system levels. The QIP will consist of 3 monthly phone calls to promote diet and medication adherence using the transtheoretical model as a behavioral framework and checklists to facilitate patients' self-monitoring of their diet, physical activity, weight and medication taking. Further, providers during the posttest phase will use checklists for inpatient and outpatient care of HF patients. Data, including quality of life (QOL), medication adherence, and dietary adherence, will be collected from patients at baseline (prior to hospital discharge) and 3 months. Hospital readmissions, emergency room visits, and healthcare utilization will be tracked for 6 months. If, as expected, there are no differences in demographic or other confounders (EF, comorbidities, etc), the pretest and posttest groups will be compared by the Fisher's Exact test for discrete outcomes (30-day readmissions or ER visits). We will use the Student's ttest (two-tailed) for normally distributed outcomes and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for categorical variables and continuous variables not normally distributed.
This study will inform and enhance quality improvement efforts in heart failure care in VA New York Harbor and elsewhere. It will also provide data for a rigorous effectiveness trial to test this promising intervention that could reduce HF recurrence and improve QOL in HF. If this promising theory-driven approach can work in a clinical setting where improvements in HF care are so urgent, it will be an important scientific contribution.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Réel)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, États-Unis, 10010
- VA New York Harbor Health Care System
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
Accepte les volontaires sains
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients admitted with either systolic or diastolic HF will be identified through ongoing daily prospective manual search of admission records in VA NYHHS
- Men and women ( 21 years) being discharged after a HF admission will be eligible
- They must have an available phone
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with poor short-term survival (< 3 months)
- recent major surgery (< 1 month)
- planned discharge to a long-term-care facility
- severe dementia or other serious psychiatric illness
- temporarily in the area
- those unable to provide consent, refusal to participate
- logistic or discretionary reasons (including participation in another study) will be excluded
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Non randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
---|---|
Aucune intervention: Current Best Practice (CBP)
CBP received no intervention and only current best practices for inpatient HF care.
|
|
Comparateur actif: Quality improvement program (QIP)
Comprehensive quality improvement program (QIP) intervenes on patient, provider and system levels.
The QIP will consist of 3 monthly phone calls to promote diet and medication adherence using the transtheoretical model as a behavioral framework and checklists to facilitate patients' self-monitoring of their diet, physical activity, weight and medication taking.
Further, providers during the posttest phase will use checklists for inpatient and outpatient care of HF patients.
|
Comprehensive quality improvement program (QIP) that intervenes on patient, provider and system levels.
The QIP will consist of 3 monthly phone calls to promote diet and medication adherence using the transtheoretical model as a behavioral framework and checklists to facilitate patients' self-monitoring of their diet, physical activity, weight and medication taking.
Further, providers during the posttest phase will use checklists for inpatient and outpatient care of HF patients.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
---|---|---|
General Quality of Life From the Standardized Physical Component Score
Délai: 3 months after discharge
|
Assesses General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
|
3 months after discharge
|
Heart Failure Specific Quality of Life
Délai: 3 months after discharge
|
Measured by Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire.
Scores range from 0-105, with higher scores indicating poorer QOL.
|
3 months after discharge
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
---|---|---|
Standardized Mental Component Score
Délai: 3 months after discharge
|
Assesses General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
|
3 months after discharge
|
Physical Functioning
Délai: 3 months after discharge
|
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
|
3 months after discharge
|
Role Physical
Délai: 3 months after discharge
|
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
|
3 months after discharge
|
Pain Index
Délai: 3 months after discharge
|
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
|
3 months after discharge
|
General Health
Délai: 3 months after discharge
|
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
|
3 months after discharge
|
Vitality
Délai: 3 months after discharge
|
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
|
3 months after discharge
|
Social Functioning
Délai: 3 months after discharge
|
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
|
3 months after discharge
|
Role Emotional
Délai: 3 months after discharge
|
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
|
3 months after discharge
|
Mental Health
Délai: 3 months after discharge
|
Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life
|
3 months after discharge
|
Physical Subscale of Heart Failure Specific Quality of Life
Délai: 3 months after discharge
|
Subscale of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (HF-specific quality of life measure).
Scores range from 0-40, with higher scores indicating poorer QOL.
|
3 months after discharge
|
Emotional Subscale of Heart Failure Specific Quality of Life
Délai: 3 months after discharge
|
Subscale of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (HF-specific quality of life measure).
Scores range from 0-25, with higher scores indicating poorer QOL.
|
3 months after discharge
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Sundar Natarajan, MD MSc, VA New York Harbor Health Care System
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Estimation)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- RRP 09-412
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .
Essais cliniques sur Insuffisance cardiaque
-
Region SkaneInscription sur invitationInsuffisance cardiaque New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classe II | Insuffisance cardiaque Classe III de la New York Heart Association (NYHA)Suède
-
Medical University of BialystokInstitute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland; Medical University of Lodz; Poznan... et autres collaborateursPas encore de recrutementInsuffisance cardiaque, systolique | Insuffisance cardiaque avec fraction d'éjection réduite | Insuffisance cardiaque New York Heart Association Classe IV | Insuffisance cardiaque Classe III de la New York Heart AssociationPologne
-
University of WashingtonAmerican Heart AssociationComplétéInsuffisance cardiaque, congestive | Altération mitochondriale | Insuffisance cardiaque New York Heart Association Classe IVÉtats-Unis