이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Study of Survivors of Different Types of Cardiac Arrest and Their Neurological Recovery

2014년 1월 9일 업데이트: Eyad AlThenayan, Lawson Health Research Institute

Neurological Outcomes After Cardiac Arrest in Pulseless Electrical Activity in Comparison to Asystole. Are All Non-shockable Rhythms the Same?

After successful resuscitation from certain types of cardiac arrest, total body cooling is now a well established treatment that improves the chances of the brain recovering. This however, has only been definitively proven after a certain type of cardiac arrest that is "ventricular fibrillation / ventricular tachycardia". The purpose of this study is to explore if total body cooling is beneficial for patients recovering from another type of cardiac arrest that is "pulseless electrical activity".

HYPOTHESIS:

Patients undergoing post-cardiac arrest therapeutic hypothermia have better neurological outcomes if their initial arrest rhythm is pulseless electrical activity (PEA) in comparison to asystole.

연구 개요

상세 설명

STUDY RATIONALE AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

After successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest the body experiences a period of global reperfusion. During this period, patients may show signs of myocardial stunning, lactic acidosis, neurological injury and reperfusion syndrome. This constellation of findings constitutes what is known as post-cardiac arrest syndrome. The brain appears to be one of the most vulnerable organs to injury during this reperfusion phase and varying degrees of cognitive impairment may be the end result. Inducing mild therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to be protective for the brain in this setting and has been demonstrated to improve neurological recovery. The evidence for this however, is only conclusive in cases where the arrest is in a shockable rhythm i.e. pulseless ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation.

In 2002, two randomized controlled trials were published showing an improvement in neurological outcomes in patients treated with mild therapeutic hypothermia post resuscitation from shockable cardiac arrest. Therapeutic hypothermia has since been widely adopted by most authorities as part of the comprehensive treatment bundle for post cardiac arrest syndrome. Whether there is any benefit for patients arrested in non-shockable rhythms however, is a matter of controversy. Some have reported improved mortality and better neurological outcomes with therapeutic hypothermia in this patient population. Others have reported no benefit or even a trend towards harm. And although the matter remains controversial, the recommendation still stands for therapeutic hypothermia to be offered for all comatose survivors of cardiac arrest whatever the arrest rhythm.

Most previous reports have examined the differences between shockable and non-shockable rhythms in terms of neurological outcome and mortality rates after therapeutic hypothermia. To our knowledge, no study has examined the differences in outcome between the two types of non-shockable rhythms, that is pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and asystole. We hypothesize that during PEA arrests, patients may retain some degree of cerebral perfusion and hence have better neurological outcomes post-resuscitation. That is in contrast to asystole where patients are likely to have no cerebral perfusion. In this study we attempt to detect any possible differences in neurological recovery (as indicated by the Cerebral Performance Category scale on hospital discharge) after therapeutic hypothermia, between patients arrested in PEA arrest and those arrested in asystole.

연구 유형

관찰

등록 (예상)

400

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, 캐나다, N6A 5A5
        • University Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario
      • London, Ontario, 캐나다, N6A 5W9
        • Victoria Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

샘플링 방법

비확률 샘플

연구 인구

All patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a diagnosis of postcardiac arrest between Jan 2008 and Dec 2012 will be examined.

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Admission to adult ICU (age ≥18 years) at London Health Sciences Centre
  • Primary reason for ICU admission: postcardiac arrest
  • Both in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest will be included
  • ICU admission between Jan 2008 and Dec 2012.

Exclusion Criteria:

- ICU admissions primarily for reasons other than cardiac arrest.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 관찰 모델: 보병대
  • 시간 관점: 회고전

코호트 및 개입

그룹/코호트
개입 / 치료
Shockable arrest
Initial arrest rhythm shockable. This is either pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pulseless VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF).
No therapeutic hypothermia was induced.
다른 이름들:
  • No therapeutic hypothermia.
  • 제어.
Hypothermia was induced after successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest.
다른 이름들:
  • 저체온증
  • Induced hypothermia
  • Mild therapeutic hypothermia
  • 냉각
  • Targeted temperature management
Pulseless electrical activity
Initial arrest rhythm is pulseless electrical activity.
No therapeutic hypothermia was induced.
다른 이름들:
  • No therapeutic hypothermia.
  • 제어.
Hypothermia was induced after successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest.
다른 이름들:
  • 저체온증
  • Induced hypothermia
  • Mild therapeutic hypothermia
  • 냉각
  • Targeted temperature management
Asystole
Initial arrest rhythm is asystole.
No therapeutic hypothermia was induced.
다른 이름들:
  • No therapeutic hypothermia.
  • 제어.
Hypothermia was induced after successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest.
다른 이름들:
  • 저체온증
  • Induced hypothermia
  • Mild therapeutic hypothermia
  • 냉각
  • Targeted temperature management

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Cerebral performance category score on hospital discharge
기간: Upon discharge from hospital, assessed up to 36 months postcardiac arrest

Neurological outcome on discharge from hospital as defined by the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale. The CPC scale is a 5 point scale. The outcome measure will be dichotomized into good or bad. Good outcome will be equivalent to CPC scores of 1 & 2 (where the patient is independent), and bad outcome will be equivalent to CPC scores of 3, 4 & 5 (where the patient is either dependent or dead).

CPC Scale:

  1. Functioning normally and independent, possibly with a minor disability.
  2. Moderately disabled, still independent.
  3. Conscious but with a severe disability, dependent.
  4. Unconscious (comatose or in a persistent vegetative state).
  5. Brain dead or dead by traditional criteria.
Upon discharge from hospital, assessed up to 36 months postcardiac arrest

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Hospital length of stay postcardiac arrest
기간: Days spent in hospital after successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest, assessed up to 36 months from the date of cardiac arrest
Hospital length of stay (LOS) post-cardiac arrest will be calculated from the day of the cardiac arrest to the day of hospital discharge. If prior to the arrest the patient was an inpatient, we will only count the days from the arrest to discharge. Days spent in hospital prior to the arrest will not be included.
Days spent in hospital after successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest, assessed up to 36 months from the date of cardiac arrest
Intensive care unit length of stay postcardiac arrest
기간: Days spent in the intensive care unit after successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest, assessed up to 36 months from the date of cardiac arrest
The length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) in days, after successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest.
Days spent in the intensive care unit after successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest, assessed up to 36 months from the date of cardiac arrest
Neurological status after hospital discharge
기간: Assessed up to 12 months from hospital discharge
Neurological status as documented on the patient's first outpatient clinic visit, assessed up to 12 months from hospital discharge. This will be analyzed as a secondary outcome only if enough data is generated on chart review.
Assessed up to 12 months from hospital discharge

기타 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Time to obeying commands
기간: Assessed up to 21 days postcardiac arrest
Total time in days from the cardiac arrest until the patient is able to obey commands, as documented in the patient's chart.
Assessed up to 21 days postcardiac arrest
Documented negative neurological prognosticators
기간: Upon withdrawal of life support, assessed up to 3 months postcardiac arrest

For patient's in which the reason for withdrawal of life support is poor neurological outcome, the number of negative neurological prognosticators recorded in the chart will be examined.

Examples of negative prognosticators include: negative somatosensory evoked potentials on post arrest day 3, post arrest status epilepticus, absent brain stem reflexes beyond post arrest day 2... etc.

Upon withdrawal of life support, assessed up to 3 months postcardiac arrest
Post arrest neurological investigations (including imaging studies)
기간: Performed within 21 days from cardiac arrest
All neurological investigations done within 21 days from cardiac arrest will be examined including electroencephalograms, somatosensory evoked potentials, brain magnetic resonance imaging, brain computerized tomography (CT) scans... etc.
Performed within 21 days from cardiac arrest

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Eyad Althenayan, MD, Western University, Canada
  • 연구 책임자: Philip Jones, MD, FRCPC, Western University, Canada
  • 연구 의자: Bryan Young, MD, FRCPC, Western University, Canada
  • 연구 책임자: Ahmed F Hegazy, MD, FRCPC, Western University, Canada
  • 연구 책임자: Ana Igric, MD, FRCSC, Western University, Canada
  • 연구 책임자: Carolyn Benson, MD, Western University, Canada

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

일반 간행물

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작

2014년 1월 1일

기본 완료 (예상)

2014년 12월 1일

연구 완료 (예상)

2015년 2월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2014년 1월 4일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2014년 1월 9일

처음 게시됨 (추정)

2014년 1월 13일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (추정)

2014년 1월 13일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2014년 1월 9일

마지막으로 확인됨

2014년 1월 1일

추가 정보

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

맥박이 없는 전기적 활동에 대한 임상 시험

No treatment에 대한 임상 시험

구독하다