Study of Survivors of Different Types of Cardiac Arrest and Their Neurological Recovery
Neurological Outcomes After Cardiac Arrest in Pulseless Electrical Activity in Comparison to Asystole. Are All Non-shockable Rhythms the Same?
After successful resuscitation from certain types of cardiac arrest, total body cooling is now a well established treatment that improves the chances of the brain recovering. This however, has only been definitively proven after a certain type of cardiac arrest that is "ventricular fibrillation / ventricular tachycardia". The purpose of this study is to explore if total body cooling is beneficial for patients recovering from another type of cardiac arrest that is "pulseless electrical activity".
HYPOTHESIS:
Patients undergoing post-cardiac arrest therapeutic hypothermia have better neurological outcomes if their initial arrest rhythm is pulseless electrical activity (PEA) in comparison to asystole.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
STUDY RATIONALE AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
After successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest the body experiences a period of global reperfusion. During this period, patients may show signs of myocardial stunning, lactic acidosis, neurological injury and reperfusion syndrome. This constellation of findings constitutes what is known as post-cardiac arrest syndrome. The brain appears to be one of the most vulnerable organs to injury during this reperfusion phase and varying degrees of cognitive impairment may be the end result. Inducing mild therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to be protective for the brain in this setting and has been demonstrated to improve neurological recovery. The evidence for this however, is only conclusive in cases where the arrest is in a shockable rhythm i.e. pulseless ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation.
In 2002, two randomized controlled trials were published showing an improvement in neurological outcomes in patients treated with mild therapeutic hypothermia post resuscitation from shockable cardiac arrest. Therapeutic hypothermia has since been widely adopted by most authorities as part of the comprehensive treatment bundle for post cardiac arrest syndrome. Whether there is any benefit for patients arrested in non-shockable rhythms however, is a matter of controversy. Some have reported improved mortality and better neurological outcomes with therapeutic hypothermia in this patient population. Others have reported no benefit or even a trend towards harm. And although the matter remains controversial, the recommendation still stands for therapeutic hypothermia to be offered for all comatose survivors of cardiac arrest whatever the arrest rhythm.
Most previous reports have examined the differences between shockable and non-shockable rhythms in terms of neurological outcome and mortality rates after therapeutic hypothermia. To our knowledge, no study has examined the differences in outcome between the two types of non-shockable rhythms, that is pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and asystole. We hypothesize that during PEA arrests, patients may retain some degree of cerebral perfusion and hence have better neurological outcomes post-resuscitation. That is in contrast to asystole where patients are likely to have no cerebral perfusion. In this study we attempt to detect any possible differences in neurological recovery (as indicated by the Cerebral Performance Category scale on hospital discharge) after therapeutic hypothermia, between patients arrested in PEA arrest and those arrested in asystole.
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Anticipado)
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Ontario
-
London, Ontario, Canadá, N6A 5A5
- University Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario
-
London, Ontario, Canadá, N6A 5W9
- Victoria Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Método de muestreo
Población de estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Admission to adult ICU (age ≥18 years) at London Health Sciences Centre
- Primary reason for ICU admission: postcardiac arrest
- Both in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest will be included
- ICU admission between Jan 2008 and Dec 2012.
Exclusion Criteria:
- ICU admissions primarily for reasons other than cardiac arrest.
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Modelos observacionales: Grupo
- Perspectivas temporales: Retrospectivo
Cohortes e Intervenciones
Grupo / Cohorte |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Shockable arrest
Initial arrest rhythm shockable.
This is either pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pulseless VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF).
|
No therapeutic hypothermia was induced.
Otros nombres:
Hypothermia was induced after successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest.
Otros nombres:
|
|
Pulseless electrical activity
Initial arrest rhythm is pulseless electrical activity.
|
No therapeutic hypothermia was induced.
Otros nombres:
Hypothermia was induced after successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest.
Otros nombres:
|
|
Asystole
Initial arrest rhythm is asystole.
|
No therapeutic hypothermia was induced.
Otros nombres:
Hypothermia was induced after successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest.
Otros nombres:
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Cerebral performance category score on hospital discharge
Periodo de tiempo: Upon discharge from hospital, assessed up to 36 months postcardiac arrest
|
Neurological outcome on discharge from hospital as defined by the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale. The CPC scale is a 5 point scale. The outcome measure will be dichotomized into good or bad. Good outcome will be equivalent to CPC scores of 1 & 2 (where the patient is independent), and bad outcome will be equivalent to CPC scores of 3, 4 & 5 (where the patient is either dependent or dead). CPC Scale:
|
Upon discharge from hospital, assessed up to 36 months postcardiac arrest
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Hospital length of stay postcardiac arrest
Periodo de tiempo: Days spent in hospital after successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest, assessed up to 36 months from the date of cardiac arrest
|
Hospital length of stay (LOS) post-cardiac arrest will be calculated from the day of the cardiac arrest to the day of hospital discharge.
If prior to the arrest the patient was an inpatient, we will only count the days from the arrest to discharge.
Days spent in hospital prior to the arrest will not be included.
|
Days spent in hospital after successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest, assessed up to 36 months from the date of cardiac arrest
|
|
Intensive care unit length of stay postcardiac arrest
Periodo de tiempo: Days spent in the intensive care unit after successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest, assessed up to 36 months from the date of cardiac arrest
|
The length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) in days, after successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest.
|
Days spent in the intensive care unit after successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest, assessed up to 36 months from the date of cardiac arrest
|
|
Neurological status after hospital discharge
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed up to 12 months from hospital discharge
|
Neurological status as documented on the patient's first outpatient clinic visit, assessed up to 12 months from hospital discharge.
This will be analyzed as a secondary outcome only if enough data is generated on chart review.
|
Assessed up to 12 months from hospital discharge
|
Otras medidas de resultado
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to obeying commands
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed up to 21 days postcardiac arrest
|
Total time in days from the cardiac arrest until the patient is able to obey commands, as documented in the patient's chart.
|
Assessed up to 21 days postcardiac arrest
|
|
Documented negative neurological prognosticators
Periodo de tiempo: Upon withdrawal of life support, assessed up to 3 months postcardiac arrest
|
For patient's in which the reason for withdrawal of life support is poor neurological outcome, the number of negative neurological prognosticators recorded in the chart will be examined. Examples of negative prognosticators include: negative somatosensory evoked potentials on post arrest day 3, post arrest status epilepticus, absent brain stem reflexes beyond post arrest day 2... etc. |
Upon withdrawal of life support, assessed up to 3 months postcardiac arrest
|
|
Post arrest neurological investigations (including imaging studies)
Periodo de tiempo: Performed within 21 days from cardiac arrest
|
All neurological investigations done within 21 days from cardiac arrest will be examined including electroencephalograms, somatosensory evoked potentials, brain magnetic resonance imaging, brain computerized tomography (CT) scans... etc.
|
Performed within 21 days from cardiac arrest
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Eyad Althenayan, MD, Western University, Canada
- Director de estudio: Philip Jones, MD, FRCPC, Western University, Canada
- Silla de estudio: Bryan Young, MD, FRCPC, Western University, Canada
- Director de estudio: Ahmed F Hegazy, MD, FRCPC, Western University, Canada
- Director de estudio: Ana Igric, MD, FRCSC, Western University, Canada
- Director de estudio: Carolyn Benson, MD, Western University, Canada
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
Publicaciones Generales
- Bernard SA, Gray TW, Buist MD, Jones BM, Silvester W, Gutteridge G, Smith K. Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 21;346(8):557-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa003289.
- Holzer M. Targeted temperature management for comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 23;363(13):1256-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMct1002402. No abstract available.
- Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Study Group. Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 21;346(8):549-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012689. Erratum In: N Engl J Med 2002 May 30;346(22):1756.
- Hazinski MF, Nolan JP, Billi JE, Bottiger BW, Bossaert L, de Caen AR, Deakin CD, Drajer S, Eigel B, Hickey RW, Jacobs I, Kleinman ME, Kloeck W, Koster RW, Lim SH, Mancini ME, Montgomery WH, Morley PT, Morrison LJ, Nadkarni VM, O'Connor RE, Okada K, Perlman JM, Sayre MR, Shuster M, Soar J, Sunde K, Travers AH, Wyllie J, Zideman D. Part 1: Executive summary: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation. 2010 Oct 19;122(16 Suppl 2):S250-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970897. No abstract available.
- Arrich J; European Resuscitation Council Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest Registry Study Group. Clinical application of mild therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):1041-7. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259383.48324.35.
- Testori C, Sterz F, Behringer W, Haugk M, Uray T, Zeiner A, Janata A, Arrich J, Holzer M, Losert H. Mild therapeutic hypothermia is associated with favourable outcome in patients after cardiac arrest with non-shockable rhythms. Resuscitation. 2011 Sep;82(9):1162-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.05.022. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
- Dumas F, Grimaldi D, Zuber B, Fichet J, Charpentier J, Pene F, Vivien B, Varenne O, Carli P, Jouven X, Empana JP, Cariou A. Is hypothermia after cardiac arrest effective in both shockable and nonshockable patients?: insights from a large registry. Circulation. 2011 Mar 1;123(8):877-86. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.987347. Epub 2011 Feb 14.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio
Finalización primaria (Anticipado)
Finalización del estudio (Anticipado)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Estimar)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 104666
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .
Ensayos clínicos sobre No treatment
-
Medical University of South CarolinaNational Institutes of Health (NIH)Inscripción por invitaciónDe fumar | Dejar de fumar | Trastorno por consumo de tabaco | VIH | SIDA | FarmaciaEstados Unidos
-
University of OklahomaTerminadoAumento de peso | Trastorno de alimentación Neonatal | Lactante de muy bajo peso al nacerEstados Unidos