- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT02542943
Efficacy of Two Experimental Oral Rinses in Providing Long Term Relief From Dentinal Hypersensitivity
A Clinical Study Investigating the Efficacy of Two Experimental Oral Rinses in Providing Long Term Relief From Dentinal Hypersensitivity
연구 개요
상태
정황
연구 유형
등록 (실제)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
Nevada
-
Las Vegas, Nevada, 미국, 89146
- GSK Investigational Site
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Demonstrates understanding of the study procedures, restrictions and willingness to participate as evidenced by voluntary written informed consent and has received a signed and dated copy of the informed consent form
- Aged between 18 and 55 years inclusive
- Good general and mental health with, in the opinion of the investigator or medically qualified designee:
A. No clinically significant and relevant abnormalities in medical history or upon oral examination.
B. Absence of any condition that would impact on the subject's safety or wellbeing or affect the individual's ability to understand and follow study procedures and requirements.
- Dental health
At Screening:
A. Self-reported history of dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) lasting more than six months but not more than 10 years.
B. Good general oral health, with a minimum of 20 natural teeth.
C. Minimum of 2 accessible non-adjacent teeth (incisors, canines, pre-molars), preferably in different quadrants, that meet all of the following criteria:
- Signs of facial/cervical gingival recession and/or signs of erosion or abrasion (EAR).
- Tooth with modified gingival index (MGI) score =0 adjacent to the test area (exposed dentine) only and a clinical mobility of ≤1.
- Tooth with signs of sensitivity measured by qualifying evaporative air assessment (Y/N response).
At Baseline:
D. Minimum of two, non-adjacent accessible teeth (incisors, canines, pre-molars), that meet all of the following criteria:
- Tooth with signs of sensitivity, measured by qualifying tactile stimulus (Yeaple ≤ 20g) and evaporative air assessment (Schiff Sensitivity Score ≥ 2)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant or breast feeding women
- Daily doses of medication/treatments which, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the perception of pain.
- Currently taking antibiotics or has taken antibiotics within two weeks of Baseline.
- Daily dose of a medication which, in the opinion of the investigator, is causing xerostomia.
- Presence of kidney disease, hyperoxaluria, or any other condition that may be exacerbated by oxalic acid or oxalate salts.
- Presence of chronic debilitating disease which, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect study outcomes.
- Any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, causes xerostomia.
- Treatment of periodontal disease within 12 months of screening
- Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients
- Participation in another clinical study (including cosmetic studies) or receipt of an investigational drug within 30 days of the screening visit.
- Recent history (within the last year) of alcohol or other substance abuse
- Dental prophylaxis within four weeks of Screening.
- Tongue or lip piercing or presence of dental implants.
- Desensitizing treatment within eight weeks of Screening (professional sensitivity treatments and non-toothpaste sensitivity treatments).
- Gross periodontal disease, treatment of periodontal disease (including surgery) within 12 months of Screening, scaling or root planning within 3 months of Screening.
- Teeth bleaching within eight weeks of Screening
- Tooth with evidence of current or recent caries, or reported treatment of decay within 12 months of Screening.
- Tooth with exposed dentine but with deep, defective or facial restorations, teeth used as abutments for fixed or removable partial dentures, teeth with full crowns or veneers, orthodontic bands or cracked enamel. Sensitive teeth with contributing aetiologies other than erosion, abrasion or recession of exposed dentine.
- Sensitive tooth not expected to respond to treatment with an over-the-counter toothpaste in the opinion of the investigator.
- Use of an oral care product indicated for the relief of dentine hypersensitivity within eight weeks of screening
- Individuals who require antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 치료
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 더블
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Experimental Oral Rinse1
Brushing with fluoride toothpaste for 1 minute followed by rinsing with 10 ml of Experimental Oral Rinse 1 for 1 minute.
This regimen will be performed twice daily for 8 weeks.
|
(1.5% w/w KOX, pH 4.5)
1000ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate
|
|
실험적: Experimental Oral Rinse 2
Brushing with fluoride toothpaste for 1 minute followed by rinsing with 10 ml of Experimental Oral Rinse 2 for 1 minute.
This regimen will be performed twice daily for 8 weeks.
|
1000ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate
(1.5% w/w KOX, pH 7)
|
|
위약 비교기: Placebo Oral Rinse
Brushing with fluoride toothpaste for 1 minute followed by rinsing with 10 ml of Placebo Oral Rinse 2 for 1 minute.
This regimen will be performed twice daily for 8 weeks.
|
1000ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate
(0% w/w KOX, pH 4.5)
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score of Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 Against a Placebo Oral Rinse at Week 8
기간: Baseline, Week 8
|
The examiner assessed the participant's response to an evaporative air stimulus for each tooth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale scored as follows - 0: Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1: responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus.
A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicate improvement in sensitivity.
|
Baseline, Week 8
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 at Week 8
기간: Baseline, Week 8
|
The examiner assessed the participant's response to an evaporative air stimulus for each tooth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale scored as follows - 0: Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1: responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus.
A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicate improvement in sensitivity.
|
Baseline, Week 8
|
|
Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 and a Placebo Oral Rinse at Week 4
기간: Baseline, Week 4
|
The examiner assessed the participant's response to an evaporative air stimulus for each tooth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale scored as follows - 0: Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1: responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus.
A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicate improvement in sensitivity.
|
Baseline, Week 4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold (Gram [g]) of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 and a Placebo Oral Rinse at Week 4
기간: Baseline, Week 4
|
The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force has reached.
The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the participant whether the sensation caused discomfort.
The pressure setting at which the participant gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold.
The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth.
At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g.
However, in situations where participants did not give a 'yes' response at force of 80g, the tactile threshold was recorded as >80g.
For analysis purposes values recorded as >80g were treated as 90g values.
|
Baseline, Week 4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold (g) of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 and a Placebo Oral Rinse at Week 8
기간: Baseline, Week 8
|
The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force has reached.
The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the participant whether the sensation caused discomfort.
The pressure setting at which the participant gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold.
The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth.
At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g.
However, in situations where participants did not give a 'yes' response at force of 80g, the tactile threshold was recorded as >80g.
For analysis purposes values recorded as >80g were treated as 90g values.
|
Baseline, Week 8
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale (VRS) of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 and a Placebo Oral Rinse) at Week 4
기간: Baseline, Week 4
|
Participants rated the intensity of their response to the evaporative (air) stimulus using a 10 point VRS.
The Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale of 1 ("No Pain") to 10 ("Intense Pain").
A reduction in the score is indicative of an improvement in sensitivity.
|
Baseline, Week 4
|
|
Change From Baseline in VRS of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 and a Placebo Oral Rinse) at Week 8
기간: Baseline, Week 8
|
Participants rated the intensity of their response to the evaporative (air) stimulus using a 10 point VRS.
The Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale of 1 ("No Pain") to 10 ("Intense Pain").
A reduction in the score is indicative of an improvement in sensitivity.
|
Baseline, Week 8
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
스폰서
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작
기본 완료 (실제)
연구 완료 (실제)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (추정)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .
Experimental Oral Rinse 1에 대한 임상 시험
-
Biomedical Development CorporationNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); University of Kentucky알려지지 않은
-
Mundipharma Manufacturing Pte Ltd.Singapore Polytechnic (SP)완전한
-
Cairo University모병소아 진정 | 클로니딘 진정 | 케타민 진정이집트
-
Clinical Hub for Interventional Research (CHOIR)The University of New South Wales; Australian National University; University of Auckland... 그리고 다른 협력자들아직 모집하지 않음
-
Aspargo Labs, Inc아직 모집하지 않음