Efficacy of Two Experimental Oral Rinses in Providing Long Term Relief From Dentinal Hypersensitivity
A Clinical Study Investigating the Efficacy of Two Experimental Oral Rinses in Providing Long Term Relief From Dentinal Hypersensitivity
研究概览
地位
条件
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
Nevada
-
Las Vegas、Nevada、美国、89146
- GSK Investigational Site
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Demonstrates understanding of the study procedures, restrictions and willingness to participate as evidenced by voluntary written informed consent and has received a signed and dated copy of the informed consent form
- Aged between 18 and 55 years inclusive
- Good general and mental health with, in the opinion of the investigator or medically qualified designee:
A. No clinically significant and relevant abnormalities in medical history or upon oral examination.
B. Absence of any condition that would impact on the subject's safety or wellbeing or affect the individual's ability to understand and follow study procedures and requirements.
- Dental health
At Screening:
A. Self-reported history of dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) lasting more than six months but not more than 10 years.
B. Good general oral health, with a minimum of 20 natural teeth.
C. Minimum of 2 accessible non-adjacent teeth (incisors, canines, pre-molars), preferably in different quadrants, that meet all of the following criteria:
- Signs of facial/cervical gingival recession and/or signs of erosion or abrasion (EAR).
- Tooth with modified gingival index (MGI) score =0 adjacent to the test area (exposed dentine) only and a clinical mobility of ≤1.
- Tooth with signs of sensitivity measured by qualifying evaporative air assessment (Y/N response).
At Baseline:
D. Minimum of two, non-adjacent accessible teeth (incisors, canines, pre-molars), that meet all of the following criteria:
- Tooth with signs of sensitivity, measured by qualifying tactile stimulus (Yeaple ≤ 20g) and evaporative air assessment (Schiff Sensitivity Score ≥ 2)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant or breast feeding women
- Daily doses of medication/treatments which, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the perception of pain.
- Currently taking antibiotics or has taken antibiotics within two weeks of Baseline.
- Daily dose of a medication which, in the opinion of the investigator, is causing xerostomia.
- Presence of kidney disease, hyperoxaluria, or any other condition that may be exacerbated by oxalic acid or oxalate salts.
- Presence of chronic debilitating disease which, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect study outcomes.
- Any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, causes xerostomia.
- Treatment of periodontal disease within 12 months of screening
- Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients
- Participation in another clinical study (including cosmetic studies) or receipt of an investigational drug within 30 days of the screening visit.
- Recent history (within the last year) of alcohol or other substance abuse
- Dental prophylaxis within four weeks of Screening.
- Tongue or lip piercing or presence of dental implants.
- Desensitizing treatment within eight weeks of Screening (professional sensitivity treatments and non-toothpaste sensitivity treatments).
- Gross periodontal disease, treatment of periodontal disease (including surgery) within 12 months of Screening, scaling or root planning within 3 months of Screening.
- Teeth bleaching within eight weeks of Screening
- Tooth with evidence of current or recent caries, or reported treatment of decay within 12 months of Screening.
- Tooth with exposed dentine but with deep, defective or facial restorations, teeth used as abutments for fixed or removable partial dentures, teeth with full crowns or veneers, orthodontic bands or cracked enamel. Sensitive teeth with contributing aetiologies other than erosion, abrasion or recession of exposed dentine.
- Sensitive tooth not expected to respond to treatment with an over-the-counter toothpaste in the opinion of the investigator.
- Use of an oral care product indicated for the relief of dentine hypersensitivity within eight weeks of screening
- Individuals who require antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:治疗
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:双倍的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的:Experimental Oral Rinse1
Brushing with fluoride toothpaste for 1 minute followed by rinsing with 10 ml of Experimental Oral Rinse 1 for 1 minute.
This regimen will be performed twice daily for 8 weeks.
|
(1.5% w/w KOX, pH 4.5)
1000ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate
|
|
实验性的:Experimental Oral Rinse 2
Brushing with fluoride toothpaste for 1 minute followed by rinsing with 10 ml of Experimental Oral Rinse 2 for 1 minute.
This regimen will be performed twice daily for 8 weeks.
|
1000ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate
(1.5% w/w KOX, pH 7)
|
|
安慰剂比较:Placebo Oral Rinse
Brushing with fluoride toothpaste for 1 minute followed by rinsing with 10 ml of Placebo Oral Rinse 2 for 1 minute.
This regimen will be performed twice daily for 8 weeks.
|
1000ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate
(0% w/w KOX, pH 4.5)
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score of Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 Against a Placebo Oral Rinse at Week 8
大体时间:Baseline, Week 8
|
The examiner assessed the participant's response to an evaporative air stimulus for each tooth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale scored as follows - 0: Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1: responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus.
A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicate improvement in sensitivity.
|
Baseline, Week 8
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 at Week 8
大体时间:Baseline, Week 8
|
The examiner assessed the participant's response to an evaporative air stimulus for each tooth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale scored as follows - 0: Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1: responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus.
A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicate improvement in sensitivity.
|
Baseline, Week 8
|
|
Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 and a Placebo Oral Rinse at Week 4
大体时间:Baseline, Week 4
|
The examiner assessed the participant's response to an evaporative air stimulus for each tooth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale scored as follows - 0: Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1: responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus.
A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicate improvement in sensitivity.
|
Baseline, Week 4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold (Gram [g]) of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 and a Placebo Oral Rinse at Week 4
大体时间:Baseline, Week 4
|
The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force has reached.
The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the participant whether the sensation caused discomfort.
The pressure setting at which the participant gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold.
The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth.
At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g.
However, in situations where participants did not give a 'yes' response at force of 80g, the tactile threshold was recorded as >80g.
For analysis purposes values recorded as >80g were treated as 90g values.
|
Baseline, Week 4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold (g) of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 and a Placebo Oral Rinse at Week 8
大体时间:Baseline, Week 8
|
The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force has reached.
The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the participant whether the sensation caused discomfort.
The pressure setting at which the participant gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold.
The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth.
At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g.
However, in situations where participants did not give a 'yes' response at force of 80g, the tactile threshold was recorded as >80g.
For analysis purposes values recorded as >80g were treated as 90g values.
|
Baseline, Week 8
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale (VRS) of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 and a Placebo Oral Rinse) at Week 4
大体时间:Baseline, Week 4
|
Participants rated the intensity of their response to the evaporative (air) stimulus using a 10 point VRS.
The Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale of 1 ("No Pain") to 10 ("Intense Pain").
A reduction in the score is indicative of an improvement in sensitivity.
|
Baseline, Week 4
|
|
Change From Baseline in VRS of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 and a Placebo Oral Rinse) at Week 8
大体时间:Baseline, Week 8
|
Participants rated the intensity of their response to the evaporative (air) stimulus using a 10 point VRS.
The Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale of 1 ("No Pain") to 10 ("Intense Pain").
A reduction in the score is indicative of an improvement in sensitivity.
|
Baseline, Week 8
|
合作者和调查者
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (估计)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.