- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT03077737
Reducing Tobacco Use Disparities Among Low-Income Adults
2022년 1월 13일 업데이트: Brian Hitsman, Northwestern University
Reducing Tobacco Use Disparities Among Adults In Safety Net Community Health Centers
Most smokers, especially those who are poor, do not receive smoking cessation treatment during their healthcare visits.
This study is evaluating a novel population health management intervention for low-income smokers.
Automated via an EHR system, which is bidirectionally linked with the Illinois Tobacco Quitline, the intervention comprises a mailed letter and text messaging designed to motivate low-income patients, most of whom are not ready to quit, to accept and use proactive quitline treatment.
Increased access to free effective treatment via the integration of healthcare systems and state quitline services may be especially significant in its impact on low-income smokers who are underserved and who carry a much greater burden of tobacco-related disease.
연구 개요
상세 설명
An estimated 26 million smokers still receive no treatment for their smoking during their primary care visits.
Given the persistent clinical system, provider, and patient barriers to addressing smoking in primary care, especially for poor populations, an electronic health record (EHR)-automated population health management approach that directly links the healthcare system with public health services to engage all smokers may increase access to effective treatment.
Increased access is especially significant for low-income smokers who are underserved and who carry a disproportionate burden of tobacco-related disease.
While 90% of smokers are not ready to quit, many are interested in cutting down, and smoking reduction increases the likelihood of future quit attempts and smoking cessation.
Based on self-determination theory, population outreach targeted to low-income smokers that offers them the choice to either quit or cut down as a first step towards cessation may increase their engagement in and utilization of smoking cessation treatment and likelihood of achieving abstinence.
This 2-group randomized controlled trial will evaluate the effectiveness of a population health management intervention for smoking cessation in low-income smokers.
Participants will be 530 diverse, low-income smokers of a large Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in Chicago identified using its EHR system.
Automated via the EHR system, participants will be mailed a letter on behalf of their providers that encourages smoking cessation or smoking reduction as a first step to quitting (Choose to Change; N=265).
The letter will be paired with 5 text messages 2-3 days apart that are designed to reinforce the central messaging of the letter ("Choose to change and make your own goal").
All components of the Choose to Change intervention will be offered in English and Spanish.
Two weeks after letter mailing and automated electronic referral, participants will receive a call from the Illinois Tobacco Quitline and offered free behavioral counseling and free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT; patch, gum, or lozenge) for smoking cessation or reduction.
Treatment will continue as either accepted or initiated by participants for 28 weeks.
Treatment outcomes will be transmitted directly from the Quitline server to the EHR system.
Choose to Change will be compared with Enhanced Usual Care (N=265), in which an electronic referral for proactive Quitline treatment is made during a clinic visit.
The primary study outcomes will be treatment engagement (initial counseling call completed) at 6 weeks, utilization (one or more additional counseling calls completed) at 14 weeks, and smoking cessation (bioverified 7-day point-prevalence abstinence) at 28 weeks.
An exploratory aim is to examine moderators of intervention effects.
An EHR-automated population health management intervention targeted to low-income smokers could reduce critical disparities in treatment access, utilization, and cessation.
If determined to be effective, the Choose to Change intervention could be readily disseminated to 11 other FQHCs in Chicago, comprising 85 clinical sites that care for almost 500,000 low-income patients.
연구 유형
중재적
등록 (실제)
190
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.
연구 장소
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, 미국, 60611
- Northwestern University Feingberg School of Medicine, Dept. of Preventive Medicine
-
-
참여기준
연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
18년 이상 (성인, 고령자)
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
예
연구 대상 성별
모두
설명
Inclusion criteria
- Men and women who are 18 years of age or older
- A patient who receives healthcare at one of the seven Near North Health Service Corporation community health centers in Chicago
- Daily or weekly cigarette smoker
- One or more healthcare visits within the past 12 months
Exclusion criteria
- Language preference other than English or Spanish for their healthcare
- No telephone number or address listed in the EHR system
- Lives with another patient who is already enrolled in the study
공부 계획
이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 치료
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Population health management
Population health management for smoking cessation in low-income smokers: the Choose to Change intervention
|
Population-based letter outreach automated via the electronic health record system and text messaging targeted to low-income smokers.
Paired with automated electronic referral for proactive quitline treatment (behavioral counseling plus nicotine replacement therapy).
|
|
활성 비교기: Enhanced usual care
Usual clinic-based care enhanced by an EHR system that can deliver an electronic referral for quitline treatment
|
Enhanced usual care based on Ask, Advise and Refer in which an electronic referral for proactive quitline treatment (behavioral counseling plus nicotine replacement therapy) is made during a clinic visit.
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Quitline Treatment Engagement
기간: Week 6
|
The number of participants who accepted the quitline call and accepted treatment as defined by enrolling in treatment and completing the first counseling session.
Participants who returned a quitline call, enrolled in treatment, and completed the first counseling session were also counted as having engaged in treatment.
|
Week 6
|
|
Quitline Treatment Utilization
기간: Week 14
|
The number of participants who completed one or more additional quitline counseling calls.
|
Week 14
|
|
Smoking Cessation at Week 28 (32 Weeks After Enrollment)
기간: Week 28
|
Self-reported seven-day point-prevalence abstinence at week 28.
Number of participants who reporting smoking cessation at week 28.
Participants were classified as abstinent if they reported not smoking (not even a puff of a cigarette) for at least 7 days prior to the assessment.
|
Week 28
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Smoking Cessation at Week 14 (18 Weeks After Enrollment)
기간: Week 14
|
Self-reported seven-day point-prevalence abstinence at week 14.
Participants were classified as abstinent if they reported not smoking (not even a puff of a cigarette) for at least 7 days prior to the assessment.
|
Week 14
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Brian Hitsman, PhD, Northwestern University Feinberg School Of Medicine
간행물 및 유용한 링크
연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.
일반 간행물
- Williams GC, McGregor HA, Sharp D, Levesque C, Kouides RW, Ryan RM, Deci EL. Testing a self-determination theory intervention for motivating tobacco cessation: supporting autonomy and competence in a clinical trial. Health Psychol. 2006 Jan;25(1):91-101. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.1.91.
- Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Ostbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):635-41. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.635.
- Hiscock R, Bauld L, Amos A, Fidler JA, Munafo M. Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Feb;1248:107-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06202.x. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
- Piper ME, Baker TB, Mermelstein R, Collins LM, Fraser DL, Jorenby DE, Smith SS, Christiansen BA, Schlam TR, Cook JW, Oguss M, Fiore MC. Recruiting and engaging smokers in treatment in a primary care setting: developing a chronic care model implemented through a modified electronic health record. Transl Behav Med. 2013 Sep;3(3):253-63. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0178-8.
- Hughes JR, Carpenter MJ. Does smoking reduction increase future cessation and decrease disease risk? A qualitative review. Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Dec;8(6):739-49. doi: 10.1080/14622200600789726.
- Jamal A, Dube SR, Malarcher AM, Shaw L, Engstrom MC; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Tobacco use screening and counseling during physician office visits among adults--National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Health Interview Survey, United States, 2005-2009. MMWR Suppl. 2012 Jun 15;61(2):38-45.
- Boyle RG, Solberg LI, Fiore MC. Electronic medical records to increase the clinical treatment of tobacco dependence: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010 Dec;39(6 Suppl 1):S77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.08.014.
- Baker DW, Parker RM, Williams MV, Clark WS, Nurss J. The relationship of patient reading ability to self-reported health and use of health services. Am J Public Health. 1997 Jun;87(6):1027-30. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.6.1027.
- Lindson-Hawley N, Aveyard P, Hughes JR. Gradual reduction vs abrupt cessation as a smoking cessation strategy in smokers who want to quit. JAMA. 2013 Jul 3;310(1):91-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.6473.
- Williams GC, Niemiec CP, Patrick H, Ryan RM, Deci EL. The importance of supporting autonomy and perceived competence in facilitating long-term tobacco abstinence. Ann Behav Med. 2009 Jun;37(3):315-24. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9090-y. Epub 2009 Apr 17.
- Landon BE, Grumbach K, Wallace PJ. Integrating public health and primary care systems: potential strategies from an IOM report. JAMA. 2012 Aug 1;308(5):461-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.8227. No abstract available.
- Hitsman B, Matthews PA, Papandonatos GD, Cameron KA, Rittner SS, Mohanty N, Long T, Ackermann RT, Ramirez E, Carr J, Cordova E, Bridges C, Flowers-Carson C, Giachello AL, Hamilton A, Ciecierski CC, Simon MA. An EHR-automated and theory-based population health management intervention for smoking cessation in diverse low-income patients of safety-net health centers: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Transl Behav Med. 2022 Oct 7;12(9):892-899. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac026.
연구 기록 날짜
이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
2017년 4월 21일
기본 완료 (실제)
2018년 8월 31일
연구 완료 (실제)
2018년 8월 31일
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
2017년 3월 1일
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
2017년 3월 7일
처음 게시됨 (실제)
2017년 3월 13일
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
2022년 1월 21일
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
2022년 1월 13일
마지막으로 확인됨
2022년 1월 1일
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
키워드
추가 관련 MeSH 약관
기타 연구 ID 번호
- 5U54CA203000 (미국 NIH 보조금/계약)
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
아니요
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
아니
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
아니
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .