이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Impact of Smoking Information on Concerns About Radon

2019년 4월 17일 업데이트: Paul Windschitl
Despite a push for tailored messages, health communications are often aimed at, and viewed by, people with varying levels of risk. This project examined-in the context of radon risk messages-whether information relevant to high-risk individuals can have an unintended influence on lower-risk individuals. Specifically, the investigators assessed whether information about lung-cancer risk from smoking reduced concerns about lung-cancer risk from radon among nonsmokers. The investigators hypothesized that non-smokers who read a message that included smoking-relevant information would express less concern about the effects of radon exposure and less interest in testing their home compared to those who read a version in which smoking-relevant information was excluded. Two studies were conducted. Although the investigators did not exclude smokers, the focus was on participants self-identifying as nonsmokers (including never smokers and former smokers).

연구 개요

상세 설명

Despite a push for tailored messages, health communications are often aimed at, and viewed by, people with varying levels of risk. This project examined-in the context of radon risk messages-whether information relevant to high-risk individuals can have an unintended influence on lower-risk individuals. Specifically, the investigators assessed whether information about lung-cancer risk from smoking reduced concerns about lung-cancer risk from radon among nonsmokers. The investigators hypothesized that non-smokers who read a message that included smoking-relevant information would express less concern about the effects of radon exposure and less interest in testing their home compared to those who read a version in which smoking-relevant information was excluded. Two studies were conducted. Although the investigators did not exclude smokers, the focus was on participants self-identifying as nonsmokers (including never smokers and former smokers). Participants in both studies were recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Participants viewed radon messages that varied in the information they communicated about smoking's effect on lung cancer. In Study 1, smoking information was included or excluded from messages assembled from existing radon pamphlets. In Study 2, versions of a new radon message either excluded smoking information, described smoking as a major cause of lung cancer, or also described smoking's synergistic effect with radon on lung cancer risk. After viewing a radon health message, participants completed a variety of measures. Primary measures assessed respondents' anticipated sense of concern and related reactions if they learned that they/their home had been exposed to elevated levels of radon. Other key measures included questions about participants' interest and intention to test their home for radon.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

1390

단계

  • 해당 없음

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 이상 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Live within the US
  • Have an Amazon Mechanical Turk account (website where online study was posted)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 방지
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 요인 할당
  • 마스킹: 하나의

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
활성 비교기: Study 1: Radon&Smoking Synergistic/EPA
Participants viewed radon and smoking risk information taken from the EPA's pamphlet on the dangers of radon gas exposure.
Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from exposure to radon gas, smoking, and their synergistic effects. This intervention represents the type of information most commonly presented in radon risk communications.
Health information modeled after the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) pamphlet on radon risk.
활성 비교기: Study 1: Radon&Smoking Synergistic/Idaho
Participants viewed radon and smoking risk information taken from Idaho's Department of Health and Human Welfare's pamphlet on the dangers of radon gas exposure.
Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from exposure to radon gas, smoking, and their synergistic effects. This intervention represents the type of information most commonly presented in radon risk communications.
Health information modeled after the Idaho Department of Health and Human Welfare's pamphlet on radon risk.
실험적: Study 1: Radon Only / EPA
Participants viewed only radon risk information taken from the EPA's pamphlet on the dangers of radon gas exposure.
Health information modeled after the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) pamphlet on radon risk.
Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from radon exposure. No information about the risks for developing lung cancer associated with smoking or its synergistic effect with radon exposure are included.
실험적: Study 1: Radon Only / Idaho
Participants viewed only radon risk information taken from Idaho's Department of Health and Human Welfare's pamphlet on the dangers of radon gas exposure.
Health information modeled after the Idaho Department of Health and Human Welfare's pamphlet on radon risk.
Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from radon exposure. No information about the risks for developing lung cancer associated with smoking or its synergistic effect with radon exposure are included.
실험적: Study 2: Radon Only
Participants viewed a radon-only message that focused only on the effect of radon on lung-cancer risk.
Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from radon exposure. No information about the risks for developing lung cancer associated with smoking or its synergistic effect with radon exposure are included.
다른: Study 2: Radon and Smoking Isolated
Participants viewed a radon-and-smoking-isolated message that covered the individual effects of radon and of smoking on lung cancer, but without mentioning their synergistic effect.
Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from radon exposure and smoking. No information describing the synergistic effects of smoking and radon exposure on lung cancer risk are included.
활성 비교기: Study 2: Radon & Smoking Synergistic
Participants viewed a radon-and-smoking-synergistic message that covered the individual effects of radon and of smoking but that also included information about their synergistic effect.
Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from exposure to radon gas, smoking, and their synergistic effects. This intervention represents the type of information most commonly presented in radon risk communications.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Conditional Concern Composite
기간: Immediately post-intervention (approx. 1 minute)
Composite formed from 4 conditional questions assessing concern, perceived impact on risk and comparative risk, and threat--if exposed to radon
Immediately post-intervention (approx. 1 minute)
Interest in Testing Composite
기간: Immediately post-intervention (approx. 2 minutes)
Composite formed from 2 questions assessing importance and intention to test home for radon
Immediately post-intervention (approx. 2 minutes)

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Worry Elicited by Health Message
기간: Immediately post-intervention (approx. 2 minutes)
Single question assessing worry elicited by the health communication material
Immediately post-intervention (approx. 2 minutes)
Likelihood Judgments about Lung Cancer
기간: Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)
Three items assessing perceived likelihood of developing lung cancer
Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)
Elect to Leave Email for Raffle
기간: Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)
Participants given option to leave email address in case they won one of the 20 radon kits being raffled (Study 2).
Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)
Elect to Read More
기간: Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)
Participants given option to be presented with more information at the end of the session about testing for radon (Study 2).
Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)
Concern about Loved Ones If Exposed to Radon
기간: Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)
Rated how concerned they would be about loved ones if they learned their home had high radon (Study 2)
Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2015년 8월 7일

기본 완료 (실제)

2016년 4월 22일

연구 완료 (실제)

2016년 4월 22일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2018년 3월 30일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2018년 4월 13일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2018년 4월 17일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2019년 4월 19일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2019년 4월 17일

마지막으로 확인됨

2019년 4월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

키워드

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • 201507727

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

IPD 계획 설명

De-identified data and guide will be made available to other investigators upon request.

IPD 공유 기간

Requested data will be made available upon publication of the project.

IPD 공유 액세스 기준

Please contact corresponding author Dr. Paul Windschitl at paul-windschitl@uiowa.edu

IPD 공유 지원 정보 유형

  • ANALYTIC_CODE

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다