此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Impact of Smoking Information on Concerns About Radon

2019年4月17日 更新者:Paul Windschitl
Despite a push for tailored messages, health communications are often aimed at, and viewed by, people with varying levels of risk. This project examined-in the context of radon risk messages-whether information relevant to high-risk individuals can have an unintended influence on lower-risk individuals. Specifically, the investigators assessed whether information about lung-cancer risk from smoking reduced concerns about lung-cancer risk from radon among nonsmokers. The investigators hypothesized that non-smokers who read a message that included smoking-relevant information would express less concern about the effects of radon exposure and less interest in testing their home compared to those who read a version in which smoking-relevant information was excluded. Two studies were conducted. Although the investigators did not exclude smokers, the focus was on participants self-identifying as nonsmokers (including never smokers and former smokers).

研究概览

详细说明

Despite a push for tailored messages, health communications are often aimed at, and viewed by, people with varying levels of risk. This project examined-in the context of radon risk messages-whether information relevant to high-risk individuals can have an unintended influence on lower-risk individuals. Specifically, the investigators assessed whether information about lung-cancer risk from smoking reduced concerns about lung-cancer risk from radon among nonsmokers. The investigators hypothesized that non-smokers who read a message that included smoking-relevant information would express less concern about the effects of radon exposure and less interest in testing their home compared to those who read a version in which smoking-relevant information was excluded. Two studies were conducted. Although the investigators did not exclude smokers, the focus was on participants self-identifying as nonsmokers (including never smokers and former smokers). Participants in both studies were recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Participants viewed radon messages that varied in the information they communicated about smoking's effect on lung cancer. In Study 1, smoking information was included or excluded from messages assembled from existing radon pamphlets. In Study 2, versions of a new radon message either excluded smoking information, described smoking as a major cause of lung cancer, or also described smoking's synergistic effect with radon on lung cancer risk. After viewing a radon health message, participants completed a variety of measures. Primary measures assessed respondents' anticipated sense of concern and related reactions if they learned that they/their home had been exposed to elevated levels of radon. Other key measures included questions about participants' interest and intention to test their home for radon.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

1390

阶段

  • 不适用

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

是的

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Live within the US
  • Have an Amazon Mechanical Turk account (website where online study was posted)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:预防
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:阶乘赋值
  • 屏蔽:单身的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
有源比较器:Study 1: Radon&Smoking Synergistic/EPA
Participants viewed radon and smoking risk information taken from the EPA's pamphlet on the dangers of radon gas exposure.
Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from exposure to radon gas, smoking, and their synergistic effects. This intervention represents the type of information most commonly presented in radon risk communications.
Health information modeled after the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) pamphlet on radon risk.
有源比较器:Study 1: Radon&Smoking Synergistic/Idaho
Participants viewed radon and smoking risk information taken from Idaho's Department of Health and Human Welfare's pamphlet on the dangers of radon gas exposure.
Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from exposure to radon gas, smoking, and their synergistic effects. This intervention represents the type of information most commonly presented in radon risk communications.
Health information modeled after the Idaho Department of Health and Human Welfare's pamphlet on radon risk.
实验性的:Study 1: Radon Only / EPA
Participants viewed only radon risk information taken from the EPA's pamphlet on the dangers of radon gas exposure.
Health information modeled after the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) pamphlet on radon risk.
Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from radon exposure. No information about the risks for developing lung cancer associated with smoking or its synergistic effect with radon exposure are included.
实验性的:Study 1: Radon Only / Idaho
Participants viewed only radon risk information taken from Idaho's Department of Health and Human Welfare's pamphlet on the dangers of radon gas exposure.
Health information modeled after the Idaho Department of Health and Human Welfare's pamphlet on radon risk.
Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from radon exposure. No information about the risks for developing lung cancer associated with smoking or its synergistic effect with radon exposure are included.
实验性的:Study 2: Radon Only
Participants viewed a radon-only message that focused only on the effect of radon on lung-cancer risk.
Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from radon exposure. No information about the risks for developing lung cancer associated with smoking or its synergistic effect with radon exposure are included.
其他:Study 2: Radon and Smoking Isolated
Participants viewed a radon-and-smoking-isolated message that covered the individual effects of radon and of smoking on lung cancer, but without mentioning their synergistic effect.
Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from radon exposure and smoking. No information describing the synergistic effects of smoking and radon exposure on lung cancer risk are included.
有源比较器:Study 2: Radon & Smoking Synergistic
Participants viewed a radon-and-smoking-synergistic message that covered the individual effects of radon and of smoking but that also included information about their synergistic effect.
Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from exposure to radon gas, smoking, and their synergistic effects. This intervention represents the type of information most commonly presented in radon risk communications.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Conditional Concern Composite
大体时间:Immediately post-intervention (approx. 1 minute)
Composite formed from 4 conditional questions assessing concern, perceived impact on risk and comparative risk, and threat--if exposed to radon
Immediately post-intervention (approx. 1 minute)
Interest in Testing Composite
大体时间:Immediately post-intervention (approx. 2 minutes)
Composite formed from 2 questions assessing importance and intention to test home for radon
Immediately post-intervention (approx. 2 minutes)

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Worry Elicited by Health Message
大体时间:Immediately post-intervention (approx. 2 minutes)
Single question assessing worry elicited by the health communication material
Immediately post-intervention (approx. 2 minutes)
Likelihood Judgments about Lung Cancer
大体时间:Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)
Three items assessing perceived likelihood of developing lung cancer
Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)
Elect to Leave Email for Raffle
大体时间:Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)
Participants given option to leave email address in case they won one of the 20 radon kits being raffled (Study 2).
Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)
Elect to Read More
大体时间:Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)
Participants given option to be presented with more information at the end of the session about testing for radon (Study 2).
Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)
Concern about Loved Ones If Exposed to Radon
大体时间:Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)
Rated how concerned they would be about loved ones if they learned their home had high radon (Study 2)
Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2015年8月7日

初级完成 (实际的)

2016年4月22日

研究完成 (实际的)

2016年4月22日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2018年3月30日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2018年4月13日

首次发布 (实际的)

2018年4月17日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2019年4月19日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2019年4月17日

最后验证

2019年4月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

关键字

其他研究编号

  • 201507727

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

是的

IPD 计划说明

De-identified data and guide will be made available to other investigators upon request.

IPD 共享时间框架

Requested data will be made available upon publication of the project.

IPD 共享访问标准

Please contact corresponding author Dr. Paul Windschitl at paul-windschitl@uiowa.edu

IPD 共享支持信息类型

  • 分析代码

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

3
订阅