이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

A Study of the Determinants of Neurological Outcomes in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (NEURDS)

2026년 6월 1일 업데이트: University Hospital, Angers

Etude Des déterminants de l'évolution NEUrologique Des Patients Ayant présenté un Syndrome de Détresse Respiratoire aiguë

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by pathological pulmonary edema caused by direct or indirect damage to the alveolar-capillary membrane.

Its management relies on etiological treatment, invasive mechanical ventilation, and the use of sedatives and neuromuscular blockers, depending on the patient's condition.

Improvements in patient care have led to an improved prognosis. However, in-hospital mortality remains high (between 35% and 45%). Notably, morbidity among surviving patients is very high and is largely dominated by neuropsychological sequelae. Attention and executive function disorders, confusion, disorientation, or memory impairment are thus found in 70 to 100% of patients following ARDS. These disorders are still present in 46 to 80% of surviving patients one year after ARDS and in 20% of them five years later.

Although essential to treatment, mechanical ventilation carries a risk of significant complications. Beyond the risk of infection and complications related to sedation and neuromuscular blockade, the use of mechanical ventilation is associated with a risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI).

The use of so-called protective ventilation reduces the risk of VILI and improves patient outcomes. However, analysis of relevant physiological parameters shows that the risk of VILI may still exist even when ventilator settings comply with recommendations and the concept of protective ventilation. Driving pressure (which represents Strain) is a good marker of VILI; it represents the distension of the lung with each breath relative to the initial lung volume. Values above 14 cmH₂O are associated with high mortality in patients with ARDS. Inspiratory transpulmonary pressure represents Stress-that is, the pressure that distends the alveoli at the end of inspiration-and is also associated with the risk of VILI. Finally, mechanical power represents the amount of energy delivered to the lung by the ventilator and has been validated as a marker of VILI. The advantage of mechanical power over the other indices described is that it incorporates all components that can lead to VILI.

Among the various sources of neurological damage during ARDS, inflammatory processes appear to play a major role. Numerous inflammatory mediators (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, IL-1β) are secreted during ARDS, and animal studies have demonstrated a link between inflammation and hippocampal damage. Furthermore, cerebral ischemic lesions, exacerbated by systemic inflammation and endothelial activation leading to coagulation activation with thrombus formation, may also contribute to the development of cognitive impairments.

In addition to the inflammatory processes associated with ARDS, mechanical ventilation itself may have a significant impact on neuroinflammatory damage. Recently, the term "ventilator-associated brain injury" (VABI) has been proposed to describe these secondary neurological lesions induced by mechanical ventilation. Studies in mouse and pig models have demonstrated a relationship between the dose and duration of VILI, apoptosis, neuroinflammation, and neuronal damage. An animal study in mice also showed an association between the duration of mechanical ventilation and the onset of cognitive impairments.

During brain injury, proteins and neurotransmitters are released and serve as biomarkers of brain damage. Elevated plasma levels of S100B protein indicate astrocyte damage caused by traumatic, anoxic-ischemic, or inflammatory mechanisms. It correlates with neurological prognosis following cardiac arrest, in ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes, in neurodegenerative diseases, and in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Clinical studies have shown a negative correlation between elevated S100B protein levels, the MoCA score, and the MMSE in patients with OSA or COPD, respectively, indicating an association between this protein and cognitive impairment.

We therefore hypothesize that mechanical ventilation associated with high mechanical power is linked to a significant risk of brain injury, reflected by elevated serum S100B protein levels and the presence of neurocognitive disorders long after ARDS.

연구 개요

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (추정된)

150

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 성인
  • 고령자

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient
  • Patient admitted to the intensive care unit less than 48 hours ago
  • Patient diagnosed with mild, moderate or severe ARDS according to the Berlin classification based on the PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio, with a minimum PEEP set at 5 cmH₂O (16), of pulmonary aetiology:

    • Mild ARDS: 200 < PaO₂/FiO₂ < 300 mmHg
    • Moderate ARDS: 100 < PaO₂/FiO₂ < 200 mmHg
    • Severe ARDS: PaO₂/FiO₂ < 100 mmHg
  • Patients fitted with an oesophageal pressure measurement catheter (Nutrivent, Sidam, San Giacomo Roncole, Italy)
  • Patients registered with or covered by a social security scheme
  • Free and informed consent from the patient or a trusted relative (where the patient is unable to give consent).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a history of central nervous system disorders resulting in cognitive impairment

    • Patients on ECMO
    • Patients admitted for symptomatic central nervous system disorders
    • Patients admitted for acute respiratory distress syndrome following cardiorespiratory arrest.
    • Patients being treated for a psychiatric condition, chronic heavy drinkers, or those undergoing long-term treatment with benzodiazepines, antidepressants or antipsychotics.
    • Pregnant, breastfeeding or labouring patients
    • Individuals subject to a legal protection order
    • Individuals receiving compulsory psychiatric care
    • Individuals deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 다른
  • 할당: 해당 없음
  • 중재 모델: 단일 그룹 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Exploratory arm
collection of oesophageal pressure data, mechanical power calculation, MOCA score collection and blood sample collection for S100B protein dosage
collection of oesophageal pressure data, mechanical power calculation, MOCA score collection and blood sample collection for S100B protein dosage

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
to determine whether there is an association between the mechanical power between Day 1 and Day 3 (reflecting the risk of VILI)
기간: at day 1, day 2 and day 3
mechanical power calculation
at day 1, day 2 and day 3
to determine serum S-100B protein level between Day 1 (H0) and Day 3 (H72).
기간: at day 1, day 2 and day 3
S-100B protein dosage
at day 1, day 2 and day 3

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
To investigate the association between serum S100B protein concentrations from day 1 to day 3 and neurological outcome at 3 months and 12 months
기간: at 3 and 12 months
Correlation coefficient between S-100B protein levels from Day 1 to Day 3 and the MOCA score at 3 and 12 months (no neurocognitive impairment if MOCA ≥ 26/30, neurocognitive impairment if < 25/30).
at 3 and 12 months
To investigate the association between other VILI markers (inspiratory transpulmonary pressure and driving pressure) and serum S100B protein concentrations from day 1 to day 3.
기간: From day 1 to day 3
Correlation coefficient between inspiratory transpulmonary pressure and driving pressure, and serum S-100B levels between Day 1 and Day 3, whilst accounting for potential confounding factors in a multivariate model
From day 1 to day 3
To investigate the association between these other VILI markers and neurological outcomes at 3 months and 12 months.
기간: at 3 and 12 months
Correlation coefficient between mechanical power, inspiratory transpulmonary pressure and driving pressure (average of values measured between J1 and J3) and the MOCA score at 3 and 12 months, taking potential confounding factors into account in a multivariate model
at 3 and 12 months
To investigate the association between the occurrence of delirium during a stay in the intensive care unit and neurological outcomes at 3 and 12 months.
기간: at 3 and 12 months
The occurrence of neurocognitive impairment, defined as a MoCA score of <25/30 at the 3- and 12-month assessments, in patients who experienced delirium in the intensive care unit compared with those who did not.
at 3 and 12 months
Describe the prevalence of depression (PHQ-9 score) among patients who presented ARDS
기간: at 3 months
occurrence of depressive symptoms (defined as a PHQ-9 score > 10)
at 3 months
Describe the prevalence of post-traumatic stress (PCL-5 score) among patients who presented ARDS
기간: at 3 months
occurrence of post-traumatic stress (defined as a PCL-5 score > 33)
at 3 months
Describe the prevalence of anxiety (GAD-2 score) among patients who presented ARDS
기간: at 3 months
anxiety disorders (defined as a GAD-2 score > 3)
at 3 months
Describe the decline in quality of life (Euro 5d 5l score) among patients who presented ARDS
기간: at 3 months
deterioration in quality of life (EuroQol-5D-5L score analysed both continuously and categorically)
at 3 months
Describe the prevalence of independence (IADL) among patients who presented ARDS
기간: at 3 months
occurence of a decline in functional independence (defined as the loss of at least one instrumental activity compared with the level prior to hospitalisation)
at 3 months

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (추정된)

2026년 10월 17일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2028년 10월 23일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2029년 10월 23일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 6월 1일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 6월 1일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 6월 5일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 6월 5일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 6월 1일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 5월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

IPD 계획 설명

Data will be shared upon reasonable request. Only de-identified data will be shared. Any data collected during the study may be shared. The protocol will be shared initially. Other documents may be shared at a later date upon request (e.g., the CRF to allow a collaborator to select the data they wish to access). The recipients of the data will be researchers. The data will be available for any purpose deemed relevant by the study investigator, based on a protocol provided by the requester, after verification of the obtaining of regulatory approvals, including the favorable opinion of an ethics committee.

IPD 공유 기간

The data will be shared after signing a negotiated data transfer agreement ( data access agreement), for the duration specified in the agreement.

IPD 공유 액세스 기준

The data will be made available via secure transfer (sharing platform approved by the university hospital: BlueFiles or Oodrive).

IPD 공유 지원 정보 유형

  • 연구_프로토콜

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다