- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT07629973
A Study of the Determinants of Neurological Outcomes in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (NEURDS)
Etude Des déterminants de l'évolution NEUrologique Des Patients Ayant présenté un Syndrome de Détresse Respiratoire aiguë
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by pathological pulmonary edema caused by direct or indirect damage to the alveolar-capillary membrane.
Its management relies on etiological treatment, invasive mechanical ventilation, and the use of sedatives and neuromuscular blockers, depending on the patient's condition.
Improvements in patient care have led to an improved prognosis. However, in-hospital mortality remains high (between 35% and 45%). Notably, morbidity among surviving patients is very high and is largely dominated by neuropsychological sequelae. Attention and executive function disorders, confusion, disorientation, or memory impairment are thus found in 70 to 100% of patients following ARDS. These disorders are still present in 46 to 80% of surviving patients one year after ARDS and in 20% of them five years later.
Although essential to treatment, mechanical ventilation carries a risk of significant complications. Beyond the risk of infection and complications related to sedation and neuromuscular blockade, the use of mechanical ventilation is associated with a risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI).
The use of so-called protective ventilation reduces the risk of VILI and improves patient outcomes. However, analysis of relevant physiological parameters shows that the risk of VILI may still exist even when ventilator settings comply with recommendations and the concept of protective ventilation. Driving pressure (which represents Strain) is a good marker of VILI; it represents the distension of the lung with each breath relative to the initial lung volume. Values above 14 cmH₂O are associated with high mortality in patients with ARDS. Inspiratory transpulmonary pressure represents Stress-that is, the pressure that distends the alveoli at the end of inspiration-and is also associated with the risk of VILI. Finally, mechanical power represents the amount of energy delivered to the lung by the ventilator and has been validated as a marker of VILI. The advantage of mechanical power over the other indices described is that it incorporates all components that can lead to VILI.
Among the various sources of neurological damage during ARDS, inflammatory processes appear to play a major role. Numerous inflammatory mediators (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, IL-1β) are secreted during ARDS, and animal studies have demonstrated a link between inflammation and hippocampal damage. Furthermore, cerebral ischemic lesions, exacerbated by systemic inflammation and endothelial activation leading to coagulation activation with thrombus formation, may also contribute to the development of cognitive impairments.
In addition to the inflammatory processes associated with ARDS, mechanical ventilation itself may have a significant impact on neuroinflammatory damage. Recently, the term "ventilator-associated brain injury" (VABI) has been proposed to describe these secondary neurological lesions induced by mechanical ventilation. Studies in mouse and pig models have demonstrated a relationship between the dose and duration of VILI, apoptosis, neuroinflammation, and neuronal damage. An animal study in mice also showed an association between the duration of mechanical ventilation and the onset of cognitive impairments.
During brain injury, proteins and neurotransmitters are released and serve as biomarkers of brain damage. Elevated plasma levels of S100B protein indicate astrocyte damage caused by traumatic, anoxic-ischemic, or inflammatory mechanisms. It correlates with neurological prognosis following cardiac arrest, in ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes, in neurodegenerative diseases, and in patients with traumatic brain injury.
Clinical studies have shown a negative correlation between elevated S100B protein levels, the MoCA score, and the MMSE in patients with OSA or COPD, respectively, indicating an association between this protein and cognitive impairment.
We therefore hypothesize that mechanical ventilation associated with high mechanical power is linked to a significant risk of brain injury, reflected by elevated serum S100B protein levels and the presence of neurocognitive disorders long after ARDS.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Estimado)
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Estudio Contacto
- Nombre: François Beloncle, Professor
- Número de teléfono: +33 2 41 35 38 15
- Correo electrónico: Francois.Beloncle@chu-angers.fr
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Adulto
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patient
- Patient admitted to the intensive care unit less than 48 hours ago
Patient diagnosed with mild, moderate or severe ARDS according to the Berlin classification based on the PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio, with a minimum PEEP set at 5 cmH₂O (16), of pulmonary aetiology:
- Mild ARDS: 200 < PaO₂/FiO₂ < 300 mmHg
- Moderate ARDS: 100 < PaO₂/FiO₂ < 200 mmHg
- Severe ARDS: PaO₂/FiO₂ < 100 mmHg
- Patients fitted with an oesophageal pressure measurement catheter (Nutrivent, Sidam, San Giacomo Roncole, Italy)
- Patients registered with or covered by a social security scheme
- Free and informed consent from the patient or a trusted relative (where the patient is unable to give consent).
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with a history of central nervous system disorders resulting in cognitive impairment
- Patients on ECMO
- Patients admitted for symptomatic central nervous system disorders
- Patients admitted for acute respiratory distress syndrome following cardiorespiratory arrest.
- Patients being treated for a psychiatric condition, chronic heavy drinkers, or those undergoing long-term treatment with benzodiazepines, antidepressants or antipsychotics.
- Pregnant, breastfeeding or labouring patients
- Individuals subject to a legal protection order
- Individuals receiving compulsory psychiatric care
- Individuals deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Otro
- Asignación: N / A
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
- Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Exploratory arm
collection of oesophageal pressure data, mechanical power calculation, MOCA score collection and blood sample collection for S100B protein dosage
|
collection of oesophageal pressure data, mechanical power calculation, MOCA score collection and blood sample collection for S100B protein dosage
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
to determine whether there is an association between the mechanical power between Day 1 and Day 3 (reflecting the risk of VILI)
Periodo de tiempo: at day 1, day 2 and day 3
|
mechanical power calculation
|
at day 1, day 2 and day 3
|
|
to determine serum S-100B protein level between Day 1 (H0) and Day 3 (H72).
Periodo de tiempo: at day 1, day 2 and day 3
|
S-100B protein dosage
|
at day 1, day 2 and day 3
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
To investigate the association between serum S100B protein concentrations from day 1 to day 3 and neurological outcome at 3 months and 12 months
Periodo de tiempo: at 3 and 12 months
|
Correlation coefficient between S-100B protein levels from Day 1 to Day 3 and the MOCA score at 3 and 12 months (no neurocognitive impairment if MOCA ≥ 26/30, neurocognitive impairment if < 25/30).
|
at 3 and 12 months
|
|
To investigate the association between other VILI markers (inspiratory transpulmonary pressure and driving pressure) and serum S100B protein concentrations from day 1 to day 3.
Periodo de tiempo: From day 1 to day 3
|
Correlation coefficient between inspiratory transpulmonary pressure and driving pressure, and serum S-100B levels between Day 1 and Day 3, whilst accounting for potential confounding factors in a multivariate model
|
From day 1 to day 3
|
|
To investigate the association between these other VILI markers and neurological outcomes at 3 months and 12 months.
Periodo de tiempo: at 3 and 12 months
|
Correlation coefficient between mechanical power, inspiratory transpulmonary pressure and driving pressure (average of values measured between J1 and J3) and the MOCA score at 3 and 12 months, taking potential confounding factors into account in a multivariate model
|
at 3 and 12 months
|
|
To investigate the association between the occurrence of delirium during a stay in the intensive care unit and neurological outcomes at 3 and 12 months.
Periodo de tiempo: at 3 and 12 months
|
The occurrence of neurocognitive impairment, defined as a MoCA score of <25/30 at the 3- and 12-month assessments, in patients who experienced delirium in the intensive care unit compared with those who did not.
|
at 3 and 12 months
|
|
Describe the prevalence of depression (PHQ-9 score) among patients who presented ARDS
Periodo de tiempo: at 3 months
|
occurrence of depressive symptoms (defined as a PHQ-9 score > 10)
|
at 3 months
|
|
Describe the prevalence of post-traumatic stress (PCL-5 score) among patients who presented ARDS
Periodo de tiempo: at 3 months
|
occurrence of post-traumatic stress (defined as a PCL-5 score > 33)
|
at 3 months
|
|
Describe the prevalence of anxiety (GAD-2 score) among patients who presented ARDS
Periodo de tiempo: at 3 months
|
anxiety disorders (defined as a GAD-2 score > 3)
|
at 3 months
|
|
Describe the decline in quality of life (Euro 5d 5l score) among patients who presented ARDS
Periodo de tiempo: at 3 months
|
deterioration in quality of life (EuroQol-5D-5L score analysed both continuously and categorically)
|
at 3 months
|
|
Describe the prevalence of independence (IADL) among patients who presented ARDS
Periodo de tiempo: at 3 months
|
occurence of a decline in functional independence (defined as the loss of at least one instrumental activity compared with the level prior to hospitalisation)
|
at 3 months
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Estimado)
Finalización primaria (Estimado)
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 49RC25_0292
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Descripción del plan IPD
Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD
Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD
Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD
- PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .