Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

A Study of the Determinants of Neurological Outcomes in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (NEURDS)

1 de junio de 2026 actualizado por: University Hospital, Angers

Etude Des déterminants de l'évolution NEUrologique Des Patients Ayant présenté un Syndrome de Détresse Respiratoire aiguë

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by pathological pulmonary edema caused by direct or indirect damage to the alveolar-capillary membrane.

Its management relies on etiological treatment, invasive mechanical ventilation, and the use of sedatives and neuromuscular blockers, depending on the patient's condition.

Improvements in patient care have led to an improved prognosis. However, in-hospital mortality remains high (between 35% and 45%). Notably, morbidity among surviving patients is very high and is largely dominated by neuropsychological sequelae. Attention and executive function disorders, confusion, disorientation, or memory impairment are thus found in 70 to 100% of patients following ARDS. These disorders are still present in 46 to 80% of surviving patients one year after ARDS and in 20% of them five years later.

Although essential to treatment, mechanical ventilation carries a risk of significant complications. Beyond the risk of infection and complications related to sedation and neuromuscular blockade, the use of mechanical ventilation is associated with a risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI).

The use of so-called protective ventilation reduces the risk of VILI and improves patient outcomes. However, analysis of relevant physiological parameters shows that the risk of VILI may still exist even when ventilator settings comply with recommendations and the concept of protective ventilation. Driving pressure (which represents Strain) is a good marker of VILI; it represents the distension of the lung with each breath relative to the initial lung volume. Values above 14 cmH₂O are associated with high mortality in patients with ARDS. Inspiratory transpulmonary pressure represents Stress-that is, the pressure that distends the alveoli at the end of inspiration-and is also associated with the risk of VILI. Finally, mechanical power represents the amount of energy delivered to the lung by the ventilator and has been validated as a marker of VILI. The advantage of mechanical power over the other indices described is that it incorporates all components that can lead to VILI.

Among the various sources of neurological damage during ARDS, inflammatory processes appear to play a major role. Numerous inflammatory mediators (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, IL-1β) are secreted during ARDS, and animal studies have demonstrated a link between inflammation and hippocampal damage. Furthermore, cerebral ischemic lesions, exacerbated by systemic inflammation and endothelial activation leading to coagulation activation with thrombus formation, may also contribute to the development of cognitive impairments.

In addition to the inflammatory processes associated with ARDS, mechanical ventilation itself may have a significant impact on neuroinflammatory damage. Recently, the term "ventilator-associated brain injury" (VABI) has been proposed to describe these secondary neurological lesions induced by mechanical ventilation. Studies in mouse and pig models have demonstrated a relationship between the dose and duration of VILI, apoptosis, neuroinflammation, and neuronal damage. An animal study in mice also showed an association between the duration of mechanical ventilation and the onset of cognitive impairments.

During brain injury, proteins and neurotransmitters are released and serve as biomarkers of brain damage. Elevated plasma levels of S100B protein indicate astrocyte damage caused by traumatic, anoxic-ischemic, or inflammatory mechanisms. It correlates with neurological prognosis following cardiac arrest, in ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes, in neurodegenerative diseases, and in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Clinical studies have shown a negative correlation between elevated S100B protein levels, the MoCA score, and the MMSE in patients with OSA or COPD, respectively, indicating an association between this protein and cognitive impairment.

We therefore hypothesize that mechanical ventilation associated with high mechanical power is linked to a significant risk of brain injury, reflected by elevated serum S100B protein levels and the presence of neurocognitive disorders long after ARDS.

Descripción general del estudio

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

150

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient
  • Patient admitted to the intensive care unit less than 48 hours ago
  • Patient diagnosed with mild, moderate or severe ARDS according to the Berlin classification based on the PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio, with a minimum PEEP set at 5 cmH₂O (16), of pulmonary aetiology:

    • Mild ARDS: 200 < PaO₂/FiO₂ < 300 mmHg
    • Moderate ARDS: 100 < PaO₂/FiO₂ < 200 mmHg
    • Severe ARDS: PaO₂/FiO₂ < 100 mmHg
  • Patients fitted with an oesophageal pressure measurement catheter (Nutrivent, Sidam, San Giacomo Roncole, Italy)
  • Patients registered with or covered by a social security scheme
  • Free and informed consent from the patient or a trusted relative (where the patient is unable to give consent).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a history of central nervous system disorders resulting in cognitive impairment

    • Patients on ECMO
    • Patients admitted for symptomatic central nervous system disorders
    • Patients admitted for acute respiratory distress syndrome following cardiorespiratory arrest.
    • Patients being treated for a psychiatric condition, chronic heavy drinkers, or those undergoing long-term treatment with benzodiazepines, antidepressants or antipsychotics.
    • Pregnant, breastfeeding or labouring patients
    • Individuals subject to a legal protection order
    • Individuals receiving compulsory psychiatric care
    • Individuals deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Otro
  • Asignación: N / A
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Exploratory arm
collection of oesophageal pressure data, mechanical power calculation, MOCA score collection and blood sample collection for S100B protein dosage
collection of oesophageal pressure data, mechanical power calculation, MOCA score collection and blood sample collection for S100B protein dosage

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
to determine whether there is an association between the mechanical power between Day 1 and Day 3 (reflecting the risk of VILI)
Periodo de tiempo: at day 1, day 2 and day 3
mechanical power calculation
at day 1, day 2 and day 3
to determine serum S-100B protein level between Day 1 (H0) and Day 3 (H72).
Periodo de tiempo: at day 1, day 2 and day 3
S-100B protein dosage
at day 1, day 2 and day 3

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
To investigate the association between serum S100B protein concentrations from day 1 to day 3 and neurological outcome at 3 months and 12 months
Periodo de tiempo: at 3 and 12 months
Correlation coefficient between S-100B protein levels from Day 1 to Day 3 and the MOCA score at 3 and 12 months (no neurocognitive impairment if MOCA ≥ 26/30, neurocognitive impairment if < 25/30).
at 3 and 12 months
To investigate the association between other VILI markers (inspiratory transpulmonary pressure and driving pressure) and serum S100B protein concentrations from day 1 to day 3.
Periodo de tiempo: From day 1 to day 3
Correlation coefficient between inspiratory transpulmonary pressure and driving pressure, and serum S-100B levels between Day 1 and Day 3, whilst accounting for potential confounding factors in a multivariate model
From day 1 to day 3
To investigate the association between these other VILI markers and neurological outcomes at 3 months and 12 months.
Periodo de tiempo: at 3 and 12 months
Correlation coefficient between mechanical power, inspiratory transpulmonary pressure and driving pressure (average of values measured between J1 and J3) and the MOCA score at 3 and 12 months, taking potential confounding factors into account in a multivariate model
at 3 and 12 months
To investigate the association between the occurrence of delirium during a stay in the intensive care unit and neurological outcomes at 3 and 12 months.
Periodo de tiempo: at 3 and 12 months
The occurrence of neurocognitive impairment, defined as a MoCA score of <25/30 at the 3- and 12-month assessments, in patients who experienced delirium in the intensive care unit compared with those who did not.
at 3 and 12 months
Describe the prevalence of depression (PHQ-9 score) among patients who presented ARDS
Periodo de tiempo: at 3 months
occurrence of depressive symptoms (defined as a PHQ-9 score > 10)
at 3 months
Describe the prevalence of post-traumatic stress (PCL-5 score) among patients who presented ARDS
Periodo de tiempo: at 3 months
occurrence of post-traumatic stress (defined as a PCL-5 score > 33)
at 3 months
Describe the prevalence of anxiety (GAD-2 score) among patients who presented ARDS
Periodo de tiempo: at 3 months
anxiety disorders (defined as a GAD-2 score > 3)
at 3 months
Describe the decline in quality of life (Euro 5d 5l score) among patients who presented ARDS
Periodo de tiempo: at 3 months
deterioration in quality of life (EuroQol-5D-5L score analysed both continuously and categorically)
at 3 months
Describe the prevalence of independence (IADL) among patients who presented ARDS
Periodo de tiempo: at 3 months
occurence of a decline in functional independence (defined as the loss of at least one instrumental activity compared with the level prior to hospitalisation)
at 3 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

17 de octubre de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

23 de octubre de 2028

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

23 de octubre de 2029

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

1 de junio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

1 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

5 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

5 de junio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

1 de junio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

Descripción del plan IPD

Data will be shared upon reasonable request. Only de-identified data will be shared. Any data collected during the study may be shared. The protocol will be shared initially. Other documents may be shared at a later date upon request (e.g., the CRF to allow a collaborator to select the data they wish to access). The recipients of the data will be researchers. The data will be available for any purpose deemed relevant by the study investigator, based on a protocol provided by the requester, after verification of the obtaining of regulatory approvals, including the favorable opinion of an ethics committee.

Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD

The data will be shared after signing a negotiated data transfer agreement ( data access agreement), for the duration specified in the agreement.

Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD

The data will be made available via secure transfer (sharing platform approved by the university hospital: BlueFiles or Oodrive).

Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir