이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Blood Tests for Alzheimer's Disease: Can Plasma Biomarkers Diagnose and Predict Disease Progression (BLAD)

2026년 7월 16일 업데이트: Prof. Massimo Filippi, IRCCS San Raffaele

The Diagnostic and Prognostic Role of Plasma Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease

BLAD is a prospective, monocentric, observational epidemiological study with an additional procedure (annual blood draw) evaluating the diagnostic and prognostic performance of plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in a large cohort of patients attending the Cognitive Disorders and Dementia Center (CDCD) at IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.

2000 patients will be enrolled and followed annually for 5 years. A validation sub-study (150 patients) will compare plasma biomarkers against CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.

The study aims to establish plasma biomarkers as a less invasive and more cost-effective alternative to CSF analysis and amyloid-PET for the diagnosis and prognosis of AD.

연구 개요

상세 설명

In light of the possible advent of disease-modifying drugs for Alzheimer's disease (AD), reliable biomarkers have been developed in recent years to define the presence of AD pathology at the brain level. The current biological gold standards are cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers (CSF-Abeta40, CSF-Abeta42, CSF-pTau, CSF-NfL) and amyloid-PET. Both methods have excellent diagnostic properties but are costly and invasive, limiting their use outside of highly specialized centers.

Plasma biomarkers (plasma-Abeta40, plasma-Abeta42, plasma-pTau-181, plasma-NfL, plasma-ApoE, plasma-ApoE4, plasma-GFAP, plasma-sTREM2, and other plasma neurodegeneration biomarkers) represent a potentially less invasive and more economically accessible alternative. Recent studies have shown that plasma biomarkers can differentiate AD from other neurodegenerative disorders with accuracy comparable to CSF and PET, detect AD pathology in MCI patients, and predict future development of AD dementia in patients with SCD or MCI. However, more research is needed before their widespread use in clinical practice.

The BLAD study is designed as a monocentric, prospective, observational epidemiological study with an additional procedure (annual blood draw for 5 years) and a diagnostic accuracy sub-study (not device-based).

Patients will be recruited among those attending the Cognitive Disorders and Dementia Center (CDCD) at IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital during routine clinical practice. All enrolled patients will undergo annual blood sampling for 5 years in addition to standard clinical assessments.

A sub-population of 150 patients who undergo lumbar puncture as part of their routine diagnostic workup will enter the validation sub-study. Only those whose CSF biomarkers confirm a biological diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease will continue follow-up; others will exit the sub-study.

The equipment for plasma biomarker measurement (CE-marked medical device) and laboratory kits will be provided on free loan by Fujirebio. No clinical or laboratory data will be shared with Fujirebio.

Statistical analyses will include: log-rank test to compare time to AD development between groups above and below the biomarker threshold; linear stepwise regression models, linear mixed-effects models, and multivariable Cox models to assess the prognostic value of plasma biomarkers; longitudinal generalized linear models for repeated measures or Wilcoxon test to assess biomarker dynamics over time. For the validation sub-study, ROC curve analysis will be performed to assess accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of plasma biomarkers against CSF gold standard.

연구 유형

관찰

등록 (추정된)

2000

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

연구 연락처 백업

  • 이름: Giuseppe Magnani, MD

연구 장소

    • Milano
      • Milan, Milano, 이탈리아, 20132
        • 모병
        • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele - Cognitive Disorders and Dementia Center (CDCD)
        • 연락하다:
        • 연락하다:
          • Giuseppe Magnani, MD
        • 수석 연구원:
          • Massimo Filippi, Prof, MD
        • 부수사관:
          • Federica Agosta, MD
        • 부수사관:
          • Giuseppe Magnani, MD
        • 부수사관:
          • Giordano Cecchetti, MD
        • 부수사관:
          • Francesca Caso, MD
        • 부수사관:
          • Roberto Santangelo, MD
        • 부수사관:
          • Gioele Spinelli, MD
        • 부수사관:
          • Giulia Rugarli, MD
        • 부수사관:
          • Federico Coraglia, MD

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 성인
  • 고령자

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

샘플링 방법

비확률 샘플

연구 인구

Adult patients attending the Cognitive Disorders and Dementia Center (CDCD) at IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy, presenting with subjective or objective cognitive complaints of progressive and suspected neurodegenerative nature.

설명

Inclusion Criteria (main study and sub-study):

  1. Age greater than or equal to 40 years (patients of childbearing age are admitted).
  2. Subjective or objective cognitive complaints, progressive in nature and of suspected neurodegenerative origin.
  3. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score greater than or equal to 18.

    Additional inclusion criterion for the validation sub-study:

  4. Availability of CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease within 6 months of the blood draw.

Exclusion Criteria (main study):

  1. Secondary forms of cognitive impairment based on medical history, neurological examination, and neuroimaging findings.
  2. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  3. Rapidly progressive cognitive decline occurring over weeks or months, typically indicative of prion disease, neoplasia, or metabolic disorders.
  4. Subjects who require a legal guardian or tutor.

Exclusion Criteria (validation sub-study):

  1. Secondary forms of cognitive impairment based on medical history, neurological examination, and neuroimaging findings.
  2. Pregnancy.
  3. Rapidly progressive cognitive decline occurring over weeks or months, typically indicative of prion disease, neoplasia, or metabolic disorders.
  4. Subjects who are unable to give informed consent and require a legal guardian or tutor.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

코호트 및 개입

그룹/코호트
개입 / 치료
Main Study Cohort
2000 adult patients attending the Cognitive Disorders and Dementia Center (CDCD) at IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital with subjective or objective cognitive complaints of progressive and suspected neurodegenerative nature. All patients undergo annual blood sampling for 5 years in addition to standard clinical follow-up.
A blood sample is collected once per year for 5 years (additional procedure beyond standard clinical care) for measurement of plasma biomarkers including: Abeta40, Abeta42, Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio, pTau-181, NfL, ApoE, ApoE4, GFAP, sTREM2, and other plasma neurodegeneration biomarkers. Blood draw is a routine clinical procedure with no specific contraindications. The only possible side effect is local hematoma at the puncture site. Plasma biomarker measurement is performed using a CE-marked medical device (Fujirebio, provided on free loan). Results do not modify the patient's standard diagnostic and therapeutic pathway.
Validation Sub-study Cohort
150 patients from the main cohort who undergo lumbar puncture as part of their routine diagnostic workup and have CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease available within 6 months of blood draw. Only those with CSF biomarkers confirming a biological diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease continue longitudinal follow-up in the sub-study.
A blood sample is collected once per year for 5 years (additional procedure beyond standard clinical care) for measurement of plasma biomarkers including: Abeta40, Abeta42, Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio, pTau-181, NfL, ApoE, ApoE4, GFAP, sTREM2, and other plasma neurodegeneration biomarkers. Blood draw is a routine clinical procedure with no specific contraindications. The only possible side effect is local hematoma at the puncture site. Plasma biomarker measurement is performed using a CE-marked medical device (Fujirebio, provided on free loan). Results do not modify the patient's standard diagnostic and therapeutic pathway.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Time to progression to all-cause dementia in MCI patients (primary prognostic endpoint)
기간: Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Time to clinical progression to all-cause dementia in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) at baseline, assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. For each plasma biomarker, patients are divided into two groups (above/below the median) and compared using the log-rank test (cause-specific hazard). The study has greater than 95% power to detect a Hazard Ratio of 2 and approximately 75-80% power for HR of 1.5.
Annually from baseline up to 5 years

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Change in MMSE score over time
기간: Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Change over time in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score as a measure of cognitive progression. A decrease of 5 or more points is considered clinically significant progression of cognitive impairment due to AD.
Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Conversion from MCI to Alzheimer's disease dementia
기간: Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Rate of clinical conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's disease dementia over the 5-year follow-up period, assessed at each annual visit.
Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Longitudinal change in plasma Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio
기간: Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Change over time in the plasma Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio, assessed using longitudinal generalized linear models for repeated measures or Wilcoxon test.
Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Longitudinal change in plasma pTau-181 levels
기간: Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Change over time in plasma phosphorylated tau 181 (pTau-181) levels, assessed using longitudinal generalized linear models for repeated measures or Wilcoxon test.
Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Longitudinal change in plasma NfL levels
기간: Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Change over time in plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels, assessed using longitudinal generalized linear models for repeated measures or Wilcoxon test.
Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Longitudinal change in plasma GFAP levels
기간: Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Change over time in plasma Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) levels, assessed using longitudinal generalized linear models for repeated measures or Wilcoxon test.
Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Longitudinal change in plasma sTREM2 levels
기간: Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Change over time in plasma soluble Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid cells 2 (sTREM2) levels, assessed using longitudinal generalized linear models for repeated measures or Wilcoxon test.
Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Longitudinal change in plasma Abeta40 levels
기간: Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Change over time in plasma beta-amyloid 40 (Abeta40) levels, assessed using longitudinal generalized linear models for repeated measures or Wilcoxon test.
Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Longitudinal change in plasma Abeta42 levels
기간: Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Change over time in plasma beta-amyloid 42 (Abeta42) levels, assessed using longitudinal generalized linear models for repeated measures or Wilcoxon test.
Annually from baseline up to 5 years

기타 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Diagnostic accuracy of plasma Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
기간: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of plasma Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio in diagnosing Alzheimer's disease, using CSF biomarkers (CSF-Abeta40, CSF-Abeta42, CSF-pTau, CSF-NfL) as the gold standard. Patients are classified as AD or non-AD based on CSF results. An AUC of at least 0.80 is expected, with greater than 95% power to reject H0: AUC=0.50 at alpha=0.05.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Diagnostic accuracy of plasma pTau-181 vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
기간: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of plasma pTau-181 in diagnosing Alzheimer's disease, using CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Diagnostic accuracy of plasma NfL vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
기간: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of plasma NfL in diagnosing Alzheimer's disease, using CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Diagnostic accuracy of plasma GFAP vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
기간: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of plasma GFAP in diagnosing Alzheimer's disease, using CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Optimal diagnostic cut-off values for plasma Abeta40 vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
기간: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Determination of the optimal diagnostic cut-off values for Abeta40 biomarker using ROC curve analysis against CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Optimal diagnostic cut-off values for plasma Abeta42 vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
기간: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Determination of the optimal diagnostic cut-off values for Abeta42 biomarker using ROC curve analysis against CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Optimal diagnostic cut-off values for plasma Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
기간: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Determination of the optimal diagnostic cut-off values for Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio biomarker using ROC curve analysis against CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Optimal diagnostic cut-off values for plasma pTau-181 vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
기간: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Determination of the optimal diagnostic cut-off values for pTau-181 biomarker using ROC curve analysis against CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Optimal diagnostic cut-off values for plasma NfL vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
기간: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Determination of the optimal diagnostic cut-off values for NfL biomarker using ROC curve analysis against CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Optimal diagnostic cut-off values for plasma GFAP vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
기간: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Determination of the optimal diagnostic cut-off values for GFAP biomarker using ROC curve analysis against CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Optimal diagnostic cut-off values for plasma sTREM2 vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
기간: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Determination of the optimal diagnostic cut-off values for sTREM2 biomarker using ROC curve analysis against CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Optimal diagnostic cut-off values for plasma ApoE vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
기간: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Determination of the optimal diagnostic cut-off values for ApoE biomarker using ROC curve analysis against CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Optimal diagnostic cut-off values for plasma ApoE4 vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
기간: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Determination of the optimal diagnostic cut-off values for ApoE4 biomarker using ROC curve analysis against CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Massimo Filippi, Prof, MD, IRCCS San Raffaele

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2023년 9월 12일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2032년 6월 1일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2032년 6월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 7월 16일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 7월 16일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 7월 21일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 7월 21일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 7월 16일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 7월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

미정

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다