Ta strona została przetłumaczona automatycznie i dokładność tłumaczenia nie jest gwarantowana. Proszę odnieść się do angielska wersja za tekst źródłowy.

Blood Tests for Alzheimer's Disease: Can Plasma Biomarkers Diagnose and Predict Disease Progression (BLAD)

16 lipca 2026 zaktualizowane przez: Prof. Massimo Filippi, IRCCS San Raffaele

The Diagnostic and Prognostic Role of Plasma Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease

BLAD is a prospective, monocentric, observational epidemiological study with an additional procedure (annual blood draw) evaluating the diagnostic and prognostic performance of plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in a large cohort of patients attending the Cognitive Disorders and Dementia Center (CDCD) at IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.

2000 patients will be enrolled and followed annually for 5 years. A validation sub-study (150 patients) will compare plasma biomarkers against CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.

The study aims to establish plasma biomarkers as a less invasive and more cost-effective alternative to CSF analysis and amyloid-PET for the diagnosis and prognosis of AD.

Przegląd badań

Szczegółowy opis

In light of the possible advent of disease-modifying drugs for Alzheimer's disease (AD), reliable biomarkers have been developed in recent years to define the presence of AD pathology at the brain level. The current biological gold standards are cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers (CSF-Abeta40, CSF-Abeta42, CSF-pTau, CSF-NfL) and amyloid-PET. Both methods have excellent diagnostic properties but are costly and invasive, limiting their use outside of highly specialized centers.

Plasma biomarkers (plasma-Abeta40, plasma-Abeta42, plasma-pTau-181, plasma-NfL, plasma-ApoE, plasma-ApoE4, plasma-GFAP, plasma-sTREM2, and other plasma neurodegeneration biomarkers) represent a potentially less invasive and more economically accessible alternative. Recent studies have shown that plasma biomarkers can differentiate AD from other neurodegenerative disorders with accuracy comparable to CSF and PET, detect AD pathology in MCI patients, and predict future development of AD dementia in patients with SCD or MCI. However, more research is needed before their widespread use in clinical practice.

The BLAD study is designed as a monocentric, prospective, observational epidemiological study with an additional procedure (annual blood draw for 5 years) and a diagnostic accuracy sub-study (not device-based).

Patients will be recruited among those attending the Cognitive Disorders and Dementia Center (CDCD) at IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital during routine clinical practice. All enrolled patients will undergo annual blood sampling for 5 years in addition to standard clinical assessments.

A sub-population of 150 patients who undergo lumbar puncture as part of their routine diagnostic workup will enter the validation sub-study. Only those whose CSF biomarkers confirm a biological diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease will continue follow-up; others will exit the sub-study.

The equipment for plasma biomarker measurement (CE-marked medical device) and laboratory kits will be provided on free loan by Fujirebio. No clinical or laboratory data will be shared with Fujirebio.

Statistical analyses will include: log-rank test to compare time to AD development between groups above and below the biomarker threshold; linear stepwise regression models, linear mixed-effects models, and multivariable Cox models to assess the prognostic value of plasma biomarkers; longitudinal generalized linear models for repeated measures or Wilcoxon test to assess biomarker dynamics over time. For the validation sub-study, ROC curve analysis will be performed to assess accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of plasma biomarkers against CSF gold standard.

Typ studiów

Obserwacyjny

Zapisy (Szacowany)

2000

Kontakty i lokalizacje

Ta sekcja zawiera dane kontaktowe osób prowadzących badanie oraz informacje o tym, gdzie badanie jest przeprowadzane.

Kontakt w sprawie studiów

Kopia zapasowa kontaktu do badania

  • Nazwa: Giuseppe Magnani, MD

Lokalizacje studiów

    • Milano
      • Milan, Milano, Włochy, 20132
        • Rekrutacyjny
        • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele - Cognitive Disorders and Dementia Center (CDCD)
        • Kontakt:
        • Kontakt:
          • Giuseppe Magnani, MD
        • Główny śledczy:
          • Massimo Filippi, Prof, MD
        • Pod-śledczy:
          • Federica Agosta, MD
        • Pod-śledczy:
          • Giuseppe Magnani, MD
        • Pod-śledczy:
          • Giordano Cecchetti, MD
        • Pod-śledczy:
          • Francesca Caso, MD
        • Pod-śledczy:
          • Roberto Santangelo, MD
        • Pod-śledczy:
          • Gioele Spinelli, MD
        • Pod-śledczy:
          • Giulia Rugarli, MD
        • Pod-śledczy:
          • Federico Coraglia, MD

Kryteria uczestnictwa

Badacze szukają osób, które pasują do określonego opisu, zwanego kryteriami kwalifikacyjnymi. Niektóre przykłady tych kryteriów to ogólny stan zdrowia danej osoby lub wcześniejsze leczenie.

Kryteria kwalifikacji

Wiek uprawniający do nauki

  • Dorosły
  • Starszy dorosły

Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników

Nie

Metoda próbkowania

Próbka bez prawdopodobieństwa

Badana populacja

Adult patients attending the Cognitive Disorders and Dementia Center (CDCD) at IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy, presenting with subjective or objective cognitive complaints of progressive and suspected neurodegenerative nature.

Opis

Inclusion Criteria (main study and sub-study):

  1. Age greater than or equal to 40 years (patients of childbearing age are admitted).
  2. Subjective or objective cognitive complaints, progressive in nature and of suspected neurodegenerative origin.
  3. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score greater than or equal to 18.

    Additional inclusion criterion for the validation sub-study:

  4. Availability of CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease within 6 months of the blood draw.

Exclusion Criteria (main study):

  1. Secondary forms of cognitive impairment based on medical history, neurological examination, and neuroimaging findings.
  2. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  3. Rapidly progressive cognitive decline occurring over weeks or months, typically indicative of prion disease, neoplasia, or metabolic disorders.
  4. Subjects who require a legal guardian or tutor.

Exclusion Criteria (validation sub-study):

  1. Secondary forms of cognitive impairment based on medical history, neurological examination, and neuroimaging findings.
  2. Pregnancy.
  3. Rapidly progressive cognitive decline occurring over weeks or months, typically indicative of prion disease, neoplasia, or metabolic disorders.
  4. Subjects who are unable to give informed consent and require a legal guardian or tutor.

Plan studiów

Ta sekcja zawiera szczegółowe informacje na temat planu badania, w tym sposób zaprojektowania badania i jego pomiary.

Jak projektuje się badanie?

Szczegóły projektu

Kohorty i interwencje

Grupa / Kohorta
Interwencja / Leczenie
Main Study Cohort
2000 adult patients attending the Cognitive Disorders and Dementia Center (CDCD) at IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital with subjective or objective cognitive complaints of progressive and suspected neurodegenerative nature. All patients undergo annual blood sampling for 5 years in addition to standard clinical follow-up.
A blood sample is collected once per year for 5 years (additional procedure beyond standard clinical care) for measurement of plasma biomarkers including: Abeta40, Abeta42, Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio, pTau-181, NfL, ApoE, ApoE4, GFAP, sTREM2, and other plasma neurodegeneration biomarkers. Blood draw is a routine clinical procedure with no specific contraindications. The only possible side effect is local hematoma at the puncture site. Plasma biomarker measurement is performed using a CE-marked medical device (Fujirebio, provided on free loan). Results do not modify the patient's standard diagnostic and therapeutic pathway.
Validation Sub-study Cohort
150 patients from the main cohort who undergo lumbar puncture as part of their routine diagnostic workup and have CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease available within 6 months of blood draw. Only those with CSF biomarkers confirming a biological diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease continue longitudinal follow-up in the sub-study.
A blood sample is collected once per year for 5 years (additional procedure beyond standard clinical care) for measurement of plasma biomarkers including: Abeta40, Abeta42, Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio, pTau-181, NfL, ApoE, ApoE4, GFAP, sTREM2, and other plasma neurodegeneration biomarkers. Blood draw is a routine clinical procedure with no specific contraindications. The only possible side effect is local hematoma at the puncture site. Plasma biomarker measurement is performed using a CE-marked medical device (Fujirebio, provided on free loan). Results do not modify the patient's standard diagnostic and therapeutic pathway.

Co mierzy badanie?

Podstawowe miary wyniku

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Time to progression to all-cause dementia in MCI patients (primary prognostic endpoint)
Ramy czasowe: Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Time to clinical progression to all-cause dementia in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) at baseline, assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. For each plasma biomarker, patients are divided into two groups (above/below the median) and compared using the log-rank test (cause-specific hazard). The study has greater than 95% power to detect a Hazard Ratio of 2 and approximately 75-80% power for HR of 1.5.
Annually from baseline up to 5 years

Miary wyników drugorzędnych

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Change in MMSE score over time
Ramy czasowe: Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Change over time in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score as a measure of cognitive progression. A decrease of 5 or more points is considered clinically significant progression of cognitive impairment due to AD.
Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Conversion from MCI to Alzheimer's disease dementia
Ramy czasowe: Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Rate of clinical conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's disease dementia over the 5-year follow-up period, assessed at each annual visit.
Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Longitudinal change in plasma Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio
Ramy czasowe: Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Change over time in the plasma Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio, assessed using longitudinal generalized linear models for repeated measures or Wilcoxon test.
Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Longitudinal change in plasma pTau-181 levels
Ramy czasowe: Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Change over time in plasma phosphorylated tau 181 (pTau-181) levels, assessed using longitudinal generalized linear models for repeated measures or Wilcoxon test.
Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Longitudinal change in plasma NfL levels
Ramy czasowe: Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Change over time in plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels, assessed using longitudinal generalized linear models for repeated measures or Wilcoxon test.
Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Longitudinal change in plasma GFAP levels
Ramy czasowe: Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Change over time in plasma Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) levels, assessed using longitudinal generalized linear models for repeated measures or Wilcoxon test.
Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Longitudinal change in plasma sTREM2 levels
Ramy czasowe: Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Change over time in plasma soluble Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid cells 2 (sTREM2) levels, assessed using longitudinal generalized linear models for repeated measures or Wilcoxon test.
Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Longitudinal change in plasma Abeta40 levels
Ramy czasowe: Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Change over time in plasma beta-amyloid 40 (Abeta40) levels, assessed using longitudinal generalized linear models for repeated measures or Wilcoxon test.
Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Longitudinal change in plasma Abeta42 levels
Ramy czasowe: Annually from baseline up to 5 years
Change over time in plasma beta-amyloid 42 (Abeta42) levels, assessed using longitudinal generalized linear models for repeated measures or Wilcoxon test.
Annually from baseline up to 5 years

Inne miary wyników

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Diagnostic accuracy of plasma Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of plasma Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio in diagnosing Alzheimer's disease, using CSF biomarkers (CSF-Abeta40, CSF-Abeta42, CSF-pTau, CSF-NfL) as the gold standard. Patients are classified as AD or non-AD based on CSF results. An AUC of at least 0.80 is expected, with greater than 95% power to reject H0: AUC=0.50 at alpha=0.05.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Diagnostic accuracy of plasma pTau-181 vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of plasma pTau-181 in diagnosing Alzheimer's disease, using CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Diagnostic accuracy of plasma NfL vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of plasma NfL in diagnosing Alzheimer's disease, using CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Diagnostic accuracy of plasma GFAP vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of plasma GFAP in diagnosing Alzheimer's disease, using CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Optimal diagnostic cut-off values for plasma Abeta40 vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Determination of the optimal diagnostic cut-off values for Abeta40 biomarker using ROC curve analysis against CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Optimal diagnostic cut-off values for plasma Abeta42 vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Determination of the optimal diagnostic cut-off values for Abeta42 biomarker using ROC curve analysis against CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Optimal diagnostic cut-off values for plasma Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Determination of the optimal diagnostic cut-off values for Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio biomarker using ROC curve analysis against CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Optimal diagnostic cut-off values for plasma pTau-181 vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Determination of the optimal diagnostic cut-off values for pTau-181 biomarker using ROC curve analysis against CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Optimal diagnostic cut-off values for plasma NfL vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Determination of the optimal diagnostic cut-off values for NfL biomarker using ROC curve analysis against CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Optimal diagnostic cut-off values for plasma GFAP vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Determination of the optimal diagnostic cut-off values for GFAP biomarker using ROC curve analysis against CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Optimal diagnostic cut-off values for plasma sTREM2 vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Determination of the optimal diagnostic cut-off values for sTREM2 biomarker using ROC curve analysis against CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Optimal diagnostic cut-off values for plasma ApoE vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Determination of the optimal diagnostic cut-off values for ApoE biomarker using ROC curve analysis against CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Optimal diagnostic cut-off values for plasma ApoE4 vs CSF gold standard (sub-study)
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)
Determination of the optimal diagnostic cut-off values for ApoE4 biomarker using ROC curve analysis against CSF biomarkers as the gold standard.
Baseline (at time of lumbar puncture, within 6 months of blood draw)

Współpracownicy i badacze

Tutaj znajdziesz osoby i organizacje zaangażowane w to badanie.

Śledczy

  • Główny śledczy: Massimo Filippi, Prof, MD, IRCCS San Raffaele

Daty zapisu na studia

Daty te śledzą postęp w przesyłaniu rekordów badań i podsumowań wyników do ClinicalTrials.gov. Zapisy badań i zgłoszone wyniki są przeglądane przez National Library of Medicine (NLM), aby upewnić się, że spełniają określone standardy kontroli jakości, zanim zostaną opublikowane na publicznej stronie internetowej.

Główne daty studiów

Rozpoczęcie studiów (Rzeczywisty)

12 września 2023

Zakończenie podstawowe (Szacowany)

1 czerwca 2032

Ukończenie studiów (Szacowany)

1 czerwca 2032

Daty rejestracji na studia

Pierwszy przesłany

16 lipca 2026

Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości

16 lipca 2026

Pierwszy wysłany (Rzeczywisty)

21 lipca 2026

Aktualizacje rekordów badań

Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)

21 lipca 2026

Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości

16 lipca 2026

Ostatnia weryfikacja

1 lipca 2026

Więcej informacji

Terminy związane z tym badaniem

Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)

Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?

NIEZDECYDOWANY

Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze

Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .

Badania kliniczne na Upośledzenie funkcji poznawczych

Subskrybuj