이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Functional Reorganization and Recovery of the Language and Domain-general Multiple Demand Systems in Aphasia

2026년 11월 3일 업데이트: Boston University Charles River Campus

The objective of this study is to apply state-of-the art brain imaging approaches to evaluate new hypotheses about the contributions of core linguistic vs. domain-general executive systems to language processing and recovery in patients with varying degrees of linguistic impairment. Specifically, the investigators will first characterize the degree to which standard language assessments tax the domain-general Multiple Demand (MD) network (Aim 1). And then systematically investigate the causal contributions of the language and the MD networks to language processing and aphasia recovery in patients of varying severity (Aims 2 and 3).

연구 개요

상태

아직 모집하지 않음

정황

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (추정된)

100

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

  • 이름: Swathi Kiran, PhD
  • 전화번호: 617-358-5478
  • 이메일: kirans@bu.edu

연구 장소

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, 미국, 02215
        • Center for Brain Recovery, BU Charles River Campus
        • 연락하다:

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • at least 12 weeks post-stroke at time of study enrolment
  • medically and neurologically stable (no active seizures for 6 months) and at least wheelchair ambulatory
  • premorbid fluency in English
  • a family member or caregiver available to assist in study setup and in communicating with study staff

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a major, active neurological condition other than stroke, as determined by medical record review
  • history of cognitive impairment unrelated to stroke, such as dementia
  • history of symptomatic stroke prior to index stroke
  • severe uncorrected vision and/or hearing problems likely to impact study participation
  • comorbid learning or language disorder diagnosed prior to stroke or as a child

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 하나의

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Immediate treatment

Participants randomized to this arm will receive the intervention immediately after baseline behavioral and neural procedures.

The Constant Therapy program includes includes 91 therapy exercise programs and participants can practice any of the exercises in the program for 50 hours (60 minutes a day, 5 days a week for 10 weeks).

활성 비교기: Delayed treatment

Participants randomized to this arm will be put on a waitlist for 5 weeks and will then receive the intervention.

The Constant Therapy program includes includes 91 therapy exercise programs and participants can practice any of the exercises in the program for 50 hours (60 minutes a day, 5 days a week for 10 weeks).

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Change in the Western Aphasia Battery Revised Aphasia Quotient
기간: Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention

The Western Aphasia Battery Revised Aphasia Quotient (WAB-R-AQ) is a standardized, gold-standard assessment for determining the presence, type, and severity of post-stroke aphasia. The WAB-R measures performance across a variety of expressive and receptive language domains. Weighted performance across four of these domains, namely spontaneous speech, auditory verbal comprehension, repetition, and naming/word finding, yields the WAB-R AQ, a composite score that ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better language function.

Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Western Aphasia Battery- Revised Language Quotient (WAB-R LQ)
기간: Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention

The WAB-R measures performance across a variety of expressive and receptive language domains and takes approximately 45-60 minutes to administer. Weighted performance across four of these domains - spontaneous speech, auditory verbal comprehension, repetition, and naming/word finding - yields a composite score, the WAB-R Aphasia Quotient (AQ). The WAB-R AQ is an impairment-based metric that reliably indexes aphasia severity across different aphasia subtypes, making it ideal as a metric for studies with heterogenous patient samples as for the current study. In addition to the AQ, Language Quotients (LQ) can be obtained from a full administration of the WAB-R. LQ is a summary score encompassing both spoken and written language abilities. The LQ is scaled from 0 to 100, where higher numbers reflect stronger overall performance across the tested domains.

Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention
Western Aphasia Battery- Revised Cortical Quotient (WAB-R CQ)
기간: Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention

The Cortical Quotient (CQ) is a summary score taking into account all subtests of the WAB-R, including not only spoken and written language but also apraxia, constructional, visuospatial and calculation tasks. Administration of tests to calculate CQ and LQ together take approximately 45 minutes. The CQ is scaled from 0 to 100, where higher numbers reflect stronger overall performance across the tested domains.

Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention
Boston Naming Test (BNT)
기간: Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention

The BNT is one of the most widely used measures of confrontational naming, consisted of 60 line drawings of objects of graded difficulty. It consists of 60 black and white pictures that increase in the order of difficulty (pictures progressively include less frequent words). Scoring comprises accuracy out of 60 items. A point is typically given for items named spontaneously or correctly after a semantic cue (a category or description hint). For healthy, non-brain-damaged adults, average raw scores generally range from 50 to 59 out of 60, depending on age and education level (with normative means clustering around 53 to 55).

Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention
Pyramids and Palm Trees Test (PPTT)
기간: Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention

The PPTT is a visual semantic association task designed to assess semantic memory and the ability to form and retrieve associations between concepts. For each triad, a target stimulus (e.g., a picture or word of a pyramid) is shown at the top, and two choice options (e.g., a palm tree vs. a fir tree) are shown at the bottom. The subject must point to or select the item that semantically matches the target. There are 52 trials. A score of 47 or higher (90% or better: ≥ 47/52) is generally considered normal, indicating no clinically significant semantic memory deficit. A score below 47 (less than 90%) indicates a clinically significant semantic memory impairment.

Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention
Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS)
기간: Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention

The RBANS provides a comprehensive assessment of general cognitive skills, including attention, memory, executive function, and visuospatial processing. The battery consists of 12 short subtests divided across five specific cognitive domains: Immediate Memory: List Learning, Story Memory, Visuospatial/Constructional: Figure Copy, Line Orientation, Language: Picture Naming, Semantic Fluency, Attention: Digit Span, Coding, Delayed Memory: List Recall, List Recognition, Story Recall, Figure Recall. Reported total scores range from 40 to 160, with scores 120 or higher as superior performance.

Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention
Reading Comprehension Battery for Aphasia-2 (RCBA-2)
기간: Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention

The RCBA-2 provides a comprehensive evaluation of the nature and degree of reading impairments at single word-, sentence- and paragraph-level. Lower total scores indicate more severe acquired reading impairments (alexia) associated with aphasia or brain injury. Total score is 0-100 (10 core subtests), typical range is 97.32, whereas aphasic patients tend to score 18-99.

Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention
Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39)
기간: Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention

The SAQOL-39 consists of 39 questions to assess health-related quality of life in individuals with chronic post-stroke aphasia with responses from 1 = Could not do it at all to 5 = No trouble at all. To calculate the scores, the mean (average) value rather than a cumulative sum is calculated and higher means suggest higher quality of life

Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Swathi Kiran, PhD, BU Charles River Campus, Center for Brain Recovery
  • 수석 연구원: Evelina Fedorenko, PhD, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (추정된)

2026년 12월 1일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2031년 7월 1일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2032년 7월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 11월 3일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 11월 3일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 11월 9일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 11월 9일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 11월 3일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 11월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다