此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Functional Reorganization and Recovery of the Language and Domain-general Multiple Demand Systems in Aphasia

2026年11月3日 更新者:Boston University Charles River Campus

The objective of this study is to apply state-of-the art brain imaging approaches to evaluate new hypotheses about the contributions of core linguistic vs. domain-general executive systems to language processing and recovery in patients with varying degrees of linguistic impairment. Specifically, the investigators will first characterize the degree to which standard language assessments tax the domain-general Multiple Demand (MD) network (Aim 1). And then systematically investigate the causal contributions of the language and the MD networks to language processing and aphasia recovery in patients of varying severity (Aims 2 and 3).

研究概览

地位

尚未招聘

条件

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

100

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

  • 姓名:Swathi Kiran, PhD
  • 电话号码:617-358-5478
  • 邮箱:kirans@bu.edu

学习地点

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston、Massachusetts、美国、02215
        • Center for Brain Recovery, BU Charles River Campus
        • 接触:

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 80年 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • at least 12 weeks post-stroke at time of study enrolment
  • medically and neurologically stable (no active seizures for 6 months) and at least wheelchair ambulatory
  • premorbid fluency in English
  • a family member or caregiver available to assist in study setup and in communicating with study staff

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a major, active neurological condition other than stroke, as determined by medical record review
  • history of cognitive impairment unrelated to stroke, such as dementia
  • history of symptomatic stroke prior to index stroke
  • severe uncorrected vision and/or hearing problems likely to impact study participation
  • comorbid learning or language disorder diagnosed prior to stroke or as a child

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:单身的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Immediate treatment

Participants randomized to this arm will receive the intervention immediately after baseline behavioral and neural procedures.

The Constant Therapy program includes includes 91 therapy exercise programs and participants can practice any of the exercises in the program for 50 hours (60 minutes a day, 5 days a week for 10 weeks).

有源比较器:Delayed treatment

Participants randomized to this arm will be put on a waitlist for 5 weeks and will then receive the intervention.

The Constant Therapy program includes includes 91 therapy exercise programs and participants can practice any of the exercises in the program for 50 hours (60 minutes a day, 5 days a week for 10 weeks).

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change in the Western Aphasia Battery Revised Aphasia Quotient
大体时间:Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention

The Western Aphasia Battery Revised Aphasia Quotient (WAB-R-AQ) is a standardized, gold-standard assessment for determining the presence, type, and severity of post-stroke aphasia. The WAB-R measures performance across a variety of expressive and receptive language domains. Weighted performance across four of these domains, namely spontaneous speech, auditory verbal comprehension, repetition, and naming/word finding, yields the WAB-R AQ, a composite score that ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better language function.

Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Western Aphasia Battery- Revised Language Quotient (WAB-R LQ)
大体时间:Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention

The WAB-R measures performance across a variety of expressive and receptive language domains and takes approximately 45-60 minutes to administer. Weighted performance across four of these domains - spontaneous speech, auditory verbal comprehension, repetition, and naming/word finding - yields a composite score, the WAB-R Aphasia Quotient (AQ). The WAB-R AQ is an impairment-based metric that reliably indexes aphasia severity across different aphasia subtypes, making it ideal as a metric for studies with heterogenous patient samples as for the current study. In addition to the AQ, Language Quotients (LQ) can be obtained from a full administration of the WAB-R. LQ is a summary score encompassing both spoken and written language abilities. The LQ is scaled from 0 to 100, where higher numbers reflect stronger overall performance across the tested domains.

Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention
Western Aphasia Battery- Revised Cortical Quotient (WAB-R CQ)
大体时间:Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention

The Cortical Quotient (CQ) is a summary score taking into account all subtests of the WAB-R, including not only spoken and written language but also apraxia, constructional, visuospatial and calculation tasks. Administration of tests to calculate CQ and LQ together take approximately 45 minutes. The CQ is scaled from 0 to 100, where higher numbers reflect stronger overall performance across the tested domains.

Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention
Boston Naming Test (BNT)
大体时间:Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention

The BNT is one of the most widely used measures of confrontational naming, consisted of 60 line drawings of objects of graded difficulty. It consists of 60 black and white pictures that increase in the order of difficulty (pictures progressively include less frequent words). Scoring comprises accuracy out of 60 items. A point is typically given for items named spontaneously or correctly after a semantic cue (a category or description hint). For healthy, non-brain-damaged adults, average raw scores generally range from 50 to 59 out of 60, depending on age and education level (with normative means clustering around 53 to 55).

Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention
Pyramids and Palm Trees Test (PPTT)
大体时间:Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention

The PPTT is a visual semantic association task designed to assess semantic memory and the ability to form and retrieve associations between concepts. For each triad, a target stimulus (e.g., a picture or word of a pyramid) is shown at the top, and two choice options (e.g., a palm tree vs. a fir tree) are shown at the bottom. The subject must point to or select the item that semantically matches the target. There are 52 trials. A score of 47 or higher (90% or better: ≥ 47/52) is generally considered normal, indicating no clinically significant semantic memory deficit. A score below 47 (less than 90%) indicates a clinically significant semantic memory impairment.

Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention
Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS)
大体时间:Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention

The RBANS provides a comprehensive assessment of general cognitive skills, including attention, memory, executive function, and visuospatial processing. The battery consists of 12 short subtests divided across five specific cognitive domains: Immediate Memory: List Learning, Story Memory, Visuospatial/Constructional: Figure Copy, Line Orientation, Language: Picture Naming, Semantic Fluency, Attention: Digit Span, Coding, Delayed Memory: List Recall, List Recognition, Story Recall, Figure Recall. Reported total scores range from 40 to 160, with scores 120 or higher as superior performance.

Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention
Reading Comprehension Battery for Aphasia-2 (RCBA-2)
大体时间:Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention

The RCBA-2 provides a comprehensive evaluation of the nature and degree of reading impairments at single word-, sentence- and paragraph-level. Lower total scores indicate more severe acquired reading impairments (alexia) associated with aphasia or brain injury. Total score is 0-100 (10 core subtests), typical range is 97.32, whereas aphasic patients tend to score 18-99.

Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention
Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39)
大体时间:Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention

The SAQOL-39 consists of 39 questions to assess health-related quality of life in individuals with chronic post-stroke aphasia with responses from 1 = Could not do it at all to 5 = No trouble at all. To calculate the scores, the mean (average) value rather than a cumulative sum is calculated and higher means suggest higher quality of life

Baseline, immediately after the 10-week intervention

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Swathi Kiran, PhD、BU Charles River Campus, Center for Brain Recovery
  • 首席研究员:Evelina Fedorenko, PhD、Massachusetts Institute of Technology

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2026年12月1日

初级完成 (估计的)

2031年7月1日

研究完成 (估计的)

2032年7月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年11月3日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年11月3日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年11月9日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年11月9日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年11月3日

最后验证

2026年11月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅