Basic Life Support Termination of Resuscitation Implementation Study

In Ontario, most victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) do not receive Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS); rather, they receive only Basic Life Support (BLS) from Primary Care Paramedics (PCPs), where the survival rate is approximately 5%. Every one of these patients is transported to the Emergency Department (ED), where the vast majority are pronounced dead. Conversely, patients who do not respond to ACLS by Advanced Care Paramedics (ACPs) are pronounced dead in the field via patching to the Base Hospital Physician (BHP). Implementation of a termination of resuscitation (TOR) guideline for the PCP's use would decrease the number of non-viable patients transported to the ED.

A reduction of unsuccessfully resuscitated cardiac arrest patients transported to the ED would have numerous advantages. First, it may improve the efficiency of the ED health care system because cardiac arrest patients in the ED require immediate attention that is diverted from potentially more salvageable patients. Second, the risk of injury and the monetary costs for the paramedic and the public would be minimized with fewer "light and sirens" transports which are known to be hazardous to motorists, pedestrians, and EMS personnel. Additionally, it is less expensive to pronounce non-viable patients in the field. And, finally termination of resuscitative efforts in the field permits the paramedic to turn his attention and skill set to supporting the family through the initial stages of grief.

The most recent American Heart Association (AHA) emergency cardiac care guidelines suggest that there is a need to develop TOR protocols for PCPs in situations where ACLS care is not rapidly available, and call for more scientific evidence to support the implementation of such guidelines.

We derived and prospectively validated a clinical prediction rule to guide PCP termination of resuscitation in out of hospital cardiac arrest.

The TOR implementation study aims to document the usefulness of the TOR guideline, as specified by a newly developed medical directive, in decreasing the rate of transport of OHCA patients to the ED. Secondary aims of this implementation study will be to describe the rates of erroneous application of the guideline. The comfort of use of the rule among paramedics and base hospital emergency physicians will be described.

This will be a multi-centre prospective implementation study involving a combination of urban and rural regional EMS systems across Ontario. Included will be consecutive patients who suffer from non-traumatic cardiac arrest (i.e. of presumed cardiac etiology). Identical to the derivation and validation phase, patients will be excluded from the study if: their arrest is due to trauma, drowning or drug overdose; they receive any prehospital ACLS care; they possess a documented "Do Not Resuscitate" directive; or they are less than 18 years of age.

Cases that meet inclusion criteria will be enrolled consecutively. For each cardiac arrest, paramedics will respond to the call as usual and initiate resuscitation attempts. Patients suffering from cardiac arrest that (1) was not witnessed by EMS personnel; (2) had no shocks delivered by anyone; and (3) have had no return of spontaneous carotid or femoral pulse meet the criteria for TOR. In these circumstances PCPs will patch to the local BHP using the standard patching process. The BHP will then direct the paramedic to either continue resuscitation and transport, or terminate resuscitation in the field based on the TOR guideline and their clinical judgment of each individual call. In the case of failure of the paramedic to reach the BHP, the paramedic is directed to continue resuscitation and transport as per normal procedures, regardless of what the TOR guideline recommends. Data for each case will be requested from both the paramedic and the emergency physician using a uniform data collection sheet and the standardized Ontario Ambulance Call Report (ACR).

The rate of patient transport to the ED will be calculated. The obtained rate of transport will be compared to the theoretical rate obtained in the validation study, 37.4% using a one sample test, two sided, test of proportions, in order to evaluate the utility of the rule to decrease transport rates. Rates of erroneous application of the rule by both paramedics and emergency physicians will be calculated by identifying and tabulating the various reason for non-compliance. Occurrence of adverse patient outcomes, such as ROSC after TOR will be closely monitored.