Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

OBE vs PBL in Physiotherapy Education

2. juni 2026 oppdatert av: Sıla YILMAZ, Medipol University

Comparison of Outcome-Based Education and Problem-Based Learning in Undergraduate Physiotherapy Education

This randomized controlled educational study aims to compare the effects of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) and guided Problem-Based Learning (PBL) approaches on learning processes and learning outcomes in undergraduate physiotherapy education.

Although traditional theoretical instruction is widely used in health professions education, concerns remain regarding the development of clinical reasoning, active learning, and knowledge retention.

OBE and PBL represent two structured educational approaches designed to support competency-based and contextual learning.

Participants are randomly assigned to either an OBE-based instructional group or a guided PBL group. Following a common theoretical foundation provided to all participants, subsequent educational content is delivered according to the assigned pedagogical approach.

The study will evaluate cognitive load, motivation-related self-regulated learning skills, student satisfaction, learning experience, attendance, and knowledge retention.

The findings are expected to contribute to the development of evidence-based educational strategies in physiotherapy and rehabilitation education.

Studieoversikt

Detaljert beskrivelse

This randomized controlled educational study is conducted among undergraduate physiotherapy students and focuses on posture-related theoretical and applied educational content.

All participants initially receive a common theoretical foundation including posture, postural alignment, balance-posture relationship, and basic postural assessment approaches prior to implementation of the educational intervention strategies.

Following this common instructional phase, the educational process differs according to the assigned pedagogical approach.

Participants are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either an Outcome-Based Education (OBE) group or a guided Problem-Based Learning (PBL) group.

In the OBE group, teaching activities and assessment processes are structured according to predefined learning outcomes aligned with Bloom's revised taxonomy.

In the guided PBL group, participants engage in structured case-based discussions and problem-solving activities supported by instructor guidance.

Students are encouraged to analyze clinical scenarios, discuss possible solutions, and apply theoretical knowledge within contextual learning processes.

The study aims to compare the effects of these educational approaches on cognitive load, motivation-related self-regulated learning skills, student satisfaction, learning experience, attendance, and knowledge retention in undergraduate physiotherapy education.

Demographic and educational characteristics, including citizenship, primary language of instruction, grade point average, and previous learning experiences, will be explored as potential factors associated with learning processes and learning outcomes.

Sample size was determined using an a priori power analysis.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Antatt)

100

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

  • Voksen

Tar imot friske frivillige

Ja

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being enrolled in the educational program in which the intervention is conducted during the study period
  • Actively participating in the educational activities during the study period
  • Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participating in less than 70% of the educational sessions
  • Having missing data at a level that prevents inclusion in the data analysis

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Annen
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Enkelt

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: Problem-Based Learning
Participants in this group initially receive the same common theoretical instruction as the comparison group. Subsequent educational content is delivered using a guided problem-based learning (PBL) approach involving case-based discussions, structured problem-solving activities, and active participant involvement under instructor guidance.
A guided problem-based learning (PBL) educational approach involving case-based discussions, structured problem-solving activities, and active student participation under instructor guidance.
Eksperimentell: Outcome-Based Education
Participants in this group initially receive the same common theoretical instruction as the comparison group. Subsequent educational content is delivered using an outcome-based education (OBE) approach structured according to predefined learning outcomes, aligned teaching activities, and targeted competencies.
An outcome-based education (OBE) approach structured according to predefined learning outcomes, aligned teaching activities, and targeted competencies.

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Cognitive Load
Tidsramme: Baseline and immediately after completion of the educational intervention
Perceived cognitive load during the learning process will be assessed using the Paas 9-point Mental Effort Rating Scale. Scores range from 1 to 9, with higher scores indicating higher perceived mental effort.
Baseline and immediately after completion of the educational intervention
Motivation-Related Self-Regulated Learning Skills
Tidsramme: Baseline and immediately after completion of the educational intervention
Motivation-related self-regulated learning skills will be assessed using selected subscales of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating higher levels of motivation-related self-regulated learning skills.
Baseline and immediately after completion of the educational intervention

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Student Satisfaction and Learning Experience
Tidsramme: Baseline and immediately after completion of the educational intervention
Student satisfaction, learning experience, and perceived active participation will be evaluated using a researcher-developed 5-point Likert-type self-report questionnaire. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction, more positive learning experience, and greater perceived active participation.
Baseline and immediately after completion of the educational intervention
Perceived Alignment With Learning Outcomes
Tidsramme: Baseline and immediately after completion of the educational intervention
Participants' perceptions regarding achievement of predefined learning outcomes will be evaluated using self-assessment items based on Bloom's revised taxonomy. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater perceived achievement of learning outcomes.
Baseline and immediately after completion of the educational intervention
Attendance Rate
Tidsramme: Immediately after completion of the educational intervention
Attendance rate will be calculated based on official attendance records and expressed as percentage of participation throughout the educational intervention period.
Immediately after completion of the educational intervention
Knowledge Retention
Tidsramme: Baseline and immediately after completion of the educational intervention
Knowledge retention will be assessed using a researcher-developed 20-item multiple-choice test based on predefined learning outcomes. Total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better knowledge retention.
Baseline and immediately after completion of the educational intervention

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Etterforskere

  • Hovedetterforsker: Sıla YILMAZ, Dr. Lect., Medipol University
  • Studieleder: Gizem ERGEZEN ŞAHİN, Assoc. Prof., Medipol University

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

4. mai 2026

Primær fullføring (Antatt)

31. august 2026

Studiet fullført (Antatt)

30. september 2026

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

26. mai 2026

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

2. juni 2026

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

4. juni 2026

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

4. juni 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

2. juni 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. juni 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Andre studie-ID-numre

  • E-10840098-50.04-2151

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere