Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

INtegrating Systematic PatIent-Reported Evaluations in Multi-Disciplinary Tumor Boards: The INSPIRE Study (INSPIRE)

30. juni 2026 oppdatert av: Gabrielle Rocque, University of Alabama at Birmingham
The purpose of the study is to characterize baseline multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB) context and variability, evaluate the relationship between baseline fitness of patients with cancer and initial treatment recommendations, and assess the impact of the INSPIRE intervention, which involves including electronic patient reported outcomes (ePROs) within MDTB on MDTB discussion content, provider burden, treatment recommended and received, healthcare utilization, and patient-reported outcomes.

Studieoversikt

Detaljert beskrivelse

Study Type/Design This multi-methods study will include two participant groups: patient participants and clinician/provider participants. The patient portion includes an initial prospective observational cohort followed by a randomized controlled trial of the INSPIRE intervention, which involves inclusion of electronic patient-reported outcomes in tumor board discussions. The clinician/provider portion includes audio recording of multidisciplinary tumor board discussions and an optional post-study semi-structured interview with clinicians/providers to understand experiences with the INSPIRE intervention, including feasibility, usefulness, workflow considerations, and implementation challenges.

Patient Participants Patients who agree to participate will complete patient-reported questionnaires at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Questionnaires may be completed online by text or email, by phone with responses entered by a research assistant, in person on a tablet, or on paper, based on patient preference. The baseline questionnaire will include questions about health, daily function, quality of life, nutrition, cognition, social support, caregiver support, treatment preferences, and decision-making preferences. At UAB, some of these electronic patient-reported outcomes may already be collected as part of standard clinical care. If a patient has already completed overlapping questionnaires as part of standard care, the patient will not be asked to repeat those questions. Instead, the study team will abstract the relevant information from the electronic medical record or electronic patient-reported outcomes system for research purposes. If the patient has not completed the standard-of-care questionnaires, the patient will complete the study-specific REDCap questionnaire in English or Spanish.

For patients in the initial observational cohort, baseline questionnaire completion may occur within 2 weeks of enrollment. If patients do not complete more than 50% of the questionnaires within 2 weeks, they will be excluded from the study. For patients in the randomized intervention component, completion of the baseline questionnaire will be required before tumor board presentation. The study team will document patients who are unable to complete the questionnaire and the reason. Participants will also complete follow-up questionnaires at approximately 3 months and 6 months after enrollment. These follow-up questionnaires may be completed electronically, by phone, or on paper and will be entered into REDCap. If a patient does not complete a follow-up questionnaire, the research coordinator will make up to three attempts to contact the patient to encourage completion. These contacts may occur by phone, patient portal, or in person during clinic.

The baseline questionnaire is expected to take approximately 40 minutes if the full study questionnaire is completed. If the patient has already completed some electronic patient-reported outcomes as part of standard care, the abbreviated questionnaire is expected to take approximately 20 minutes. The 3-month and 6-month questionnaires are expected to take approximately 10 minutes each. Patients will not be asked to complete any additional clinic visits or study-specific medical procedures.

Use of Patient Questionnaire Information in Tumor Board

After a patient completes the baseline questionnaire, the research coordinator will review the responses and, for patients assigned to the INSPIRE intervention group, create a single PowerPoint slide for tumor board presentation. The slide may include patient frailty or fitness status, frailty components, treatment preferences, decision-making style, and a map showing travel distance from the patient's home to the cancer center. For patients randomized to the intervention group, the slide will be shared during tumor board. The slide will be sent by secure email or secure file transfer to the clinician presenting the case. If the clinician is not available, a research team member or research assistant may present the slide during tumor board. For patients not randomized to the formal INSPIRE presentation group, questionnaire information may still be available to the care team through clinical or study-related workflows, but it will not be formally presented during tumor board as part of the intervention.

Medical Record Review for Patient Participants

Study staff will review patient medical records at baseline to collect information such as demographics, cancer diagnosis and stage, treatment history, prior visits with geriatrics or palliative care, prior cancer history, performance status, medical comorbidities, medications, laboratory results, imaging results, and other information relevant to cancer care. At approximately 6 months, study staff will review the medical record again to collect information about treatment recommendations, treatments received, treatment modifications or delays, complications, health care utilization, palliative care, hospice care, and survival status. Information that cannot be obtained from discrete electronic medical record fields will be entered into REDCap by trained study staff. If a patient withdraws from the study, the study team will ask whether the patient will allow continued medical record review. If the patient declines continued medical record review, the patient's data will be censored at the time of withdrawal.

Tumor Board Recording Procedures

Data from multidisciplinary tumor board presentations on individual patients will be captured by a research coordinator and entered into a REDCap database. This will include HIPPA-protected information, including the MRN. Only the study team will have access to the REDCap database, which will allow them to link individual patient demographics, treatment information, survey responses, and presentation details.

Clinic Notes Review Related to Tumor Board Decision-Making

To understand how treatment decisions are documented after tumor board, the research coordinator will review clinic notes leading up to the initial treatment recommendation. Relevant note content will be copied into a separate document, de-identified, and uploaded for qualitative analysis. The same general coding approach used for tumor board discussions will be applied to clinic note content.

Clinician/Provider Participants

Tumor Board Recording Procedures

Trained research assistants will audio-record eligible tumor board meetings to document discussion content, workflow, and use of patient-reported information in treatment planning. All providers will be informed that tumor board discussions are being recorded for research purposes. If a provider chooses not to participate, that provider's verbal contributions will not be analyzed. Approximately 600 MDTB meetings will be recorded during the study period. These recordings will include eligible tumor board meetings in which enrolled or potentially eligible patient cases are discussed, and we estimate 4-5 patients per tumor board.

All participating tumor boards are expected to occur in hybrid or virtual formats, such as Zoom, Microsoft Teams, or a similar platform. If the tumor board is recorded as part of standard-of-care, the research team will be provided the recording by the clinical team. If the tumor board is not recorded as part of standard of care, the research assistant will attend the meeting and use a recording device to capture the tumor board discussion. The research assistant will also complete standardized data capture forms about the tumor board context and individual patient case presentations, including information such as meeting length, number of cases presented, attendee roles, and discussion flow. The research assistant will not otherwise participate in the clinical discussion, except when presenting the INSPIRE slide if needed.

Field Notes

At each participating site, the research coordinator will capture field notes related to eligible multidisciplinary tumor board meetings. These field notes will document contextual information that may not be fully captured in the audio recording or structured data collection forms, such as meeting format, attendance patterns, workflow issues, timing or agenda changes, interruptions, technical issues, and whether patient-reported information was presented as planned. The research coordinator may also document observations about how the INSPIRE information was incorporated into the tumor board discussion, including who presented the information, whether the information was visible or accessible to tumor board participants, and any notable questions or discussion related to the geriatric assessment, patient preferences, travel distance, or other patient-reported information. Field notes will not be used to evaluate individual clinicians. Field notes will be uploaded into REDCap and stored with other study data.

Clinician Interviews

Clinicians/providers may also be invited to participate in a one-on-one semi-structured interview. The PIs or lead co-investigators will invite clinicians/providers by email. Interviews will be conducted by trained study staff at a time convenient for the participant. Interviews will be conducted remotely using a secure, HIPAA-compliant videoconferencing platform or by telephone, based on participant preference. Interviews are expected to last approximately 30 to 60 minutes. The interviewer will ask about the participant's role in tumor board discussions and experiences with the INSPIRE intervention, including the feasibility and usefulness of incorporating geriatric assessment and patient preference data into tumor board, how the information was presented, factors that supported or limited use of the information in decision-making, provider burden, and recommendations for refinement and future expansion. With participant permission, interviews will be audio-recorded and professionally transcribed or transcribed by study staff for analysis. Clinician/provider participants may decline to participate in an interview, skip any question, or stop the interview at any time. Clinicians/providers who complete an interview will receive $50 for their participation. Payment will be provided after the interview is completed via Greenphire/ClinCard provided in person or via mail at the participants preference.

Site Survey

Annually, site leads for each tumor type will complete a site survey describing basic information about tumor board structure and electronic patient-reported outcome use. This will include information about how tumor boards are organized and how patient-reported information is used in routine care.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Antatt)

2748

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiekontakt

Studer Kontakt Backup

  • Navn: Gabrielle B Rocque, MD
  • Telefonnummer: (205) 975-2914
  • E-post: grocque@uabmc.edu

Studiesteder

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, Forente stater, 35294
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham
        • Hovedetterforsker:
          • Gabrielle B Rocque, MD
        • Ta kontakt med:
        • Underetterforsker:
          • Rebecca Arend, MD
        • Ta kontakt med:
        • Underetterforsker:
          • Courtney Williams, DrPH
        • Underetterforsker:
          • Nicole Henderson, PhD
        • Underetterforsker:
          • Andres Azuero, PhD
        • Underetterforsker:
          • Teresa Boitano, MD
        • Underetterforsker:
          • Qasim Hussaini, MD
        • Underetterforsker:
          • Bart Rose, MD
        • Underetterforsker:
          • Joud El Dick, MD
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, Forente stater, 90404
        • University of California Los Angeles (UCLA)
        • Hovedetterforsker:
          • Mina Sedrak, MD
        • Ta kontakt med:
          • Mina Sedrak, MD, MS
        • Underetterforsker:
          • Emily Martin, MD
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Forente stater, 73126-0901
        • University of Oklahoma (OU) Health Campus
        • Hovedetterforsker:
          • Ryan Nipp, MD
        • Ta kontakt med:
          • Ryan Nipp, MD

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

  • Voksen
  • Eldre voksen

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Beskrivelse

Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria: We will include two populations: (1) patients and (2) clinical team members involved in the MDTB.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inclusions Criteria- Patients:

    1. aged 18 years or older;
    2. with suspected or confirmed diagnosis of pancreatic, breast, and gynecologic cancer (all stages) within 8 weeks of diagnosis;
    3. intention to be treated at a participating institution;
    4. with verbal fluency in English or Spanish; and
    5. scheduled to be discussed at MDTB.
  • Inclusion criteria - Clinicians:

All clinical team members participating in the pancreatic, breast, or gynecologic MDTB at a participating site will be included and have pre-emptively agreed to participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria - Patients:

Individuals with plans to receive cancer treatment outside the participating institution and inability to speak English or Spanish.

  • Exclusion criteria - Clinician:

Clinicians will retain the opportunity to opt-out of participation, in which case their portions of the discussion will not be included in the analysis; however, this is not anticipated based on pilot data.

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Helsetjenesteforskning
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Ingen (Open Label)

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Group A- Enhanced Usual Care
Patient-reported outcomes captured; no data presented in any multidisciplinary tumor board. This group is a historical control.
Capture of patient-reported outcomes including geriatric assessment and patient preferences
Aktiv komparator: Group B- Enhanced Clinician Awareness
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) captured with no personal data presented to multidisciplinary tumor board; other patient's PROs may be presented. This groups is a contemporary control.
Capture of patient-reported outcomes including geriatric assessment and patient preferences
Inclusion of patients within tumor board that may have patient-reported outcomes
Eksperimentell: Group C- INSPIRE intervention
Patient-reported outcomes presented to multidisciplinary tumor board
Capture of patient-reported outcomes including geriatric assessment and patient preferences
Inclusion of patients within tumor board that may have patient-reported outcomes
The INSPIRE intervention is the systematic capture and presentation of patient-reported outcomes (geriatric assessment, patient preferences, and distance to care) within multi-disciplinary tumor boards

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Treatment modifications
Tidsramme: Tumor board presentation to 3 months
Any dose reduction or delay during treatment.
Tumor board presentation to 3 months

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Treatment Modifications (2)
Tidsramme: Tumor board presentation to 6 months
Treatment dose reduction or delay
Tumor board presentation to 6 months
Symptom Experience
Tidsramme: Tumor board to 6 months
Composite and Individual component scores on Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) assessment for frequency, severity, and interference of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, shortness of breath, hair loss, concentration, fatigue, numbness and tingling, pain
Tumor board to 6 months
Symptom Experience (1)
Tidsramme: Tumor board to 3 months
Composite score and individual components on Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) assessment for frequency, severity, and interference of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, shortness of breath, hair loss, concentration, fatigue, numbness and tingling, pain
Tumor board to 3 months
Treatment alignment
Tidsramme: Tumor board presentation to 3 months
Concordance between (1) treatment received and GA status.
Tumor board presentation to 3 months
Treatment Intensity
Tidsramme: Tumor board presentation to 3 months
Relative dose intensity, with doses characterized as full or reduced for initial treatment
Tumor board presentation to 3 months
Surgical Complications
Tidsramme: Tumor board presentation to 3 months
Surgical complications due to cancer surgery using Clavien-Dindo classification for surgical complications
Tumor board presentation to 3 months
Surgical Complications
Tidsramme: Tumor board presentation to 6 months
Surgical complications related to cancer surgery using Clavien-Dindo classification for surgical complications
Tumor board presentation to 6 months
ER visits - Any (1)
Tidsramme: Tumor board presentation to 3 months
Any ER visits
Tumor board presentation to 3 months
ER visits - Any (2)
Tidsramme: Tumor board presentation to 6 months
Any ER visits
Tumor board presentation to 6 months
ER visits - Count (1)
Tidsramme: Tumor board presentation to 3 months
Number of ER visits
Tumor board presentation to 3 months
ER visits - Count (2)
Tidsramme: Tumor board presentation to 6 months
Number of ER visits
Tumor board presentation to 6 months
Hospitalization - Any (1)
Tidsramme: Tumor board presentation to 3 months
Any hospitalization
Tumor board presentation to 3 months
Hospitalization - Any (2)
Tidsramme: Tumor board presentation to 6 months
Any hospitalization during study period
Tumor board presentation to 6 months
Hospitalization - Count (1)
Tidsramme: Tumor board presentation to 3 months
Number of hospitalizations
Tumor board presentation to 3 months
Hospitalizations - Count (2)
Tidsramme: Tumor board presentation to 6 months
Number of hospitalizations in time period
Tumor board presentation to 6 months
ICU - Any (1)
Tidsramme: Tumor board presentation to 3 months
Any ICU admission during time period
Tumor board presentation to 3 months
ICU - Any (2)
Tidsramme: Tumor board presentation to 6 months
Any ICU admission during time period
Tumor board presentation to 6 months
ICU - Count (1)
Tidsramme: Tumor board presentation to 3 months
Number of hospitalization
Tumor board presentation to 3 months
ICU - Count (2)
Tidsramme: Tumor board presentation to 6 months
Number of ICU admissions
Tumor board presentation to 6 months
Perception of Decision-Making Style
Tidsramme: 3 months from tumor board
Control Preferences Scale; Patient perception that the treatment decision was patient-driven, shared, or provider-driven
3 months from tumor board
Patient Activation (1)
Tidsramme: 3 months from tumor board
Patient Activation Measure (PAM) scores, which captured patient knowledge, skill, and confidence in self-management
3 months from tumor board
Patient Activation (2)
Tidsramme: 6 months from tumor board
Patient Activation Measure (PAM) scores that captured patient knowledge, skill, and confidence in self-management
6 months from tumor board
Treatment Satisfaction (1)
Tidsramme: 3 months from tumor board
Score on Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)
3 months from tumor board
Treatment Satisfaction (2)
Tidsramme: 6 months from tumor board
Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) score
6 months from tumor board
Decision Regret (1)
Tidsramme: 3 months from tumor board
Score on Decision Regret Scale
3 months from tumor board
Decision Regret (2)
Tidsramme: 6 months from tumor board
Score on Decision Regret Scale
6 months from tumor board
Quality of Life (1)
Tidsramme: 3 months from tumor board
Score on PROMIS-Global scale
3 months from tumor board
Quality of Life (2)
Tidsramme: 6 months from tumor board
Score on PROMIS-Global scale
6 months from tumor board

Andre resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Tumor board context
Tidsramme: During tumor board discussion
Average number of participants; average number of cases presented; discipline of team members present; role of person typically presenting cases; length of average case; baseline presentation of frailty, comorbid conditions, preferences
During tumor board discussion
Fitness discussed
Tidsramme: During tumor board and/or initial clinic note
Proportion of cases in which clinical team specifically discussed fitness within MDTB
During tumor board and/or initial clinic note
Preferences Discussed
Tidsramme: during tumor board and/or initial clinic note
Proportion of cases in which clinical team specifically discussed preferences within tumor board
during tumor board and/or initial clinic note
Comorbid conditions discussed
Tidsramme: during tumor board and/or initial clinic note
Proportion of cases in which clinical team specifically discussed comorbid conditions within MDTB
during tumor board and/or initial clinic note

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Etterforskere

  • Hovedetterforsker: Gabrielle B Rocque, MD, The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Antatt)

1. september 2026

Primær fullføring (Antatt)

1. juli 2030

Studiet fullført (Antatt)

1. juli 2031

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

22. juni 2026

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

22. juni 2026

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

26. juni 2026

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

2. juli 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

30. juni 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. juni 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

UBESLUTTE

IPD-planbeskrivelse

We would consider data sharing upon reasonable request with appropriate regulatory approvals and support for data abstraction.

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere