TS Triage of HR-HPV Positive Population and Its Accuracy Study
17. august 2026 oppdatert av: Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University
A Study on the Application of TS for Triage in HR-HPV Viral Load Positive Population and Accuracy Related Studies
A prospective study assessing TS accuracy in HR-HPV+ women, influencing factors, and 1-year follow-up of false-positives versus biopsy.
Studieoversikt
Status
Aktiv, ikke rekrutterende
Intervensjon / Behandling
Detaljert beskrivelse
The study will be conducted between 2025.01 and 2027.12 and will assess the diagnostic accuracy of TS testing in patients with positive HR-HPV viral loads by means of a prospective controlled study analyzing the factors influencing the false positive/negative results (age/gynecological findings/vaginal microbiota, etc.) and using cervical biopsy as a reference standard for 1 year in cases of TS false positives.
The principal investigator will write and publish a paper.
Studietype
Observasjonsmessig
Registrering (Antatt)
300
Kontakter og plasseringer
Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.
Studiesteder
-
-
Jiangsu
-
Nantong, Jiangsu, Kina, 226001
- Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
- Barn
- Voksen
- Eldre voksen
Tar imot friske frivillige
Ja
Prøvetakingsmetode
Sannsynlighetsprøve
Studiepopulasjon
Patients who visited the gynecological outpatient department of the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University between October 2024 and October 2026, and were detected as positive for high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) in cervical cancer screening through the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) technique, and had indications for colposcopic evaluation, and were scheduled for colposcopy or cervical pathological biopsy, as well as those patients who had both the HPV viral load test results and the Triple Staining (TS) results in our hospital and were awaiting colposcopy, will be selected.
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients in our outpatient clinic who have already undergone HPV viral load testing and are awaiting colposcopy, or those who have both HPV viral load test results and TS (Triple Staining) results and are awaiting colposcopy；
- Informed consent obtained from voluntary participants.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are unable to cooperate or have poor compliance;
- Within four months postpartum;
- During the first three days of menstruation with heavy flow;
- Within three months after cervical surgery (including cervical biopsy);
- Previous radiotherapy in the pelvic region;
- Currently undergoing chemotherapy or within five weeks after chemotherapy;
- Clinically evident acute or subacute cervical/vaginal infection;
- History of photosensitivity disorders, current photodynamic therapy, or exposure to photosensitizing agents;
- Suspected or confirmed history of alcohol/drug abuse, or any other condition that-in the investigator's judgment-may reduce enrollment feasibility or complicate participation (e.g., frequent job relocation, unstable living conditions leading to high risk of loss to follow-up);
- Other patients deemed ineligible by the investigators.
Studieplan
Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
Kohorter og intervensjoner
Gruppe / Kohort |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
HPV16/18 - Low VL
HPV type 16/18 positive, low viral load group (1.00-99.99
RLU/PC)
|
The cervix was visualized through colposcopic magnification and samples of suspicious tissue were taken for pathological examination.
False-positive people with initial TS screening were followed up for 1 year, with a second TS examination six months after the initial TS screening.
|
|
HPV16/18 - Medium VL
HPV type 16/18 positive, medium viral load group (100-999.99
RLU/PC)
|
The cervix was visualized through colposcopic magnification and samples of suspicious tissue were taken for pathological examination.
False-positive people with initial TS screening were followed up for 1 year, with a second TS examination six months after the initial TS screening.
|
|
HPV16/18 - High VL
HPV type 16/18 positive, high viral load group (≥1000.00
RLU/PC)
|
The cervix was visualized through colposcopic magnification and samples of suspicious tissue were taken for pathological examination.
False-positive people with initial TS screening were followed up for 1 year, with a second TS examination six months after the initial TS screening.
|
|
Other12 HR-HPV - Low VL
Positive for 12 other high-risk HPV types, low viral load group (1.00-99.99
RLU/PC)
|
The cervix was visualized through colposcopic magnification and samples of suspicious tissue were taken for pathological examination.
False-positive people with initial TS screening were followed up for 1 year, with a second TS examination six months after the initial TS screening.
|
|
Other12 HR-HPV - Medium VL
Positive for 12 other high-risk HPV types, medium viral load group (100-999.99
RLU/PC)
|
The cervix was visualized through colposcopic magnification and samples of suspicious tissue were taken for pathological examination.
False-positive people with initial TS screening were followed up for 1 year, with a second TS examination six months after the initial TS screening.
|
|
Other12 HR-HPV - High VL
Positive for 12 other high-risk HPV types, high viral load group (≥1000.00
RLU/PC)
|
The cervix was visualized through colposcopic magnification and samples of suspicious tissue were taken for pathological examination.
False-positive people with initial TS screening were followed up for 1 year, with a second TS examination six months after the initial TS screening.
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Sensitivity of TS for diagnosing populations with different HR-HPV subtypes and viral loads
Tidsramme: January 2025 to December 2025
|
Using cervical biopsy pathology as the gold standard, the study participants were stratified into 6 detailed subgroups based on HR-HPV genotype (HPV 16/18 and other 12 genotypes) and viral load gradients (low: 1.00-99.99;
medium: 100-999.99;
high: ≥1000.00) to form six detailed subgroups.
The percentage of TS-positive cases among pathologically confirmed patients was calculated for each subgroup to determine the differences in diagnostic sensitivity when using TS as a screening tool.
|
January 2025 to December 2025
|
|
The specificity of TS in diagnosing individuals with different HR-HPV subtypes and viral loads
Tidsramme: January 2025 to December 2025
|
Using the pathological diagnosis of cervical biopsy as the gold standard, the study subjects were stratified into 6 detailed subgroups based on HR-HPV genotype (HPV 16/18 and other 12 genotypes) and viral load gradients (low: 1.00-99.99;
medium: 100-999.99;
high: ≥1000.00) to form six detailed subgroups.
The percentage of TS-negative cases among pathologically negative (non-lesional) patients was calculated for each subgroup to clarify the differences in clinical efficacy of the test as a triage tool in excluding non-lesional individuals and reducing unnecessary referral rates.
|
January 2025 to December 2025
|
|
The positive predictive value of TS in populations with different HR-HPV subtypes and viral loads
Tidsramme: January 2025 to December 2025
|
Using cervical biopsy pathology as the gold standard, the study participants were stratified into 6 detailed subgroups based on HR-HPV genotype (HPV 16/18 and other 12 genotypes) and viral load gradients (low: 1.00-99.99;
medium: 100-999.99;
high: ≥1000.00) to form six detailed subgroups.
The percentage of TS-positive subjects in each subgroup who were pathologically confirmed to have lesions was calculated to assess the predictive ability of TS-positive results for cervical high-grade lesions and their clinical diagnostic value across different viral load levels.
|
January 2025 to December 2025
|
|
Negative predictive value of TS in populations with different HR-HPV subtypes and viral loads
Tidsramme: January 2025 to December 2025
|
Using cervical biopsy pathology as the gold standard, the study participants were stratified into 6 detailed subgroups based on HR-HPV genotype (HPV 16/18 and other 12 genotypes) and viral load gradients (low: 1.00-99.99;
medium: 100-999.99;
high: ≥1000.00) to form six detailed subgroups.
The percentage of subjects with a normal/non-lesional pathological diagnosis among those with a negative TS test result was calculated for each subgroup to assess the reliability of TS-negative results in ruling out cervical lesions and to determine the safety of using TS as a triage tool at different viral load levels.
|
January 2025 to December 2025
|
|
The AUC of TS in diagnosing individuals with different HR-HPV subtypes and viral loads
Tidsramme: January 2025 to December 2025
|
Using the pathological diagnosis of cervical biopsy as the gold standard, the study subjects were stratified into 6 detailed subgroups based on HR-HPV genotyping (HPV types 16/18 and other 12 types) and viral load gradients (low: 1.00-99.99;
medium: 100-999.99;
high: ≥1000.00) to form six detailed subgroups.
By plotting receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculating the area under the curve (AUC), we comprehensively evaluated the overall diagnostic performance of TS in distinguishing between women with and without cervical lesions across different viral load levels.
The closer the AUC value is to 1.0, the higher the accuracy of TS in classifying patients within that subgroup.
|
January 2025 to December 2025
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Factors Contributing to False-Positive Results in TS
Tidsramme: January 2025 to December 2025
|
This study used pathological diagnosis based on cervical biopsy as the gold standard.
Patients with positive TS test results but pathological diagnoses of normal or inflammation were defined as the TS false-positive group, while the TS true-positive group-in which TS and pathological results were consistent-served as the control group.
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed on the two groups, examining factors such as age, cervical conditions (e.g., columnar epithelium ectopia, hypertrophy, polyps), history of cervical conization, and vaginal microbiome (various types of vaginal inflammation and pathogen infections), with the aim of identifying independent risk factors contributing to false-positive interference in TS results.
|
January 2025 to December 2025
|
|
Factors Contributing to False-Negative Results in TS
Tidsramme: January 2025 to December 2025
|
This study used the pathological diagnosis of cervical biopsy as the gold standard, defining patients with negative TS test results but a pathological diagnosis of lesions as the TS false-negative group, and using the TS true-negative group-in which TS and pathological results were consistent-as the control group.
Through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of indicators such as age, cervical anatomical status, and vaginal microbiome composition in both patient groups, the study aims to identify independent risk factors leading to TS missed diagnosis (false negatives) and provide clinical evidence to optimize screening strategies.
|
January 2025 to December 2025
|
|
Sensitivity of TS in predicting 1-year follow-up outcomes in patients with a positive initial screening result but a negative cervical biopsy
Tidsramme: Baseline (initial visit), 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up.
|
This indicator uses the pathological diagnoses from the second and third cervical biopsies during the 1-year follow-up period as the gold standard.
For the specific population of patients who were "TS-positive but biopsy-negative" at the initial visit, it calculates the percentage of patients in this group who tested positive on subsequent TS screening during the follow-up period out of the total number of patients in this group who were ultimately pathologically confirmed to have lesions.
This indicator is designed to evaluate the ability of TS to detect missed diagnoses at the initial visit, occult lesions, or newly developed lesions during long-term monitoring, to clarify its safety as a follow-up management tool, and to prevent the missed diagnosis of high-grade lesions.
|
Baseline (initial visit), 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up.
|
|
Specificity of TS in predicting 1-year follow-up outcomes for patients with a positive initial screening result but a negative cervical biopsy
Tidsramme: Baseline (initial visit), 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up.
|
This indicator uses the pathological diagnoses from the second and third cervical biopsies during a 1-year follow-up period as the gold standard.
For a specific subgroup of patients who were "TS-positive but biopsy-negative" at their initial visit, it calculates the percentage of patients in this subgroup who maintained a consistently negative TS result during follow-up, relative to the total number of patients in this subgroup who ultimately maintained a normal or inflammatory pathological diagnosis.
This indicator aims to evaluate the ability of TS to rule out transient risks and identify non-lesional cases, thereby demonstrating its clinical efficacy in reducing unnecessary repeat biopsies and optimizing the allocation of medical resources during the follow-up process.
|
Baseline (initial visit), 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up.
|
|
The positive predictive value of TS for predicting outcomes at 1-year follow-up in patients with a positive initial screening result but a negative cervical biopsy
Tidsramme: Baseline (initial visit), 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up.
|
This indicator uses the pathological diagnoses from the second and third cervical biopsies during the 1-year follow-up period as the gold standard.
For the specific subgroup of patients who were "TS-positive but biopsy-negative" at the initial visit, it calculates the percentage of patients among all those with positive TS results during follow-up who were ultimately pathologically confirmed to have lesions.
This indicator aims to evaluate the predictive value of TS "false-positive" results in identifying actual lesions during follow-up, thereby providing data to support clinical decisions regarding the timing of intervention.
|
Baseline (initial visit), 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up.
|
|
The negative predictive value of TS for predicting outcomes at 1-year follow-up in patients with a positive initial screening result but a negative cervical biopsy
Tidsramme: Baseline (initial visit), 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up.
|
This indicator uses the pathological diagnoses from the second and third cervical biopsies during the 1-year follow-up period as the gold standard.
For the specific subgroup of patients who were "TS-positive but biopsy-negative" at the initial visit, it calculates the percentage of patients who maintained a normal/negative pathological result throughout the follow-up period among those with negative TS results on all follow-up tests.
This indicator is used to evaluate the safety of TS-negative results in follow-up management, providing a basis for using it as a decision-making tool to extend follow-up intervals and reduce monitoring frequency.
|
Baseline (initial visit), 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up.
|
|
The AUC of TS for predicting 1-year follow-up outcomes in patients with a positive initial screening result but a negative cervical biopsy
Tidsramme: Baseline (initial visit), 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up.
|
This metric uses the pathological diagnoses from the second and third cervical biopsies during the 1-year follow-up period as the gold standard.
For the specific subgroup of patients who were "TS-positive but biopsy-negative" at the initial visit, a ROC curve is plotted and the area under the curve (AUC) is calculated by integrating dynamic testing data collected over the 1-year follow-up period.
This indicator aims to comprehensively evaluate the overall predictive accuracy of TS regarding long-term disease outcomes in this population and to compare the monitoring efficacy of TS alone versus TS combined with HPV testing.
|
Baseline (initial visit), 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up.
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.
Etterforskere
- Hovedetterforsker: Yuquan Zhang Professor, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University
Studierekorddatoer
Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
1. oktober 2024
Primær fullføring (Antatt)
31. desember 2027
Studiet fullført (Antatt)
31. desember 2027
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
17. august 2026
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
17. august 2026
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
20. august 2026
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
20. august 2026
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
17. august 2026
Sist bekreftet
1. august 2026
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
- Urogenitale sykdommer
- Kjønnssykdommer
- Urogenitale neoplasmer
- Neoplasmer etter nettsted
- Neoplasmer
- Kvinnelige urogenitale sykdommer
- Kvinnelige urogenitale sykdommer og graviditetskomplikasjoner
- Livmorsykdommer
- Kjønnssykdommer, kvinner
- Genitale neoplasmer, kvinnelige
- Livmor livmorhalssykdommer
- Uterine neoplasmer
- Uterine cervikale neoplasmer
- Diagnostiske teknikker og prosedyrer
- Diagnose
- Kirurgiske prosedyrer, operativ
- Minimalt invasive kirurgiske inngrep
- Diagnostiske teknikker, kirurgisk
- Endoskopi
- Urogenitale kirurgiske inngrep
- Gynekologiske kirurgiske inngrep
- Obstetriske kirurgiske inngrep
- Diagnostiske teknikker, fødselshjelp og gynekologisk
- Kolposkopi
Andre studie-ID-numre
- Tdfy-FCK-2025
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
NEI
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Nei
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Nei
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .