Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Video-Based Versus Bedside eFAST Training in Final-Year Medical Students

25. august 2026 oppdatert av: Gorkem Alper Solakoglu

Comparative Effectiveness of Video-Based and Bedside Teaching for eFAST Training in Final-Year Medical Students: A Randomised Controlled Educational Trial

This study compared two methods of teaching the Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (eFAST) examination to final-year medical students. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either a 60-minute standardized video-based training session or a 60-minute instructor-led bedside training session. Both groups received the same educational content, for the same duration, from the same instructor.

Within one hour after completing the training, each participant performed an individual eFAST examination on a healthy volunteer. Performance was assessed by an evaluator who was unaware of the participant's training group, using an eFAST Image Acquisition Checklist. The study compared overall immediate eFAST performance between the two teaching methods and also examined performance in individual eFAST examination windows.

Studieoversikt

Detaljert beskrivelse

This was a single-center, parallel-group, individually randomized educational trial involving final-year medical students undertaking an emergency medicine clerkship. Participants with previous formal ultrasound training or prior practical ultrasound experience were excluded. One hundred consenting participants were randomized, with 50 assigned to standardized video-based eFAST training and 50 assigned to instructor-led bedside eFAST training.

Both interventions lasted 60 minutes and covered the same theoretical and practical eFAST content. Participants underwent an individual practical assessment on a healthy volunteer within one hour after training. Outcome assessors were blinded to training allocation. Performance was assessed using an eFAST Image Acquisition Checklist, which generated an overall score ranging from 0 to 100 and window-specific classifications of error-free performance.

No primary outcome was designated in advance of the analysis. For the present report and retrospective trial registration, the overall eFAST performance score is designated as the primary outcome, while the window-level comparisons are considered exploratory secondary outcomes.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Faktiske)

100

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

    • Istanbul
      • Kadıköy, Istanbul, Tyrkia (Türkiye)
        • Istanbul Medeniyet University

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

  • Barn
  • Voksen
  • Eldre voksen

Tar imot friske frivillige

Ja

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

Current enrollment as a final-year (sixth-year) medical student at İstanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine.

Participation in the emergency medicine clerkship during the study period. Provision of written informed consent before randomization.

Exclusion Criteria:

Previous formal ultrasound training. Prior practical ultrasound experience. A physical condition that could interfere with performing an ultrasound examination.

Declining or not providing written informed consent.

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Annen
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Enkelt

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: Video-Based eFAST Training
Participants received a 60-minute standardized video-based eFAST training session. The video was recorded on a healthy volunteer and covered the theoretical principles and practical performance of eFAST, including clinical indications, ultrasound physics, examination windows, transducer selection, probe positioning and orientation, image optimization, normal anatomical landmarks, and representative pathological images.
Participants watched a standardized 60-minute instructional video covering the theoretical principles and practical performance of eFAST. The video was recorded on a healthy volunteer and included demonstrations of the examination with visual annotation. Content included the principles and clinical indications of eFAST, ultrasound physics, examination windows, transducer selection, probe positioning and orientation, image optimization, normal anatomical landmarks, and representative pathological images.
Aktiv komparator: Instructor-Led Bedside eFAST Training
Participants received a 60-minute instructor-led bedside eFAST training session on a healthy volunteer. The session covered the same theoretical and practical content as the video-based intervention and included live demonstration of each eFAST examination window followed by supervised practice, during which each participant performed the examination once under direct guidance.
Participants received a 60-minute instructor-led bedside training session delivered by the same emergency physician on a healthy volunteer. The session covered the same theoretical and practical eFAST content as the video-based intervention and included live demonstration of each examination window followed by supervised practice, during which each participant performed the examination once under direct guidance.

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Overall eFAST Performance Score
Tidsramme: Within 1 hour after completion of the assigned training session
Overall practical eFAST performance was assessed using the eFAST Image Acquisition and Interpretation Assessment Checklist. The checklist comprised 21 image-acquisition items across six eFAST windows and one image-differentiation component. Image-acquisition items contributed a maximum of 84 points and image differentiation contributed a maximum of 16 points, yielding a total score from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better performance. For this retrospective registration, the overall performance score is designated as the primary outcome; no primary outcome was prospectively designated before the analysis.
Within 1 hour after completion of the assigned training session

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Error-Free Anterior Lung Window Performance
Tidsramme: Within 1 hour after completion of the assigned training session
Proportion of participants who completed all required steps for the anterior lung eFAST window correctly. Any incorrectly performed required step resulted in classification as not error-free.
Within 1 hour after completion of the assigned training session
Error-Free Subxiphoid Window Performance
Tidsramme: Within 1 hour after completion of the assigned training session
Proportion of participants who completed all required steps for the subxiphoid eFAST window correctly. Any incorrectly performed required step resulted in classification as not error-free.
Within 1 hour after completion of the assigned training session
Error-Free Right Upper Quadrant Window Performance
Tidsramme: Within 1 hour after completion of the assigned training session
Proportion of participants who completed all required steps for the right upper quadrant eFAST window.correctly. Any incorrectly performed required step resulted in classification as not error-free.
Within 1 hour after completion of the assigned training session
Error-Free Left Upper Quadrant Window Performance
Tidsramme: Within 1 hour after completion of the assigned training session
Proportion of participants who completed all required steps for the left upper quadrant eFAST windowcorrectly. Any incorrectly performed required step resulted in classification as not error-free.
Within 1 hour after completion of the assigned training session
Error-Free Pelvic Window Performance
Tidsramme: ithin 1 hour after completion of the assigned training session
Proportion of participants who completed all required steps for the pelvic eFAST window correctly. Any incorrectly performed required step resulted in classification as not error-free.
ithin 1 hour after completion of the assigned training session

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

1. august 2025

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

30. november 2025

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

30. november 2025

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

25. august 2026

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

25. august 2026

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

27. august 2026

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

27. august 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

25. august 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. august 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

JA

IPD-planbeskrivelse

De-identified individual participant data underlying the reported results may be made available by the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Public deposition of individual-level data is not planned because the participant consent did not cover public data deposition. Requests will be considered in accordance with applicable ethical and institutional requirements.

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere