Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

Chronic Pain, Opioids, and Anger Treatment

18 maj 2022 uppdaterad av: Ephrem Fernandez, The University of Texas at San Antonio

Alleviating Pain and Opioid Dependence Through Anger Management: A Pilot Study

The current US opioid epidemic is a pressing public health concern. Links between opioid misuse and mortality are well-known; nearly 70% of all drug overdose deaths in 2017 were attributable to opioids. Given their pain-relieving properties, opioids have been widely used in the chronic pain population who are also susceptible to misuse of these analgesics.. In chronic pain patients with anger, the pain as well as opioid use may be aggravated. For example, suppression of anger has been linked with increased pain sensitivity in experiments, while anger-hostility scores and internalized anger predict pain severity variance and pain intensity, respectively. Anger is also linked with drug use/abuse, including opioids. The goal of this research is to implement a state-of-the-art program for anger regulation in chronic pain patients., Called Cognitive Behavioral Affective Therapy (CBAT), this program is evaluated on multiple measures of anger, sensory versus affective measures of pain, and measures of opioid misuse. CBAT is expected to reduce anger, and thereby produce reduction in pain as well as shift attitudes away from opioid misuse..

Studieöversikt

Detaljerad beskrivning

Participants will be recruited by electronic announcements and IRB approved recruitment flyers in local pain clinics and pain support groups. These ads and flyers will contain relevant info (e.g., study email address and GoogleVoice number) for prospective participants to contact study staff with any questions about participation. Interested participants will be screened by an RA on the phone using the following steps: 1) RA will obtain verbal consent upon explaining study participation and answering any questions participants may have; 2) Once informed consent is obtained, RA will use participants preferred email address to send potential participant a link to the Qualtrics screening questionnaire; 3) RA will then briefly orient participant to Qualtrics; and 3) RA will complete the screening process with participant on the phone to determine and inform participant of their eligibility to participate.

Consent and Screening: Participants will first go through the informed consent procedure, where they will be told about the purpose of the study, expectations of them as participants, etc. Informed consent is expected to take no more than 5 minutes. They will then be asked to complete a screening questionnaire which is expected to take no more than 3 minutes. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: 1) Control and 2) CBAT. Both control group and experimental group participants will be required to complete 2 pre-recorded sessions per week lasting 1 hour each (total of 8 hours) over the course of 4 weeks.

Online Sessions and Surveys: After questionnaires (including measures of pain and opioid use, the Anger Parameters Scale) have been administered at pre-treatment, the first session will serve as orientation to self-monitoring anger levels between sessions. If a participant has no anger on a given day, no monitoring is necessary. Following this, control group participants self-monitor their anger and watch pre-recorded sessions on emotions in general. The treatment group will be actively trained in anger regulation skills within the framework of CBAT. These participants will proceed from a week of anger prevention to a week of intervention to a week of postvention. During the prevention phase, an individually-tailored behavior contract against anger will be signed by each paParticipants will work with investigators over email to draft and electronically sign their contracts. RAs will review participant progress toward fulfillment of contracts during weekly check-in phone calls to participants. Participants will also engage in behavioral rehearsal of anger-provoking situations and learn about stimulus control for discriminating and avoiding situations that are likely to culminate in anger.

In the Intervention phase, participants will be introduced to techniques for regulating anger that could not be prevented. These include thought-stopping, distraction, and cognitive reappraisal..

In the postvention phase, participants will be trained in techniques for ameliorating residual anger. These include expressive writing and verbal disclosure. Gestalt therapy empty chair dialogue will be used for overcoming unresolved anger.

At the conclusion of the 4 weeks of anger self-regulation training, the same questionnaires relating to anger, pain, and opioid misuse and beliefs will be assessed in both groups. This post-treatment set of questionnaires is expected to take no more than 20 minutes.

Finally, a follow-up session (2 hours) will be held for both groups one month after post-treatment. Anger, pain, and opioid use measures will be re-administered (taking no more than 20 minutes). All participants will receive a brief booster session to reinforce effective anger regulation techniques. The same pre- and post-treatment questionnaires mentioned above will be re-administered at this point in the study.

Phone Calls and Knowledge Tests: To ensure that participants are paying attention to the online videos, RAs will contact them weekly and administer a brief, multiple choice knowledge test over the phone. Participants who score less than 50% in any given week will be dropped from the study. During that same phone call, RAs will check in with participants to ensure that there are no problems with their participation in the study and that the participants are not in any emotional distress. Phone calls are anticipated to last approximately 10 minutes, for a total time of 50 minutes over the span of the study (4 weeks of either treatment or control and the 1-month follow up). Total participant time commitment over the course of the study is approximately 12 hours.

Studietyp

Interventionell

Inskrivning (Faktisk)

51

Fas

  • Inte tillämpbar

Kontakter och platser

Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.

Studieorter

    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, Förenta staterna, 78249
        • University of Texas at San Antonio

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

18 år till 65 år (Vuxen, Äldre vuxen)

Tar emot friska volontärer

Ja

Kön som är behöriga för studier

Allt

Beskrivning

Inclusion Criteria:

  • taking opioid pain relievers for at least 3 months in the past 12 months
  • maladaptive levels of anger as measured by STAXI-2
  • without psychiatric co-morbidity (e.g., major depression, substance use disorder, etc.)
  • not undergoing current psychological/psychiatric treatment
  • speak English.

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

  • Primärt syfte: Behandling
  • Tilldelning: Randomiserad
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
  • Maskning: Ingen (Open Label)

Vapen och interventioner

Deltagargrupp / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Experimentell: Group receiving CBAT
Active training in regulating anger
Placebo-jämförare: Group receiving general emotion training
General discussion of emotions; no therapy or training is offered

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Change in pain medication dosage and frequency of use at one month
Tidsram: One month
Participants are asked what pain medication they are using and at what dosage and frequency. Open-ended question.
One month
Change in pain medication dosage and frequency of use at one month follow-up
Tidsram: One month after end of intervention
Participants are asked what pain medication they are using and at what dosage and frequency. Open-ended question.
One month after end of intervention
Change in attitudes/beliefs surrounding pain medication at one month
Tidsram: One month
Assessed using the Pain Medication Beliefs Questionnaire (Schieffer et al., 2005), a five-item instrument measuring beliefs about one's response to, relief from, and potential addiction to pain medication
One month
Change in attitudes/beliefs surrounding pain medication at one month follow-up
Tidsram: One month after end of intervention
Assessed using the Pain Medication Beliefs Questionnaire (Schieffer et al., 2005), a five-item instrument measuring beliefs about one's response to, relief from, and potential addiction to pain medication
One month after end of intervention
Change in opioid misuse at one month
Tidsram: One month
Measured with the Current Opioid Misuse Measure (Butler et al., 2007), a 17-item instrument assessing signs and symptoms of drug misuse, emotional/psychiatric problems due to misuse, evidence of lying about drug use, and other domains
One month
Change in opioid misuse at one month follow-up
Tidsram: One month after end of intervention
Measured with the Current Opioid Misuse Measure (Butler et al., 2007), a 17-item instrument assessing signs and symptoms of drug misuse, emotional/psychiatric problems due to misuse, evidence of lying about drug use, and other domains
One month after end of intervention
Change in anger parameters at one month
Tidsram: One month

The Anger Parameters Scale taps into five parameters: Frequency, Duration, Intensity, Latency, and Threshold (Fernandez et al., 2014). Scores can range from 0-120 and higher scores imply more maladaptive anger.

The APS is comprised of 30 items rated from 0-4. The total possible score ranges from 0 to 120. A higher score on the APS indicates more maladaptive anger.

One month
Change in anger parameters at one month follow-up
Tidsram: One month after end of intervention
The Anger Parameters Scale taps into five parameters: Frequency, Duration, Intensity, Latency, and Threshold (Fernandez et al., 2014). Scores can range from 0-120 and higher scores imply more maladaptive anger.
One month after end of intervention
Change in anger expression style at one month
Tidsram: One month
Measured with the Anger Expression Scale (Fernandez, 2008). The AES is comprised of 60 items rated from 0-4. These items are organized into 12 sub-scales of 5 items each. These sub-scales have a minimum total possible score of 0 and a maximum of 20. Higher scores on each sub-scale (as well as a higher cumulative score) indicates more maladaptive anger.
One month
Change in anger expression style at one month follow-up
Tidsram: One month after end of intervention
Measured with the Anger Expression Scale (Fernandez, 2008). The AES is comprised of 60 items rated from 0-4. These items are organized into 12 sub-scales of 5 items each. These sub-scales have a minimum total possible score of 0 and a maximum of 20. Higher scores on each sub-scale (as well as a higher cumulative score) indicates more maladaptive anger.
One month after end of intervention
Change in chronic pain ratings at one month
Tidsram: One month
Single item measured on a scale from 0-10
One month
Change in chronic pain ratings at one month follow up
Tidsram: One month after end of intervention
Single item measured on a scale from 0-10
One month after end of intervention
Change in emotional response to chronic pain at one month
Tidsram: One month
Single item measured on a scale from "a little unpleasant" to "extremely distressing"
One month
Change in emotional response to chronic pain at one month follow-up
Tidsram: One month after end of intervention
Single item measured on a scale from "a little unpleasant" to "extremely distressing"
One month after end of intervention

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Utredare

  • Huvudutredare: Ephrem Fernandez, PhD, University of Texas at San Antonio

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart (Faktisk)

1 juli 2020

Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)

1 januari 2022

Avslutad studie (Förväntat)

1 januari 2023

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

28 maj 2020

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

17 juni 2020

Första postat (Faktisk)

19 juni 2020

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)

20 maj 2022

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

18 maj 2022

Senast verifierad

1 maj 2022

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor

Andra studie-ID-nummer

  • #20-002

Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt

Nej

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt

Nej

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Prenumerera