Trial of Ascertaining Individual Preferences for Loved One's Role in End-of-Life
Specific Aims and Hypotheses:
Aim 1: To test the effect of the "Trial of Ascertaining Individual preferences for Loved Ones' Role in End-of-life Decisions" (TAILORED) Intervention on family decision-making self-efficacy at 8 weeks both with respect to the patient's present situation and in a hypothetical situation in which the patient lacks decision-making capacity.
Hypotheses 1a: Family decision-making self-efficacy will be greater at 8 weeks in pairs that have undergone the TAILORED Intervention than in pairs receiving the standard information on advance directives in the patient's present situation.
Hypotheses 1b: Family decision-making self-efficacy will be greater at 8 weeks in pairs that have undergone the TAILORED Intervention than in pairs receiving the standard information on advance directives in the hypothetical situation in which the patient lacks decision making capacity.
Aim 2: To test the effect of the TAILORED Intervention on family psychological outcomes (depression, caregiver burden, decision making distress).
Hypotheses 2a: Depression will be less at 8 weeks in family members who have undergone the TAILORED Intervention than in family members who have received the standard information on advance directives.
Hypotheses 2b: Caregiver burden will be less at 8 weeks in family members who have undergone the TAILORED Intervention than in family members who have received the standard information on advance directives.
Hypotheses 2c: Decision-making distress will be less at 8 weeks in family members who have undergone the TAILORED Intervention than in family members who have received the standard information on advance directives.
Aim 3: To test the effect of the TAILORED Intervention on patient and family satisfaction with family decision-making involvement.
Hypothesis 3a: Patient satisfaction with family decision involvement will be greater at 8 weeks in patients who have undergone the TAILORED Intervention than in patients receiving the standard information on advance directives.
Hypothesis 3b: Family member satisfaction with decision involvement will be greater at 8 weeks in family members who have undergone the TAILORED Intervention than in family members receiving the standard information on advance directives.
Aim 4: To explore family decision-making self-efficacy and perceptions of the TAILORED Intervention.
研究概览
详细说明
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore、Maryland、美国、21205
- Johns Hopkins University
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient Inclusion Criteria
- Age 18 or older
- Speaks and reads English
- Diagnosed by a specialist at either Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions or University of Chicago Medical Center as having ALS or stage III or IV GI or pancreatic cancer.
- Accompanied to clinic by a family member who may participate in the patient's health care decisions and who patient gives permission to approach for participation in study.
- Lives within a 2-hour drive of The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions or The University of Chicago Medical Center
5.G.2. Family Inclusion Criteria
- Age 18 or older
- Speaks and reads English
- Identified by the patient-subject as a family member whom the patient may involve in health care decision making in the present and/or should the patient become too ill to make health care decisions.
- Person who the patient-subject has granted investigators permission to approach for participation in this study.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient Exclusion Criteria
- Severe visual impairment that would limit ability to visualize instrument illustrations
- Cognitive impairment indicated by a Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire adjusted error score of >5
- Has no family member who might assist in decision making or family member declines to participate.
- Is not accompanied to the clinic by family member.
- G.4. Family Exclusion Criteria
- Declines to participate.
- Severe visual impairment that would limit ability to visualize instrument illustrations.
- Cognitive impairment indicated by a Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire adjusted error score of >5
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:支持治疗
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:单组作业
- 屏蔽:单身的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
有源比较器:standard of care health decision making
Patient-family dyads will receive the standard of care for support of patient and family members health care decision making during a clinic appointment.
|
Patient-family dyads will receive standard of care in health decision-making
|
|
实验性的:TAILORED intervention
Patients and family members who receive the TAILORED Decision Making Intervention
|
Patient-family dyads will receive TAILORED intervention on health decision making
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|
|
family decision-making self-efficacy
大体时间:at 8 weeks after the intervention
|
at 8 weeks after the intervention
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|
|
family psychological outcomes (depression, caregiver burden, decision making distress)
大体时间:8 weeks after the intervention
|
8 weeks after the intervention
|
合作者和调查者
出版物和有用的链接
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (估计)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.