此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Study On Utilization Of Cabergoline For Compliance With Risk Minimization Activities (SUCRE) (SUCRE)

2014年4月14日 更新者:Pfizer

Study on Utilization Of Cabergoline For Compliance With Risk Minimization Activities (SUCRE)

The overall goal of this study will be to assess and monitor the adherence to and effectiveness of the new prescribing guidelines for cabergoline.

Specific objectives will be to assess: 1. The indication for use of cabergoline (Parkinson, hyperprolactinemia, other) 2. Prior treatment strategies in patients who start cabergoline treatment for Parkinson's Disease 3. The percentage of cabergoline users who are prescribed doses above 3 mg per day 4. Whether cabergoline users are monitored by echocardiography prior and during treatment. 5. The incidence and prevalence of valvular fibrosis

研究概览

地位

完全的

干预/治疗

详细说明

does not involve random selection

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (实际的)

22014

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 孩子
  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

取样方法

非概率样本

研究人群

Cohort of patients, who are treated with cabergoline during the study period. This cohort will be divided in new users and prevalent users based on when cabergoline was started. New (incident) users will be all persons who have a first prescription for cabergoline after the date that the change in SPC was made. Prevalent users will be all cohort members who received a cabergoline prescription during the study period but who had also been using cabergoline prior to the change in SPC.

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Treated with cabergoline during the study period (January 1st, 2006 and will end on July 1st 2012) and identified in one of 6 databases: The Health Information Network, Health Search Database, Integrated Primary Care Information database, PHARMO, Aarhus hospital databases, and the Universitaet Bremen - Bremen Institute for Prevention

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with eligibility dates that start after July 1st 2007 (meaning that they would have less than one year of valid data before publication of the results of the EMEA review), will be excluded as well as patients whose eligibility ends before July 1st 2008 (date of SmPC changes).

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

队列和干预

团体/队列
干预/治疗
Cabergoline users
cohort of patients, who are treated with cabergoline during the study period ( from January 1st, 2006 to July 1st 2012)
non interventional study - usage as per usual care

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Number of Cabergoline Prescriptions by Database and Indication: Year 1
大体时间:Year 1 (Year 2006)
Cabergoline prescriptions were stratified by indications per year. Indications were coded using Anatomical Therapeutic Code (ATC) which included G02CB03 for prolactin reduction indication and N04BC06 for neurological indication.
Year 1 (Year 2006)
Number of Cabergoline Prescriptions by Database and Indication: Year 2
大体时间:Year 2 (Year 2007)
Cabergoline prescriptions were stratified by indications per year. Indications were coded using Anatomical Therapeutic Code (ATC) which included G02CB03 for prolactin reduction indication and N04BC06 for neurological indication.
Year 2 (Year 2007)
Number of Cabergoline Prescriptions by Database and Indication: Year 3
大体时间:Year 3 (Year 2008)
Cabergoline prescriptions were stratified by indications per year. Indications were coded using Anatomical Therapeutic Code (ATC) which included G02CB03 for prolactin reduction indication and N04BC06 for neurological indication.
Year 3 (Year 2008)
Number of Cabergoline Prescriptions by Database and Indication: Year 4
大体时间:Year 4 (Year 2009)
Cabergoline prescriptions were stratified by indications per year. Indications were coded using Anatomical Therapeutic Code (ATC) which included G02CB03 for prolactin reduction indication and N04BC06 for neurological indication.
Year 4 (Year 2009)
Number of Cabergoline Prescriptions by Database and Indication: Year 5
大体时间:Year 5 (Year 2010)
Cabergoline prescriptions were stratified by indications per year. Indications were coded using Anatomical Therapeutic Code (ATC) which included G02CB03 for prolactin reduction indication and N04BC06 for neurological indication.
Year 5 (Year 2010)
Number of Cabergoline Prescriptions by Database and Indication: Year 6
大体时间:Year 6 (Year 2011)
Cabergoline prescriptions were stratified by indications per year. Indications were coded using Anatomical Therapeutic Code (ATC) which included G02CB03 for prolactin reduction indication and N04BC06 for neurological indication.
Year 6 (Year 2011)
Percentage of Second-line Prescriptions of Cabergoline for Parkinson's Disease Indications: Year 1
大体时间:Year 1 (Year 2006)
Changes to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) included that the cabergoline should be used for Parkinson's disease only in participants who had already taken or cannot take other treatments, which was as second line therapy. Second-line use restriction did not apply to the hyperprolactinemia indication, for which cabergoline was considered a first-time therapy. Percentage of second-line prescriptions of a total number of prescriptions for cabergoline during a respective year for the neurological indication was reported.
Year 1 (Year 2006)
Percentage of Second-line Prescriptions of Cabergoline for Parkinson's Disease Indications: Year 2
大体时间:Year 2 (Year 2007)
Changes to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) included that the cabergoline should be used for Parkinson's disease only in participants who had already taken or cannot take other treatments, which was as second line therapy. Second-line use restriction did not apply to the hyperprolactinemia indication, for which cabergoline was considered a first-time therapy. Percentage of second-line prescriptions of a total number of prescriptions for cabergoline during a respective year for the neurological indication was reported.
Year 2 (Year 2007)
Percentage of Second-line Prescriptions of Cabergoline for Parkinson's Disease Indications: Year 3
大体时间:Year 3 (Year 2008)
Changes to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) included that the cabergoline should be used for Parkinson's disease only in participants who had already taken or cannot take other treatments, which was as second line therapy. Second-line use restriction did not apply to the hyperprolactinemia indication, for which cabergoline was considered a first-time therapy. Percentage of second-line prescriptions of a total number of prescriptions for cabergoline during a respective year for the neurological indication was reported.
Year 3 (Year 2008)
Percentage of Second-line Prescriptions of Cabergoline for Parkinson's Disease Indications: Year 4
大体时间:Year 4 (Year 2009)
Changes to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) included that the cabergoline should be used for Parkinson's disease only in participants who had already taken or cannot take other treatments, which was as second line therapy. Second-line use restriction did not apply to the hyperprolactinemia indication, for which cabergoline was considered a first-time therapy. Percentage of second-line prescriptions of a total number of prescriptions for cabergoline during a respective year for the neurological indication was reported.
Year 4 (Year 2009)
Percentage of Second-line Prescriptions of Cabergoline for Parkinson's Disease Indications: Year 5
大体时间:Year 5 (Year 2010)
Changes to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) included that the cabergoline should be used for Parkinson's disease only in participants who had already taken or cannot take other treatments, which was as second line therapy. Second-line use restriction did not apply to the hyperprolactinemia indication, for which cabergoline was considered a first-time therapy. Percentage of second-line prescriptions of a total number of prescriptions for cabergoline during a respective year for the neurological indication was reported.
Year 5 (Year 2010)
Percentage of Second-line Prescriptions of Cabergoline for Parkinson's Disease Indications: Year 6
大体时间:Year 6 (Year 2011)
Changes to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) in April 2007 included that the cabergoline should be used for Parkinson's disease only in participants who have already taken or cannot take other treatments, that is as second line therapy. Second-line use restriction did not apply to the hyperprolactinemia indication, for which cabergoline is considered a first-time therapy. Percentage of second-line prescriptions of a total number of prescriptions for cabergoline during a respective year for the neurological indication was reported.
Year 6 (Year 2011)
Percentage of Cabergoline Prescriptions for Dosages Greater Than 3 Milligram (mg) Per Day: Year 1
大体时间:Year 1 (Year 2006)
The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended that the prescribing information for cabergoline should be updated to include: a reduction of the maximum recommended dose to 3 mg per day. To evaluate compliance with the new prescription guidelines, it was assessed whether the dose exceeded 3 mg per day during the study period.
Year 1 (Year 2006)
Percentage of Cabergoline Prescriptions for Dosages Greater Than 3 Milligram (mg) Per Day: Year 2
大体时间:Year 2 (Year 2007)
The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended that the prescribing information for cabergoline should be updated to include: a reduction of the maximum recommended dose to 3 mg per day. To evaluate compliance with the new prescription guidelines, it was assessed whether the dose exceeded 3 mg per day during the study period.
Year 2 (Year 2007)
Percentage of Cabergoline Prescriptions for Dosages Greater Than 3 Milligram (mg) Per Day: Year 3
大体时间:Year 3 (Year 2008)
The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended that the prescribing information for cabergoline should be updated to include: a reduction of the maximum recommended dose to 3 mg per day. To evaluate compliance with the new prescription guidelines, it was assessed whether the dose exceeded 3 mg per day during the study period.
Year 3 (Year 2008)
Percentage of Cabergoline Prescriptions for Dosages Greater Than 3 Milligram (mg) Per Day: Year 4
大体时间:Year 4 (Year 2009)
The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended that the prescribing information for cabergoline should be updated to include: a reduction of the maximum recommended dose to 3 mg per day. To evaluate compliance with the new prescription guidelines, it was assessed whether the dose exceeded 3 mg per day during the study period.
Year 4 (Year 2009)
Percentage of Cabergoline Prescriptions for Dosages Greater Than 3 Milligram (mg) Per Day: Year 5
大体时间:Year 5 (Year 2010)
The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended that the prescribing information for cabergoline should be updated to include: a reduction of the maximum recommended dose to 3 mg per day. To evaluate compliance with the new prescription guidelines, it was assessed whether the dose exceeded 3 mg per day during the study period.
Year 5 (Year 2010)
Percentage of Cabergoline Prescriptions for Dosages Greater Than 3 Milligram (mg) Per Day: Year 6
大体时间:Year 6 (Year 2011)
The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended that the prescribing information for cabergoline should be updated to include: a reduction of the maximum recommended dose to 3 mg per day. To evaluate compliance with the new prescription guidelines, it was assessed whether the dose exceeded 3 mg per day during the study period.
Year 6 (Year 2011)
Total Number of Echocardiography Examinations in Cabergoline Users
大体时间:Baseline (Week 1) up to Week 339
The CHMP recommended that the prescribing information for cabergoline should be updated to include: a warning stating that participant must be monitored for signs of cardiac valve fibrosis with echocardiography before treatment is started and regularly (every 6 months) during treatment. To evaluate effectiveness with the new prescription guidelines, it was assessed whether cabergoline users were monitored by echocardiography.
Baseline (Week 1) up to Week 339
Incidence of Valvular Fibrosis
大体时间:Baseline (Week 1) up to Week 339
Incidence of valvular fibrosis was calculated as number of participants with documented valvulopathy during cabergoline treatment and absence of any valve damage at baseline divided by number of participants without any valve damage at baseline and at least 1 additional echocardiography examination during follow-up while on cabergoline treatment. Percentage of participants with valvular fibrosis are reported.
Baseline (Week 1) up to Week 339
Prevalence of Valvular Fibrosis
大体时间:Baseline (Week 1) up to Week 339
Prevalence of valvular fibrosis was calculated as number of participants with documented valvulopathy during cabergoline treatment divided by number of participants with at least 1 echocardiography examination. Percentage of participants with valvular fibrosis are reported.
Baseline (Week 1) up to Week 339

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2010年11月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2013年2月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2013年2月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2010年12月9日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2011年1月4日

首次发布 (估计)

2011年1月5日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (估计)

2014年5月2日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2014年4月14日

最后验证

2014年2月1日

更多信息

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅