Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Study On Utilization Of Cabergoline For Compliance With Risk Minimization Activities (SUCRE) (SUCRE)

14 april 2014 bijgewerkt door: Pfizer

Study on Utilization Of Cabergoline For Compliance With Risk Minimization Activities (SUCRE)

The overall goal of this study will be to assess and monitor the adherence to and effectiveness of the new prescribing guidelines for cabergoline.

Specific objectives will be to assess: 1. The indication for use of cabergoline (Parkinson, hyperprolactinemia, other) 2. Prior treatment strategies in patients who start cabergoline treatment for Parkinson's Disease 3. The percentage of cabergoline users who are prescribed doses above 3 mg per day 4. Whether cabergoline users are monitored by echocardiography prior and during treatment. 5. The incidence and prevalence of valvular fibrosis

Studie Overzicht

Toestand

Voltooid

Conditie

Interventie / Behandeling

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

does not involve random selection

Studietype

Observationeel

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

22014

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

  • Kind
  • Volwassen
  • Oudere volwassene

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Bemonsteringsmethode

Niet-waarschijnlijkheidssteekproef

Studie Bevolking

Cohort of patients, who are treated with cabergoline during the study period. This cohort will be divided in new users and prevalent users based on when cabergoline was started. New (incident) users will be all persons who have a first prescription for cabergoline after the date that the change in SPC was made. Prevalent users will be all cohort members who received a cabergoline prescription during the study period but who had also been using cabergoline prior to the change in SPC.

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Treated with cabergoline during the study period (January 1st, 2006 and will end on July 1st 2012) and identified in one of 6 databases: The Health Information Network, Health Search Database, Integrated Primary Care Information database, PHARMO, Aarhus hospital databases, and the Universitaet Bremen - Bremen Institute for Prevention

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with eligibility dates that start after July 1st 2007 (meaning that they would have less than one year of valid data before publication of the results of the EMEA review), will be excluded as well as patients whose eligibility ends before July 1st 2008 (date of SmPC changes).

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

Cohorten en interventies

Groep / Cohort
Interventie / Behandeling
Cabergoline users
cohort of patients, who are treated with cabergoline during the study period ( from January 1st, 2006 to July 1st 2012)
Geneesmiddel: Study Drug
non interventional study - usage as per usual care

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Number of Cabergoline Prescriptions by Database and Indication: Year 1
Tijdsspanne: Year 1 (Year 2006)
Cabergoline prescriptions were stratified by indications per year. Indications were coded using Anatomical Therapeutic Code (ATC) which included G02CB03 for prolactin reduction indication and N04BC06 for neurological indication.
Year 1 (Year 2006)
Number of Cabergoline Prescriptions by Database and Indication: Year 2
Tijdsspanne: Year 2 (Year 2007)
Cabergoline prescriptions were stratified by indications per year. Indications were coded using Anatomical Therapeutic Code (ATC) which included G02CB03 for prolactin reduction indication and N04BC06 for neurological indication.
Year 2 (Year 2007)
Number of Cabergoline Prescriptions by Database and Indication: Year 3
Tijdsspanne: Year 3 (Year 2008)
Cabergoline prescriptions were stratified by indications per year. Indications were coded using Anatomical Therapeutic Code (ATC) which included G02CB03 for prolactin reduction indication and N04BC06 for neurological indication.
Year 3 (Year 2008)
Number of Cabergoline Prescriptions by Database and Indication: Year 4
Tijdsspanne: Year 4 (Year 2009)
Cabergoline prescriptions were stratified by indications per year. Indications were coded using Anatomical Therapeutic Code (ATC) which included G02CB03 for prolactin reduction indication and N04BC06 for neurological indication.
Year 4 (Year 2009)
Number of Cabergoline Prescriptions by Database and Indication: Year 5
Tijdsspanne: Year 5 (Year 2010)
Cabergoline prescriptions were stratified by indications per year. Indications were coded using Anatomical Therapeutic Code (ATC) which included G02CB03 for prolactin reduction indication and N04BC06 for neurological indication.
Year 5 (Year 2010)
Number of Cabergoline Prescriptions by Database and Indication: Year 6
Tijdsspanne: Year 6 (Year 2011)
Cabergoline prescriptions were stratified by indications per year. Indications were coded using Anatomical Therapeutic Code (ATC) which included G02CB03 for prolactin reduction indication and N04BC06 for neurological indication.
Year 6 (Year 2011)
Percentage of Second-line Prescriptions of Cabergoline for Parkinson's Disease Indications: Year 1
Tijdsspanne: Year 1 (Year 2006)
Changes to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) included that the cabergoline should be used for Parkinson's disease only in participants who had already taken or cannot take other treatments, which was as second line therapy. Second-line use restriction did not apply to the hyperprolactinemia indication, for which cabergoline was considered a first-time therapy. Percentage of second-line prescriptions of a total number of prescriptions for cabergoline during a respective year for the neurological indication was reported.
Year 1 (Year 2006)
Percentage of Second-line Prescriptions of Cabergoline for Parkinson's Disease Indications: Year 2
Tijdsspanne: Year 2 (Year 2007)
Changes to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) included that the cabergoline should be used for Parkinson's disease only in participants who had already taken or cannot take other treatments, which was as second line therapy. Second-line use restriction did not apply to the hyperprolactinemia indication, for which cabergoline was considered a first-time therapy. Percentage of second-line prescriptions of a total number of prescriptions for cabergoline during a respective year for the neurological indication was reported.
Year 2 (Year 2007)
Percentage of Second-line Prescriptions of Cabergoline for Parkinson's Disease Indications: Year 3
Tijdsspanne: Year 3 (Year 2008)
Changes to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) included that the cabergoline should be used for Parkinson's disease only in participants who had already taken or cannot take other treatments, which was as second line therapy. Second-line use restriction did not apply to the hyperprolactinemia indication, for which cabergoline was considered a first-time therapy. Percentage of second-line prescriptions of a total number of prescriptions for cabergoline during a respective year for the neurological indication was reported.
Year 3 (Year 2008)
Percentage of Second-line Prescriptions of Cabergoline for Parkinson's Disease Indications: Year 4
Tijdsspanne: Year 4 (Year 2009)
Changes to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) included that the cabergoline should be used for Parkinson's disease only in participants who had already taken or cannot take other treatments, which was as second line therapy. Second-line use restriction did not apply to the hyperprolactinemia indication, for which cabergoline was considered a first-time therapy. Percentage of second-line prescriptions of a total number of prescriptions for cabergoline during a respective year for the neurological indication was reported.
Year 4 (Year 2009)
Percentage of Second-line Prescriptions of Cabergoline for Parkinson's Disease Indications: Year 5
Tijdsspanne: Year 5 (Year 2010)
Changes to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) included that the cabergoline should be used for Parkinson's disease only in participants who had already taken or cannot take other treatments, which was as second line therapy. Second-line use restriction did not apply to the hyperprolactinemia indication, for which cabergoline was considered a first-time therapy. Percentage of second-line prescriptions of a total number of prescriptions for cabergoline during a respective year for the neurological indication was reported.
Year 5 (Year 2010)
Percentage of Second-line Prescriptions of Cabergoline for Parkinson's Disease Indications: Year 6
Tijdsspanne: Year 6 (Year 2011)
Changes to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) in April 2007 included that the cabergoline should be used for Parkinson's disease only in participants who have already taken or cannot take other treatments, that is as second line therapy. Second-line use restriction did not apply to the hyperprolactinemia indication, for which cabergoline is considered a first-time therapy. Percentage of second-line prescriptions of a total number of prescriptions for cabergoline during a respective year for the neurological indication was reported.
Year 6 (Year 2011)
Percentage of Cabergoline Prescriptions for Dosages Greater Than 3 Milligram (mg) Per Day: Year 1
Tijdsspanne: Year 1 (Year 2006)
The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended that the prescribing information for cabergoline should be updated to include: a reduction of the maximum recommended dose to 3 mg per day. To evaluate compliance with the new prescription guidelines, it was assessed whether the dose exceeded 3 mg per day during the study period.
Year 1 (Year 2006)
Percentage of Cabergoline Prescriptions for Dosages Greater Than 3 Milligram (mg) Per Day: Year 2
Tijdsspanne: Year 2 (Year 2007)
The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended that the prescribing information for cabergoline should be updated to include: a reduction of the maximum recommended dose to 3 mg per day. To evaluate compliance with the new prescription guidelines, it was assessed whether the dose exceeded 3 mg per day during the study period.
Year 2 (Year 2007)
Percentage of Cabergoline Prescriptions for Dosages Greater Than 3 Milligram (mg) Per Day: Year 3
Tijdsspanne: Year 3 (Year 2008)
The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended that the prescribing information for cabergoline should be updated to include: a reduction of the maximum recommended dose to 3 mg per day. To evaluate compliance with the new prescription guidelines, it was assessed whether the dose exceeded 3 mg per day during the study period.
Year 3 (Year 2008)
Percentage of Cabergoline Prescriptions for Dosages Greater Than 3 Milligram (mg) Per Day: Year 4
Tijdsspanne: Year 4 (Year 2009)
The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended that the prescribing information for cabergoline should be updated to include: a reduction of the maximum recommended dose to 3 mg per day. To evaluate compliance with the new prescription guidelines, it was assessed whether the dose exceeded 3 mg per day during the study period.
Year 4 (Year 2009)
Percentage of Cabergoline Prescriptions for Dosages Greater Than 3 Milligram (mg) Per Day: Year 5
Tijdsspanne: Year 5 (Year 2010)
The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended that the prescribing information for cabergoline should be updated to include: a reduction of the maximum recommended dose to 3 mg per day. To evaluate compliance with the new prescription guidelines, it was assessed whether the dose exceeded 3 mg per day during the study period.
Year 5 (Year 2010)
Percentage of Cabergoline Prescriptions for Dosages Greater Than 3 Milligram (mg) Per Day: Year 6
Tijdsspanne: Year 6 (Year 2011)
The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended that the prescribing information for cabergoline should be updated to include: a reduction of the maximum recommended dose to 3 mg per day. To evaluate compliance with the new prescription guidelines, it was assessed whether the dose exceeded 3 mg per day during the study period.
Year 6 (Year 2011)
Total Number of Echocardiography Examinations in Cabergoline Users
Tijdsspanne: Baseline (Week 1) up to Week 339
The CHMP recommended that the prescribing information for cabergoline should be updated to include: a warning stating that participant must be monitored for signs of cardiac valve fibrosis with echocardiography before treatment is started and regularly (every 6 months) during treatment. To evaluate effectiveness with the new prescription guidelines, it was assessed whether cabergoline users were monitored by echocardiography.
Baseline (Week 1) up to Week 339
Incidence of Valvular Fibrosis
Tijdsspanne: Baseline (Week 1) up to Week 339
Incidence of valvular fibrosis was calculated as number of participants with documented valvulopathy during cabergoline treatment and absence of any valve damage at baseline divided by number of participants without any valve damage at baseline and at least 1 additional echocardiography examination during follow-up while on cabergoline treatment. Percentage of participants with valvular fibrosis are reported.
Baseline (Week 1) up to Week 339
Prevalence of Valvular Fibrosis
Tijdsspanne: Baseline (Week 1) up to Week 339
Prevalence of valvular fibrosis was calculated as number of participants with documented valvulopathy during cabergoline treatment divided by number of participants with at least 1 echocardiography examination. Percentage of participants with valvular fibrosis are reported.
Baseline (Week 1) up to Week 339

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Sponsor

Pfizer

Publicaties en nuttige links

De persoon die verantwoordelijk is voor het invoeren van informatie over het onderzoek stelt deze publicaties vrijwillig ter beschikking. Dit kan gaan over alles wat met het onderzoek te maken heeft.

Nuttige links

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start

1 november 2010

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 februari 2013

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 februari 2013

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

9 december 2010

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

4 januari 2011

Eerst geplaatst (Schatting)

5 januari 2011

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Schatting)

2 mei 2014

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

14 april 2014

Laatst geverifieerd

1 februari 2014

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Trefwoorden

Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • A7231030

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Klinische onderzoeken op Study Drug

Zoek naar vergelijkbare onderzoeken

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

CROs by country

CROs in Burkina Faso

Voorwaarden

Zeldzame ziekten

Geneesmiddelinterventies

Voedingssupplementen

Sponsor / medewerkers

Locaties

3
Abonneren