- ICH GCP
- US-Register für klinische Studien
- Klinische Studie NCT01270711
Study On Utilization Of Cabergoline For Compliance With Risk Minimization Activities (SUCRE) (SUCRE)
Study on Utilization Of Cabergoline For Compliance With Risk Minimization Activities (SUCRE)
The overall goal of this study will be to assess and monitor the adherence to and effectiveness of the new prescribing guidelines for cabergoline.
Specific objectives will be to assess: 1. The indication for use of cabergoline (Parkinson, hyperprolactinemia, other) 2. Prior treatment strategies in patients who start cabergoline treatment for Parkinson's Disease 3. The percentage of cabergoline users who are prescribed doses above 3 mg per day 4. Whether cabergoline users are monitored by echocardiography prior and during treatment. 5. The incidence and prevalence of valvular fibrosis
Studienübersicht
Status
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Kind
- Erwachsene
- Älterer Erwachsener
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Probenahmeverfahren
Studienpopulation
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Treated with cabergoline during the study period (January 1st, 2006 and will end on July 1st 2012) and identified in one of 6 databases: The Health Information Network, Health Search Database, Integrated Primary Care Information database, PHARMO, Aarhus hospital databases, and the Universitaet Bremen - Bremen Institute for Prevention
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with eligibility dates that start after July 1st 2007 (meaning that they would have less than one year of valid data before publication of the results of the EMEA review), will be excluded as well as patients whose eligibility ends before July 1st 2008 (date of SmPC changes).
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
Kohorten und Interventionen
Gruppe / Kohorte |
Intervention / Behandlung |
---|---|
Cabergoline users
cohort of patients, who are treated with cabergoline during the study period ( from January 1st, 2006 to July 1st 2012)
|
non interventional study - usage as per usual care
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
---|---|---|
Number of Cabergoline Prescriptions by Database and Indication: Year 1
Zeitfenster: Year 1 (Year 2006)
|
Cabergoline prescriptions were stratified by indications per year.
Indications were coded using Anatomical Therapeutic Code (ATC) which included G02CB03 for prolactin reduction indication and N04BC06 for neurological indication.
|
Year 1 (Year 2006)
|
Number of Cabergoline Prescriptions by Database and Indication: Year 2
Zeitfenster: Year 2 (Year 2007)
|
Cabergoline prescriptions were stratified by indications per year.
Indications were coded using Anatomical Therapeutic Code (ATC) which included G02CB03 for prolactin reduction indication and N04BC06 for neurological indication.
|
Year 2 (Year 2007)
|
Number of Cabergoline Prescriptions by Database and Indication: Year 3
Zeitfenster: Year 3 (Year 2008)
|
Cabergoline prescriptions were stratified by indications per year.
Indications were coded using Anatomical Therapeutic Code (ATC) which included G02CB03 for prolactin reduction indication and N04BC06 for neurological indication.
|
Year 3 (Year 2008)
|
Number of Cabergoline Prescriptions by Database and Indication: Year 4
Zeitfenster: Year 4 (Year 2009)
|
Cabergoline prescriptions were stratified by indications per year.
Indications were coded using Anatomical Therapeutic Code (ATC) which included G02CB03 for prolactin reduction indication and N04BC06 for neurological indication.
|
Year 4 (Year 2009)
|
Number of Cabergoline Prescriptions by Database and Indication: Year 5
Zeitfenster: Year 5 (Year 2010)
|
Cabergoline prescriptions were stratified by indications per year.
Indications were coded using Anatomical Therapeutic Code (ATC) which included G02CB03 for prolactin reduction indication and N04BC06 for neurological indication.
|
Year 5 (Year 2010)
|
Number of Cabergoline Prescriptions by Database and Indication: Year 6
Zeitfenster: Year 6 (Year 2011)
|
Cabergoline prescriptions were stratified by indications per year.
Indications were coded using Anatomical Therapeutic Code (ATC) which included G02CB03 for prolactin reduction indication and N04BC06 for neurological indication.
|
Year 6 (Year 2011)
|
Percentage of Second-line Prescriptions of Cabergoline for Parkinson's Disease Indications: Year 1
Zeitfenster: Year 1 (Year 2006)
|
Changes to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) included that the cabergoline should be used for Parkinson's disease only in participants who had already taken or cannot take other treatments, which was as second line therapy.
Second-line use restriction did not apply to the hyperprolactinemia indication, for which cabergoline was considered a first-time therapy.
Percentage of second-line prescriptions of a total number of prescriptions for cabergoline during a respective year for the neurological indication was reported.
|
Year 1 (Year 2006)
|
Percentage of Second-line Prescriptions of Cabergoline for Parkinson's Disease Indications: Year 2
Zeitfenster: Year 2 (Year 2007)
|
Changes to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) included that the cabergoline should be used for Parkinson's disease only in participants who had already taken or cannot take other treatments, which was as second line therapy.
Second-line use restriction did not apply to the hyperprolactinemia indication, for which cabergoline was considered a first-time therapy.
Percentage of second-line prescriptions of a total number of prescriptions for cabergoline during a respective year for the neurological indication was reported.
|
Year 2 (Year 2007)
|
Percentage of Second-line Prescriptions of Cabergoline for Parkinson's Disease Indications: Year 3
Zeitfenster: Year 3 (Year 2008)
|
Changes to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) included that the cabergoline should be used for Parkinson's disease only in participants who had already taken or cannot take other treatments, which was as second line therapy.
Second-line use restriction did not apply to the hyperprolactinemia indication, for which cabergoline was considered a first-time therapy.
Percentage of second-line prescriptions of a total number of prescriptions for cabergoline during a respective year for the neurological indication was reported.
|
Year 3 (Year 2008)
|
Percentage of Second-line Prescriptions of Cabergoline for Parkinson's Disease Indications: Year 4
Zeitfenster: Year 4 (Year 2009)
|
Changes to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) included that the cabergoline should be used for Parkinson's disease only in participants who had already taken or cannot take other treatments, which was as second line therapy.
Second-line use restriction did not apply to the hyperprolactinemia indication, for which cabergoline was considered a first-time therapy.
Percentage of second-line prescriptions of a total number of prescriptions for cabergoline during a respective year for the neurological indication was reported.
|
Year 4 (Year 2009)
|
Percentage of Second-line Prescriptions of Cabergoline for Parkinson's Disease Indications: Year 5
Zeitfenster: Year 5 (Year 2010)
|
Changes to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) included that the cabergoline should be used for Parkinson's disease only in participants who had already taken or cannot take other treatments, which was as second line therapy.
Second-line use restriction did not apply to the hyperprolactinemia indication, for which cabergoline was considered a first-time therapy.
Percentage of second-line prescriptions of a total number of prescriptions for cabergoline during a respective year for the neurological indication was reported.
|
Year 5 (Year 2010)
|
Percentage of Second-line Prescriptions of Cabergoline for Parkinson's Disease Indications: Year 6
Zeitfenster: Year 6 (Year 2011)
|
Changes to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) in April 2007 included that the cabergoline should be used for Parkinson's disease only in participants who have already taken or cannot take other treatments, that is as second line therapy.
Second-line use restriction did not apply to the hyperprolactinemia indication, for which cabergoline is considered a first-time therapy.
Percentage of second-line prescriptions of a total number of prescriptions for cabergoline during a respective year for the neurological indication was reported.
|
Year 6 (Year 2011)
|
Percentage of Cabergoline Prescriptions for Dosages Greater Than 3 Milligram (mg) Per Day: Year 1
Zeitfenster: Year 1 (Year 2006)
|
The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended that the prescribing information for cabergoline should be updated to include: a reduction of the maximum recommended dose to 3 mg per day.
To evaluate compliance with the new prescription guidelines, it was assessed whether the dose exceeded 3 mg per day during the study period.
|
Year 1 (Year 2006)
|
Percentage of Cabergoline Prescriptions for Dosages Greater Than 3 Milligram (mg) Per Day: Year 2
Zeitfenster: Year 2 (Year 2007)
|
The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended that the prescribing information for cabergoline should be updated to include: a reduction of the maximum recommended dose to 3 mg per day.
To evaluate compliance with the new prescription guidelines, it was assessed whether the dose exceeded 3 mg per day during the study period.
|
Year 2 (Year 2007)
|
Percentage of Cabergoline Prescriptions for Dosages Greater Than 3 Milligram (mg) Per Day: Year 3
Zeitfenster: Year 3 (Year 2008)
|
The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended that the prescribing information for cabergoline should be updated to include: a reduction of the maximum recommended dose to 3 mg per day.
To evaluate compliance with the new prescription guidelines, it was assessed whether the dose exceeded 3 mg per day during the study period.
|
Year 3 (Year 2008)
|
Percentage of Cabergoline Prescriptions for Dosages Greater Than 3 Milligram (mg) Per Day: Year 4
Zeitfenster: Year 4 (Year 2009)
|
The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended that the prescribing information for cabergoline should be updated to include: a reduction of the maximum recommended dose to 3 mg per day.
To evaluate compliance with the new prescription guidelines, it was assessed whether the dose exceeded 3 mg per day during the study period.
|
Year 4 (Year 2009)
|
Percentage of Cabergoline Prescriptions for Dosages Greater Than 3 Milligram (mg) Per Day: Year 5
Zeitfenster: Year 5 (Year 2010)
|
The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended that the prescribing information for cabergoline should be updated to include: a reduction of the maximum recommended dose to 3 mg per day.
To evaluate compliance with the new prescription guidelines, it was assessed whether the dose exceeded 3 mg per day during the study period.
|
Year 5 (Year 2010)
|
Percentage of Cabergoline Prescriptions for Dosages Greater Than 3 Milligram (mg) Per Day: Year 6
Zeitfenster: Year 6 (Year 2011)
|
The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended that the prescribing information for cabergoline should be updated to include: a reduction of the maximum recommended dose to 3 mg per day.
To evaluate compliance with the new prescription guidelines, it was assessed whether the dose exceeded 3 mg per day during the study period.
|
Year 6 (Year 2011)
|
Total Number of Echocardiography Examinations in Cabergoline Users
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Week 1) up to Week 339
|
The CHMP recommended that the prescribing information for cabergoline should be updated to include: a warning stating that participant must be monitored for signs of cardiac valve fibrosis with echocardiography before treatment is started and regularly (every 6 months) during treatment.
To evaluate effectiveness with the new prescription guidelines, it was assessed whether cabergoline users were monitored by echocardiography.
|
Baseline (Week 1) up to Week 339
|
Incidence of Valvular Fibrosis
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Week 1) up to Week 339
|
Incidence of valvular fibrosis was calculated as number of participants with documented valvulopathy during cabergoline treatment and absence of any valve damage at baseline divided by number of participants without any valve damage at baseline and at least 1 additional echocardiography examination during follow-up while on cabergoline treatment.
Percentage of participants with valvular fibrosis are reported.
|
Baseline (Week 1) up to Week 339
|
Prevalence of Valvular Fibrosis
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Week 1) up to Week 339
|
Prevalence of valvular fibrosis was calculated as number of participants with documented valvulopathy during cabergoline treatment divided by number of participants with at least 1 echocardiography examination.
Percentage of participants with valvular fibrosis are reported.
|
Baseline (Week 1) up to Week 339
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Schätzen)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
- Erkrankungen des Gehirns
- Erkrankungen des zentralen Nervensystems
- Erkrankungen des Nervensystems
- Erkrankungen des endokrinen Systems
- Parkinsonsche Störungen
- Erkrankungen der Basalganglien
- Bewegungsstörungen
- Synucleinopathien
- Neurodegenerative Krankheiten
- Hypothalamische Erkrankungen
- Hyperpituitarismus
- Hypophysenerkrankungen
- Parkinson Krankheit
- Hyperprolaktinämie
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- A7231030
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .
Klinische Studien zur Study Drug
-
Radicle ScienceAktiv, nicht rekrutierendKognitive FunktionVereinigte Staaten
-
Apple Inc.Stanford UniversityAbgeschlossenVorhofflimmern | Arrhythmien, Herz | VorhofflatternVereinigte Staaten
-
Radicle ScienceRekrutierungSchmerzen | Neuropathischer Schmerz | Nozizeptiver SchmerzVereinigte Staaten
-
Radicle ScienceAktiv, nicht rekrutierendBetonen | AngstVereinigte Staaten
-
Radicle ScienceAbgeschlossenSchlafstörung | Schlafen | SchlafstörungVereinigte Staaten
-
University of Southern CaliforniaUnited States Department of DefenseRekrutierungMilitärische Aktivität | MilitäreinsätzeVereinigte Staaten
-
Radicle ScienceAktiv, nicht rekrutierendErmüdung | EnergieVereinigte Staaten
-
Radicle ScienceAktiv, nicht rekrutierendKognitive FunktionVereinigte Staaten
-
Radicle ScienceAbgeschlossenBetonen | AngstVereinigte Staaten
-
University Hospital UlmRekrutierungChronischer totaler Verschluss | Chronischer Totalverschluss der KoronararterieDeutschland