此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Evaluating a Structural and Behavioral HIV Risk Reduction Program for Black Men (MENCount)

2018年12月4日 更新者:Anita Raj、University of California, San Diego
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Making Employment Needs (MEN) Count intervention, an HIV intervention and prevention program for heterosexual Black men. The MEN Count model integrates HIV risk reduction and gender-equity counseling with housing and employment case management via multiple one-on-one sessions delivered by a peer case manager over 60-90 day period. MEN Count was developed and pilot tested using a Community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach via funding from a National Institutes of Health (NIH) R21, in Boston, Massachusetts. A more larger scale, two-armed quasi-experimental controlled trial design will be used to test MEN Count among Black men recruited/enrolled from an STD clinic and other community-recruitment methods in Washington, DC. Study participants (N=504) will be Black men reporting heterosexual risk for HIV [unprotected sex with a woman and 2+ female sex partners in the past 6 months] and either current unemployment or homeless in the past 6 months. To evaluate the effectiveness of MEN Count, a two-armed quasi-experimental design will be conducted in which participants will receive either MEN Count or an attention comparison program similar to MEN Count in structure. We will assess program impact on reduction in number of unprotected sex episodes and incident cases of STI (Chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis) via survey and STI testing, respectively, at baseline and 6 and 12 month follow-ups. Additionally, quality assurance and process evaluation efforts will be conducted to ensure high quality program adherence and delivery, as well as to support program replication should the model prove effective.

研究概览

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

455

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington、District of Columbia、美国、20052
        • George Washington University

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 40年 (成人)

接受健康志愿者

是的

有资格学习的性别

男性

描述

Inclusion Criteria: Black men aged 18 and older, reporting heterosexual risk for HIV [unprotected sex with a woman and 2+ female sex partners in the past 6 months] and either current unemployment or homeless in the past 6 months.

Exclusion Criteria: planned to leave Washington D.C., Maryland, or Virginia in the next 6 months, were cognitively impaired (based on Folstein Mini-Mental Exam at recruitment or baseline testing), and/or had self-reported health status that prohibited them from participating in the program

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:预防
  • 分配:非随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:MEN Count
3 session HIV intervention including a) HIV risk reduction, inclusive of gender equity and healthy relationship counseling and b) case management support for stable employment and housing.
The MEN Count model integrates HIV risk reduction and gender-equity counseling with housing and employment case management via multiple one-on-one sessions delivered by a peer case manager over 60-90 day period.
有源比较器:Comparison
An attention comparison program similar to the MEN Count intervention in structure (3 one-on-one sessions delivered over 60-90 days) but focused on stress reduction and healthy lifestyle.
general health intervention for men, not inclusive of HIV or relationship health

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Condom Use/Unprotected Sex - Redefined as Sexual Risk - 12 Month Follow-up
大体时间:12 month follow-up
Behavioral assessment of the ratio of protected to total number of sex episodes -- changed to sexual risk inclusive of inconsistent condom use in past 90 days + multiple sex partners + sex trade involvement. Very low sexual risk was defined as having one partner and consistent condom use. Low sexual risk was defined as having multiple partners and consistent condom use OR one partner and no/inconsistent condom use. Medium sexual risk was defined as having multiple partners, no/inconsistent condom use and not participating in transactional sex. High risk was defined as having multiple partners, no/inconsistent condom use, and participating in transactional sex. Participants reporting sex with men in the prior 90 days or who reported that they themselves or (one of) their partner(s) was HIV-positive were excluded from the sexual risk outcome given the known differential HIV risk profile for these subpopulations and small numbers of participants in each.
12 month follow-up
Condom Use/Unprotected Sex - Redefined as Sexual Risk - 6 Month Follow-up
大体时间:6 month follow-up
Behavioral assessment of the ratio of protected to total number of sex episodes -- changed to sexual risk inclusive of inconsistent condom use in past 90 days + multiple sex partners + sex trade involvement. Very low sexual risk was defined as having one partner and consistent condom use. Low sexual risk was defined as having multiple partners and consistent condom use OR one partner and no/inconsistent condom use. Medium sexual risk was defined as having multiple partners, no/inconsistent condom use and not participating in transactional sex. High risk was defined as having multiple partners, no/inconsistent condom use, and participating in transactional sex. Participants reporting sex with men in the prior 90 days or who reported that they themselves or (one of) their partner(s) was HIV-positive were excluded from the sexual risk outcome given the known differential HIV risk profile for these subpopulations and small numbers of participants in each.
6 month follow-up

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Non-viral STI - 12 Month Follow-up
大体时间:12 month follow-up
HIV and STI testing via blood and urine tests was conducted; outcome based on non-viral STI to allow for incidence assessment and change over time
12 month follow-up
Non-viral STI - 6 Month Follow-up
大体时间:6 month follow-up
HIV and STI testing via blood and urine tests was conducted; outcome based on non-viral STI to allow for incidence assessment and change over time
6 month follow-up

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Anita Raj, PhD、UCSD
  • 首席研究员:Lisa Bowleg, PhD、George Washington University

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2013年3月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2017年4月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2018年5月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2012年9月22日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2012年9月25日

首次发布 (估计)

2012年9月26日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2018年12月28日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2018年12月4日

最后验证

2018年12月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • R01MH096657 (美国 NIH 拨款/合同)

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅