此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Evaluation of Iphone Technology in Diabetes Treatment

2014年12月3日 更新者:Dr. Hugh Tildesley、Endocrine Research Society

Background

With the emergence of the internet, health care professionals are changing the way they approach diabetes management. Internet Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems (IBGMS) are aimed at keeping blood glucose levels normal or in the range of acceptable levels to prevent the complications associated with diabetes. The Principal Investigators have completed a randomized clinical trial supporting the efficacy of IBGMS (1,2).

Patient satisfaction of reporting platform is essential to encourage patient reporting and participation in IBGMS. In this study, we wish to compare two different types of meters which will be used to internet blood glucose monitoring: the BG Star Meter (Conventional Meter), and the iBG Star Group (iPhone Technology).

Purpose and Rationale

Patients who are more satisfied with their meter and internet reporting platform are more likely to participate in an internet monitoring system. Patients often lack the motivation to report to their endocrinologist. With increased reporting to their healthcare professional, patients are more likely to benefit from such a system. This study aims to compare two types of meters and their respective internet reporting platforms to encourage patient participation.

Objectives

Our main goal is to compare the two types of meters.

Primary Outcomes Include:

  1. Patient Satisfaction as measured by the "Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire" (DTSQ)
  2. Frequency of reporting to endocrinologist
  3. Number of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose (SMBG) tests
  4. Time taken to teach each patient the platforms

Research Design/Methods

Sample Size: 50 patients will be randomized into two groups:

BG Star Group (Conventional Meter) 25 patients will use the (conventional) BG star meter in which patients will upload their readings onto a computer and send in their readings via email.

IBG Star Group (iPhone Technology) 25 patients will be randomized to the iBGstar system will upload their readings to their iPhone and send in their readings using the iPhone.

Patients will be recruited from a Physician's private office.

Both the (Conventional meter) BG star and iBG star (iPhone Technology) group will be asked to perform SMBG 3 or more times per day and to upload their metered glucose values online every 2 weeks to be reviewed by the doctor.

Inclusion criteria:

  • Type 1s
  • Type 2s, can be on insulin, oral antihyperglycemic agents, or in combination.
  • Willingness to test blood glucose levels a minimum of 3 times daily
  • Willingness to be randomized
  • Trained in self-blood glucose monitoring
  • Internet Access

Exclusion criteria: Patients who do not meet the above criteria or are not willing to participate will not be included in the study.

研究概览

详细说明

Background/Hypothesis

Management of diabetes is an evolving challenge to health care professionals. The fluctuations of glucose levels over the lifetime of patients with diabetes can lead to complications such as nephropathy, neuropathy, retinopathy and cardiovascular diseases. Although diabetes is a chronic disease, it can be controlled with use of medications (oral agents or insulin), and/or changes in life-style and diet.

With the emergence of the internet, health care professionals are changing the way they approach diabetes management. Internet Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems (IBGMS) are aimed at keeping blood glucose levels normal or in the range of acceptable levels to prevent the complications associated with diabetes. The Principal Investigators have completed a randomized clinical trial supporting the efficacy of IBGMS (1,2).

Patient satisfaction of reporting platform is essential to patient reporting and participation in IBGMS. In this study, we wish to compare two different types of meters which will be used to internet blood glucose monitoring: the BG Star Meter (Conventional Meter), and the iBG Star Group (iPhone Technology).

Purpose and Rationale

Patients who are more satisfied with their meter and internet reporting platform are more likely to participate in an internet monitoring system. Patients often lack the motivation to report to their endocrinologist. With increased reporting to their healthcare professional, patients are more likely to benefit from such a system. This study aims to compare two types of meters and their respective internet reporting platforms to encourage patient participation.

Objectives

Our main goal is to compare the two types of meters.

Primary Outcomes Include:

  1. Patient Satisfaction as measured by the "Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire" (DTSQ)
  2. Frequency of reporting to endocrinologist
  3. Number of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose (SMBG) tests
  4. Time taken to teach each patient the platforms

Research Design/Methods

Sample Size: 50 patients will be randomized into two groups:

BG Star Group (Conventional Meter) 25 patients will use the (conventional) BG star meter in which patients will upload their readings onto a computer and send in their readings via email.

IBG Star Group (iPhone Technology) 25 patients will be randomized to the iBGstar system will upload their readings to their iPhone and send in their readings using the iPhone.

Patients will be recruited from a Physician's private office.

Both the (Conventional meter) BG star and iBG star (iPhone Technology) group will be asked to perform SMBG 3 or more times per day and to upload their metered glucose values online every 2 weeks to be reviewed by the doctor.

Inclusion criteria:

  • Type 1s
  • Type 2s, can be on insulin, oral antihyperglycemic agents, or in combination.
  • Willingness to test blood glucose levels a minimum of 3 times daily
  • Willingness to be randomized
  • Trained in self-blood glucose monitoring
  • Internet Access

Exclusion criteria: Patients who do not meet the above criteria or are not willing to participate will not be included in the study.

Confidentiality According to the guidelines of the University of British Columbia (UBC)/Providence Health Care Research Ethics Boards, the identity of participants will be kept confidential.

Data for each patient will be collected from the Clinical Research Coordinator and the Internet based glucose monitoring system. These data will only be accessed by the investigators and will be inputted into an Excel® spreadsheet where each patient will be given a unique identifier. All data pertaining to individual patients will be kept locked in the office of the study investigators.

Calculations and Statistics Statistical analysis will be performed on site by the researchers. Each group will complete the DTSQ. Questions revolve around satisfaction of treatment and are to be answered on a scale of 1 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very Satisfied). Frequency of reporting will be determined through number of reports sent in per month. Total strip count will be recorded for each group. Time will be measured for the time it takes to train each patient in their respective meter/platform. All outcome measurements will be analysed using independent samples t-tests. Participants will only be identified by coded initials and a number to protect privacy.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

43

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver、British Columbia、加拿大、V6E1M7
        • Endocrine Research Society

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 80年 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Type 1s
  • Type 2s, can be on insulin, oral antihyperglycemic agents, or in combination.
  • Willingness to test blood glucose levels a minimum of 3 times daily
  • Willingness to be randomized
  • Trained in self-blood glucose monitoring
  • Internet Access

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who do not meet the above criteria or are not willing to participate will not be included in the study.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:支持治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
有源比较器:BG Star (Conventional Meter)
25 patients will use the (conventional) BG star meter in which patients will upload their readings onto a computer and send in their readings via email.
Patients in BG Star Meter Group will report using BG software through uploading information onto a computer and sending readings to their endocrinologist via email
有源比较器:IBG Star Group (iPhone)
25 patients will be randomized to the iBGstar system will upload their readings to their iPhone and send in their readings using the iPhone.
25 patients will be randomized to the iBGstar system will upload their readings to their iPhone and send in their readings using the iPhone.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
患者满意度
大体时间:6个月
6个月
Frequency of SMBG testing
大体时间:6 months
6 months
Frequency of Reporting
大体时间:6 months
How often patient sends report in to endocrinologist
6 months
Time required to teach meter/internet platform
大体时间:Measured at beginning of study
Measured at beginning of study

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

有用的网址

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2013年4月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2013年12月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2013年12月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2013年3月21日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2013年3月21日

首次发布 (估计)

2013年3月25日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (估计)

2014年12月5日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2014年12月3日

最后验证

2014年12月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅